Law / United States / Tennessee

Health Care AI Act, AI mental health professional representation prohibition

Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-1-205 (Pub. Ch. 647, 2026)

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force 84 days, effective 1 July 2026.

An AI sector rules rule binding public and private bodies.

As of 6 September 2026.

What it requires

  • Do not advertise or represent to the public that an artificial intelligence system you develop or deploy is, or is able to act as, a qualified mental health professional.

If you get it wrong

Penalty structure

Civil penalty of $5,000 per violation, notwithstanding the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act's general civil penalty limits; enforced as an unfair or deceptive act under that Act.

Rule
Fixed only
As of
6 September 2026
Currency
USD
Fixed cap
5,000

What it reaches

Obligation class

Prohibition

What it makes you log

Logging duty

The Act's single substantive duty bars representing an AI system as a qualified mental health professional, enforced as a Tennessee Consumer Protection Act violation with its own civil penalty. Read in full, it states no duty to create, keep, or produce a record of any kind.

Kind
None
As of
21 September 2026

Who checks it

Audit expectation

none

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

A new section of the mental health code bars a person who develops or deploys an artificial intelligence system from advertising or representing to the public that the system is, or is able to act as, a qualified mental health professional. A violation is a violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977 and, notwithstanding that act's ordinary civil penalty limits, carries its own civil penalty of five thousand dollars per violation.

The act defines artificial intelligence broadly as models and systems capable of performing functions generally associated with human intelligence, including reasoning and learning.

When LexLint raises it

  • deploys_chatbot
  • high_risk_decisions

Read the law

official signed act text, Public Chapter 647 (2026), Tennessee Secretary of State

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app