Global AI law: 8 common threads

About this documentUpdated ShowHide

Sean McDermott, Co-Founder and CEO, UnGovr

Written by Sean McDermott (with AI assistance) using the LexLint law library, which supplied every legal instrument, status and date on these pages.

Every law named here links to its summary page on lexlint.io, translated to English (if needed) and restructured to a standard format for human and code use. Every case links to the court's or the regulator's own record where one could be reached.

© 2026 UnGovr, publishing as LexLint. The text and the figures are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0: share and adapt them, including commercially, with credit to LexLint (UnGovr) and under the same license. Please contact LexLint at hello@ungovr.org to discuss other terms. Logos and wordmarks belong to their owners.

Law library as of .

Legal information, not legal advice. This document describes the law as written and dated; it does not apply it to any system. The notice in the footer says what that means.

What the AI laws in force around the world have in common, the unusual provisions that trip an agent, the older privacy, security and scraping law that already binds one, where the new law restates the old, and why a system built to the EU rule still has twenty-seven national layers to read.

1Why this paper, and who it is for

Three readers are in mind. A governance working group mapping regulatory alignment across jurisdictions, which needs a baseline of binding law to map against. Anyone who has to decide what "compliant" should mean for an AGENT, and who might reasonably assume it boils down to the EU AI Act and a handful of other acts, when the LexLint law library holds 567 AI instruments in force or enacted across 150 jurisdictions, and far more law that binds an AGENT without naming AI at all. And the engineer writing agentic software today, who wants to know which of the things the AGENT does are legal events, and where.

The paper is a summary, not an analysis of any system. It states the law as the law library held it on , and it analyses only law in force or enacted with a start date; a proposal is named, if at all, as something coming. The larger the reach of an instrument, the more room it gets, so the EU and the United States lead most sections and a city ordinance appears once. The vocabulary is the one in Introduction: The 6 parties in AI law: the parties around a piece of software, each with a location, and an AGENT in the middle acting on most of them at once. This paper attaches the statutes to that picture.

A word on the source. LexLint is a law library first, indexed by jurisdiction and dated on every row, and it is also a tool: a lint that takes a description of what a piece of software does and where it operates and returns the obligations the law library associates with it, cited and dated, so the library can be used as background when a system is examined for legal risk. For a project that provides deep infrastructure to an application, an AGENT proxy or a runtime, that examination is harder, because the project cannot know what its USERS will do with it. What such a project can do is support the legal questions of its USERS, by giving its logs and its controls some awareness of the facts the law turns on. The fourth document in this section is about that.

2The map: what "AI law" is, by shape and by jurisdiction

AI law is not one shape. Read across the law library, the instruments in force that name AI as their subject fall into six kinds, and an AGENT meets each kind differently.

ShapeWhat it doesLeading examples in force
Horizontal actsDefine AI systems, tier them by risk, prohibit some uses, and attach duties to providers and deployers of the rest The EU AI Act (in force in stages from ); Korea's AI Framework Act (since ); Vietnam's Law on AI (since ); Peru's regulation under Law 31814 (since )
Transparency and labeling statutesTell the person they are dealing with a machine; mark what the machine produced, often in a machine-readable way The EU AI Act's Article 50 (since ); India's labelling duty for intermediaries (since ); California's AI Transparency Act (since ); Utah's disclosure duty (since ); Texas's interaction disclosure (since )
Automated-decision and employment rulesGovern a decision about a person made with a system: notice, an impact assessment, a bias audit, a way to contest New York City's bias-audit law (since ); Illinois's employment amendment (since ); California's automated decision-making regulations (since ); Colorado's Automated Decision-Making Technology Act (from , in 2 months); Connecticut's employment-decision act (from , in 11 months)
Model-level and frontier dutiesBind the party that trains or places a model: documentation, a training-content summary, safety frameworks, incident reporting The EU AI Act's Article 53 (since ); California's frontier AI act (since ); New York's RAISE Act (from , in 2 months); California's training-data transparency act (since )
Companion and conversational systemsRules for systems that talk to people as if they were people: reminders, minors, self-harm protocols, no posing as a human California's companion chatbot act (since ); New York's companion model safeguards (since ); Utah's mental-health chatbot rule (since ); Colorado's conversational AI duties (since )
Synthetic-content harms in criminal and election lawThe largest number of instruments by far: intimate-image and child-abuse offenses extended to generated imagery, and election deepfake rules Australia's deepfake offence; the United Kingdom's purported-intimate-image offence; Italy's dissemination offence; France's sexual-montage offence; Texas's political deepfake ban; Brazil's electoral deepfake prohibition

Not every AI act binds a business. Japan's AI Promotion Act (since ) sets up a strategy headquarters and a national plan, and asks a business only to endeavor to use AI and to cooperate with the government's measures. The one AI-specific duty the law library holds for Japan is an election rule: a 2026 amendment to its election law requires an AI-made image or video in online campaign material to be labeled as such, from .

By jurisdiction, the law library holds AI instruments in the regions below. The count is of instruments it holds in force or enacted, which is a measure of law rather than of any one country's attention; the largest single share is the American states' own statute books, and the largest single instrument is the EU's.

RegionAI instruments in force or enactedJurisdictions
European Union711
EU member states (the national layer)7825
United Kingdom251
United States, federal221
United States, states22648
United States, cities1212
Asia and the Pacific4715
The Americas outside the United States3815
Africa2011
The Middle East65
Elsewhere2216

Every AI instrument the law library holds in force or enacted is listed in the appendix at the end of this page, by region, each linked to its summary page.

The zero on the United States' federal row is a finding rather than a gap. Congress has enacted no horizontal AI act, and the two federal AI instruments the law library holds are both proposals, so neither is counted here. It does not mean no federal law reaches generated content: the TAKE IT DOWN Act criminalizes publishing intimate images a system generated, and people have been prosecuted under it. The law library files that statute under content moderation rather than AI, which is why it is absent from this table and present in Does legal action really happen?. Read the row as "no federal AI statute", never as "no federal law".

3What the laws have in common

Eight threads run through most of the AI law in force. An engineer who builds for the threads rather than for any one statute will find that most statutes are then a matter of parameters.

Eight things most of the world's AI laws have in common Eight labeled cells, one per common thread. Tell the person it is a machine: Disclosure at the interaction, per interaction. Mark what the machine made: Machine-readable marking that survives every layer. Tier by risk, with a prohibited top: A list of banned practices, a high-risk class, a lighter rest. Keep a person able to intervene: Override for the operator, a human to reach for the affected. Keep records, and be able to explain: Event logs, explanations, documentation for a regulator. Assign duties by role along a chain: Provider, deployer, importer, distributor, and the flip between them. Reach by market and by output: Where the system is sold and where its output is used, never the server. Commence in stages, and change in flight: Dated application, amended before it applies. Tell the person it is a machine Disclosure at the interaction, per interaction Mark what the machine made Machine-readable marking that survives every layer Tier by risk, with a prohibited top A list of banned practices, a high-risk class, a lighter rest Keep a person able to intervene Override for the operator, a human to reach for the affected Keep records, and be able to explain Event logs, explanations, documentation for a regulator Assign duties by role along a chain Provider, deployer, importer, distributor, and the flip between them Reach by market and by output Where the system is sold and where its output is used, never the server Commence in stages, and change in flight Dated application, amended before it applies
Figure 1. The eight threads. Each is drawn with the icon the rest of this section uses for it.

Tell the person they are dealing with a machine

The most widely shared duty, and the oldest of the new ones. AI Act Article 50 requires it of any system that interacts with people unless it is obvious from context; Korea's Article 31 requires prior notice that a service runs on generative AI; Texas, Utah and California's 2019 bot-disclosure act each say it in their own terms, and California's companion chatbot act adds a duty to repeat the reminder to a minor. The differences are in the trigger (always, on request, at first use, on a schedule) and in who owes it (provider, deployer, OPERATOR).

Mark what the machine made

A second duty attaches to the output rather than the interaction: machine-readable marking of synthetic audio, image, video and text. It is in Article 50(2), in India's rules, which require permanent metadata with a unique identifier, in Vietnam's transparency article, and in California's AI Transparency Act. For an AGENT the consequence is architectural: the mark has to be applied where the output is produced and preserved by every layer that carries it.

Tier by risk, with a prohibited top

The horizontal acts share a shape: a list of prohibited practices, a class of high-risk or high-impact uses with the heaviest duties, and a lighter regime for the rest. Vietnam and Peru both open with prohibitions; Texas's TRAIGA is almost entirely a list of them, binding any person. Prohibition is how the law tiers: the AI instruments in the law library carry more prohibition lines than any other class.

Keep a person able to intervene, and give affected people a way to one

Human oversight appears in two forms: a duty on the OPERATOR to keep a person able to stop or override the system, and a right for the person affected by a decision to reach a human and contest it. The second form is older than AI law and arrives mostly through privacy statutes (section 5). The first is the AI Act's Article 14, Vietnam's rule that oversight mechanisms must not be disabled, and Peru's bar on autonomous lethal capability without supervision.

Keep records, and be able to explain

Record-keeping comes in three registers: automatic event logs for high-risk systems (the AI Act's Article 12, with a six-month retention floor on deployers in Article 26), an explanation to the person affected by a decision (Peru, California's regulations), and documentation kept for a regulator (Article 53, California's frontier act). The logging and record-keeping questions a governance framework asks are these three duties, seen from the OPERATOR'S side.

Assign duties by role along a chain

The AI Act names a provider, a deployer, an importer, a DISTRIBUTOR, an authorized representative and a product manufacturer for one system, a seventh role for general-purpose model providers, and a rule in Article 25 under which a deployer, DISTRIBUTOR or importer becomes the provider by putting its name on a high-risk system, substantially modifying it, or changing a system's purpose so that it becomes high-risk. Korea's act keys on the "AI business operator"; the United States state acts on the "deployer" and the "developer". One company usually holds three of these roles at once, and the role, not the code, decides the duty.

Reach by market and by output, not by where the server is

The AI Act reaches a provider anywhere that places a system on the EU market and a provider or deployer anywhere whose output is used in the Union. State acts reach a company that does business in the state when the consumer is a resident. Korea's act reaches acts abroad that affect its market. The server's location is the one fact none of them turns on.

Commence in stages, and change while in flight

The AI Act binds in dated stages, the first on and the last on , and the omnibus regulation of July 2026 moved the high-risk stages back by more than a year while leaving the transparency duties on their August 2026 date. Colorado enacted an AI act in 2024, delayed it in 2025, and repealed and re-enacted it in 2026 before any line of it was in force, as an automated-decision act (from , in 2 months). A map of AI law is a dated artifact, and a system that reads the map once is out of date the month after. More is coming: Brazil's framework bill has passed its Senate, and several EU member states have implementing acts in draft (section 7).

4Provisions that are unusual, and awkward for an AGENT

The common threads are what a framework captures. The provisions below are the ones a framework does not, because each is one jurisdiction's own idea, and each lands on something an AGENT does routinely. The EU comes first, then the United States by state, then the rest of the world by name.

WhereProvisionWhat is unusualWhy it is awkward for an AGENT
EUAI Act, Article 50 (transparency obligations for AI systems and synthetic content) (since ) A fine of up to EUR 15 million or 3 percent of worldwide turnover, whichever is higher, and for a small or medium enterprise whichever is lower The ceiling depends on which party in the chain is the addressee and how large it is, which for an AGENT built by a start-up on a large provider's model is two different answers
CaliforniaCompanion Chatbot Safety and Accountability Act (SB 243) (since ) For companion chatbots: a protocol for suicidal ideation, reminders to minors that they are talking to a machine, and a private right of action Any AGENT with a persona and memory can become a companion in the statute's sense without having been designed as one
CaliforniaGenerative AI Training Data Transparency Act (AB 2013) (since ) A public summary of the training data behind a generative system, with no regulator and no penalty in the statute An AGENT assembled from several models inherits several summaries, and the duty attaches to whoever makes the system available in California
ColoradoHB 26-1263 (2026), Conversational AI Service Operator Requirements (since ) A separate statute for OPERATORS of conversational AI services, beside the automated-decision act, both from 2027 An AGENT that both talks to a person and decides about them falls under two Colorado regimes with two sets of duties and one Attorney General
IllinoisArtificial Intelligence Video Interview Act (since ) Consent before AI analyses a recorded video interview, an explanation of how it works, deletion on request within thirty days, and a report on demographics where AI decides who gets an in-person interview Voice and video analysis by an AGENT is the regulated act, whether or not the product calls itself an interview tool
New YorkArtificial Intelligence Companion Models safeguards (since ) Safeguards for companion models, with a penalty of up to US$ 15,000 per day A per-day penalty on a feature that runs continuously
New York CityAutomated Employment Decision Tools Bias Audit and Notice Law (since ) An independent bias audit, published, before an automated employment decision tool is used, and notice to candidates An AGENT that screens applicants is the tool; the audit is of the tool's outputs, which for an AGENT are not fixed
TexasTRAIGA (H.B. 149, 2025), prohibited AI practices binding any person (since ) Prohibitions keyed on intent (to manipulate, to discriminate, to produce unlawful content), enforced only by the Attorney General, with penalties up to US$ 200,000 for an uncurable violation and per-day penalties for continuing ones Intent is the developer's or deployer's, but the conduct is the AGENT'S. The record of why an AGENT did something is the evidence on both sides
UtahSB 226 (2025), required disclosures for generative AI in consumer transactions (since ); HB 452 (2025), mental health chatbot disclosure Disclosure of generative AI in a consumer transaction when asked, and always for regulated occupations; a separate mental-health chatbot rule "When asked" means the AGENT must recognize the question in any phrasing and answer it truthfully, mid-task
IndiaSynthetically Generated Information Labelling Duty for Intermediaries (since ) Synthetic content must carry permanent metadata or technical provenance with a unique identifier "Permanent" is the hard word: any transformation the AGENT applies downstream has to preserve an identifier it did not create
KoreaAI Framework Act, Article 31 (transparency obligations for AI outputs) (since ) Prior notice that a product or service operates on high-impact or generative AI, before the USER interacts The notice comes before the interaction, so an AGENT invoked by another system has to have been announced by that system, not by itself
PeruReglamento de la Ley 31814, high-risk AI system duties (since ) Before the interaction, tell the USER the system's purpose, its main functions and what decisions it can make; explain rights-affecting results in accessible language An AGENT'S "what decisions it can make" is its tool set and its autonomy budget. Few AGENTS can state that list to a USER, and it changes per task
VietnamLaw on Artificial Intelligence, prohibited practices; risk classification articles (since ) A prohibition on obstructing, disabling or distorting the human-oversight mechanisms the law requires; a duty to re-classify the system when its function changes An AGENT that reconfigures its own tools or is given a new one has changed function; an AGENT that routes around an approval step has touched an oversight mechanism

5The law that was already there

Most attention is on the AI statutes, and above all on the EU AI Act. But the law library holds far more law that binds an AGENT without naming AI at all. Privacy law is the largest topic in it, scraping and access law the second, and both are older than any AI act. The table under each heading gives the kind of duty, an instrument in the law library, and what the duty asks of an AGENT in particular.

5.1 Privacy law: the AGENT as a processor of people

1,939 instruments in force or enacted, across 254 jurisdictions. Every one of them keys on a person whose data is in the payload, which for an AGENT is nearly every payload.

Kind of dutyInstruments in the law libraryWhat it asks of an AGENT
Decisions made by a machine GDPR Article 22, the right not to be subject to a solely automated decision, with the duty to explain its logic; the AI Act's right to an explanation of a decision based on a high-risk system; the United Kingdom's 2025 rewrite of that right; California's automated decision-making regulations; Colorado's privacy act and its profiling opt-out; Brazil's LGPD (the general data protection law) with its Article 20 review right; Korea's right to refuse, or have explained, a fully automated decision; Quebec's notice of a decision made by automated processing, with a right to have it reviewed When the AGENT decides about a person (a refund, a shortlist, a price, an account action), the person may be owed notice, an explanation, a human review and a way to contest. The law library holds automated-decision lines in 143 jurisdictions
Lawful basis, purpose and minimization The GDPR; Japan's APPI; Canada's PIPEDA; California's CCPA; Virginia's act; Texas's act An AGENT that reads an inbox to plan a week has a purpose for the correspondents' data that none of them agreed to. What it retains, and where, is the minimization question
Sensitive data and biometrics GDPR Article 9; Illinois's BIPA and its private right of action; Virginia's sensitive-data consent A voiceprint derived to tell speakers apart, or a face matched in a photo, is a biometric identifier. Illinois requires written consent first and lets the person sue per violation
Cross-border transfer GDPR Chapter V; Japan's Article 28; the United Kingdom's transfer rules Every model call and every tool call has a destination. If the payload carries personal data and the destination is abroad, the call is a transfer
Breach notification GDPR Articles 33 and 34; California's breach law; the HIPAA breach rule; the GLBA safeguards amendment; Australia's notifiable breaches scheme An AGENT that sends the wrong document to the wrong recipient has caused a breach. The clock starts on awareness, and the log is what says what left

5.2 Cybersecurity law: the AGENT as a product and as an incident

Kind of dutyInstruments in the law libraryWhat it asks of an AGENT
Risk management and incident reporting for OPERATORS of essential services NIS2, Article 21 and Article 23 (early warning within 24 hours, notification within 72) An AGENT with credentials to production systems is part of the attack surface those measures cover, and an AGENT acting on an injected instruction is an incident
Product security and vulnerability handling for the MAKER of software The CRA, Article 13 and Annex I (from , in 13 months); Article 14 (since ), an actively exploited vulnerability reported within 24 hours The first horizontal law to make the MAKER of software an addressee. An AGENT shipped as a product is a product with digital elements, and prompt injection is a vulnerability class its manufacturer must handle

5.3 Scraping, access and content law: the AGENT as a visitor on other people's machines

583 instruments in force or enacted, across 258 jurisdictions. This is the body of law an AGENT meets every time it fetches a page, calls an interface it was not invited to, or reuses what it found.

Kind of dutyInstruments in the law libraryWhat it asks of an AGENT
Computer misuse and unauthorized access The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act; Singapore's Computer Misuse Act; Germany's Criminal Code sections 202a to 303b Whether access was authorized is decided by the COUNTERPARTY'S gates: a login, a block, a revoked permission. An AGENT that works around any of them has crossed a line the statute draws
Text and data mining reservations The EU copyright directive's Article 4; Germany's section 44b; AI Act Article 53, which makes a general-purpose model provider honor the reservation A rightsholder's machine-readable reservation binds the fetch and the training use. An AGENT that reads a page to answer a question is mining it; whether that is covered depends on the reservation and the purpose
Database rights and unfair competition Germany's database right; Austria's unfair-practices clause Systematic extraction of a substantial part of somebody's database is a wrong in itself in the EU, whatever the terms said
Personal data on public pages Illinois's consent duty for scraped faces; Australia's reach over scraped personal information; Korea's rule as applied by its regulator "It was public" is not a lawful basis. The names on a page are personal data, and copyright has nothing to say about them

5.4 Consumer, contract and outreach law: the AGENT as a contracting party's instrument and as a caller

Kind of dutyInstrumentsWhat it asks of an AGENT
Unfair and deceptive practices FTC Act section 5; California's bot-disclosure act What the AGENT says to a consumer is what the company said. A claim about what the AGENT can do is an advertising claim about the product
Contracts formed by machines Indonesia's electronic-agent liability rule; the United States electronic-signature statute and the state UETA, under which a contract may be formed by the interaction of electronic AGENTS with no person reviewing it; Article 12 of the 2005 United Nations convention on electronic contracting, which says the same of automated message systems When an AGENT clicks "buy", a contract is formed and the principal is bound. Who bears a mistaken purchase is a question the electronic-agent rules answer, and the answer is usually the principal
Automated calls and messages The United States TCPA, which the Federal Communications Commission ruled on covers calls made with an AI-generated voice; the consent rules for marketing email and text in most jurisdictions An outbound voice AGENT is a robocall. A drafted email the AGENT also sends is marketing mail if it markets. Consent and an opt-out are the price of the channel

5.5 Sector and people-specific law

AreaInstruments in the law libraryWhat it asks of an AGENT
Employment New York City's bias-audit law; Illinois's Human Rights Act amendment; New Jersey's disparate-impact rules; Spain's works-council right to algorithm parameters An AGENT that screens, schedules, scores or dismisses workers is an employment decision tool, with notice, audit and disclosure duties that predate any AI act
Children The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act and its 2025 rule; the DSA, Article 28; the United Kingdom's children's code; Texas's age-verification law The principal's age and location at access decide which of these applies. An AGENT that cannot tell it is talking to a child is talking to one
Health and finance The HIPAA privacy rule; the GLBA safeguards rule; Texas's AI diagnostic disclosure; California's patient-communication disclosure; the ECOA adverse-action notice, which applies however a credit decision was made Sector law attaches to the data and the decision, not to the technology. An AGENT in a clinic or a lender is inside those regimes on its first day

6Where the AI laws restate what was already required

Read against section 5, a large share of the new AI law is a restatement or a refinement of a duty the same jurisdiction already had, aimed at a new class of system. That is good news for an engineering team, because a control built for the old duty is usually most of the new one. The table pairs them.

The AI-law dutyThe duty that was already there, same jurisdictionWhat the AI law adds
EU: Article 50, tell the person it is a machine GDPR Articles 13 and 14, information to be given when personal data is collected; the unfair commercial practices rules on misleading omissions The duty fires on every interaction whether or not personal data is involved, and adds machine-readable marking of the output
EU: the AI Act's high-risk explanation and human-oversight duties GDPR Article 22, the right not to be subject to a solely automated decision, and Article 15's right to meaningful information about the logic A duty on the deployer to design oversight in, and an explanation right that does not depend on the decision being "solely" automated
Colorado: the 2026 automated-decision act The Colorado Privacy Act's right to opt out of profiling in furtherance of decisions with legal or similarly significant effects Duties on the developer and the deployer of the technology itself, not only rights for the consumer
California: the automated decision-making regulations The CCPA itself: the regulations are made under it Pre-use notice, an opt-out and access rights specific to automated decision-making technology, and risk assessments for it
California: the AI Transparency Act The 2019 bot-disclosure act, which made it unlawful to use a bot with intent to mislead about its identity in sales or elections Marking of the output itself, a detection tool, and a penalty per violation, with no intent element
Korea: AI Framework Act Article 31 The Personal Information Protection Act's 2023 amendments, which gave data subjects a right to refuse or demand an explanation of a fully automated decision A notice duty on the OPERATOR that does not depend on personal data or on a decision being made
Illinois: the 2026 employment amendment The Illinois Human Rights Act's existing prohibition on discrimination, and the 2020 video-interview act A notice duty and an express statement that using AI in a way that has a discriminatory effect is a civil rights violation
New York City: the bias-audit law The city's Human Rights Law, which already prohibited discriminatory hiring however it was done A procedural duty, the audit and the notice, that makes the substantive one checkable before the harm
United Kingdom: no AI act The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 rewrote the automated-decision right Nothing: the United Kingdom's AI duty arrives as a privacy amendment, which is the pattern in its purest form

7The EU: "AI Act compliant" is not "compliant in the EU"

The AI Act is a regulation, directly applicable in every member state, and that has led to a habit of treating it as the whole of EU AI law. It is not, for two reasons the law library makes visible.

First, the Act leaves to each member state the designation of its market surveillance and notifying authorities, the procedure they follow, the penalties within the Act's ranges, and the treatment of public bodies. Those choices are national statutes, and they differ: which authority a provider answers to, what powers it has, whether a public body can be fined and by how much, and how the prohibitions in Article 5 are enforced. A system that is compliant with the Act has to be compliant with it in front of a named authority under a named procedure, and there are twenty-seven of those.

Member stateImplementing or enforcement instrument, in forceWhen
AustriaKommAustria-Gesetz and Telekommunikationsgesetz 2021, Servicestelle für Künstliche Intelligenz at the RTR-GmbHsince
GermanyGesetz zur Marktüberwachung und Innovationsförderung von künstlicher Intelligenz (KI-MIG), AI Market Surveillance and Innovation Promotion Actsince
DenmarkLov nr. 467 af 14. maj 2025, National Competent Authorities and Article 5 Enforcementsince
SpainReal Decreto 729/2023, Statute of the Agencia Española de Supervisión de Inteligencia Artificial (AESIA), Article 4since
FinlandLaki eräiden tekoälyjärjestelmien valvonnasta, Act on the Supervision of Certain Artificial Intelligence Systemssince
GreeceLaw 5321/2026, National AI Act Implementation Lawsince
HungaryAct LXXV of 2025 on the Domestic Implementation of the EU AI Regulationsince
HungaryGovernment Decree 344/2025 Implementing the Hungarian AI Act: Designated Authorities, Notified-Body Reports and Fine Ceilingssince
IrelandEuropean Union (Artificial Intelligence) (Designation) Regulations 2025since
IrelandRegulation of Artificial Intelligence Act 2026since
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 160/2026, After-the-Fact Facial Recognition Integrated in Video Surveillance (Art. 10)since
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 160/2026, Police Biometric AI: Dataset Labelling and Real-Time Remote Identification (Artt. 7-9, 13)since
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 160/2026, Police Use of AI Systems: Human Review, Oversight, Collaborations, Sandbox Basis and Training (Artt. 3-6, 21)since
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 179/2026 Arts. 4 to 6 and 21 to 23, National AI Act Authorities and Administrative Finessince
ItalyLegge 132/2025 Art. 20, National AI Authorities (AgID and ACN)since
LithuaniaLithuanian Law Amendments Designating National Competent Authorities under the AI Actsince
LatviaConsumer Rights Protection Centre Statute, Points 4.3.1 11 and 4.22.5, AI Act Market Surveillance and Single Point of Contact Taskssince
LatviaLaw on Digital Operational Resilience of the Financial Market and the Use of Artificial Intelligence, Articles 7, 8(5)-(7), 10(3)-(4) and 11(2)since
LatviaOmbudsman Law (Tiesībsarga likums), Article 13, Points 15 and 16, Access to AI System Documentation and Testing Requestssince
MaltaArtificial Intelligence (Designation of the Information and Data Protection Commissioner for the purposes of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) Regulations, 2025 (L.N. 227 of 2025)since
MaltaArtificial Intelligence Regulations, 2025 (L.N. 226 of 2025)since
MaltaMalta Digital Innovation Authority Act, Article 6A, Market Surveillance Enforcement Powers of the Authorityin force
PolandUstawa o systemach sztucznej inteligencji, Act on Artificial Intelligence Systemssince
SloveniaZakon o izvajanju uredbe (EU) o določitvi harmoniziranih pravil o umetni inteligenci (ZIUDHPUI), Designation of AI Act Market Surveillance Authoritiessince

Implementing acts are in draft in Germany, France, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Sweden, Slovakia; they are not analyzed here.

Second, member states keep their own law on what AI systems produce and how they are used at work, and that law is not displaced by the Act. Italy's Law 132 of 2025 requires parental consent for under-fourteens, sets sector rules for oversight and disclosure, and creates a criminal offense for disseminating harmful generated content. France, Ireland, the Netherlands and most other member states have extended their intimate-image and child-abuse offenses to generated material. Spain gives works councils a right to the parameters of algorithms that affect working conditions. None of this is in the AI Act, all of it binds an AGENT operating in that country, and the omnibus regulation of July 2026 changed none of it.

Member stateNational instrument beyond the Act, in forceWhen
AustriaStGB Section 207a(4)(4), Computer-Generated and Altered Child Sexual Abuse Materialsince
AustriaVerbraucherkreditgesetz 2026 (VKrG 2026), Personalized Offers and Automated Creditworthiness Assessment (Sections 13 and 17(5))from , in 2 weeks
CyprusIntellectual Property and Related Rights Law, Articles 49-50 (Non-Consensual Deepfake Imitation Ban)since
CyprusLaw 91(I)/2014 as Amended by Law 59(I)/2025, Child Sexual Abuse Material Including Realistic Images (Articles 2 and 8)since
Czech RepublicCriminal Code Section 181(2), Realistic Fake Depiction of a Person Made to Cause Serious Harm to Rightssince
Czech RepublicCriminal Code Section 191a, Non-Consensual Identity-Based Pornographic Depictionsince
Czech RepublicCriminal Code Section 192, Child Pornography Including a Depiction of a Person Who Appears to Be a Childsince
GermanyBetriebsverfassungsgesetz (BetrVG) Sections 80(3), 90(1) No. 3 and 95(2a), Works Council Rights on the Use of Artificial Intelligencesince
GermanyMedienstaatsvertrag (MStV) Section 18(3), Labelling of Automatically Created Content in Social Networkssince
DenmarkLov nr. 1322 af 20. november 2025, Credit Agreements Act Section 7 c(9) to (11), Human Intervention in Automated Creditworthiness Assessmentfrom , in 2 weeks
EstoniaKutseõppeasutuse seadus Section 32^1, Artificial Intelligence Applications in Vocational Teaching and Pupils' Personal Datasince
EstoniaPõhikooli- ja gümnaasiumiseadus Section 20^1, Artificial Intelligence Applications in Teaching and Pupils' Personal Datasince
EstoniaVäärtpaberituru seadus Sections 82^15 and 82^16, Algorithmic Trading and Direct Electronic Access Controlssince
EstoniaVõlaõigusseadus Section 55^2, Explanations to Consumers and Human Intervention in Online Financial Servicessince
SpainEstatuto de los Trabajadores Article 64.4.d), Algorithmic Management Works Council Information Rightsince
SpainLey 10/2025 Final Provisions 1 and 3, Disclosure of Automated Personalisation of Offers and Prices to Consumerssince
SpainLey 10/2025, Customer Service Rules for Automated Channels (Article 8 and Transitional Provision)from , in 7 weeks
SpainReal Decreto 723/2026 Article 3(2)(k), Written Notice to Workers of Algorithmic and Automated Decision-Making Systemssince
FinlandRikoslaki Chapter 20, Distribution and Possession of an Image Depicting a Child Sexually, Including Realistic Depictionssince
FranceCode Pénal Article 226-8 as Amended, Existing Offense Extended to Algorithmically Generated Contentsince
FranceCode Pénal Article 226-8-1, Non-Consensual Sexual Montage and Algorithmically Generated Sexual Contentsince
FranceLaw 2023-380, Article 10, Experimental Algorithmic Processing of Video-Protection Images, Extended to 31 December 2030since
FranceLaw 2023-451, Article 5, Labelling of Retouched and AI-Generated Images by Commercial Influencersin force
CroatiaAct Implementing the European Media Freedom Act, Article 23, Labelling of AI-Generated Contentsince
CroatiaConsumer Credit Act, Articles 24 and 30, Personalised Offers and Creditworthiness Assessment by Automated Processingfrom , in 2 weeks
CroatiaKazneni zakon Article 215a, Endangering Life and Property by an Artificial Intelligence Systemsince
CroatiaLabour Act, Articles 221.g to 221.i, Algorithmic Management of Work Through Digital Labour Platformssince
HungaryAct XLVII of 1997 on Health Data, Section 35/A(4) to (8), Conditions for AI Development on Electronic Health Service Space Datasince
HungaryBüntető Törvénykönyv (Criminal Code), Section 204(8), Realistic Depiction of a Non-Existent Person as Child Pornographysince
IrelandHarassment, Harmful Communications and Related Offences Act 2020, Intimate Image Offencessince
ItalyCodice Penale Art. 437-bis, Omitted Safety Measures in High-Risk AI Systems and Unlawful Alteration of Themsince
ItalyCodice Penale Art. 612-quater, Illicit Dissemination of AI-Generated or AI-Altered Contentsince
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 160/2026 Art. 14, Preventive Seizure of AI-Generated Online Content (Implementing Norms of the Codice di Procedura Penale, Art. 104, Letter e-bis)since
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 160/2026, Civil Damages Actions for Harm Caused by AI Systems (Artt. 16-20)since
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 179/2026 Art. 41, Employer Decisions Assisted by AI Systems (Final Decisions Reserved to a Person)since
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 231/2001 Art. 25-vicies, Entity Liability for Offences Committed with the Use of AI Systemssince
ItalyLegge 132/2025, Sector Human-Oversight and Disclosure Duties (Artt. 4, 11, 13)since
ItalyLegislative Decree 216/2003, equal treatment in employment and working conditionssince
LithuaniaCriminal Code Art. 309(2), Dealing in Child Sexual Abuse Material Including Simulated Depictionssince
LatviaKrimināllikums Sections 90.1 and 90.2, Criminalization of Deepfake Election and State-Appointment Disinformationsince
LatviaPre-Election Campaigning Law, Articles 3.1 and 31.1, Indicating AI-Generated Campaign Content and the Ban on Further Distributionsince
MaltaCriminal Code, Article 208A, Indecent Material Involving Persons Under Age Including Digitally Created and Non-Existent Minorsin force
NetherlandsWetboek van Strafrecht, art. 252, Sexual Imagery of an Apparent Minor (Virtual Child Sexual Abuse Material)since
PolandKodeks karny art. 202 § 4b-4c, Fabricated Child Sexual Abuse Materialin force
PortugalLabour Code as Amended by Law 13/2023, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence in Employment: Articles 106(3)(s), 24(3) and 3(3)(o)since
PortugalPortuguese Charter of Human Rights in the Digital Era, Article 9, Use of Artificial Intelligence and Robotssince
RomaniaCod penal, Art. 374, Pornografia infantilă (Child Pornography, Including Simulated or Computer-Generated Depictions of Minors)since
SwedenBrottsbalken 16 kap. 10 a-10 b §§, Child Pornography Offence (Barnpornografibrott)since
SwedenConsumer Credit Act (2026:1011), Chapter 2 Section 7 and Chapter 3 Section 15, Personalised Offers and Credit Assessment by Automated Processingfrom , in 2 weeks
SloveniaKazenski zakonik (KZ-1, Criminal Code), Art. 176(3), Pornographic Material Involving a Minor's Realistic Likenesssince
SloveniaMedia Act (ZMed-1), Articles 66 and 67, Labelling of AI-Generated Media Content and Publisher Responsibilitysince
SlovakiaTrestný zákon, Child Pornography Including Simulated Depictionssince

The practical reading: EU compliance for an AGENT is the Act, plus the implementing act of every member state whose market it is placed on or whose residents' output it produces, plus that state's own criminal, labor and consumer law on synthetic content and automated management. The law library documents the national layer on each member state's page rather than restating the Act there; the Act is one instrument, held once.

8How the law reaches the AGENT

Put the statutes onto the second figure of the parties document, and each line out of the AGENT'S box collects a family of law. The table is the whole paper in one place.

What the AGENT doesWhose position triggers scopeLaw families that attachExamples
Answers, shows output to the person who askedThe principal; where the output is usedInteraction disclosure; content marking; companion rules; consumer protectionAI Act Article 50; Korea Article 31; California's companion act
Decides about a person, or scores themThe affected person's residenceAutomated-decision rights; employment, credit and insurance rules; impact assessmentsGDPR Article 22; Colorado's act; New York City's audit law
Remembers, stores, infersThe data subject's residence; the OPERATOR'S establishmentLawful basis, minimization, retention, sensitive data, breachThe GDPR; BIPA; Virginia's sensitive-data rule
Reads pages, calls interfaces it was not invited toThe COUNTERPARTY'S location and termsComputer misuse; text-and-data-mining reservations; database rights; terms of serviceThe Computer Fraud and Abuse Act; Germany's section 44b; the EU database right
Calls a model or a tool providerThe provider's establishment; the destination of the callProcessor contracts; cross-border transfer; the provider's own model dutiesGDPR Chapter V; AI Act Article 53
Sends, posts, submits, paysThe recipient's location; the platform's rules; the COUNTERPARTY'S termsOutreach and telemarketing rules; platform policies; contract formation by electronic AGENTS; payment rulesThe TCPA and the 2024 AI-voice ruling; Indonesia's electronic-agent rule
Acts in the OPERATOR'S name on its systemsThe OPERATOR'S establishmentSecurity duties; sector regimes; the OPERATOR'S own role under the AI Act as deployer or providerNIS2 Article 21; the Cyber Resilience Act
Is offered through a store, a registry, an interfaceWhere it is placed on the marketProduct safety and liability; market access; store rules by contractThe AI Act's provider duties; Cyber Resilience Act Article 14
Leaves a record, or fails toWhichever party a regulator asks aboutRecord-keeping, logging, audit, breach evidenceThe AI Act's Article 12; GDPR Articles 33 and 34

One AGENT, six instruments

Take an AGENT operated by a company whose main establishment is in the United States, offered to consumers in Ireland and Virginia, built on a general-purpose model its provider placed on the EU market, that answers questions by fetching pages from a German publisher and stores USER prompts that sometimes include the USER'S location. Six instruments reach it, each through a different party.

InstrumentWhom it bindsThe hook that reaches this AGENT
EU: the GDPROPERATOR as controllerTargeting data subjects in the Union; the Irish USER is the data subject
Ireland: the Data Protection Act 2018OPERATOR as controllerThe national act that supplements the GDPR for that data subject
EU: AI Act Article 50OPERATOR as deployer; the model provider, a MAKER, as providerOutput used in the Union; the model placed on the EU market
EU: AI Act Article 53The model provider alone, a MAKERA general-purpose model placed on the EU market
Germany: section 44bOPERATOR as the party mining; the publisher, a COUNTERPARTY, may have reservedThe reproduction happens against a German rightsholder's pages
Virginia: the Consumer Data Protection ActOPERATOR as controllerProducts targeted to Virginia residents; a stored location is sensitive data, consent required
One agent, six instruments, drawn by jurisdiction A constructed example, drawn to show how jurisdictions nest around one agent rather than to state any real company's position: the instruments named are real and carry their citations on this page, and the company does not exist. The agent in the middle is operated from the United States. The instruments that reach it are drawn inside the jurisdiction each one belongs to, and member states sit inside the Union. European Union: General Data Protection Regulation, AI Act, Article 50, AI Act, Article 53. Ireland, inside European Union: Data Protection Act 2018. Germany, inside European Union: Copyright Act, section 44b. United States: the operator's main establishment. Virginia, inside United States: Consumer Data Protection Act. European Union General Data Protection Regulation AI Act, Article 50 AI Act, Article 53 Ireland Data Protection Act 2018 Germany Copyright Act, section 44b United States the operator's main establishment Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act AGENT run from the United States offered in Ireland and in Virginia on a model placed on the EU market reads a German publisher
Figure. The same AGENT, drawn by jurisdiction: the instruments that reach it sit at the Union level, inside two member states, and inside one American state, and each one arrives through a different party.

Swap the Irish USER for one in Seoul and the AI rows change to Korea's Article 31; swap Virginia for Texas and the privacy row becomes Texas's sensitive-data consent. Nothing about the OPERATOR changed. One field in the request did, which is why the applicability question is answered per transaction from facts the AGENT either recorded or lost.

What a control on the request path can do about it

Of the requirement lines in force that an independent classification has reached (2,289 on ), 39% can be prevented by a control on the request path (refuse a destination, require a claim, transform a payload), 16% can be detected there but are discharged in the application's interface or process, 11% are performed elsewhere with the control's record as the evidence, and 34% never cross the request path at all: lawful basis, conformity assessment, registration, contracts. By topic the pattern is sharp: scraping law is overwhelmingly enforceable at the edge, AI law is mostly detectable, since its disclosure and marking duties close in the interface, and the out-of-path share of privacy law is what has to be staffed rather than engineered. A control that sits in the enforceable tier is a technical measure, not a finding that the duty is met.

9What it costs

The enforcement examples this paper would otherwise carry are in their own document, Does legal action really happen?, each starting from an ordinary product feature and ending in a figure with its primary source. The law library also records the enforcement climate of a regime where a regulator or a tracker publishes one; the figures below, read on the date shown, say the powers are used.

RegimeWhat is recordedAs of
Digital Services Act, Article 35(1)(k) (systemic risk mitigation, synthetic media marking)
European Union
Fines in the last year: EUR 870,000,000. Actions in the last year: 3. Trend: rising. Source
Digital Services Act, Article 37 (independent audit of very large online platforms and search engines)
European Union
Fines in the last year: EUR 870,000,000. Actions in the last year: 3. Trend: rising. Source
Law No. 124/2024, Commissioner, remedies, liability and penalties
Albania
Fines in the last year: ALL 3,680,000. Actions in the last year: 18. Source
GDPR Article 82 and Datenschutzbehörde Enforcement in Austria
Austria
Fines in the last year: EUR 145,000. Actions in the last year: 58. Trend: falling. Source
AEPD Enforcement, GDPR Article 82 and LOPDGDD Título IX
Spain
Fines in the last year: EUR 48,108,765. Actions in the last year: 325. Trend: rising. Source
GDPR Article 22, Automated Individual Decision-Making
European Union
Fines in the last year: EUR 1,145,760,374. Actions in the last year: 2,161. Source
GDPR Article 9, Special Categories of Personal Data
European Union
Fines in the last year: EUR 1,145,760,374. Actions in the last year: 2,161. Source
GDPR Articles 12-21, Data Subject Rights
European Union
Fines in the last year: EUR 1,145,760,374. Actions in the last year: 2,161. Source
GDPR Articles 33-34, Breach Notification
European Union
Fines in the last year: EUR 1,145,760,374. Actions in the last year: 2,161. Source
GDPR Articles 51-59, 68-76 and 77-84, Supervisory Authorities, Penalties and Remedies
European Union
Fines in the last year: EUR 1,145,760,374. Actions in the last year: 2,161. Source
GDPR Chapter V, Cross-Border Transfer Restrictions
European Union
Fines in the last year: EUR 1,145,760,374. Actions in the last year: 2,161. Source
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Comprehensive Regime
European Union
Fines in the last year: EUR 1,145,760,374. Actions in the last year: 2,161. Source
CNIL Enforcement, GDPR Article 83 and Code Pénal Articles 226-16 to 226-22-2
France
Fines in the last year: EUR 486,839,500. Actions in the last year: 83. Source
GDPR Articles 82-83 and HDPA Enforcement in Greece
Greece
Fines in the last year: EUR 4,302,149. Actions in the last year: 46. Source
AZOP Enforcement and GDPR Article 82
Croatia
Fines to date: EUR 10,500,000. Source
NAIH Enforcement, GDPR Article 82, and Infotörvény Section 24 Sérelemdíj
Hungary
Fines in the last year: HUF 67,195,000. Actions in the last year: 1,005. Source
Data Protection Act 2018
Ireland
Fines in the last year: EUR 530,770,000. Actions in the last year: 4. Source
Data Protection Act 2018 (Section 36(2)) (Health Research) Regulations 2018, Safeguards and Explicit Consent for Health Research in Ireland
Ireland
Fines in the last year: EUR 530,770,000. Actions in the last year: 4. Source
GDPR Article 22 and Data Protection Act 2018 Section 57, Automated Decision-Making in Ireland
Ireland
Fines in the last year: EUR 530,770,000. Actions in the last year: 4. Source
GDPR Article 82, Data Protection Act 2018 Section 117, and DPC Enforcement in Ireland
Ireland
Fines in the last year: EUR 530,770,000. Actions in the last year: 4. Source
GDPR Article 9 and Data Protection Act 2018 Section 46, Special Categories of Personal Data in Employment and Social Welfare Law in Ireland
Ireland
Fines in the last year: EUR 530,770,000. Actions in the last year: 4. Source
GDPR Articles 12-21 and Data Protection Act 2018 Sections 60-61, Data Subject Rights in Ireland
Ireland
Fines in the last year: EUR 530,770,000. Actions in the last year: 4. Source
GDPR Articles 33-34, Breach Notification in Ireland
Ireland
Fines in the last year: EUR 530,770,000. Actions in the last year: 4. Source
GDPR Chapter V, Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Data from Ireland
Ireland
Fines in the last year: EUR 530,770,000. Actions in the last year: 4. Source
DSG Datenschutzstelle Enforcement in Liechtenstein
Liechtenstein
Fines in the last year: CHF 21,500. Actions in the last year: 3. Source
GDPR Articles 82-83 and VDAI Enforcement in Lithuania
Lithuania
Fines in the last year: EUR 27,029. Actions in the last year: 5. Source
GDPR Articles 82-83 and DVI Enforcement in Latvia
Latvia
Fines in the last year: EUR 326,400. Actions in the last year: 62. Source
GDPR Articles 82-83 and IDPC Enforcement in Malta
Malta
Fines in the last year: EUR 17,500. Actions in the last year: 2. Trend: flat. Source
Personal Data Act Chapter 7, Datatilsynet Enforcement in Norway
Norway
Fines in the last year: NOK 4,250,000. Actions in the last year: 4. Trend: falling. Source
UODO Enforcement, GDPR Article 82, and Act Articles 98, 101-108
Poland
Fines in the last year: PLN 64,436,940.25. Actions in the last year: 20. Trend: rising. Source
CNPD Deliberacao 2019/494, Disapplication of Lei 58/2019 Provisions in Portugal
Portugal
Fines in the last year: EUR 47,000. Actions in the last year: 2. Trend: falling. Source
IMY Enforcement, GDPR Article 82, Dataskyddslagen Chapter 6-7, and Group Proceedings
Sweden
Fines in the last year: SEK 250,000. Actions in the last year: 3. Trend: falling. Source
Office for Personal Data Protection Enforcement and GDPR Article 82
Slovakia
Fines in the last year: EUR 468,000. Actions in the last year: 542. Trend: rising. Source
Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK), enforcement and compensation
Turkey
Fines in the last year: TRY 352,510,494. Actions in the last year: 876. Trend: falling. Source

10What this paper does not claim

It does not say which of these instruments binds any particular system; that is decided per deployment from the roles the system's OPERATOR holds and where its parties are. It analyses law in force or enacted on the date the law library was read, and a law that moved after it may have moved the answer. The appendix is a list of what the law library holds, not a census of the world's law. Nothing here is legal advice.

Appendix: every AI instrument in force or enacted, by region

Read from the law library on . Each name links to the summary page carrying its citation, status, start date and source.

European Union: 71 provisions in 1 jurisdictions
JurisdictionInstrumentWhenAsks of an app
European UnionAI Act, Article 10 (data and data governance)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 11 (technical documentation)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 111(2) (2030 compliance deadline for public-authority-intended systems)from , in 3.7 yearsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 12 (record-keeping)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 13 (transparency and provision of information to deployers)from , in 13 monthsdisclose the use of AI
European UnionAI Act, Article 14 (human oversight)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; limits on biometric use
European UnionAI Act, Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity)from , in 13 monthssecure the system and the data in it; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 16 (obligations of providers of high-risk AI systems)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI; assess the impact on personal data first; hold a license or registration
European UnionAI Act, Article 17 (quality management system)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 18 (documentation keeping)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; keep records for a set time
European UnionAI Act, Article 19 (automatically generated logs)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; keep records for a set time
European UnionAI Act, Article 20 (corrective actions and duty of information)from , in 13 monthsreport to a regulator; disclose the use of AI
European UnionAI Act, Article 21(1) and (3) (provider's information and documentation to a competent authority on a reasoned request, and confidentiality)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 21(2) (competent authority access to automatically generated logs)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 22 (authorised representative of a provider established in a third country: appointment, mandate, tasks and termination)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator
European UnionAI Act, Article 22(3), points (b) and (c) (authorised representative: documents held for 10 years and access to logs)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; keep records for a set time
European UnionAI Act, Article 23 (obligations of importers of high-risk AI systems)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; keep records for a set time; report to a regulator
European UnionAI Act, Article 24 (obligations of distributors of high-risk AI systems)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator
European UnionAI Act, Article 25 (responsibilities along the AI value chain)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; put the terms in the contract
European UnionAI Act, Article 26(1) to (5) (deployer use, human oversight, input data and monitoring)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator
European UnionAI Act, Article 26(10) (post-remote biometric identification authorisation)from , in 13 monthslimits on biometric use; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator
European UnionAI Act, Article 26(11) (informing individuals subject to an Annex III decision)from , in 13 monthsdisclose the use of AI
European UnionAI Act, Article 26(6) (deployer log-keeping)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; keep records for a set time
European UnionAI Act, Article 26(7) (informing workers before workplace use)from , in 13 monthsdisclose the use of AI
European UnionAI Act, Article 26(8) (public-authority deployer registration)from , in 13 monthshold a license or registration
European UnionAI Act, Article 26(9) (using Article 13 information for a data protection impact assessment)from , in 13 monthsassess the impact on personal data first
European UnionAI Act, Article 27 (fundamental rights impact assessment)from , in 13 monthsassess the impact on personal data first
European UnionAI Act, Article 4 (AI literacy)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 43 (conformity assessment procedures)from , in 13 monthsassess the impact on personal data first
European UnionAI Act, Article 4a (processing of special categories of personal data for bias detection and correction)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; secure the system and the data in it
European UnionAI Act, Article 5 (prohibited AI practices)since do not do the named thing
European UnionAI Act, Article 5(1)(ba) and (bb) (AI-generated non-consensual intimate imagery and child sexual abuse material)from , in 4 weeksdo not do the named thing
European UnionAI Act, Article 50 (transparency obligations for AI systems and synthetic content)since label generated content; disclose the use of AI
European UnionAI Act, Article 53 (obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models)since disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; respect text and data mining opt-outs
European UnionAI Act, Article 54 (authorised representatives of providers of general-purpose AI models)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; keep records for a set time
European UnionAI Act, Article 55 (obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk)since
European UnionAI Act, Article 56 (codes of practice for general-purpose AI models)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 57 (national AI regulatory sandboxes)from , in 9 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 59 (further processing of personal data for developing certain AI systems in the public interest in an AI regulatory sandbox)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; secure the system and the data in it
European UnionAI Act, Article 6(1) and Annex I (high-risk classification of a safety component or product under Annex I harmonisation legislation: provider duties)from , in 1.7 yearsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; assess the impact on personal data first
European UnionAI Act, Article 6(2) and Annex III, point 5(b) (creditworthiness and credit-scoring systems: provider duties)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; assess the impact on personal data first
European UnionAI Act, Article 6(3) and (4) (narrow-task derogation from Annex III high-risk classification)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; assess the impact on personal data first
European UnionAI Act, Article 60a (real-world testing frameworks for products under the Annex I, Section B legislation)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 72 (post-market monitoring by providers and post-market monitoring plan)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 73 (reporting of serious incidents)from , in 13 months
European UnionAI Act, Article 75 and Articles 75a to 75d (AI Office supervision, investigation, commitments, fines and periodic penalty payments)since report to a regulator; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Article 85 (right to lodge a complaint with a market surveillance authority)since honor the person's rights over their data
European UnionAI Act, Article 86 (right to explanation of individual decision-making)from , in 13 monthshonor the person's rights over their data
European UnionAI Act, Article 9 (risk management system)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Articles 51 and 52 (classification of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk and the notification procedure)since report to a regulator
European UnionAI Act, Articles 60 and 61 (testing in real world conditions outside AI regulatory sandboxes, with informed consent)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; get consent first; report to a regulator
European UnionAI Act, Articles 74(12) and (13) and 77 (market surveillance access to documentation, data sets and source code, and the access of authorities protecting fundamental rights)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Articles 79 and 81 (AI systems presenting a risk: national procedure and Union safeguard procedure)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Articles 80, 82 and 83 (misclassified systems, compliant systems presenting a risk, formal non-compliance)from , in 13 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAI Act, Articles 88 to 94 (enforcement of the obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models)since report to a regulator; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionAnti-Money-Laundering Regulation, Human Oversight of AI-Generated Information Shared in Partnerships for Information Sharing (Article 75(4), Point (g))from , in 8 months
European UnionAnti-Money-Laundering Regulation: Reporting of Suspicions to the Financial Intelligence Unit and Prohibition of Disclosure (Articles 69 and 73)from , in 8 monthsreport to a regulator; do not do the named thing
European UnionCapital Requirements Directive, Robust Governance Arrangements of Institutions (Article 74(1))since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionConsumer Credit Directive, Duty to Assess the Consumer's Creditworthiness Before Lending (Article 18)from , in 2 weeksgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI
European UnionConsumer Rights Directive, Adequate Explanations and Human Intervention in Online Tools for Distance Financial Services Contracts (Article 16d)since
European UnionDigital Services Act, Article 35(1)(k) (systemic risk mitigation, synthetic media marking)since label generated content; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; assess the impact on personal data first
European UnionDigital Services Act, Article 37 (independent audit of very large online platforms and search engines)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator
European UnionEuropean Health Data Space Regulation, High-Risk AI Systems Claiming Interoperability with EHR Systems (Article 27(2))from , in 2.4 years
European UnionFourth Anti-Money-Laundering Directive: Reporting of Suspicious Transactions to the Financial Intelligence Unit and Prohibition of Disclosure (Articles 33 and 39)since report to a regulator; do not do the named thing
European UnionMachinery Regulation, Conformity Assessment of Machine-Learning Safety Components and Embedded Systems (Annex I, Part A, Points 5 and 6)from , in 2 months
European UnionMedical Device Regulation, Annex VIII Rule 11 (classification of software) with Article 52 (conformity assessment by class)since assess the impact on personal data first
European UnionMiFID II Algorithmic Trading Controls: Resilient Systems, Testing, Kill Functionality, Records and Notification (Article 17 and RTS 6)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator; secure the system and the data in it
European UnionMiFID II Product Governance for Manufacturers and Distributors of Financial Instruments (Articles 16(3) and 24(2) and Delegated Directive 2017/593 Articles 9 and 10)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionMiFID II Suitability Assessment for Investment Advice and Portfolio Management, Including Automated and Semi-Automated Systems (Article 25(2) and Delegated Regulation 2017/565 Article 54)since disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionMiFID II and MiFIR Records of Services, Activities, Orders and Transactions (Article 16(6) and MiFIR Article 25)since keep records for a set time; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
European UnionToy Safety Regulation, Safety Assessment of Toys Within the Scope of the AI Act (Article 25(2), Point (c))from , in 3.7 years
EU member states (the national layer): 78 provisions in 25 jurisdictions
JurisdictionInstrumentWhenAsks of an app
AustriaKommAustria-Gesetz and Telekommunikationsgesetz 2021, Servicestelle für Künstliche Intelligenz at the RTR-GmbHsince
AustriaStGB Section 207a(4)(4), Computer-Generated and Altered Child Sexual Abuse Materialsince do not do the named thing
AustriaVerbraucherkreditgesetz 2026 (VKrG 2026), Personalized Offers and Automated Creditworthiness Assessment (Sections 13 and 17(5))from , in 2 weeks
BulgariaРешение № 398 на Министерския съвет (Council of Ministers Decision No. 398), Fundamental-Rights Authorities under Article 77 of the AI Actfrom a date not yet set
CyprusIntellectual Property and Related Rights Law, Articles 49-50 (Non-Consensual Deepfake Imitation Ban)since do not do the named thing; get consent first
CyprusLaw 91(I)/2014 as Amended by Law 59(I)/2025, Child Sexual Abuse Material Including Realistic Images (Articles 2 and 8)since do not do the named thing
Czech RepublicCriminal Code Section 181(2), Realistic Fake Depiction of a Person Made to Cause Serious Harm to Rightssince do not do the named thing
Czech RepublicCriminal Code Section 191a, Non-Consensual Identity-Based Pornographic Depictionsince do not do the named thing
Czech RepublicCriminal Code Section 192, Child Pornography Including a Depiction of a Person Who Appears to Be a Childsince do not do the named thing
GermanyBetriebsverfassungsgesetz (BetrVG) Sections 80(3), 90(1) No. 3 and 95(2a), Works Council Rights on the Use of Artificial Intelligencesince
GermanyGesetz zur Marktüberwachung und Innovationsförderung von künstlicher Intelligenz (KI-MIG), AI Market Surveillance and Innovation Promotion Actsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator
GermanyMedienstaatsvertrag (MStV) Section 18(3), Labelling of Automatically Created Content in Social Networkssince
DenmarkLov nr. 1322 af 20. november 2025, Credit Agreements Act Section 7 c(9) to (11), Human Intervention in Automated Creditworthiness Assessmentfrom , in 2 weeks
DenmarkLov nr. 467 af 14. maj 2025, National Competent Authorities and Article 5 Enforcementsince do not do the named thing; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
EstoniaKutseõppeasutuse seadus Section 32^1, Artificial Intelligence Applications in Vocational Teaching and Pupils' Personal Datasince
EstoniaPõhikooli- ja gümnaasiumiseadus Section 20^1, Artificial Intelligence Applications in Teaching and Pupils' Personal Datasince
EstoniaVäärtpaberituru seadus Sections 82^15 and 82^16, Algorithmic Trading and Direct Electronic Access Controlssince
EstoniaVõlaõigusseadus Section 55^2, Explanations to Consumers and Human Intervention in Online Financial Servicessince
SpainEstatuto de los Trabajadores Article 64.4.d), Algorithmic Management Works Council Information Rightsince
SpainLey 10/2025 Final Provisions 1 and 3, Disclosure of Automated Personalisation of Offers and Prices to Consumerssince
SpainLey 10/2025, Customer Service Rules for Automated Channels (Article 8 and Transitional Provision)from , in 7 weeks
SpainLey 15/2022 Article 23, Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decision-Making Mechanisms in Public Administrationssince
SpainReal Decreto 723/2026 Article 3(2)(k), Written Notice to Workers of Algorithmic and Automated Decision-Making Systemssince
SpainReal Decreto 729/2023, Statute of the Agencia Española de Supervisión de Inteligencia Artificial (AESIA), Article 4since
FinlandLaki eräiden tekoälyjärjestelmien valvonnasta, Act on the Supervision of Certain Artificial Intelligence Systemssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
FinlandRikoslaki Chapter 20, Distribution and Possession of an Image Depicting a Child Sexually, Including Realistic Depictionssince do not do the named thing
FranceCode Pénal Article 226-8 as Amended, Existing Offense Extended to Algorithmically Generated Contentsince do not do the named thing
FranceCode Pénal Article 226-8-1, Non-Consensual Sexual Montage and Algorithmically Generated Sexual Contentsince do not do the named thing
FranceLaw 2023-380, Article 10, Experimental Algorithmic Processing of Video-Protection Images, Extended to 31 December 2030since do not do the named thing; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
FranceLaw 2023-451, Article 5, Labelling of Retouched and AI-Generated Images by Commercial Influencersin forcelabel generated content
GreeceLaw 5321/2026, National AI Act Implementation Lawsince label generated content
CroatiaAct Implementing the European Media Freedom Act, Article 23, Labelling of AI-Generated Contentsince label generated content
CroatiaConsumer Credit Act, Articles 24 and 30, Personalised Offers and Creditworthiness Assessment by Automated Processingfrom , in 2 weeksdisclose the use of AI; honor the person's rights over their data
CroatiaKazneni zakon Article 215a, Endangering Life and Property by an Artificial Intelligence Systemsince do not do the named thing
CroatiaLabour Act, Articles 221.g to 221.i, Algorithmic Management of Work Through Digital Labour Platformssince disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
HungaryAct LXXV of 2025 on the Domestic Implementation of the EU AI Regulationsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
HungaryAct XLVII of 1997 on Health Data, Section 35/A(4) to (8), Conditions for AI Development on Electronic Health Service Space Datasince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; assess the impact on personal data first
HungaryBüntető Törvénykönyv (Criminal Code), Section 204(8), Realistic Depiction of a Non-Existent Person as Child Pornographysince do not do the named thing
HungaryGovernment Decree 344/2025 Implementing the Hungarian AI Act: Designated Authorities, Notified-Body Reports and Fine Ceilingssince report to a regulator; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
IrelandEuropean Union (Artificial Intelligence) (Designation) Regulations 2025since
IrelandHarassment, Harmful Communications and Related Offences Act 2020, Intimate Image Offencessince do not do the named thing; get consent first
IrelandRegulation of Artificial Intelligence Act 2026since
ItalyCodice Penale Art. 437-bis, Omitted Safety Measures in High-Risk AI Systems and Unlawful Alteration of Themsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; secure the system and the data in it
ItalyCodice Penale Art. 612-quater, Illicit Dissemination of AI-Generated or AI-Altered Contentsince do not do the named thing; get consent first
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 160/2026 Art. 14, Preventive Seizure of AI-Generated Online Content (Implementing Norms of the Codice di Procedura Penale, Art. 104, Letter e-bis)since
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 160/2026, After-the-Fact Facial Recognition Integrated in Video Surveillance (Art. 10)since limits on biometric use; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; assess the impact on personal data first; keep records for a set time
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 160/2026, Civil Damages Actions for Harm Caused by AI Systems (Artt. 16-20)since disclose the use of AI
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 160/2026, Police Biometric AI: Dataset Labelling and Real-Time Remote Identification (Artt. 7-9, 13)since limits on biometric use; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; assess the impact on personal data first
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 160/2026, Police Use of AI Systems: Human Review, Oversight, Collaborations, Sandbox Basis and Training (Artt. 3-6, 21)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 179/2026 Art. 41, Employer Decisions Assisted by AI Systems (Final Decisions Reserved to a Person)since
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 179/2026 Arts. 4 to 6 and 21 to 23, National AI Act Authorities and Administrative Finessince
ItalyDecreto Legislativo 231/2001 Art. 25-vicies, Entity Liability for Offences Committed with the Use of AI Systemssince
ItalyLegge 132/2025 Art. 20, National AI Authorities (AgID and ACN)since
ItalyLegge 132/2025, Sector Human-Oversight and Disclosure Duties (Artt. 4, 11, 13)since
ItalyLegislative Decree 216/2003, equal treatment in employment and working conditionssince do not do the named thing
LithuaniaCriminal Code Art. 309(2), Dealing in Child Sexual Abuse Material Including Simulated Depictionssince do not do the named thing
LithuaniaLithuanian Law Amendments Designating National Competent Authorities under the AI Actsince
LatviaConsumer Rights Protection Centre Statute, Points 4.3.1 11 and 4.22.5, AI Act Market Surveillance and Single Point of Contact Taskssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
LatviaKrimināllikums Sections 90.1 and 90.2, Criminalization of Deepfake Election and State-Appointment Disinformationsince do not do the named thing
LatviaLaw on Digital Operational Resilience of the Financial Market and the Use of Artificial Intelligence, Articles 7, 8(5)-(7), 10(3)-(4) and 11(2)since do not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
LatviaOmbudsman Law (Tiesībsarga likums), Article 13, Points 15 and 16, Access to AI System Documentation and Testing Requestssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
LatviaPre-Election Campaigning Law, Articles 3.1 and 31.1, Indicating AI-Generated Campaign Content and the Ban on Further Distributionsince label generated content
MaltaArtificial Intelligence (Designation of the Information and Data Protection Commissioner for the purposes of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) Regulations, 2025 (L.N. 227 of 2025)since limits on biometric use; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
MaltaArtificial Intelligence Regulations, 2025 (L.N. 226 of 2025)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
MaltaCriminal Code, Article 208A, Indecent Material Involving Persons Under Age Including Digitally Created and Non-Existent Minorsin forcedo not do the named thing
MaltaMalta Digital Innovation Authority Act, Article 6A, Market Surveillance Enforcement Powers of the Authorityin forcegovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
NetherlandsWetboek van Strafrecht, art. 252, Sexual Imagery of an Apparent Minor (Virtual Child Sexual Abuse Material)since do not do the named thing
PolandKodeks karny art. 202 § 4b-4c, Fabricated Child Sexual Abuse Materialin forcedo not do the named thing
PolandUstawa o systemach sztucznej inteligencji, Act on Artificial Intelligence Systemssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
PortugalLabour Code as Amended by Law 13/2023, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence in Employment: Articles 106(3)(s), 24(3) and 3(3)(o)since disclose the use of AI
PortugalPortuguese Charter of Human Rights in the Digital Era, Article 9, Use of Artificial Intelligence and Robotssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI
RomaniaCod penal, Art. 374, Pornografia infantilă (Child Pornography, Including Simulated or Computer-Generated Depictions of Minors)since do not do the named thing
SwedenBrottsbalken 16 kap. 10 a-10 b §§, Child Pornography Offence (Barnpornografibrott)since do not do the named thing
SwedenConsumer Credit Act (2026:1011), Chapter 2 Section 7 and Chapter 3 Section 15, Personalised Offers and Credit Assessment by Automated Processingfrom , in 2 weeksdisclose the use of AI; honor the person's rights over their data
SloveniaKazenski zakonik (KZ-1, Criminal Code), Art. 176(3), Pornographic Material Involving a Minor's Realistic Likenesssince do not do the named thing
SloveniaMedia Act (ZMed-1), Articles 66 and 67, Labelling of AI-Generated Media Content and Publisher Responsibilitysince label generated content; disclose the use of AI
SloveniaZakon o izvajanju uredbe (EU) o določitvi harmoniziranih pravil o umetni inteligenci (ZIUDHPUI), Designation of AI Act Market Surveillance Authoritiessince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
SlovakiaTrestný zákon, Child Pornography Including Simulated Depictionssince
United Kingdom: 25 provisions in 1 jurisdictions
JurisdictionInstrumentWhenAsks of an app
United KingdomAuthorized Technology Testing Defense for Obscenity and Child Abuse Image Offenses (Regulation-Making Power)since
United KingdomAutomated Decision-Making: Significant Decisions Based Solely on Automated Processing (UK GDPR Articles 22A to 22D)since honor the person's rights over their data; disclose the use of AI
United KingdomCMA Publisher Conduct Requirement on Google's general search servicesfrom , in 4 weeks
United KingdomCompliance function of a common platform firm: compliance-risk policies and procedures, and a permanent and effective compliance function that operates independentlysince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
United KingdomCompliance: adequate policies and procedures, and a director or senior manager's oversight of compliancesince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
United KingdomConsumer Credit Act 1974, duty to tell a refused applicant that a credit reference agency was used and to give its name and addresssince disclose the use of AI
United KingdomCopies for Text and Data Analysis for Non-Commercial Research (Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, s. 29A)since respect text and data mining opt-outs; credit or license the publisher's content
United KingdomCreating, or Requesting the Creation of, Purported Intimate Image of Adultsince do not do the named thing; get consent first
United KingdomEquality Act 2010, discrimination by a service-provider, with indirect discrimination and the exceptions for financial services and insurancesince do not do the named thing
United KingdomEquality Act 2010, duty on a service-provider to make reasonable adjustments for disabled personssince do not do the named thing
United KingdomFCA Handbook, CONC 5.2A, assessing the creditworthiness of a customer before consumer credit is granted or significantly increasedsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
United KingdomFundamental Rule 5: effective risk strategies and risk management systemssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
United KingdomGeneral organizational requirements: governance arrangements, internal controls, information security and business continuitysince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; secure the system and the data in it
United KingdomGeneral outsourcing requirements for a common platform firm: relying on a third party to perform operational functions, including critical or important functionssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
United KingdomMaking or Supplying a Generator of Purported Intimate Imagessince do not do the named thing
United KingdomMaking, Adapting, Possessing or Supplying a Child Sexual Abuse Image-Generator, England and Walesfrom a date not yet setdo not do the named thing
United KingdomMaking, Adapting, Possessing or Supplying a Child Sexual Abuse Image-Generator, Northern Irelandfrom a date not yet setdo not do the named thing
United KingdomMaking, Adapting, Possessing or Supplying a Child Sexual Abuse Image-Generator, Scotlandfrom a date not yet setdo not do the named thing
United KingdomOutsourcing by a firm other than a common platform firm: remaining fully responsible for outsourced critical or important operational functionssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
United KingdomPossession of Advice or Guidance About Abusing Children Sexually or Creating CSA Images, England and Wales and Northern Irelandfrom a date not yet setdo not do the named thing
United KingdomPossession of Advice or Guidance About Abusing Children Sexually or Creating CSA Images, Scotlandfrom a date not yet setdo not do the named thing
United KingdomPower to Amend the Online Safety Act 2023 for Illegal AI-Generated Content (New Section 216A), with Progress Report Dutysince
United KingdomSuitability for MiFID business: personal recommendations and decisions to trade, including advice given through an automated or semi-automated systemsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI
United KingdomSuitability for business that is not MiFID business: personal recommendations to retail clients and decisions to trade for them (COBS 9.1 and 9.2)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
United KingdomThe Consumer Duty: Principle 12 and the cross-cutting rules and outcome rules for retail customerssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
United States, federal: 22 provisions in 1 jurisdictions
JurisdictionInstrumentWhenAsks of an app
United StatesBank Secrecy Act and 31 CFR 1020.320, bank reports of suspicious transactions and their confidentialitysince report to a regulator; keep records for a set time; do not do the named thing
United StatesEqual Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B, notice of action taken and statement of specific reasons for adverse actionsince disclose the use of AI
United StatesExchange Act Rule 17a-4, records to be preserved by certain exchange members, brokers and dealerssince keep records for a set time; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
United StatesExecutive Order 13960, Promoting the Use of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in the Federal Governmentsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI
United StatesExecutive Order 14319, Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Governmentsince put the terms in the contract; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI
United StatesFD&C Act section 520(o), software functions excluded from the device definition, with section 201(h)since hold a license or registration; report to a regulator
United StatesFINRA Rule 2210, communications with the publicsince disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; keep records for a set time
United StatesFINRA Rule 3110, supervisionsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; keep records for a set time
United StatesFINRA Rule 4511, general requirements for books and recordssince keep records for a set time
United StatesFTC Rule on Impersonation of Government and Businessessince do not do the named thing
United StatesGarcia v. Character Technologies, Inc.since
United StatesInvestment Advisers Act of 1940 section 206, prohibited transactions by investment advisersin forcedo not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI
United StatesOMB Memorandum M-25-21, Accelerating Federal Use of Artificial Intelligence through Innovation, Governance, and Public Trustsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator; disclose the use of AI; assess the impact on personal data first
United StatesOMB Memorandum M-25-22, Driving Efficient Acquisition of Artificial Intelligence in Governmentsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI
United StatesONC certification criterion for decision support interventions, 45 CFR 170.315(b)(11), as amended by the HTI-5 final rulefrom , in 7 weeksgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
United StatesObscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children, and the definition of child pornography, as they reach computer-generated imagessince do not do the named thing
United StatesRegulation B, 2026 amendments on evaluation of applications, discouragement and special purpose credit programssince do not do the named thing
United StatesRegulation Best Interest, standard of conduct for broker-dealerssince disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
United StatesSafety and soundness standards for insured depository institutions: internal controls, information systems and internal audit systemssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
United StatesSection 1557 final rule, nondiscrimination in the use of patient care decision support toolssince do not do the named thing; assess the impact on personal data first
United StatesTAKE IT DOWN Act, section 2: criminal prohibition on publishing intimate digital forgeriessince do not do the named thing
United StatesTitle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, unlawful employment practicessince do not do the named thing
United States, states: 226 provisions in 48 jurisdictions
JurisdictionInstrumentWhenAsks of an app
AlabamaAlabama Child Protection Act of 2024, AI-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Materialsince do not do the named thing
AlabamaDistribution of Materially Deceptive Media to Influence an Upcoming Electionsince label generated content; disclose the use of AI
AlabamaSB 63 (2026), Artificial Intelligence in Health Insurance Prior Authorizationsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI; report to a regulator
ArkansasAct 159 of 2025 (HB 1071), AI-Generated Replicas Amendment to Publicity Rights Actsince do not do the named thing
ArkansasAct 827 of 2025 (HB 1529), Unlawful Creation or Distribution of Deepfake Visual Materialsince do not do the named thing
ArkansasAct 927 of 2025 (HB 1876), Generative AI Ownership of Model Training and Contentsince
ArkansasAct 977 of 2025 (HB 1877), AI-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material Amendmentssince do not do the named thing
ArizonaAI-generated and indistinguishable depictions included in child-exploitation definitions (HB 2678)since do not do the named thing
ArizonaDeepfakes; candidate disclosure requirement and civil penaltysince do not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI
ArizonaDenial of claims; individualized review requirementsince
ArizonaDigital impersonation of a candidate or other person (civil action)since disclose the use of AI
ArizonaUnlawful disclosure extended to AI-generated 'realistic pictorial representation' intimate images (SB 1462)since do not do the named thing
CaliforniaAB 730, as extended by AB 972, election deepfake disclosure lawsince label generated content; do not do the named thing
CaliforniaAI Agents and Public Participation Law (SB 1159)from , in 2 monthsdo not do the named thing
CaliforniaAI Auditor Registry Act (AB 1405)from , in 2.2 yearshold a license or registration; keep records for a set time; disclose the use of AI
CaliforniaAI-Generated and Digitally Altered Child Sexual Exploitation Matter (SB 1276)from , in 2 monthsdo not do the named thing
CaliforniaArtificial Intelligence in Health Care Utilization Review (SB 1120)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; do not do the named thing
CaliforniaAttorney, Court Filing and Arbitrator Generative AI Duties (SB 574)from , in 2 monthsdo not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI
CaliforniaBolstering Online Transparency Act (SB 1001)since
CaliforniaCCPA Automated Decisionmaking Technology Regulationssince honor the person's rights over their data; assess the impact on personal data first; disclose the use of AI
CaliforniaCalifornia AI Transparency Act (SB 942, as amended by AB 853, SB 1000 and AB 2713)since label generated content; disclose the use of AI
CaliforniaCalifornia Executive Order N-5-26 (vendor certifications, supply chain review and contractor responsibility in state AI procurement)since put the terms in the contract; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI
CaliforniaCivil Rights Council Employment Regulations on Automated-Decision Systemssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; do not do the named thing
CaliforniaClinical Decision Support Systems Bias Mitigation Act (SB 503)from , in 2 monthsassess the impact on personal data first; disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
CaliforniaCompanion Chatbot Safety and Accountability Act (SB 243)since disclose the use of AI; report to a regulator
CaliforniaCustomer Service Chatbots Law (AB 1609)from , in 2 monthslabel generated content; disclose the use of AI
CaliforniaDeceased Personality Digital Replica Liability Law (AB 1836)since do not do the named thing; get consent first
CaliforniaDeepfake Pornography Civil Liability Law (AB 621)since do not do the named thing; get consent first
CaliforniaDigital Replica Contract Terms Law (AB 2602)since put the terms in the contract
CaliforniaDigital Replica Likeness and Impersonation Law (SB 1111)from , in 2 monthsdo not do the named thing; get consent first
CaliforniaEmployment Automated Decision Systems Act (SB 947)from , in 8 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI; honor the person's rights over their data
CaliforniaEmployment Technological Displacement Notice (SB 951)from , in 2 monthsreport to a regulator; disclose the use of AI
CaliforniaGenerative AI Training Data Transparency Act (AB 2013)since disclose the use of AI
CaliforniaHealth Care Professional Title Protection for Artificial Intelligence Act (AB 489)since do not do the named thing
CaliforniaHealth Care Services Artificial Intelligence Act (AB 1979)from , in 2 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; do not do the named thing
CaliforniaHealthcare AI Patient-Communication Disclosure Act (AB 3030)since disclose the use of AI
CaliforniaIndependent Verification Organizations Act (SB 813)from , in 2 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator; hold a license or registration; disclose the use of AI
CaliforniaSynthetic Performer Advertising Disclosure Act (SB 1050)from , in 2 monthslabel generated content; disclose the use of AI
CaliforniaToys with Companion Chatbots Ban (SB 867)from , in 2 monthsdo not do the named thing
CaliforniaTransparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 53)since disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator
CaliforniaWorkplace Surveillance Tools: AI Emotion Recognition and Neural Data Prohibition (AB 1883)from , in 2 monthsdo not do the named thing
ColoradoAmended Regulation 10-1-1 (2025), Governance and Risk Management Framework for Insurers' Use of External Consumer Data and Information Sources, Algorithms, and Predictive Modelssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; assess the impact on personal data first; report to a regulator
ColoradoHB 24-1147, Candidate Election Deepfake Disclosuressince label generated content; do not do the named thing
ColoradoHB 26-1139 (2026), Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Carefrom , in 2 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator; disclose the use of AI; do not do the named thing
ColoradoHB 26-1195 (2026), Psychotherapy Artificial Intelligence Restrictionssince do not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI; get consent first
ColoradoHB 26-1263 (2026), Conversational AI Service Operator Requirementssince label generated content; meet a design code; report to a regulator
ColoradoSB 21-169 (2021), Insurers' Use of External Consumer Data and Information Sources, Algorithms, and Predictive Modelssince
ColoradoSB 26-189 (2026), Automated Decision-Making Technology Actfrom , in 2 months
ColoradoSB 26-189 (2026), Automated Decision-Making Technology Act, deployer record keepingfrom , in 2 months
ColoradoSB 26-189 (2026), Automated Decision-Making Technology Act, developer documentation and recordsfrom , in 2 months
ConnecticutAI Companion Chatbot Disclosure and Minor Safety Dutiesfrom , in 2 months
ConnecticutAutomated Employment-Related Decision Technology Actfrom , in 11 months
ConnecticutCivil Action and Platform Takedown Duty for Synthetically Created Intimate Imagessince do not do the named thing
ConnecticutComputer-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Materialsince do not do the named thing
ConnecticutEmployer AI-Related Layoff Disclosure to the Labor Departmentsince
ConnecticutFrontier Developer Catastrophic-Risk Whistleblower Protectionssince
ConnecticutGenerative AI Content Provenance Duty for Large Providerssince label generated content
ConnecticutSubscription-Based Generative AI Provider Disclosure Dutysince
ConnecticutUnlawful Dissemination of an Intimate Synthetically Created Imagesince do not do the named thing
DelawareChild sexual abuse material offenses, computer-generated depictionssince do not do the named thing
DelawareHouse Bill 191 (2026), medical professional title protection against nonhuman and AI entitiessince do not do the named thing
DelawareHouse Bill 316 (2024), use of deep fake technology to influence an electionsince do not do the named thing; label generated content
DelawareHouse Bill 353 (2024), deep fake intimate images (The Amelia Kramer Act)since do not do the named thing
FloridaAI Use in Political Advertising Disclosure Requirement (HB 919, 2024)since label generated content; disclose the use of AI
FloridaChild Sexual Abuse Material Including AI-Altered Images of a Minorsince do not do the named thing
FloridaPromotion of an Altered Sexual Depiction; Brooke's Law platform takedown dutysince do not do the named thing; honor the person's rights over their data
GeorgiaAI Companion Chatbot Safety Act (SB 540)from , in 8 months
GeorgiaPrivate Review Agent Artificial Intelligence Coverage Determinations Act (SB 444)from , in 2 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
GeorgiaWalters v. OpenAI, L.L.C.since
HawaiiArtificial Intelligence Disclosure and Safety Act (2026 Haw. Sess. Laws Act 248, S.B. 3001 CD1)since
HawaiiArtificial Intelligence; Digital Imitation; Personal Likeness; Protections (2026 Haw. Sess. Laws Act 247, H.B. 2137 CD1)since do not do the named thing
HawaiiPromoting Child Abuse, computer-generated child pornographysince do not do the named thing
HawaiiViolation of Privacy in the First Degree, deepfake and composite intimate imagessince do not do the named thing
IowaConversational AI Services Act (Senate File 2417)from , in 8 monthslabel generated content; meet a design code
IowaHarassment, nonconsensual and synthetic intimate imagessince do not do the named thing
IowaSexual exploitation of a minor, AI-generated and manipulated depictionssince do not do the named thing
IowaUtilization Review Artificial Intelligence Limits (House File 2635)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
IdahoConversational AI Safety Actfrom , in 8 monthslabel generated content; meet a design code
IdahoDisclosing explicit synthetic mediasince do not do the named thing
IdahoFAIR Elections Act, disclosure duty for synthetic media in electioneering communicationssince label generated content
IdahoGenerative Artificial Intelligence in Education Act, vendor disclosure dutysince disclose the use of AI
IllinoisArtificial Intelligence Safety Measures Actfrom , in 2 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator; disclose the use of AI
IllinoisArtificial Intelligence Video Interview Actsince disclose the use of AI; get consent first; keep records for a set time; report to a regulator
IllinoisChild sexual abuse material, computer-generated and digitally altered depictionssince do not do the named thing
IllinoisCivil Remedies for Nonconsensual Dissemination of Private Sexual Images Act, digitally altered imagessince do not do the named thing
IllinoisHB 3851 / P.A. 104-0338 (2025), Bullying prevention: cyber-bullying by unauthorized digital replicasince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI
IllinoisHB 4762 / P.A. 103-0830 (2024), Digital Voice and Likeness Protection Act: unenforceable digital replica provisions in service agreementssince get consent first
IllinoisIllinois Human Rights Act, use of artificial intelligence in employment decisionssince do not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI
IllinoisRight of Publicity Act, unauthorized AI digital replica prohibitionsince do not do the named thing; get consent first
IllinoisSB 2909 / P.A. 104-0565 (2026), Teacher evaluation: limits on artificial intelligence toolsfrom , in 2 monthsdo not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI
IllinoisWellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Actsince do not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI; get consent first
IndianaChild Exploitation and Possession of Child Pornography, obscene simulated or computer-generated imagessince do not do the named thing
IndianaDistribution of an Intimate Image and Civil Action for Nonconsensual Pornography, extended to AI-generated images (House Enrolled Act 1047, 2024)since do not do the named thing; get consent first
IndianaDowncoding of Health Benefits Claims, automated and AI decision-making (House Enrolled Act 1271, 2026)since disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
IndianaUse of Digitally Altered Media in Elections (House Enrolled Act 1133, 2024)since label generated content; disclose the use of AI
KansasAI-generated and AI-altered images in child exploitation and non-consensual dissemination offensessince do not do the named thing
KentuckyComputer-generated images of a minor in sexual performance offenses (HB 207)since do not do the named thing
KentuckyPossession or viewing of matter portraying a computer-generated image of a minor (HB 366)since do not do the named thing
KentuckySynthetic Media Disclosure in Electioneering Communicationssince label generated content; disclose the use of AI
LouisianaAct 250 (HB 178), attorney duty to verify and disclose AI-generated evidencesince disclose the use of AI
LouisianaAct 496 (SB 346), deepfake material used against K-12 studentssince do not do the named thing
LouisianaAct 559 (HB 639), AI-generated voice telephone campaign communication disclosuresince label generated content
LouisianaAct 806 (HB 459), AI-manipulated electioneering communication disclosuresince label generated content
LouisianaAct 892 (SB 42), AI-generated child sexual abuse materialssince do not do the named thing
MarylandComputer-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Materialsince do not do the named thing
MarylandHB 820 / Ch. 747 (2025), Artificial Intelligence in Health Insurance Utilization Reviewsince
MarylandHB 895 / Ch. 154 (2026), Surveillance Pricing and Algorithmic Price Disclosure (Protection from Predatory Pricing Act)since
MarylandSB 141 / Ch. 444 (2026), Election Deepfake Prohibitionsince do not do the named thing
MarylandSB 360 / Ch. 219 (2025), AI-Generated Deepfakes in Nonconsensual Intimate Imagerysince do not do the named thing
MarylandSB 8 / Ch. 445 (2026), AI and Deepfake Identity Fraudsince do not do the named thing
MaineMaine Chatbot Disclosure Actsince
MaineSynthetic media disclosure in campaign advertisingsince label generated content
MaineTechnology-facilitated sexual abuse of minors, AI-generated and modified child sexual abuse material (LD 524)since do not do the named thing
MaineUnauthorized dissemination of certain private images (AI-generated image amendment)since do not do the named thing
MaineUse of artificial intelligence in therapy or psychotherapy servicessince do not do the named thing; get consent first; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
MichiganAI-Generated Political Advertisement and Robocall Disclosure (Public Act 263 of 2023)since label generated content; disclose the use of AI
MichiganDistribution of Materially Deceptive Election Media (Public Act 265 of 2023)since label generated content; do not do the named thing
MichiganElliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, public accommodations, public service and real estate financing (Act 453 of 1976)since do not do the named thing
MichiganInsurance Code of 1956, rate-making standards, rates not unfairly discriminatory (Act 218 of 1956)since do not do the named thing
MichiganProtection from Intimate Deep Fakes Act (Public Act 11 of 2025)since do not do the named thing
MinnesotaAI-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Materialsince do not do the named thing
MinnesotaElection Deepfake Prohibition and Candidate Forfeituresince do not do the named thing
MinnesotaNonconsensual Deepfake Sexual Imagery, Civil and Criminal Liabilitysince do not do the named thing
MinnesotaNudification Technology Prohibitionsince do not do the named thing
MinnesotaUtilization Review, AI-Only Adverse Determination Prohibitionfrom , in 2 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
MissouriChild sexual abuse material offenses, computer-generated and AI-indistinguishable images includedsince do not do the named thing
MissouriDisclosure of an intimate digital depictionsince
MississippiHB 1308 (2025), Morphed-Image Child Exploitation Amendmentssince do not do the named thing
MississippiSB 2577 (2024), Wrongful Dissemination of Digitizations (Election Deepfakes)since do not do the named thing; label generated content
MontanaDeepfake Regulation Act (SB 25, 2025), election deepfake disclosuresince do not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI
MontanaDigital Likeness and Voice Rights Act (HB 513, 2025), unauthorized AI depiction liabilitysince do not do the named thing
MontanaPrivacy in communications, digitally fabricated intimate imagesin forcedo not do the named thing
MontanaRight to Compute Act (SB 212, 2025), critical AI infrastructure risk management dutysince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
MontanaSexual abuse of children, computer-generated child pornographysince do not do the named thing
North CarolinaAI-Generated Intimate Images and Child Sexual Abuse Material (Session Law 2024-37, HB 591)since do not do the named thing
North DakotaHouse Bill 1167 (2025), AI-generated political content disclosuresince disclose the use of AI; label generated content
North DakotaHouse Bill 1351 (2025), sexually expressive images including AI-generated or altered deepfakessince do not do the named thing
North DakotaHouse Bill 1429 (2025), harassment and stalking with a robotsince do not do the named thing
NebraskaChild Sexual Abuse Material Prevention Act, computer-generated and artificial-intelligence depictionsin forcedo not do the named thing
NebraskaConversational Artificial Intelligence Safety Act (LB 525, §§ 12-18)from , in 8 monthsdisclose the use of AI; label generated content
NebraskaEnsuring Transparency in Prior Authorization Act, artificial-intelligence utilization review restrictionsince do not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI
New HampshireAI Chatbot Solicitation of Childrensince
New HampshireCreation of Child Intimate Visual Representationssince do not do the named thing
New HampshireFraudulent Use of Deepfakessince do not do the named thing
New HampshireSynthetic Media and Deceptive and Fraudulent Deepfakes in Electionssince disclose the use of AI
New JerseyDeceptive Audio or Visual Media (Deepfake) Criminalization Actsince do not do the named thing
New JerseyForbidding the Algorithmic Inflation of Rent (FAIR) Actfrom , in 8 months
New JerseyNew Jersey Disparate Impact Discrimination Rules, Automated Employment Decision Toolssince
New JerseyOnline Bot Disclosure Law (A4563)since
New MexicoHB 182 (2024), AI-generated and manipulated media disclosure and disclaimer requirements in campaign advertisingsince label generated content; disclose the use of AI; do not do the named thing
New MexicoSexual Exploitation of Children Act, morphed and computer-generated image provisionsin forcedo not do the named thing
NevadaAB 325 (2025), human decision-making required for AI in emergency response and utility shutoffsince do not do the named thing; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
NevadaAB 406 (2025), AI mental and behavioral health care provider and marketing prohibitionssince do not do the named thing
NevadaAB 406 (2025), licensed provider restriction on direct clinical use of AIsince do not do the named thing; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
NevadaAB 73 (2025), AI-manipulated media disclosure in paid political communicationssince disclose the use of AI; label generated content
NevadaSB 213 (2025), AI-generated and digitally altered intimate imagessince do not do the named thing
NevadaSB 263 (2025), AI-generated and computer-generated child sexual abuse materialsince do not do the named thing
New YorkArtificial Intelligence Companion Models safeguardssince
New YorkDisclosure of materially deceptive AI-generated media in political communicationssince disclose the use of AI; label generated content
New YorkPrivate right of action for unlawful dissemination or publication of a sexually explicit depiction (digital replica)since get consent first; do not do the named thing
New YorkProhibition on Unsafe AI Companion Features for Minorsfrom , in 2 months
New YorkResponsible AI Safety and Education Act (RAISE Act)from , in 2 months
New YorkRight of privacy, use of a living person's name, portrait, picture, likeness, or voice for advertising or tradein forceget consent first; do not do the named thing
New YorkRight of publicity, digital replica of a deceased performersince do not do the named thing
New YorkS3008C Part X / Ch. 58 (2025), Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Actsince disclose the use of AI
New YorkSynthetic Performer Advertising Disclosure Lawsince disclose the use of AI; label generated content
New YorkUnlawful dissemination or publication of an intimate image (digitization amendment)since do not do the named thing
OklahomaComputer-generated child sexual abuse material prohibition (SB 53, 2025 amendment)since do not do the named thing
OklahomaHB 1364 (2025), nonconsensual dissemination of artificially generated sexual depictionssince do not do the named thing
OregonAI Companion Chatbot Safety Act (SB 1546)from , in 2 monthsdisclose the use of AI; label generated content; meet a design code; report to a regulator
OregonCampaign communication disclosure of synthetic media (SB 1571)since disclose the use of AI; label generated content
OregonUnlawful dissemination of an intimate image extended to AI-generated depictions (HB 2299)since do not do the named thing
OregonUse of nursing titles by a nonhuman entity (HB 2748)since do not do the named thing
PennsylvaniaAct 125 of 2024, artificially generated child sexual abuse materialsince do not do the named thing
PennsylvaniaAct 125 of 2024, artificially generated sexual depictions in the unlawful dissemination of intimate image offensesince do not do the named thing
PennsylvaniaAct 35 of 2025, digital forgerysince do not do the named thing
PennsylvaniaS.B. 806, Artificial Intelligence Deceptive Advertising Actfrom , in 6 weekslabel generated content; disclose the use of AI
Puerto RicoAI disclosure in political advertising and electoral communicationssince label generated content; disclose the use of AI
Rhode IslandArtificial Intelligence Companion Models Actfrom , in 2 months
Rhode IslandChild pornography prohibited, computer-generated and digitally altered depictionssince do not do the named thing
Rhode IslandDeceptive and Fraudulent Synthetic Media in Election Communicationssince disclose the use of AI; do not do the named thing
Rhode IslandOversight of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Mental Health Care Actsince
Rhode IslandUnauthorized dissemination of indecent material, digitally created or altered imagessince do not do the named thing
Rhode IslandUse of Artificial Intelligence by Healthcare Providers Notification Actsince
South CarolinaAI-Generated and Morphed Images of an Identifiable Minor (2025 Act No. 58, S.29)since do not do the named thing
South DakotaComputer-generated child pornography ban (SB 79, 2024)since do not do the named thing
South DakotaElection Deepfake Disclosure Law (SB 164, 2025)since do not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI
South DakotaNonconsensual Digitally Fabricated Intimate Image Law (SB 41, 2026)in forcedo not do the named thing
TennesseeAI-generated child sexual abuse material, tool possession and distribution offensesince do not do the named thing
TennesseeEnsuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security (ELVIS) Actsince do not do the named thing
TennesseeHealth Care AI Act, AI mental health professional representation prohibitionsince do not do the named thing
TennesseePreventing Deepfake Images Actsince do not do the named thing
TexasH.B. 3133 (2025), social media platform complaint system for explicit deep fake materialsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
TexasPolitical deep fake video ban (originally S.B. 751, 2019)since do not do the named thing
TexasS.B. 1188 (2025), AI diagnostic disclosure duty in electronic health recordssince disclose the use of AI
TexasS.B. 20 (2025), possession, promotion, or production of AI-generated or apparent child pornographysince do not do the named thing
TexasS.B. 441 (2025), civil liability for artificial intimate visual material and nudification applicationssince do not do the named thing
TexasS.B. 441 (2025), unlawful production or distribution of AI deep fake sexually explicit mediasince do not do the named thing
TexasS.B. 815 (2025), utilization review agent ban on automated decision systems for adverse determinationssince do not do the named thing
TexasTRAIGA (H.B. 149, 2025), Attorney General enforcement, civil investigative demand, cure period, penalties and defensessince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
TexasTRAIGA (H.B. 149, 2025), consumer AI-interaction disclosure dutysince disclose the use of AI
TexasTRAIGA (H.B. 149, 2025), prohibited AI practices binding any personsince do not do the named thing
UtahDigital Content Provenance Standards Act (HB 276, 2026 General Session), Utah Code Title 13 Chapter 72cfrom , in 2 monthslabel generated content; disclose the use of AI
UtahDigital Voyeurism Prevention Act (HB 276, 2026 General Session), Utah Code Title 13 Chapter 72bfrom , in 2 monthsdo not do the named thing; get consent first
UtahHB 452 (2025), mental health chatbot disclosuresince
UtahHealth Insurance Preauthorization AI Disclosure (SB 319, 2026 General Session)from , in 2 monthsdisclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
UtahIdentity Protection Modifications, AI Defamation and Identity Replication (SB 256, 2026 General Session)since get consent first; do not do the named thing
UtahSB 226 (2025), required disclosures for generative AI in consumer transactionssince
VirginiaComputer-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Materialin forcedo not do the named thing
VirginiaHB 2678 (2019), Deepfakes in Nonconsensual Image Disseminationsince do not do the named thing
VermontAct 156 (H.816), artificial intelligence in the provision of mental health servicessince do not do the named thing
VermontDisclosure of sexually explicit images without consent, digitized and computer-generated imagessince do not do the named thing
VermontVermont Synthetic Media in Elections Actsince disclose the use of AI; do not do the named thing
WashingtonAI companion chatbot disclosure and safety actfrom , in 2 monthslabel generated content; disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
WashingtonAI content provenance and disclosure actfrom , in 3 monthslabel generated content; disclose the use of AI
WashingtonDisclosing fabricated intimate imagessince do not do the named thing
WashingtonFabricated depictions of minors (sexual exploitation of children)since do not do the named thing
WashingtonForged digital likeness act (Personality Rights Law amendment)since do not do the named thing; get consent first
WashingtonSynthetic media in electioneering communicationssince disclose the use of AI; label generated content
Wisconsin2023 Wisconsin Act 123, AI-Generated Content Disclosure in Political Communicationssince label generated content
Wisconsin2023 Wisconsin Act 224, Possession of Virtual Child Pornographysince do not do the named thing
Wisconsin2025 Wisconsin Act 34, Synthetic Intimate Representation Bansince do not do the named thing
Wisconsin2025 Wisconsin Act 69, Disclosure of Technology-Altered Real Estate Advertisingfrom , in 2 monthslabel generated content
West VirginiaSB 198 (2025), computer-generated child pornography prohibitionsince do not do the named thing
West VirginiaSB 198 (2025), fabricated intimate image disclosure prohibitionsince do not do the named thing
WyomingArtificial Intelligence Offenses (2026 Wyoming House Bill 102, Enrolled Act No. 32)since do not do the named thing
United States, cities: 12 provisions in 12 jurisdictions
JurisdictionInstrumentWhenAsks of an app
BerkeleyProhibition on the Sale or Use of Coordinated Pricing Algorithmssince do not do the named thing
San DiegoProhibition of Anti-Competitive Automated Rent Price-Fixing Ordinance (Ord. O-21955 N.S.)since do not do the named thing
City and County of San FranciscoUse and Sale of Algorithmic Devices Prohibited (Rent Ordinance Sec. 37.10C), as amended by Ord. No. 169-25since do not do the named thing
Santa MonicaAlgorithmic Rental Price Fixing (Ord. No. 2817 (CCS))since do not do the named thing
RockvillePrice Coordination and Algorithmic Devicesfrom , in 2 monthsdo not do the named thing
MinneapolisProhibition on Use of Rent-Setting Algorithms (Ord. No. 2025-010)since do not do the named thing
HobokenOrd. No. B-781, Algorithmic Rent Fixing in Rental Housing Market Prohibitedsince do not do the named thing
Jersey CityOrdinance 25-057, Preventing Algorithmic Rent-Fixing in the Rental Housing Marketsince do not do the named thing
New York CityAutomated Employment Decision Tools Bias Audit and Notice Lawsince
City of PhiladelphiaBill No. 240823, Anti-Competitive Rental Practicessince do not do the named thing
ProvidenceProhibition of Algorithmic Rent Setting Devicessince do not do the named thing
SeattleOrdinance 127241 (Council Bill 121000), Algorithmic Rent Fixingsince do not do the named thing
Asia and the Pacific: 47 provisions in 15 jurisdictions
JurisdictionInstrumentWhenAsks of an app
AustraliaAustralian Consumer Law ss. 18, 29 and 34, Misleading Conduct and Representations about an AI Product's Capabilitiessince do not do the named thing
AustraliaUsing a Carriage Service to Transmit Sexual Material Without Consent (Deepfake Offences)since do not do the named thing
BangladeshCyber Security Act, 2026, AI-generated sexual content and CSAM bansince do not do the named thing
ChinaCivil Code, portrait right and protection of the voicesince get consent first; do not do the named thing
ChinaCybersecurity Law, Article 20 (state support for artificial intelligence)since
ChinaInterim Measures for the Administration of Anthropomorphic Interactive Services of Artificial Intelligence, Article 14 (minors)since
ChinaInterim Measures for the Administration of Anthropomorphic Interactive Services of Artificial Intelligence, Article 18since
ChinaInterim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services, Article 11 (user input and usage records)since
ChinaInterim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services, Article 12since
ChinaInterim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services, Article 14since
ChinaInterim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services, Articles 7 and 8 (training data)since
ChinaMeasures for Labeling AI-Generated Synthetic Contentsince label generated content
ChinaMeasures for Labeling AI-Generated Synthetic Content, Article 6 (content dissemination platforms)since
ChinaProvisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis Internet Information Services, Article 10since
ChinaProvisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis Internet Information Services, Articles 16 and 17since
IndonesiaElectronic Information and Transactions Law, electronic agent liabilitysince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
IndiaSynthetically Generated Information Labelling Duty for Intermediariessince
JapanAct on Promotion of Research and Development, and Utilization of Artificial Intelligence-related Technology (AI Promotion Act)since
JapanPublic Offices Election Act, AI-Generated Content Labelling Duty (2026 Amendment)from , in 4 monthslabel generated content; disclose the use of AI
KyrgyzstanDigital Code, Article 126: AI systems used in digital well-being services are systems of increased dangersince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
KyrgyzstanDigital Code, Chapter 23: AI interaction and deepfake disclosure dutiessince disclose the use of AI; label generated content
KyrgyzstanDigital Code, Chapter 23: AI system design and risk-management obligationssince assess the impact on personal data first; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
South KoreaAI Framework Act, Article 31 (transparency obligations for AI outputs)since
South KoreaAI Framework Act, Article 32 (safety-assurance duty for high-compute AI systems)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator
South KoreaAI Framework Act, Article 34 (business-operator duties for high-impact AI)since govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI; keep records for a set time
KazakhstanCode of Administrative Offences, artificial intelligence violationssince
KazakhstanDigital Code, algorithmic decision-making rightssince
KazakhstanLaw on Artificial Intelligence, copyright and training datasince
KazakhstanLaw on Artificial Intelligence, prohibited practicessince
KazakhstanLaw on Artificial Intelligence, transparency and disclosure dutiessince label generated content; disclose the use of AI
PhilippinesAnti-OSAEC and Anti-CSAEM Act, Computer-Generated Child Sexual Abuse or Exploitation Materialsin forcedo not do the named thing
PakistanPrevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016, child pornography offencesince do not do the named thing
SingaporeParliamentary Elections Act 1954, Ban on Manipulated Online Election Advertising Containing a Realistic but False Representation of a Candidatesince do not do the named thing
SingaporePenal Code, Distributing or Threatening to Distribute Intimate Image or Recordingsince do not do the named thing
SingaporeQuoine Pte Ltd v B2C2 Ltdsince
TaiwanArtificial Intelligence Basic Act (人工智慧基本法)in forcegovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
UzbekistanEthics Rules for creating, deploying and using AI-based solutionssince
UzbekistanLaw on Informatization, use of artificial intelligence in information resources and systemssince
VietnamDecree implementing the AI Law, risk classification, notification, conformity assessment and risk managementsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; report to a regulator
VietnamDecree implementing the AI Law, serious incident reporting and handlingsince tell somebody when there is a breach
VietnamDecree implementing the AI Law, transparency, technical marking and labeling of AI-generated contentsince disclose the use of AI; label generated content
VietnamLaw on Artificial Intelligence, incident management and reporting obligationsince tell somebody when there is a breach; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
VietnamLaw on Artificial Intelligence, inspection and examinationsince
VietnamLaw on Artificial Intelligence, prohibited practicessince
VietnamLaw on Artificial Intelligence, risk classification and conformity assessmentsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; assess the impact on personal data first; report to a regulator
VietnamLaw on Artificial Intelligence, transparency obligationsince label generated content; disclose the use of AI
VietnamNational Artificial Intelligence Ethics Framework (Circular No. 05/2026/TT-BKHCN)since
The Americas outside the United States: 38 provisions in 15 jurisdictions
JurisdictionInstrumentWhenAsks of an app
BrazilTSE Resolution, AI-Generated Content Disclosure Dutysince label generated content
BrazilTSE Resolution, Prohibition on Electoral Deepfakessince do not do the named thing
GoiásComplementary Law 205 of 2025, State Policy to Foster Innovation in Artificial Intelligencesince
BahamasSexual Offences Act, child pornography offencein forcedo not do the named thing
BelizePractice Direction No. 18 of 2025, ethical use of generative AI in court proceedingssince disclose the use of AI; do not do the named thing
CanadaBank Act: investment and lending policies, standards and proceduresin forcegovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
CanadaCIRO Rule 3100, Part B, conflicts of interestsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI
CanadaCIRO Rule 3400, suitability determinationsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
CanadaCIRO Rule 3600, communications with the publicsince do not do the named thing; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
CanadaCIRO Rule 3800, records and client reportingsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; keep records for a set time; disclose the use of AI
CanadaCIRO Rule 3900, supervisionsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
CanadaCIRO Rules 3200 and 3300, know your client and know your productsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
CanadaCanadian Human Rights Act, discriminatory practices in services, accommodation and employment, with the defences and the Tribunal's remediessince do not do the named thing
CanadaNational Instrument 31-103, compliance system and general recordssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
CanadaNational Instrument 31-103, know your client and know your productsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
CanadaNational Instrument 31-103, material conflicts of interestsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI
CanadaNational Instrument 31-103, relationship disclosure informationsince disclose the use of AI
CanadaNational Instrument 31-103, suitability determinationsince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
CanadaProtecting Victims Act, intimate images made by artificial intelligence software and threats to publish themsince do not do the named thing
AlbertaElection Finances and Contributions Disclosure Act, Part 6.21, political deepfakessince do not do the named thing
AlbertaProtection of Privacy Act, automated-system notice and decision accuracy duties of public bodiessince disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; keep records for a set time
British ColumbiaMoffatt v. Air Canadasince
ManitobaBusiness Practices Act, personalized algorithmic pricingsince do not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI; get consent first
ManitobaNon-Consensual Distribution of Intimate Images Act, civil action for fake intimate images created with artificial intelligencesince do not do the named thing
ManitobaPublic Sector Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity Governance Act, governance of public sector use of artificial intelligence systemsfrom a date not yet setdisclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; do not do the named thing
Nova ScotiaIntimate Images and Cyber-protection Act, fake intimate imagesin forcedo not do the named thing; disclose the use of AI
OntarioEmployment Standards Act, 2000, use of artificial intelligence in job postingssince disclose the use of AI
OntarioEnhancing Digital Security and Trust Act, 2024, use of artificial intelligence systems by public sector entitiessince disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
ColombiaCódigo Penal, Falsedad Personal, AI Deepfake Aggravationsince do not do the named thing
JamaicaPractice Direction No. 1 of 2025, Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court Proceedingssince disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
MexicoCódigo Penal Federal, Violación a la Intimidad Sexual (Arts. 199 Octies a 199 Decies), including manipulated or non-corresponding depictionssince do not do the named thing
MexicoReform to the Federal Labor Law and the Federal Copyright Law, AI Voice and Image Consent Regime for Performing Artistssince get consent first; put the terms in the contract; do not do the named thing
PeruReglamento de la Ley 31814, high-risk AI system dutiessince disclose the use of AI; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
PeruReglamento de la Ley 31814, prohibited AI usessince do not do the named thing; limits on biometric use
El SalvadorLey de Fomento a la Inteligencia Artificial y Tecnologías, decisiones de la IA o impulsadas por IAin force
El SalvadorLey de Fomento a la Inteligencia Artificial y Tecnologías, marco institucional, registro y evaluación de riesgosin forcegovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; hold a license or registration; assess the impact on personal data first
El SalvadorResolución ANIA 0001/2025, derecho a notificación ante decisiones automatizadasin force
El SalvadorResolución ANIA 0001/2025, registro obligatorio para decisiones consecuencialesin forcegovern the system: policies, roles, assessments; limits on biometric use; assess the impact on personal data first
Africa: 20 provisions in 11 jurisdictions
JurisdictionInstrumentWhenAsks of an app
AngolaPenal Code, Child Pornography Including a Virtual or Simulated Minorin forcedo not do the named thing
BeninDigital Code of the Republic of Benin, Livre VI, Article 576 (Unauthorised Image or Voice Montage / Synthetic-Media Prohibition)in forcedo not do the named thing; get consent first
Central African RepublicCode Pénal Centrafricain, article 111 (pornographie impliquant des enfants)in force
Cabo VerdeCybercrime Law, Child Pornography Including Simulated Representationsin forcedo not do the named thing
DjiboutiDigital Code, Book VI: Computer-Generated Child Pornography Banin forcedo not do the named thing
GabonOrdonnance n°0011/PR/2026, contenus interdits générés par intelligence artificiellesince do not do the named thing; label generated content
GabonOrdonnance n°0011/PR/2026, marquage des contenus générés par intelligence artificiellesince label generated content; report to a regulator
ComorosPenal Code, pornographic and manipulated image or representation offenses via an information systemsince do not do the named thing
MauritiusFinancial Services (Robotic and Artificial Intelligence Enabled Advisory Services) Rules 2021since hold a license or registration; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI; report to a regulator
MozambiqueNational Commission for Artificial Intelligence (CNIA), Establishment Decree (Decreto n.º 14/2026)since
NigeriaCentral Bank of Nigeria (Customer Due Diligence) Regulations 2023, monitoring of internet-based business and computerized monitoring systemssince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
NigeriaMoney Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022, customer due diligence, record retention and risk assessment of new technologiessince govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; keep records for a set time; assess the impact on personal data first
NigeriaMoney Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022, reports of single transactions above N5,000,000 for an individual and N10,000,000 for a body corporatesince report to a regulator
NigeriaMoney Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022, reports of suspicious transactions and the prohibition on tipping offsince report to a regulator; do not do the named thing
NigeriaNational Insurance Commission Guidelines for Insurtech Operations in Nigeria, licensing, technology security, lead management and limits on automated claims rejectionsince hold a license or registration; secure the system and the data in it; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; disclose the use of AI; get consent first
NigeriaSecurities and Exchange Commission Rule on Robo-Advisory Services, governance, testing, audit and disclosure duties for firms that give automated investment advicein forcehold a license or registration; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments; assess the impact on personal data first; disclose the use of AI; report to a regulator
NigeriaTerrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022, counter-financing of terrorism programmes and 24-hour reports of suspicious transactions to the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unitsince report to a regulator; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
NigeriaTerrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022, immediate freezing of the funds of designated persons and monitoring of accounts against the sanctions listssince do not do the named thing; report to a regulator; do not get in without authorization
TanzaniaCybercrimes Act, 2015, child sexual abuse material including computer-generated contentsince do not do the named thing
TanzaniaOnline Content Regulations, prohibited content including AI-generated contentsince do not do the named thing
The Middle East: 6 provisions in 5 jurisdictions
Elsewhere: 22 provisions in 16 jurisdictions
JurisdictionInstrumentWhenAsks of an app
AzerbaijanCode of Administrative Offences, distributing AI-made photo, video or audio without a labelfrom a date not yet setlabel generated content
AzerbaijanCriminal Code, making or distributing AI-made material that uses a person's image or voice without consentfrom a date not yet setdo not do the named thing; get consent first
AzerbaijanCriminal Code, making or distributing AI-made pornographic or sexual material that uses a person's image or voice without consentfrom a date not yet setdo not do the named thing; get consent first
AzerbaijanLaw on Information, Informatization and Protection of Information, label on publicly shown AI-made photo, video or audiofrom a date not yet setlabel generated content
BermudaCriminal Code Act 1907, making and distributing child abusive material or child pornographysince do not do the named thing
BhutanInformation, Communications and Media Act of Bhutan 2018, obscene communications depicting childrensince do not do the named thing
SwitzerlandSwiss Criminal Code, Pornographic Depictions of Non-Genuine Sexual Acts with Minorssince
IcelandAlmenn hegningarlög nr. 19/1940, Art. 210.a, Simulated and Non-Real Child Sexual Abuse Materialsince do not do the named thing
Saint Kitts and NevisElectronic Crimes Act, child pornography, including computer-generated depictionssince do not do the named thing
Cayman IslandsPenal Code 2019 Revision, indecent photographs and pseudo-photographs of childrensince do not do the named thing
MonacoCode Pénal Arts. 294-3 to 294-4, Child Sexual Abuse Material Including Realistic and AI-Generated Depictionssince do not do the named thing; report to a regulator
North MacedoniaCriminal Code, Production and Distribution of Child Pornographyin forcedo not do the named thing
RussiaFederal Law No. 243-FZ, Article 8, Duties of Sovereign and National Foundation Model Developersfrom , in 4 monthsgovern the system: policies, roles, assessments
RussiaFederal Law No. 243-FZ, Article 9, AI-Generated Content Noticefrom , in 4 monthslabel generated content
Timor-LestePenal Code, Article 176 (Child Pornography)since do not do the named thing
TurkeyCommercial Advertising Regulation, AI Deepfake Endorsement Bansince do not do the named thing
TurkeyCommercial Advertising Regulation, AI Disclosure Dutysince disclose the use of AI; label generated content
Vatican CityChild sexual abuse material offences (Legge N. VIII, arts. 4, 10-11)since do not do the named thing
Vatican CityGuidelines on Artificial Intelligence of Vatican City State (Decree No. DCCII)since do not do the named thing; label generated content; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
VanuatuDigital Transformation Act 2025, ICT service permit for AI and AI-related data servicessince hold a license or registration; govern the system: policies, roles, assessments
SamoaCrimes Act 2013, child pornography offence reaching synthetic and represented depictionssince do not do the named thing
KosovoCriminal Code of the Republic of Kosovo, Articles 225 and 232 (Child Pornography, Including Computer-Generated and Non-Existent-Child Images)since do not do the named thing