Law / Frameworks / NIST AI RMF

NIST AI Risk Management Framework

Below are its 72 controls in the framework's own order, and under each one the laws we track that bear on it. Each mapping is our reading that a law bears on a control, never a finding that running the control meets the law.

Where the law lands in the framework

50of 72 controls have law1,141laws263jurisdictions

GOVERN 1.1: 63 laws in 34 jurisdictionsGOVERN 1.2: 6 laws in 6 jurisdictionsGOVERN 1.3: 6 laws in 4 jurisdictionsGOVERN 1.4: 19 laws in 14 jurisdictionsGOVERN 1.5: 7 laws in 7 jurisdictionsGOVERN 1.6: 8 laws in 7 jurisdictionsGOVERN 1.7: 1 law in 1 jurisdictionGOVERN 2.1: 9 laws in 7 jurisdictionsGOVERN 2.2: 3 laws in 2 jurisdictionsGOVERN 2.3: 9 laws in 7 jurisdictionsGOVERN 3.1: no law we trackGOVERN 3.2: 5 laws in 2 jurisdictionsGOVERN 4.1: 2 laws in 2 jurisdictionsGOVERN 4.2: 18 laws in 15 jurisdictionsGOVERN 4.3: 2 laws in 2 jurisdictionsGOVERN 5.1: 1 law in 1 jurisdictionGOVERN 5.2: no law we trackGOVERN 6.1: 14 laws in 12 jurisdictionsGOVERN 6.2: 1 law in 1 jurisdictionMAP 1.1: 3 laws in 2 jurisdictionsMAP 1.2: no law we trackMAP 1.3: no law we trackMAP 1.4: no law we trackMAP 1.5: 1 law in 1 jurisdictionMAP 1.6: 33 laws in 26 jurisdictionsMAP 2.1: no law we trackMAP 2.2: 11 laws in 8 jurisdictionsMAP 2.3: 18 laws in 13 jurisdictionsMAP 3.1: no law we trackMAP 3.2: no law we trackMAP 3.3: 240 laws in 125 jurisdictionsMAP 3.3 240MAP 3.4: 3 laws in 2 jurisdictionsMAP 3.5: 99 laws in 83 jurisdictionsMAP 4.1: 591 laws in 239 jurisdictionsMAP 4.1 591MAP 4.2: no law we trackMAP 5.1: 22 laws in 18 jurisdictionsMAP 5.2: no law we trackMEASURE 1.1: no law we trackMEASURE 1.2: 1 law in 1 jurisdictionMEASURE 1.3: 10 laws in 8 jurisdictionsMEASURE 2.1: 1 law in 1 jurisdictionMEASURE 2.2: 1 law in 1 jurisdictionMEASURE 2.3: 6 laws in 3 jurisdictionsMEASURE 2.4: 27 laws in 16 jurisdictionsMEASURE 2.5: 7 laws in 5 jurisdictionsMEASURE 2.6: 22 laws in 20 jurisdictionsMEASURE 2.7: 10 laws in 7 jurisdictionsMEASURE 2.8: 146 laws in 80 jurisdictionsMEASURE 2.8 146MEASURE 2.9: 42 laws in 33 jurisdictionsMEASURE 2.10: 28 laws in 24 jurisdictionsMEASURE 2.11: 24 laws in 19 jurisdictionsMEASURE 2.12: no law we trackMEASURE 2.13: no law we trackMEASURE 3.1: 2 laws in 2 jurisdictionsMEASURE 3.2: no law we trackMEASURE 3.3: 52 laws in 45 jurisdictionsMEASURE 4.1: no law we trackMEASURE 4.2: no law we trackMEASURE 4.3: no law we trackMANAGE 1.1: 6 laws in 3 jurisdictionsMANAGE 1.2: no law we trackMANAGE 1.3: 14 laws in 10 jurisdictionsMANAGE 1.4: no law we trackMANAGE 2.1: 1 law in 1 jurisdictionMANAGE 2.2: no law we trackMANAGE 2.3: 1 law in 1 jurisdictionMANAGE 2.4: 21 laws in 11 jurisdictionsMANAGE 3.1: 3 laws in 3 jurisdictionsMANAGE 3.2: no law we trackMANAGE 4.1: 22 laws in 15 jurisdictionsMANAGE 4.2: no law we trackMANAGE 4.3: 15 laws in 9 jurisdictions1234561234512341234GOVERNMAPMEASUREMANAGE

Of these laws, 994 are in force, 98 not yet in force, 2 blocked by a court, and 47 proposed and not law.

8 of the 18 controls under Map have no law we track under them.

  • in force
  • not yet in force
  • blocked by a court
  • proposed
  • no law we track
A bar's height is its number of laws. Select one to open the control.

Each requirement line of the AI, scraping and news aggregation laws we track was read on its own and mapped to the control it bears on most closely, and to a second or third only where the line has more than one limb. Lines of the privacy laws that reach a control in the NIST framework for their own subject were read against it as well, where their subject reaches into it, and count here wherever they land on a control.

Govern

17 of 19 controls with law
ControlWhat it saysLaws, by stateLawsJurisdictionsNot yet in forceBlockedProposed
GOVERN 1Policies, processes, procedures, and practices across the organization related to the mapping, measuring, and managing of AI risks are in place, transparent, and implemented effectively.
GOVERN 1.1 Legal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and documented. 63 laws, 13 not yet in force, 7 proposed 63 34 13 0 7
GOVERN 1.2 The characteristics of trustworthy AI are integrated into organizational policies, processes, procedures, and practices. 6 laws, 2 proposed 6 6 0 0 2
GOVERN 1.3 Processes, procedures, and practices are in place to determine the needed level of risk management activities based on the organization’s risk tolerance. 6 laws, 1 not yet in force 6 4 1 0 0
GOVERN 1.4 The risk management process and its outcomes are established through transparent policies, procedures, and other controls based on organizational risk priorities. 19 laws, 7 not yet in force, 1 proposed 19 14 7 0 1
GOVERN 1.5 Ongoing monitoring and periodic review of the risk management process and its outcomes are planned and organizational roles and responsibilities clearly defined, including determining the frequency of periodic review. 7 laws, 1 not yet in force, 1 proposed 7 7 1 0 1
GOVERN 1.6 Mechanisms are in place to inventory AI systems and are resourced according to organizational risk priorities. 8 laws, 1 not yet in force 8 7 1 0 0
GOVERN 1.7 Processes and procedures are in place for decommissioning and phasing out AI systems safely and in a manner that does not increase risks or decrease the organization’s trustworthiness. 1 law, 1 not yet in force 1 1 1 0 0
GOVERN 2Accountability structures are in place so that the appropriate teams and individuals are empowered, responsible, and trained for mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks.
GOVERN 2.1 Roles and responsibilities and lines of communication related to mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks are documented and are clear to individuals and teams throughout the organization. 9 laws 9 7 0 0 0
GOVERN 2.2 The organization’s personnel and partners receive AI risk management training to enable them to perform their duties and responsibilities consistent with related policies, procedures, and agreements. 3 laws 3 2 0 0 0
GOVERN 2.3 Executive leadership of the organization takes responsibility for decisions about risks associated with AI system development and deployment. 9 laws, 2 proposed 9 7 0 0 2
GOVERN 3Workforce diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility processes are prioritized in the mapping, measuring, and managing of AI risks throughout the lifecycle.
GOVERN 3.1 Decision-making related to mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks throughout the lifecycle is informed by a diverse team (e.g., diversity of demographics, disciplines, experience, expertise, and backgrounds). no law we track no law we track
GOVERN 3.2 Policies and procedures are in place to define and differentiate roles and responsibilities for human-AI configurations and oversight of AI systems. 5 laws, 3 not yet in force 5 2 3 0 0
GOVERN 4Organizational teams are committed to a culture that considers and communicates AI risk.
GOVERN 4.1 Organizational policies and practices are in place to foster a critical thinking and safety-first mindset in the design, development, deployment, and uses of AI systems to minimize potential negative impacts. 2 laws, 1 not yet in force 2 2 1 0 0
GOVERN 4.2 Organizational teams document the risks and potential impacts of the AI technology they design, develop, deploy, evaluate, and use, and they communicate about the impacts more broadly. 18 laws, 6 not yet in force, 4 proposed 18 15 6 0 4
GOVERN 4.3 Organizational practices are in place to enable AI testing, identification of incidents, and information sharing. 2 laws, 1 not yet in force 2 2 1 0 0
GOVERN 5Processes are in place for robust engagement with relevant AI actors.
GOVERN 5.1 Organizational policies and practices are in place to collect, consider, prioritize, and integrate feedback from those external to the team that developed or deployed the AI system regarding the potential individual and societal impacts related to AI risks. 1 law 1 1 0 0 0
GOVERN 5.2 Mechanisms are established to enable the team that developed or deployed AI systems to regularly incorporate adjudicated feedback from relevant AI actors into system design and implementation. no law we track no law we track
GOVERN 6Policies and procedures are in place to address AI risks and benefits arising from third-party software and data and other supply chain issues.
GOVERN 6.1 Policies and procedures are in place that address AI risks associated with third-party entities, including risks of infringement of a third-party’s intellectual property or other rights. 14 laws, 3 not yet in force 14 12 3 0 0
GOVERN 6.2 Contingency processes are in place to handle failures or incidents in third-party data or AI systems deemed to be high-risk. 1 law 1 1 0 0 0

Map

10 of 18 controls with law
ControlWhat it saysLaws, by stateLawsJurisdictionsNot yet in forceBlockedProposed
MAP 1Context is established and understood.
MAP 1.1 Intended purposes, potentially beneficial uses, context-specific laws, norms and expectations, and prospective settings in which the AI system will be deployed are understood and documented. Considerations include: the specific set or types of users along with their expectations; potential positive and negative impacts of system uses to individuals, communities, organizations, society, and the planet; assumptions and related limitations about AI system purposes, uses, and risks across the development or product AI lifecycle; and related TEVV and system metrics. 3 laws, 2 not yet in force 3 2 2 0 0
MAP 1.2 Interdisciplinary AI actors, competencies, skills, and capacities for establishing context reflect demographic diversity and broad domain and user experience expertise, and their participation is documented. Opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration are prioritized. no law we track no law we track
MAP 1.3 The organization’s mission and relevant goals for AI technology are understood and documented. no law we track no law we track
MAP 1.4 The business value or context of business use has been clearly defined or – in the case of assessing existing AI systems – re-evaluated. no law we track no law we track
MAP 1.5 Organizational risk tolerances are determined and documented. 1 law 1 1 0 0 0
MAP 1.6 System requirements (e.g., “the system shall respect the privacy of its users”) are elicited from and understood by relevant AI actors. Design decisions take socio-technical implications into account to address AI risks. 33 laws, 8 not yet in force, 1 proposed 33 26 8 0 1
MAP 2Categorization of the AI system is performed.
MAP 2.1 The specific tasks and methods used to implement the tasks that the AI system will support are defined (e.g., classifiers, generative models, recommenders). no law we track no law we track
MAP 2.2 Information about the AI system’s knowledge limits and how system output may be utilized and overseen by humans is documented. Documentation provides sufficient information to assist relevant AI actors when making decisions and taking subsequent actions. 11 laws, 8 not yet in force, 2 proposed 11 8 8 0 2
MAP 2.3 Scientific integrity and TEVV considerations are identified and documented, including those related to experimental design, data collection and selection (e.g., availability, representativeness, suitability), system trustworthiness, and construct validation. 18 laws, 4 not yet in force, 1 proposed 18 13 4 0 1
MAP 3AI capabilities, targeted usage, goals, and expected benefits and costs compared with appropriate benchmarks are understood.
MAP 3.1 Potential benefits of intended AI system functionality and performance are examined and documented. no law we track no law we track
MAP 3.2 Potential costs, including non-monetary costs, which result from expected or realized AI errors or system functionality and trustworthiness – as connected to organizational risk tolerance – are examined and documented. no law we track no law we track
MAP 3.3 Targeted application scope is specified and documented based on the system’s capability, established context, and AI system categorization. 240 laws, 25 not yet in force, 2 blocked, 12 proposed 240 125 25 2 12
MAP 3.4 Processes for operator and practitioner proficiency with AI system performance and trustworthiness – and relevant technical standards and certifications – are defined, assessed, and documented. 3 laws, 1 not yet in force 3 2 1 0 0
MAP 3.5 Processes for human oversight are defined, assessed, and documented in accordance with organizational policies from the GOVERN function. 99 laws, 16 not yet in force, 5 proposed 99 83 16 0 5
MAP 4Risks and benefits are mapped for all components of the AI system including third-party software and data.
MAP 4.1 Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components – including the use of third-party data or software – are in place, followed, and documented, as are risks of infringement of a third party’s intellectual property or other rights. 591 laws, 10 not yet in force, 3 proposed 591 239 10 0 3
MAP 4.2 Internal risk controls for components of the AI system, including third-party AI technologies, are identified and documented. no law we track no law we track
MAP 5Impacts to individuals, groups, communities, organizations, and society are characterized.
MAP 5.1 Likelihood and magnitude of each identified impact (both potentially beneficial and harmful) based on expected use, past uses of AI systems in similar contexts, public incident reports, feedback from those external to the team that developed or deployed the AI system, or other data are identified and documented. 22 laws, 2 not yet in force, 8 proposed 22 18 2 0 8
MAP 5.2 Practices and personnel for supporting regular engagement with relevant AI actors and integrating feedback about positive, negative, and unanticipated impacts are in place and documented. no law we track no law we track

Measure

15 of 22 controls with law
ControlWhat it saysLaws, by stateLawsJurisdictionsNot yet in forceBlockedProposed
MEASURE 1Appropriate methods and metrics are identified and applied.
MEASURE 1.1 Approaches and metrics for measurement of AI risks enumerated during the MAP function are selected for implementation starting with the most significant AI risks. The risks or trustworthiness characteristics that will not – or cannot – be measured are properly documented. no law we track no law we track
MEASURE 1.2 Appropriateness of AI metrics and effectiveness of existing controls are regularly assessed and updated, including reports of errors and potential impacts on affected communities. 1 law 1 1 0 0 0
MEASURE 1.3 Internal experts who did not serve as front-line developers for the system and/or independent assessors are involved in regular assessments and updates. Domain experts, users, AI actors external to the team that developed or deployed the AI system, and affected communities are consulted in support of assessments as necessary per organizational risk tolerance. 10 laws, 3 not yet in force, 1 proposed 10 8 3 0 1
MEASURE 2AI systems are evaluated for trustworthy characteristics.
MEASURE 2.1 Test sets, metrics, and details about the tools used during TEVV are documented. 1 law 1 1 0 0 0
MEASURE 2.2 Evaluations involving human subjects meet applicable requirements (including human subject protection) and are representative of the relevant population. 1 law 1 1 0 0 0
MEASURE 2.3 AI system performance or assurance criteria are measured qualitatively or quantitatively and demonstrated for conditions similar to deployment setting(s). Measures are documented. 6 laws, 3 not yet in force 6 3 3 0 0
MEASURE 2.4 The functionality and behavior of the AI system and its components – as identified in the MAP function – are monitored when in production. 27 laws, 10 not yet in force, 1 proposed 27 16 10 0 1
MEASURE 2.5 The AI system to be deployed is demonstrated to be valid and reliable. Limitations of the generalizability beyond the conditions under which the technology was developed are documented. 7 laws, 1 not yet in force 7 5 1 0 0
MEASURE 2.6 The AI system is evaluated regularly for safety risks – as identified in the MAP function. The AI system to be deployed is demonstrated to be safe, its residual negative risk does not exceed the risk tolerance, and it can fail safely, particularly if made to operate beyond its knowledge limits. Safety metrics reflect system reliability and robustness, real-time monitoring, and response times for AI system failures. 22 laws, 9 not yet in force, 1 proposed 22 20 9 0 1
MEASURE 2.7 AI system security and resilience – as identified in the MAP function – are evaluated and documented. 10 laws, 3 not yet in force, 1 proposed 10 7 3 0 1
MEASURE 2.8 Risks associated with transparency and accountability – as identified in the MAP function – are examined and documented. 146 laws, 26 not yet in force, 1 blocked, 22 proposed 146 80 26 1 22
MEASURE 2.9 The AI model is explained, validated, and documented, and AI system output is interpreted within its context – as identified in the MAP function – to inform responsible use and governance. 42 laws, 11 not yet in force, 1 proposed 42 33 11 0 1
MEASURE 2.10 Privacy risk of the AI system – as identified in the MAP function – is examined and documented. 28 laws, 4 not yet in force, 2 proposed 28 24 4 0 2
MEASURE 2.11 Fairness and bias – as identified in the MAP function – are evaluated and results are documented. 24 laws, 5 not yet in force, 1 proposed 24 19 5 0 1
MEASURE 2.12 Environmental impact and sustainability of AI model training and management activities – as identified in the MAP function – are assessed and documented. no law we track no law we track
MEASURE 2.13 Effectiveness of the employed TEVV metrics and processes in the MEASURE function are evaluated and documented. no law we track no law we track
MEASURE 3Mechanisms for tracking identified AI risks over time are in place.
MEASURE 3.1 Approaches, personnel, and documentation are in place to regularly identify and track existing, unanticipated, and emergent AI risks based on factors such as intended and actual performance in deployed contexts. 2 laws, 1 not yet in force, 1 proposed 2 2 1 0 1
MEASURE 3.2 Risk tracking approaches are considered for settings where AI risks are difficult to assess using currently available measurement techniques or where metrics are not yet available. no law we track no law we track
MEASURE 3.3 Feedback processes for end users and impacted communities to report problems and appeal system outcomes are established and integrated into AI system evaluation metrics. 52 laws, 9 not yet in force, 8 proposed 52 45 9 0 8
MEASURE 4Feedback about efficacy of measurement is gathered and assessed.
MEASURE 4.1 Measurement approaches for identifying AI risks are connected to deployment context(s) and informed through consultation with domain experts and other end users. Approaches are documented. no law we track no law we track
MEASURE 4.2 Measurement results regarding AI system trustworthiness in deployment context(s) and across the AI lifecycle are informed by input from domain experts and relevant AI actors to validate whether the system is performing consistently as intended. Results are documented. no law we track no law we track
MEASURE 4.3 Measurable performance improvements or declines based on consultations with relevant AI actors, including affected communities, and field data about context-relevant risks and trustworthiness characteristics are identified and documented. no law we track no law we track

Manage

8 of 13 controls with law
ControlWhat it saysLaws, by stateLawsJurisdictionsNot yet in forceBlockedProposed
MANAGE 1AI risks based on assessments and other analytical output from the MAP and MEASURE functions are prioritized, responded to, and managed.
MANAGE 1.1 A determination is made as to whether the AI system achieves its intended purposes and stated objectives and whether its development or deployment should proceed. 6 laws, 3 not yet in force, 1 proposed 6 3 3 0 1
MANAGE 1.2 Treatment of documented AI risks is prioritized based on impact, likelihood, and available resources or methods. no law we track no law we track
MANAGE 1.3 Responses to the AI risks deemed high priority, as identified by the MAP function, are developed, planned, and documented. Risk response options can include mitigating, transferring, avoiding, or accepting. 14 laws, 2 not yet in force, 6 proposed 14 10 2 0 6
MANAGE 1.4 Negative residual risks (defined as the sum of all unmitigated risks) to both downstream acquirers of AI systems and end users are documented. no law we track no law we track
MANAGE 2Strategies to maximize AI benefits and minimize negative impacts are planned, prepared, implemented, documented, and informed by input from relevant AI actors.
MANAGE 2.1 Resources required to manage AI risks are taken into account – along with viable non-AI alternative systems, approaches, or methods – to reduce the magnitude or likelihood of potential impacts. 1 law, 1 not yet in force 1 1 1 0 0
MANAGE 2.2 Mechanisms are in place and applied to sustain the value of deployed AI systems. no law we track no law we track
MANAGE 2.3 Procedures are followed to respond to and recover from a previously unknown risk when it is identified. 1 law, 1 not yet in force 1 1 1 0 0
MANAGE 2.4 Mechanisms are in place and applied, and responsibilities are assigned and understood, to supersede, disengage, or deactivate AI systems that demonstrate performance or outcomes inconsistent with intended use. 21 laws, 6 not yet in force, 2 proposed 21 11 6 0 2
MANAGE 3AI risks and benefits from third-party entities are managed.
MANAGE 3.1 AI risks and benefits from third-party resources are regularly monitored, and risk controls are applied and documented. 3 laws, 1 not yet in force 3 3 1 0 0
MANAGE 3.2 Pre-trained models which are used for development are monitored as part of AI system regular monitoring and maintenance. no law we track no law we track
MANAGE 4Risk treatments, including response and recovery, and communication plans for the identified and measured AI risks are documented and monitored regularly.
MANAGE 4.1 Post-deployment AI system monitoring plans are implemented, including mechanisms for capturing and evaluating input from users and other relevant AI actors, appeal and override, decommissioning, incident response, recovery, and change management. 22 laws, 5 not yet in force 22 15 5 0 0
MANAGE 4.2 Measurable activities for continual improvements are integrated into AI system updates and include regular engagement with interested parties, including relevant AI actors. no law we track no law we track
MANAGE 4.3 Incidents and errors are communicated to relevant AI actors, including affected communities. Processes for tracking, responding to, and recovering from incidents and errors are followed and documented. 15 laws, 5 not yet in force, 3 proposed 15 9 5 0 3

AI duties with no home in the NIST AI RMF

396 lines in 97 laws

Each line below was read against the AI RMF and recorded as having no control to sit under.

AI sector rules 67

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
California Employment Automated Decision Systems Act (SB 947) from , in 8 months

Do not discharge, demote, suspend, or otherwise retaliate against an employee for exercising their rights under this part

Canada Bank Act: investment and lending policies, standards and procedures

Have the directors of the bank establish investment and lending policies, standards and procedures that a reasonable and prudent person would apply in respect of a portfolio of investments and loans, to avoid undue risk of loss and obtain a reasonable return.

Adhere to those investment and lending policies, standards and procedures.

Canada CIRO Guidance Note GN-2300-21-003, outsourcing arrangements

It reaches you if you are a Dealer Member of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) that outsources an activity to a service provider, whether or not the provider is also a Dealer: CIRO says you retain the responsibility to ensure that those activities are conducted in accordance with the applicable rules and securities legislation, and that you must, at a minimum, supervise the activities the provider performs on your behalf in a manner similar to the supervision that would be required if you performed them yourself.

CIRO says the rules effectively prohibit outsourcing most client-facing activities, among them a Registered Representative's assessment of the information collected from the client for know-your-client purposes (sections 3202 through 3209) and a Registered Representative's performance of suitability assessments (sections 3402 through 3406).

+4 more
Canada CIRO Rule 3100, Part B, conflicts of interest

It reaches you if you are a Dealer Member of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO), which Canada's provincial and territorial securities regulators recognize as a self-regulatory organization, or an Approved Person of one, because a hearing panel that finds a Dealer Member or an Approved Person has contravened a CIRO requirement may impose sanctions on it (Rules 8209 and 8210), and the Rules exclude a Mutual Fund Dealer Member from the term Dealer Member: take reasonable steps to identify existing material conflicts of interest, and material conflicts of interest that are reasonably foreseeable, between you and the client and between each Approved Person acting on your behalf and the client (Rule 3110(1)).

Address all material conflicts of interest between you, including each Approved Person acting on your behalf, and the client in the best interest of the client, and avoid a material conflict that is not, or cannot be, otherwise addressed in the best interest of the client (Rule 3112(1) and (2)).

+4 more
Canada CIRO Rule 3400, suitability determination

It reaches you if you are a Dealer Member of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO), which Canada's provincial and territorial securities regulators recognize as a self-regulatory organization, or an Approved Person of one, because a hearing panel that finds a Dealer Member or an Approved Person has contravened a CIRO requirement may impose sanctions on it (Rules 8209 and 8210), and the Rules exclude a Mutual Fund Dealer Member from the term Dealer Member: before you purchase, sell, withdraw, exchange or transfer-out securities or precious metals bullion, or transact in derivatives for a retail client's account, take any other investment action for a client, make a recommendation or exercise discretion to take any such action, determine on a reasonable basis that the action is suitable for the retail client, based on the client's information, your assessment of the security or derivative under Rule 3300, the impact on the account including concentration and liquidity, the impact of costs on the client's returns and a reasonable range of alternative actions, and that it puts the retail client's interest first; this does not apply to an order execution only account or a direct electronic access account (Rules 3402(1) and 3404(1)).

Review the retail client's account and the securities, derivatives or precious metals bullion in it to determine whether those criteria are met, and take reasonable steps within a reasonable time, after a deposit or transfer-in, the designation of a new Registered Representative, Portfolio Manager or Associate Portfolio Manager, a change in the client's information or in a security or derivative in the account, or your review of the client's information under subsection 3209(4) (Rule 3402(2)).

+5 more
Canada CIRO Rule 3600, communications with the public

It reaches you if you are a Dealer Member of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO), which Canada's provincial and territorial securities regulators recognize as a self-regulatory organization, or an Approved Person of one, because a hearing panel that finds a Dealer Member or an Approved Person has contravened a CIRO requirement may impose sanctions on it (Rules 8209 and 8210), and the Rules exclude a Mutual Fund Dealer Member from the term Dealer Member: do not issue, participate in or knowingly allow the use of your name in any advertisement, sales literature or correspondence, terms that reach any written or electronic communication for client use or prepared for distribution to a single current or prospective client, that contains an untrue statement or omission of a material fact or is otherwise false or misleading, contains an unjustified promise of specific results, uses unrepresentative statistics to suggest unwarranted or exaggerated conclusions or fails to identify the material assumptions made, contains any opinion or forecast of future events that is not clearly labeled as such, fails to fairly present the potential risks to the client, is detrimental to the interests of the public, CIRO or its Dealer Members, or fails to comply with Corporation requirements or any applicable laws (Rule 3602(1)).

Have policies and procedures that specifically address communication with the public and the review and supervision of advertisements, sales literature and correspondence relating to your business, and monitor compliance with them (Rules 3601(1) and 3602(2)).

+4 more
Canada CIRO Rule 3800, records and client reporting

It reaches you if you are a Dealer Member of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO), which Canada's provincial and territorial securities regulators recognize as a self-regulatory organization, or an Approved Person of one, because a hearing panel that finds a Dealer Member or an Approved Person has contravened a CIRO requirement may impose sanctions on it (Rules 8209 and 8210), and the Rules exclude a Mutual Fund Dealer Member from the term Dealer Member: retain copies of all records required under Corporation requirements, in durable and accessible form, for a minimum of seven years from the date the record is created, unless Corporation requirements or securities laws relating to the specific type of record require a different retention period (Rule 3803(1)).

Maintain current records that properly record your business activities, financial position, financial operating results and client transactions and that demonstrate your compliance with securities laws and Corporation requirements, including records that provide an audit trail for client instructions, orders and transactions and for each trade transmitted or transaction executed for a client or on your own behalf, that demonstrate compliance with the know-your-client, account appropriateness, product due diligence, know-your-product and suitability determination requirements and with the complaint handling requirements, and that document correspondence with clients (Rule 3804(1) and (2)).

+4 more
Canada CIRO Rule 3900, supervision

It reaches you if you are a Dealer Member of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO), which Canada's provincial and territorial securities regulators recognize as a self-regulatory organization, or an Approved Person of one, because a hearing panel that finds a Dealer Member or an Approved Person has contravened a CIRO requirement may impose sanctions on it (Rules 8209 and 8210), and the Rules exclude a Mutual Fund Dealer Member from the term Dealer Member: establish policies and procedures for a supervisory system to supervise the activities of all your employees and Approved Persons that provides reasonable assurance they comply with Corporation requirements and securities laws, put them in writing, and amend them within a reasonable time after changes in Corporation requirements or securities laws (Rule 3904(1) and (2)).

Assign sufficient personnel and commit adequate resources to fully and properly apply and enforce your policies and procedures, take reasonable steps to ensure your Supervisors and Executives are fully proficient and understand the products and services of the people they supervise, and have procedures in place that ensure Supervisors are properly performing their supervisory functions (Rule 3905(1), (5) and (6)).

+5 more
Canada CIRO Rules 3200 and 3300, know your client and know your product

It reaches you if you are a Dealer Member of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO), which Canada's provincial and territorial securities regulators recognize as a self-regulatory organization, or an Approved Person of one, because a hearing panel that finds a Dealer Member or an Approved Person has contravened a CIRO requirement may impose sanctions on it (Rules 8209 and 8210), and the Rules exclude a Mutual Fund Dealer Member from the term Dealer Member: take reasonable steps to learn and remain informed of the essential facts relative to every order, account and client you accept, including establishing the client's identity and collecting sufficient information about the client's personal circumstances, financial circumstances, investment needs and objectives, investment knowledge, risk profile and investment time horizon to enable you to meet your obligations under Rule 3400 (Rule 3202(1)).

Within a reasonable time after you receive that information, take reasonable steps to have the client confirm its accuracy (Rule 3202(3)).

+5 more
Canada Companion Policy 31-103CP, know your client and suitability guidance

It reaches you if you are a registrant that uses standardized questionnaires or other tools to collect or update a client's know your client information, including through an online adviser: the Canadian Securities Administrators say the process must amount to a meaningful interaction between the client and the registrant, and that you remain responsible for the know your client process.

The Canadian Securities Administrators say the know your client obligation does not vary depending on the medium through which you interact with your client to gather the necessary information, and that responsibilities arising from it cannot be delegated.

+2 more
Show the other 57 laws
Canada CSA Staff Notice 31-342, guidance for portfolio managers regarding online advice

CSA staff say your know your client process must amount to a meaningful discussion with the client or prospective client, even if that discussion is not a face-to-face conversation, and cannot be a tick the box exercise; clients should be able to start a live interaction with an advising representative by telephone, video link, email or internet chat.

CSA staff say you must gather your own know your client information and make your own suitability determinations, and cannot rely on information provided under a referral arrangement or otherwise delegate those obligations to someone else.

+2 more
Canada National Instrument 31-103, compliance system and general records

It reaches you if you are a registered firm, meaning a registered dealer, a registered adviser or a registered investment fund manager: establish, maintain and apply policies and procedures that establish a system of controls and supervision sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that the firm and each individual acting on its behalf complies with securities legislation and to manage the risks associated with its business in accordance with prudent business practices (section 11.1(1)).

Provide training to your registered individuals on compliance with securities legislation, including the obligations under sections 13.2, 13.2.1, 13.3, 13.4 and 13.4.1 (section 11.1(2)).

+4 more
Canada National Instrument 31-103, know your client and know your product

It reaches you if you are a registrant dealing with a client, other than an investment fund manager in respect of its activities as one and other than where the client is a registered firm, a Canadian financial institution or a Schedule III bank: take reasonable steps to establish the identity of the client and, if you have cause for concern, make reasonable inquiries as to the reputation of the client (sections 13.1 and 13.2(2)(a) and (5)).

Take reasonable steps to establish whether the client is an insider of a reporting issuer or any other issuer whose securities are publicly traded (section 13.2(2)(b)).

+7 more
Canada National Instrument 31-103, material conflicts of interest

It reaches you if you are a registered firm, meaning a registered dealer, a registered adviser or a registered investment fund manager, other than an investment fund manager in respect of an investment fund that is subject to National Instrument 81-107: take reasonable steps to identify existing material conflicts of interest, and material conflicts of interest that are reasonably foreseeable, between the firm and the client and between each individual acting on the firm's behalf and the client (sections 13.4(1) and 13.4.2).

Address all material conflicts of interest between a client and the firm, including each individual acting on its behalf, in the best interest of the client (section 13.4(2)).

+5 more
Canada National Instrument 31-103, relationship disclosure information

It reaches you if you are a registered firm, meaning a registered dealer, a registered adviser or a registered investment fund manager, other than a firm exempted from subsections 14.2(2) to (6) by Part 9 as a member of a self-regulatory organization: deliver to each client all information that a reasonable investor would consider important about the client's relationship with the registrant (section 14.2(1)).

Include in that information a description of the nature or type of the client's account; a general description of the products and services you will offer, including restrictions on the client's ability to liquidate or resell a security; and a general description of any limits on the products and services you will offer, including whether you will primarily or exclusively offer proprietary products (section 14.2(2)(a), (b) and (b.1)).

+5 more
Canada National Instrument 31-103, suitability determination

It reaches you if you are a registrant, other than where the client is a registered firm, a Canadian financial institution or a Schedule III bank, other than a registered dealer buying or selling securities for the client only as directed by a registered adviser acting for the client, and other than a dealer or dealing representative relieved by Part 3 or Part 9 as a member of a self-regulatory organization: before you open an account for a client, purchase, sell, deposit, exchange or transfer securities for a client's account, take any other investment action for a client, make a recommendation to a client or exercise discretion to take any such action, determine on a reasonable basis that the action is suitable for the client and puts the client's interest first (section 13.3(1), (3) and (4)).

Base the suitability determination on the client's information collected under section 13.2, your assessment or understanding of the security consistent with section 13.2.1, the impact of the action on the client's account including the concentration of securities within the account and the liquidity of those securities, the potential and actual impact of costs on the client's return on investment, and a reasonable range of alternative actions available to you through the registered firm at the time you make the determination (section 13.3(1)(a)).

+2 more
Estonia Väärtpaberituru seadus Sections 82^15 and 82^16, Algorithmic Trading and Direct Electronic Access Controls

If you give a client direct electronic access to a trading venue, apply effective systems and controls to assess the client's suitability, review that assessment regularly, ensure the client observes trading thresholds and limits and monitor its trading, and conclude a binding written agreement under which you remain responsible (section 82^16(1) and (4)).

Estonia Võlaõigusseadus Section 55^2, Explanations to Consumers and Human Intervention in Online Financial Services

If you are a trader offering a financial services contract by means of distance communication, give the consumer free explanations before the contract is concluded so that the consumer can assess whether the contract and any additional services suit the consumer's needs and financial situation (Võlaõigusseadus, section 55^2(1)).

Be ready to prove that you gave adequate explanations, including the human intervention (section 55^2(3)).

European Union Anti-Money-Laundering Regulation: Reporting of Suspicions to the Financial Intelligence Unit and Prohibition of Disclosure (Articles 69 and 73) from , in 8 months

It reaches you if you are an obliged entity within Article 3, which lists credit institutions, financial institutions and the persons named in point (3) acting in the exercise of their professional activities: cooperate fully with the financial intelligence unit by promptly reporting to it, on your own initiative, where you know, suspect or have reasonable grounds to suspect that funds or activities, regardless of the amount involved, are the proceeds of criminal activity or are related to terrorist financing or criminal activity, and by responding to its requests for additional information in such cases (Article 69(1), point (a)). A notary, lawyer, other independent legal professional, auditor, external accountant or tax advisor is exempt from Article 69(1) to the extent that the exemption relates to information received from, or obtained on, a client in the course of ascertaining the legal position of that client or performing the task of defending or representing that client in, or concerning, judicial proceedings, but not where the person takes part in money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing, provides legal advice for those purposes, or knows that the client is seeking legal advice for those purposes (Article 70(2)).

Provide the financial intelligence unit, at its request, with all necessary information, including information on transaction records, within the deadlines imposed, and reply to its requests for information within 5 working days, a deadline the unit may shorten in justified and urgent cases, including to less than 24 hours, or extend where it considers that justified and the extension does not undermine its analysis (Article 69(1), point (b), and third and fourth subparagraphs).

+4 more
European Union Capital Requirements Directive, Robust Governance Arrangements of Institutions (Article 74(1))

Have robust governance arrangements, which include a clear organizational structure with well-defined, transparent and consistent lines of responsibility (Article 74(1), point (a)).

Have effective processes to identify, manage, monitor and report the risks you are or might be exposed to, including ESG risks in the short, medium and long term (Article 74(1), point (b)).

+4 more
European Union Consumer Credit Directive, Duty to Assess the Consumer's Creditworthiness Before Lending (Article 18) from , in 6 days

If you are a creditor, carry out a thorough assessment of the consumer's creditworthiness before concluding a credit agreement (Article 18(1)).

Carry out that assessment in the interest of the consumer, to prevent irresponsible lending practices and over-indebtedness, taking appropriate account of factors relevant to verifying the prospect of the consumer meeting his or her obligations under the credit agreement (Article 18(1)).

+11 more
European Union Consumer Rights Directive, Adequate Explanations and Human Intervention in Online Tools for Distance Financial Services Contracts (Article 16d)

If you are a trader concluding a financial services contract with a consumer at a distance, give the consumer free of charge, before the contract is concluded, adequate explanations that make it possible to assess whether the proposed contract and ancillary services are adapted to the consumer's needs and financial situation (Article 16d(1)).

Be ready to prove that you gave the adequate explanations, since the burden of proof is on the trader (Article 16d(4)).

European Union EBA Guidelines on outsourcing arrangements (EBA/GL/2019/02), outsourcing a function to a service provider

Institutions, payment institutions and electronic money institutions should establish whether an arrangement with a third party falls under the definition of outsourcing, an arrangement of any form by which a service provider performs a process, a service or an activity that would otherwise be undertaken by the institution itself (paragraphs 12 and 26).

Institutions and payment institutions should always consider a function as critical or important where a defect or failure in its performance would materially impair their continuing compliance with the conditions of their authorization, their financial performance, or the soundness or continuity of their banking and payment services and activities; or when operational tasks of internal control functions are outsourced, unless the assessment establishes that a failure to provide the outsourced function or its inappropriate provision would not have an adverse impact on the effectiveness of the internal control function; or when they intend to outsource functions of banking activities or payment services to an extent that would require authorization by a competent authority (paragraph 29).

+6 more
European Union European Health Data Space Regulation, High-Risk AI Systems Claiming Interoperability with EHR Systems (Article 27(2)) from , in 2.4 years

If you are a provider of an AI system considered high-risk under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, outside the scope of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 or (EU) 2017/746, and you claim interoperability of the system with the harmonised software components of EHR systems, prove compliance with the essential requirements on the European interoperability software component and the European logging software component in Section 2 of Annex II (Article 27(2)).

European Union Fourth Anti-Money-Laundering Directive: Reporting of Suspicious Transactions to the Financial Intelligence Unit and Prohibition of Disclosure (Articles 33 and 39)

It reaches you if you are an obliged entity within Article 2(1), which lists credit institutions, financial institutions and the natural or legal persons acting in the exercise of their professional activities that the paragraph names: cooperate fully with the financial intelligence unit by promptly informing it, including by filing a report, on your own initiative, where you know, suspect or have reasonable grounds to suspect that funds, regardless of the amount involved, are the proceeds of criminal activity or are related to terrorist financing, and by promptly responding to its requests for additional information in such cases (Article 33(1), point (a)). A notary, other independent legal professional, auditor, external accountant or tax advisor is outside the obligations of Article 33(1) only to the strict extent that the information is received from, or obtained on, a client in the course of ascertaining the legal position of the client, or performing the task of defending or representing that client in, or concerning, judicial proceedings (Article 34(2)).

Provide the financial intelligence unit directly, at its request, with all necessary information (Article 33(1), point (b), as replaced by Directive (EU) 2018/843, Article 1, point (21)).

+3 more
European Union MiFID II Algorithmic Trading Controls: Resilient Systems, Testing, Kill Functionality, Records and Notification (Article 17 and RTS 6)

Implement an IT strategy and arrangements for physical and electronic security that minimize the risks of attacks against your information systems, promptly inform the competent authority of any material breaches of your physical and electronic security measures with an incident report on the nature of the incident, the measures taken and the initiatives to avoid similar incidents, and annually undertake penetration tests and vulnerability scans (Article 18(1) to (4)).

If your algorithmic trading pursues a market making strategy, carry out that market making continuously during a specified proportion of the trading venue's trading hours, except under exceptional circumstances, enter into a binding written agreement with the trading venue that specifies your obligations, and have in place effective systems and controls to ensure that you fulfil your obligations under the agreement at all times (Directive 2014/65/EU, Article 17(3)). You are considered to pursue a market making strategy when, as a member or participant of one or more trading venues, your strategy, when dealing on own account, involves posting firm, simultaneous two-way quotes of comparable size and at competitive prices relating to one or more financial instruments on a single trading venue or across different trading venues, with the result of providing liquidity on a regular and frequent basis to the overall market (Article 17(4)).

+2 more
European Union MiFID II and MiFIR Records of Services, Activities, Orders and Transactions (Article 16(6) and MiFIR Article 25)

It reaches you if you are an investment firm, meaning a legal person whose regular occupation or business is the provision of one or more investment services to third parties and/or the performance of one or more investment activities on a professional basis (Directive 2014/65/EU, Article 4(1), point (1)): arrange for records to be kept of all services, activities and transactions undertaken by you, sufficient to enable the competent authority to fulfil its supervisory tasks and to perform the enforcement actions under the Directive, Regulation (EU) No 600/2014, Directive 2014/57/EU and Regulation (EU) No 596/2014, and in particular to ascertain that you have complied with all obligations, including those with respect to clients or potential clients and to the integrity of the market (Article 16(6)).

Keep at the disposal of the competent authority, for five years, the relevant data relating to all orders and all transactions in financial instruments which you have carried out, whether on own account or on behalf of a client (Regulation (EU) No 600/2014, Article 25(1)).

+2 more
European Union MiFID II Product Governance for Manufacturers and Distributors of Financial Instruments (Articles 16(3) and 24(2) and Delegated Directive 2017/593 Articles 9 and 10)

It reaches you if you are an investment firm, meaning a legal person whose regular occupation or business is the provision of one or more investment services to third parties and/or the performance of one or more investment activities on a professional basis (Directive 2014/65/EU, Article 4(1), point (1)), that manufactures financial instruments for sale to clients, or that offers or recommends financial instruments: maintain, operate and review a process for the approval of each financial instrument and significant adaptations of existing financial instruments before it is marketed or distributed to clients, specify in that process an identified target market of end clients within the relevant category of clients for each financial instrument, assess all relevant risks to that target market, and make sure the intended distribution strategy is consistent with it (Directive 2014/65/EU, Article 16(3)).

Regularly review the financial instruments you offer or market, taking into account any event that could materially affect the potential risk to the identified target market, to assess at least whether each remains consistent with the needs of the identified target market and whether the intended distribution strategy remains appropriate (Article 16(3)).

+6 more
European Union MiFID II Suitability Assessment for Investment Advice and Portfolio Management, Including Automated and Semi-Automated Systems (Article 25(2) and Delegated Regulation 2017/565 Article 54)

It reaches you if you are an investment firm, meaning a legal person whose regular occupation or business is the provision of one or more investment services to third parties and/or the performance of one or more investment activities on a professional basis (Directive 2014/65/EU, Article 4(1), point (1)), that provides investment advice or portfolio management: obtain the necessary information regarding the client's or potential client's knowledge and experience in the investment field relevant to the specific type of product or service, financial situation including the ability to bear losses, and investment objectives including risk tolerance, so as to recommend the investment services and financial instruments that are suitable for the client and in particular are in accordance with the client's risk tolerance and ability to bear losses (Article 25(2)).

Do not create any ambiguity or confusion about your responsibilities in the process when assessing suitability, and inform clients or potential clients, clearly and simply, that the reason for assessing suitability is to enable you to act in the client's best interest (Article 54(1)).

+8 more
Germany Betriebsverfassungsgesetz (BetrVG) Sections 80(3), 90(1) No. 3 and 95(2a), Works Council Rights on the Use of Artificial Intelligence

Obtain the works council's consent to guidelines on personnel selection for hirings, transfers, regroupings and dismissals, also where artificial intelligence is used in drawing them up (section 95(1) and (2a)).

Accept that the works council may call in an expert where it must assess the introduction or application of artificial intelligence, which the Act treats as necessary (section 80(3)).

Italy Legislative Decree 216/2003, equal treatment in employment and working conditions

Do not treat workers or applicants less favourably than others in a comparable situation because of religion, personal convictions, disability, age, nationality, or sexual orientation, and do not apply a seemingly neutral provision, criterion, practice, act, agreement, or conduct that puts persons with one of those characteristics at a particular disadvantage (art. 2, comma 1).

Do not harass anyone on those grounds through unwanted conduct that violates a person's dignity and creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive climate, and do not order anyone to discriminate (art. 2, commi 3 and 4).

+4 more
Mauritius Financial Services (Robotic and Artificial Intelligence Enabled Advisory Services) Rules 2021

At all times keep your principal bank account in Mauritius, an office and relevant infrastructure in Mauritius, adequate internal controls, risk management (including cyber risk management) and governance policies and procedures, a business continuity and disaster recovery plan, a board of at least three directors with one independent director resident in Mauritius, an adequate number of competent officers, and a code of conduct and ethics that binds your officers (clause 5(1)).

Preserve the integrity and privacy of clients' information in conformity with the applicable Data Protection Laws of Mauritius, and where clients' information is stored and processed through cloud computing facilities for analytics, keep it under adequate security and access controls, accessible to you at all times and to the Commission on request (clause 5(1)(e) and (2)).

+3 more
Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, public accommodations, public service and real estate financing (Act 453 of 1976)

It reaches you if you operate as a place of public accommodation or public service, meaning a business, facility or institution whose goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations are made available to the public (section 301): do not deny an individual the full and equal enjoyment of them because of religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or marital status (section 302(a)).

Do not print, circulate, post, mail, or otherwise publish a statement, advertisement, notice, or sign indicating that the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of a place of public accommodation or public service will be refused, withheld, or denied on those grounds (section 302(b)).

+3 more
Portugal Labour Code as Amended by Law 13/2023, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence in Employment: Articles 106(3)(s), 24(3) and 3(3)(o)

Apply the rules of Article 24 also to decisions you take on the basis of algorithms or other artificial intelligence systems (Article 24(3)).

Saudi Arabia Counter-Fraud Framework: fraud detection systems, machine learning and artificial intelligence

It reaches you if you are a Member Organisation, meaning a financial institution or financial services provider regulated by SAMA, that SAMA has notified is required to implement and comply with the Counter-Fraud Framework (the Framework applies to Member Organisations operating in Saudi Arabia at SAMA's discretion, Sections 1.4 and 1.5 and Appendix A): implement and maintain fraud detection systems that monitor customer products and services, and internal systems, for transactions or behaviors that may be indicative of fraud, and have them operate 24/7 with appropriate resources in place to manage their outputs on a timely basis (Sections 5.2(a) and 5.2(b)). The Framework words its Control Requirements as "should", and each line below keeps that strength.

Build the fraud detection system capability to include, at a minimum, analysis of structured data, monitoring of customer and internal accounts, baselining of user behavior patterns into profiles so that deviations from normal activity can be identified, a library of rules based on known fraud typologies, segmentation of customer groups to tailor rules, a weighting of rules based on the assessed level of fraud risk together with risk scoring, aggregation of risk scores across multiple channels, and linking of outputs to a Case Management System (Section 5.2(e)).

+3 more
Spain Ley 10/2025, Customer Service Rules for Automated Channels (Article 8 and Transitional Provision) from , in 6 weeks

Provide personalised attention through a natural-person operator who answers in real time and identifies themselves at the start of the conversation, as soon as possible, so that on average 95 percent of requests are attended within three minutes (article 8(2)).

Spain Real Decreto 723/2026 Article 3(2)(k), Written Notice to Workers of Algorithmic and Automated Decision-Making Systems

Give the information on paper or in electronic form that is accessible to the worker and can be stored and printed, and keep proof that it was transmitted or received (Article 6(2)).

Texas S.B. 815 (2025), utilization review agent ban on automated decision systems for adverse determinations

Include in each notice of an adverse determination a description of and the source of the screening criteria and review procedures used as guidelines in making the adverse determination.

United Arab Emirates Consumer Protection Standards: reasons for rejecting an application or reducing credit, and complaint decisions

It reaches you if you are a Licensed Financial Institution, meaning a bank or other financial institution licensed by the Central Bank of the UAE under Decretal Federal Law 14 of 2018 to carry on a licensed financial activity, and you provide Financial Products and/or Services to Consumers who are Natural Persons or Sole Proprietorships (Regulation, Scope of Application and Article 1; Standards, Introduction): when you reject a Consumer's application for a Financial Product and/or Service, disclose the reason for the rejection to the applicant, except where the reason is related to Financial Crime Compliance risks or as may be prohibited by law (Standard 2.1.1.26).

When you decrease the credit limit on a card or close the card for business reasons, provide the Consumer with a notice and the reason for the limit decrease or closure (Standard 7.1.3.6).

+3 more
United Kingdom Compliance function of a common platform firm: compliance-risk policies and procedures, and a permanent and effective compliance function that operates independently

If you are a common platform firm, taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of your business and the nature and range of financial services and activities undertaken in the course of your designated investment business, establish, implement and maintain adequate policies and procedures designed to detect any risk of failure by the firm to comply with its obligations under the UK law on markets in financial instruments, as well as associated risks, and put in place adequate measures and procedures designed to minimize such risks and to enable the FCA to exercise its powers effectively under that law (SYSC 6.1.2-AR).

If you are a common platform firm, establish and maintain a permanent and effective compliance function which operates independently and which monitors on a permanent basis and assesses, on a regular basis, the adequacy and effectiveness of the measures, policies and procedures put in place under SYSC 6.1.2-AR and the actions taken to address any deficiencies in your compliance with your obligations; advises and assists the relevant persons responsible for carrying out your designated investment business to comply with your obligations under the UK law on markets in financial instruments; reports to the management body, at least on an annual basis, on the implementation and effectiveness of the overall control environment for your designated investment business, the risks that have been identified and the complaints-handling reporting as well as remedies undertaken or to be undertaken; and monitors the operations of the complaints-handling process and considers complaints as a source of relevant information (SYSC 6.1.3-AR).

+2 more
United Kingdom Compliance: adequate policies and procedures, and a director or senior manager's oversight of compliance

It reaches you if you are a firm to which the common platform requirements apply, which is every firm apart from an insurer, a UK ISPV, a managing agent and the Society unless a specific rule provides otherwise (SYSC 1 Annex 1 2.1R): establish, implement and maintain adequate policies and procedures sufficient to ensure compliance of the firm, including its managers, employees and appointed representatives, with its obligations under the regulatory system and for countering the risk that the firm might be used to further financial crime (SYSC 6.1.1R).

If you are a firm which is not a common platform firm or management company and you carry on designated investment business with or for retail clients or professional clients, allocate to a director or senior manager the function of having responsibility for oversight of your compliance and of reporting to the governing body in respect of that responsibility (SYSC 6.1.4AR).

United Kingdom Consumer Credit Act 1974, duty to tell a refused applicant that a credit reference agency was used and to give its name and address

It reaches you if you operate as a creditor under a prospective regulated agreement, meaning the person providing credit under a consumer credit agreement, including the prospective creditor, where the agreement is a regulated agreement and is not an excluded agreement (a consumer hire agreement or an agreement secured on land): when you decide not to proceed with it on the basis of information you obtained from a credit reference agency, inform the debtor, when telling the debtor of the decision, that the decision was reached on the basis of information from a credit reference agency, and provide the debtor with the particulars of the agency, including its name, address and telephone number (Consumer Credit Act 1974, section 157(A1), (4); section 189).

United Kingdom Equality Act 2010, discrimination by a service-provider, with indirect discrimination and the exceptions for financial services and insurance

It reaches you if you operate as a service-provider, meaning a person concerned with the provision of a service to the public or a section of the public (for payment or not), and a service includes goods or facilities: do not discriminate against a person requiring the service, including a person seeking to obtain or use it, by not providing the person with the service, which includes not providing it of the quality, in the manner or on the terms on which you usually provide it to the public or the section of it that includes the person (Equality Act 2010, section 29(1), section 31(2), (6) and (7)).

In providing the service, do not discriminate against a person as to the terms on which you provide the service, by terminating the provision of the service, or by subjecting the person to any other detriment (section 29(2)).

+5 more
United Kingdom Equality Act 2010, duty on a service-provider to make reasonable adjustments for disabled persons

It reaches you if you operate as a service-provider, meaning a person concerned with the provision of a service to the public or a section of the public (for payment or not), or exercise a public function that is not the provision of such a service: where a provision, criterion or practice of yours puts disabled persons generally at a substantial disadvantage in relation to the provision of the service in comparison with persons who are not disabled, take such steps as it is reasonable to have to take to avoid the disadvantage (Equality Act 2010, section 29(7), section 20(3), Schedule 2 paragraph 2(1), (2) and (4)).

Where a physical feature puts disabled persons generally at a substantial disadvantage in relation to the provision of the service, take such steps as it is reasonable to have to take to avoid the disadvantage or to adopt a reasonable alternative method of providing the service (section 20(4), Schedule 2 paragraph 2(3)).

+3 more
United Kingdom FCA Handbook, CONC 5.2A, assessing the creditworthiness of a customer before consumer credit is granted or significantly increased

It reaches you if you operate as a firm with respect to consumer credit lending, other than under an agreement in which you take an article in pawn on the terms described in CONC 5.2A.2R(1), a current account agreement that may allow the account-holder to overdraw without a pre-arranged overdraft or to exceed a pre-arranged overdraft limit where doing so would be a regulated credit agreement (overrunning), a non-commercial agreement, or a small borrower-lender-supplier agreement which is a restricted-use credit agreement: undertake a reasonable assessment of the creditworthiness of a customer before entering into a regulated credit agreement, significantly increasing the amount of credit provided under one, or significantly increasing a credit limit for running-account credit under one, and do not take that step unless you can demonstrate that you have done so in accordance with CONC 5.2A and had proper regard to the outcome in respect of affordability risk (CONC 5.2A.1R, 5.2A.2R, 5.2A.4R, 5.2A.5R).

Base the assessment on sufficient information that you are aware of at the time, obtained where appropriate from the customer and where necessary from a credit reference agency, enough to carry out a reasonable assessment (CONC 5.2A.7R).

+10 more
United Kingdom Fundamental Rule 5: effective risk strategies and risk management systems

A firm must have effective risk strategies and risk management systems (Fundamental Rule 5).

United Kingdom General organizational requirements: governance arrangements, internal controls, information security and business continuity

It reaches you if you are a firm to which the common platform requirements apply, which is every firm apart from an insurer, a UK ISPV, a managing agent and the Society unless a specific rule provides otherwise (SYSC 1 Annex 1 2.1R): have robust governance arrangements, which include a clear organizational structure with well defined, transparent and consistent lines of responsibility, effective processes to identify, manage, monitor and report the risks you are or might be exposed to, and internal control mechanisms, including sound administrative and accounting procedures and effective control and safeguard arrangements for information processing systems (SYSC 4.1.1R(1)).

If you are a common platform firm, make the arrangements, processes and mechanisms in SYSC 4.1.1R comprehensive and proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of the risks inherent in your business model and activities (SYSC 4.1.2R).

+6 more
United Kingdom General outsourcing requirements for a common platform firm: relying on a third party to perform operational functions, including critical or important functions

It reaches you if you are a common platform firm, meaning a MIFIDPRU investment firm, a bank, a building society, a designated investment firm or a dormant asset fund operator (SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2G and Table A): when relying on a third party for the performance of operational functions which are critical for the performance of regulated activities, listed activities or ancillary services on a continuous and satisfactory basis, take reasonable steps to avoid undue additional operational risk, and do not undertake the outsourcing of important operational functions in such a way as to impair materially the quality of your internal control or the ability of the FCA to monitor your compliance with all obligations under the regulatory system (SYSC 8.1.1R).

If you are a common platform firm and you outsource critical or important operational functions, remain fully responsible for discharging all of your obligations under the UK law on markets in financial instruments, and comply with the conditions that the outsourcing must not result in the delegation by senior management of their responsibility, must not alter your relationship and obligations towards clients, must not undermine the conditions with which you must comply in order to be authorized and to remain so, and must not remove or modify any other condition subject to which your authorization was granted (SYSC 8.1.6-AR).

+8 more
United Kingdom Outsourcing by a firm other than a common platform firm: remaining fully responsible for outsourced critical or important operational functions

If you are a firm other than a common platform firm and you outsource critical or important operational functions or any relevant services and activities, remain fully responsible for discharging all of your obligations under the regulatory system, and comply with the conditions that the outsourcing must not result in the delegation by senior personnel of their responsibility, must not alter your relationship and obligations towards clients, must not undermine the conditions with which you must comply in order to be authorized and to remain so, and must not remove or modify any other condition subject to which your authorization was granted (SYSC 8.1.6R).

United Kingdom Suitability for business that is not MiFID business: personal recommendations to retail clients and decisions to trade for them (COBS 9.1 and 9.2)

It reaches you if you are a firm that makes a personal recommendation to a retail client in relation to a designated investment, manages investments of a retail client of the firm, or manages the assets of an occupational pension scheme, stakeholder pension scheme or personal pension scheme, other than in relation to your MiFID, equivalent third country or optional exemption business or an insurance-based investment product, for which COBS 9A sets the suitability rules (COBS 9.1.1R and COBS 9.1.1AG), and not in relation to a targeted support service within the scope of COBS 9B (COBS 9.1.1BG): take reasonable steps to ensure that a personal recommendation, or a decision to trade, is suitable for your client, and ensure that any life policy proposed is consistent with the client's insurance demands and needs (COBS 9.2.1R(1)).

When making the personal recommendation or managing the client's investments, obtain the necessary information regarding the client's knowledge and experience in the investment field relevant to the specific type of designated investment or service, financial situation and investment objectives, so as to enable you to make the recommendation, or take the decision, which is suitable for the client (COBS 9.2.1R(2)).

+5 more
United Kingdom Suitability for MiFID business: personal recommendations and decisions to trade, including advice given through an automated or semi-automated system

It reaches you if you are a firm that provides investment advice or portfolio management in the course of MiFID, equivalent third country or optional exemption business, or investment advice in relation to an insurance-based investment product (COBS 9A.1.1R; for an insurance-based investment product only the rules that implemented the IDD or derive from the IDD Regulation apply, COBS 9A.1.5R; the chapter does not apply in relation to a targeted support service within the scope of COBS 9B, COBS 9A.1.1AG): when providing investment advice or portfolio management, obtain the necessary information regarding the client's knowledge and experience in the investment field relevant to the specific type of financial instrument or service, financial situation including ability to bear losses, and investment objectives including risk tolerance, and only recommend investment services and financial instruments, or take decisions to trade, which are suitable for the client and in particular in accordance with the client's risk tolerance and ability to bear losses (COBS 9A.2.1R).

Determine the extent of the information to be obtained from a client in light of all the features of the service to be provided, and obtain from the client such information as is necessary to understand the essential facts about the client and to have a reasonable basis for determining that the specific transaction meets the client's investment objectives including risk tolerance, that the client is able financially to bear any related investment risks consistent with those objectives, and that the client has the necessary experience and knowledge to understand the risks involved in the transaction or in the management of the portfolio (COBS 9A.2.4R).

+6 more
United Kingdom The Consumer Duty: Principle 12 and the cross-cutting rules and outcome rules for retail customers

It reaches you if you are a firm carrying on retail market business, meaning the regulated activities and ancillary activities, payment services and issuing of electronic money of a firm in a distribution chain that involves a retail customer, or if you communicate or approve a financial promotion addressed to or likely to be received by a retail customer, to the extent you are responsible for determining or materially influencing retail customer outcomes: act to deliver good outcomes for retail customers (Principle 12, PRIN 2.1.1R, and PRIN 3.2.6R to 3.2.7R).

Act in good faith towards retail customers (PRIN 2A.2.1R); the standard of conduct is set out in PRIN 2A.2.2R and includes fair and open dealing and acting consistently with the reasonable expectations of retail customers.

+11 more
United States Bank Secrecy Act and 31 CFR 1020.320, bank reports of suspicious transactions and their confidentiality

It reaches you if you operate as a bank as 31 CFR 1010.100 defines the term: each agent, agency, branch or office within the United States of a person doing business as a commercial bank or trust company, a private bank, a savings and loan association or building and loan association, an insured institution, a savings bank, industrial bank or other thrift institution, a credit union, or another listed capacity. File a SAR with FinCEN for a transaction conducted or attempted by, at, or through the bank that involves or aggregates at least $5,000 in funds or other assets and that the bank knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect falls within 31 CFR 1020.320(a)(2)(i), (ii) or (iii). A bank is not required to file a SAR for a robbery or burglary committed or attempted that is reported to appropriate law enforcement authorities, or for lost, missing, counterfeit, or stolen securities with respect to which the bank files a report under 17 CFR 240.17f-1 (31 CFR 1020.320(c)).

File the SAR no later than 30 calendar days after the date of initial detection of facts that may constitute a basis for filing; where no suspect was identified on that date you may delay filing an additional 30 calendar days to identify a suspect, but never more than 60 calendar days after initial detection (31 CFR 1020.320(b)(3)).

+6 more
United States Commission Interpretation Regarding Standard of Conduct for Investment Advisers

It reaches you if you are an investment adviser under the Advisers Act, including an automated adviser: the Commission interprets the federal fiduciary duty you owe your client, which comprises a duty of care and a duty of loyalty, to require you to act in the best interest of your client and not to place your own interest ahead of the client's.

The Commission says the duty of care includes a duty to provide advice that is in the best interest of the client based on a reasonable understanding of the client's objectives; for a retail client you should, at a minimum, make a reasonable inquiry into the client's financial situation, level of financial sophistication, investment experience, and financial goals.

+3 more
United States Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B, notice of action taken and statement of specific reasons for adverse action

It reaches you if you operate as a creditor: a person who regularly extends, renews, or continues credit, who regularly arranges for credit to be extended, renewed, or continued, or who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly participates in a credit decision, including setting the terms of the credit, but not a person whose only participation in a credit transaction involves honoring a credit card. The duty is triggered by adverse action, which does not include a refusal to extend additional credit under an existing credit arrangement where the applicant is delinquent or otherwise in default, or where the additional credit would exceed a previously established credit limit (15 U.S.C. 1691(d)(6)). A creditor must notify an applicant of the action taken within 30 days after receiving a completed application (15 U.S.C. 1691(d)(1); 12 CFR 1002.9(a)(1)(i)).

Notify the applicant within 30 days after taking adverse action on an incomplete application (unless you send a notice of incompleteness), within 30 days after taking adverse action on an existing account, and within 90 days after notifying the applicant of a counteroffer that the applicant does not expressly accept or use (12 CFR 1002.9(a)(1)(ii) to (iv)).

+4 more
United States Exchange Act Rule 17a-4, records to be preserved by certain exchange members, brokers and dealers

It reaches you if you are a member of a national securities exchange that transacts a business in securities directly with others than members of a national securities exchange, a broker or dealer that transacts a business in securities through the medium of such a member, or a broker or dealer registered under section 15 of the Exchange Act (including a security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap participant that is also a registered broker or dealer): preserve for not less than six years, the first two years in an easily accessible place, the records Rule 17a-3(a)(1) through (3), (5), (21) and (22) require, and analogous records created under Rule 17a-3(e) (Rule 17a-4(a)).

Preserve for not less than three years, the first two years in an easily accessible place, the originals of all communications received and copies of all communications sent (and any approvals thereof) relating to your business as such, including inter-office memoranda and communications and communications subject to the rules of a self-regulatory organization of which you are a member regarding communications with the public (Rule 17a-4(b)(4)).

+9 more
United States FinCEN Guidance FIN-2025-G001, Cross-Border Information Sharing by Financial Institutions and SAR Confidentiality

FinCEN says the Bank Secrecy Act prohibits you from disclosing a SAR, or information that would reveal the existence or non-existence of a SAR, other than in limited circumstances (31 CFR 1020.320(e); 31 U.S.C. 5318(g)(2)(A)).

When you share underlying facts, transactions or documents with another financial institution, including a foreign one, FinCEN says you must take appropriate measures, such as redaction, to ensure that information that would reveal the existence of a SAR is not shared.

+2 more
United States FINRA Rule 2210, communications with the public

It reaches you if you are a FINRA member firm or a person associated with one, because FINRA may sanction either for a violation of a FINRA rule (Rule 8310(a)): have an appropriately qualified registered principal approve each retail communication before the earlier of its use or its filing with FINRA's Advertising Regulation Department, unless an exception in Rule 2210(b)(1) applies (Rule 2210(b)(1)(A)).

Base every communication on principles of fair dealing and good faith, make it fair and balanced, and give it a sound basis for evaluating the facts about any particular security or type of security, industry, or service; do not omit a material fact or qualification if the omission, in light of the context of the material presented, would cause the communication to be misleading (Rule 2210(d)(1)(A)).

+5 more
United States FINRA Rule 3110, supervision

It reaches you if you are a FINRA member firm or a person associated with one, because FINRA may sanction either for a violation of a FINRA rule (Rule 8310(a)): establish and maintain a system to supervise the activities of each associated person that is reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations and with applicable FINRA rules; final responsibility for proper supervision rests with the member (Rule 3110(a)).

Establish, maintain, and enforce written procedures to supervise the types of business in which you engage and the activities of your associated persons, reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations and with applicable FINRA rules (Rule 3110(b)(1)).

+5 more
United States FINRA Rule 4511, general requirements for books and records

It reaches you if you are a FINRA member firm or a person associated with one, because FINRA may sanction either for a violation of a FINRA rule (Rule 8310(a)): make and preserve the books and records the FINRA rules, the Exchange Act and the applicable Exchange Act rules require (Rule 4511(a)).

Preserve for at least six years any FINRA book or record for which neither the FINRA rules nor the applicable Exchange Act rules specify a period (Rule 4511(b)).

+1 more
United States Interagency Statement on the Use of Alternative Data in Credit Underwriting

Before using alternative data, carry out through a well-designed compliance management program a thorough analysis of the relevant consumer protection laws and regulations, which the statement names as fair lending laws, the prohibitions against unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices, and the Fair Credit Reporting Act, so that you understand the opportunities, risks and compliance requirements.

Apply more robust compliance management, including appropriate testing, monitoring and controls, to alternative data that present greater consumer protection risks.

+2 more
United States Investment Advisers Act of 1940 section 206, prohibited transactions by investment advisers

It reaches you if you are an investment adviser, meaning any person who, for compensation, engages in the business of advising others, either directly or through publications or writings, as to the value of securities or as to the advisability of investing in, purchasing, or selling securities (subject to the exclusions in section 202(a)(11) of the Advisers Act): do not use the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, directly or indirectly, to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud any client or prospective client (section 206(1)).

Do not engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or prospective client (section 206(2)).

+2 more
United States Joint Statement on Suspicious Activity Report Confidentiality Considerations Regarding Communications with Customers

The agencies say the Bank Secrecy Act prohibits you from disclosing a SAR, or any information that would reveal the existence of a SAR, including to a customer or other person who is the subject of the SAR, and from notifying any person involved in the transaction that the transaction has been reported (31 CFR 1020.320(e); 31 U.S.C. 5318(g)(2)).

The agencies say you should consider customer communication on a case-by-case basis and take precautions when discussing information that could reveal the existence of a SAR.

United States Regulation Best Interest, standard of conduct for broker-dealers

It reaches you if you are a broker, a dealer, or a natural person who is an associated person of a broker or dealer and you make a recommendation of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities (including account recommendations) to a retail customer, meaning a natural person (or that person's legal representative) who uses the recommendation primarily for personal, family, or household purposes: act in the best interest of the retail customer at the time the recommendation is made, without placing your financial or other interest ahead of the interest of the retail customer (Rule 15l-1(a)(1)).

Provide the retail customer, prior to or at the time of the recommendation, in writing, full and fair disclosure of all material facts relating to the scope and terms of the relationship (that you act as a broker, dealer, or associated person with respect to the recommendation, the material fees and costs that apply, and the type and scope of services, including any material limitations on what may be recommended) and of all material facts relating to conflicts of interest associated with the recommendation (Rule 15l-1(a)(2)(i)).

+7 more
United States Safety and soundness standards for insured depository institutions: internal controls, information systems and internal audit systems

An institution should have internal controls and information systems appropriate to the size of the institution and the nature, scope and risk of its activities, providing for clear lines of authority and responsibility for monitoring adherence to established policies, effective risk assessment, timely and accurate financial, operational and regulatory reports, adequate procedures to safeguard and manage assets, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations (Guidelines section II.A).

An institution should have an internal audit system appropriate to its size and the nature and scope of its activities, providing for adequate monitoring of the system of internal controls through an internal audit function (or, where its size, complexity or scope of operations does not warrant a full scale internal audit function, a system of independent reviews of key internal controls), independence and objectivity, qualified persons, adequate testing and review of information systems, adequate documentation of tests and findings and any corrective actions, verification and review of management actions to address material weaknesses, and review by its audit committee or board of directors of the effectiveness of the internal audit systems (Guidelines section II.B).

United States Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, unlawful employment practices

If you procure employees for an employer, or procure for employees opportunities to work for an employer, do not fail or refuse to refer, or classify or refer, an individual because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin (Title VII section 703(b)), or because of age (Age Discrimination in Employment Act section 4(b)).

Be ready to demonstrate that a particular employment practice that causes a disparate impact on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin is job related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity; a disparate impact is also established where the complaining party demonstrates an alternative employment practice and the respondent refuses to adopt it (Title VII section 703(k)(1)).

+1 more
Utah Health Insurance Preauthorization AI Disclosure (SB 319, 2026 General Session) from , in 7 weeks

Set an authorization validity period of at least 12 months for a drug, device, or covered service treating a chronic or long-term care condition, and at least six months for an outpatient covered service

AI governance 13

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
Austria KommAustria-Gesetz and Telekommunikationsgesetz 2021, Servicestelle für Künstliche Intelligenz at the RTR-GmbH

If you receive federal funding for an AI project, provide the RTR-GmbH with the essential project data for its AI information portal when the federal funding body arranges it, as section 20c(2) directs the funding bodies to ensure.

California AI Auditor Registry Act (AB 1405) from , in 2.1 years

If you offer, sell, or conduct a covered AI audit, an audit assessing internal controls, processes, or systems implemented for an AI system or model that are necessary for compliance with California law, register with the Government Operations Agency before doing so, starting .

If you register as an AI auditor, give the agency your business name, contact information, the California laws or regulations you audit under, relevant certifications, a description of your services, and a standard operating procedure describing the standards you apply and the basis for your accuracy and reliability claims.

+5 more
California Independent Verification Organizations Act (SB 813) from , in 7 weeks

If you are a designated IVO, submit an annual report on your standards, methodologies, governance changes, and conflicts of interest to the agency and the Legislature, starting no sooner than 12 months after your designation.

European Union AI Act, Article 18 (documentation keeping) from , in 13 months

If you are a financial institution subject to internal-governance requirements under Union financial services law, maintain the technical documentation as part of the documentation kept under the relevant Union financial services law.

European Union AI Act, Article 19 (automatically generated logs) from , in 13 months

Retain the logs for a period appropriate to the system's intended purpose, at least six months, unless other Union or national law, such as data-protection law, provides otherwise.

If you are a financial institution, keep the logs as part of the documentation your sector's internal-governance rules already require.

European Union AI Act, Article 22(3), points (b) and (c) (authorised representative: documents held for 10 years and access to logs) from , in 13 months

Perform the tasks specified in the mandate, which Article 22(3) says must empower you to carry out the tasks in points (b) and (c) below.

European Union AI Act, Article 26(6) (deployer log-keeping) from , in 13 months

Retain the logs for a period appropriate to the system's intended purpose, at least six months, unless other Union or national law, such as data-protection law, provides otherwise.

If you are a financial institution, keep the logs as part of the documentation your sector's internal-governance rules already require.

Indonesia Electronic Information and Transactions Law, electronic agent liability

A qualifying Electronic Agent operator must let a user correct information they submitted while a transaction is still in process.

Ireland Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Act 2026

Do not knowingly give false or misleading information to an adjudicator, or disclose confidential material relevant to an adjudicator's finding without authorisation (ss. 95, 104).

Italy Decreto Legislativo 160/2026 Art. 14, Preventive Seizure of AI-Generated Online Content (Implementing Norms of the Codice di Procedura Penale, Art. 104, Letter e-bis)

If you provide hosting services, an online platform, a search engine or another intermediary service of the information society, remove the content and the data, or disable access to the profile, when a preventive-seizure order covers online content generated also with AI systems, while ensuring where technically possible access to content unrelated to the unlawful conduct (art. 14, amending art. 104, comma 1, lettera e-bis of the implementing norms of the Codice di Procedura Penale).

Show the other 3 laws
Italy Decreto Legislativo 160/2026, Civil Damages Actions for Harm Caused by AI Systems (Artt. 16-20)

If you are sued for damage caused in the use of an AI system, and the claimant presents facts and elements that make the claim plausible, produce on the court's order the evidence specifically relevant to how the system works, including the logs under Article 12, the risk-management documentation under Article 9, the relevant technical documentation under Article 11 and the human-oversight information under Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; the order is limited to what is necessary and proportionate, and the court protects trade secrets and confidential information (art. 17, commi 1 to 4).

If you hold such evidence as a third party to the action, produce it on the same terms (art. 17, comma 1).

+1 more
New York Responsible AI Safety and Education Act (RAISE Act) from , in 7 weeks

If you redact a document you publish under this article to protect trade secrets, cybersecurity, public safety or national security, or to comply with law, describe the character and justification of each redaction in the published version, to the extent those concerns permit, and keep the unredacted information for five years.

New York City Third-Party Validation and Shut-Down Capability of Artificial Intelligence Models proposed

A third-party validator would have to certify to the model's developer and to the Office of Cyber Command whether the model has been validated and is appropriately positioned for deployment, and disclose any financial or other interest the validator has in the model or its developer.

AI transparency 8

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
California Synthetic Performer Advertising Disclosure Act (SB 1050) from , in 7 weeks

If you are an advertising medium served with a court order finding that an advertisement violates the chapter or enjoining its creator, remove, disable access to, or stop disseminating the advertisement in California and stop accepting payment for further dissemination

China Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis Internet Information Services, Articles 16 and 17

Retain the log information the Provisions require

Connecticut Subscription-Based Generative AI Provider Disclosure Duty

Before entering into or renewing a consumer subscription for a generative AI system, or collecting a fee for one, give the consumer written notice of the key terms and conditions and obtain the consumer's written acceptance.

In the initial-subscription notice, give material information sufficient for a reasonable consumer to decide whether to purchase or maintain the subscription, including any quantitative or qualitative limitations you may impose (such as limits on tokens, images generated or modified, or transcription services), including limitations you may impose in response to the consumer's own conduct.

+2 more
France Law 2023-451, Article 5, Labelling of Retouched and AI-Generated Images by Commercial Influencers

Label content that includes images modified to slim or thicken the silhouette or alter the appearance of the face with the words “Images retouchées” (Article 5(I), point 1).

Germany Digitale Medien-Staatsvertrag Teil 2 (Discussion Draft), Rules for Providers of AI Information Systems (Proposed Sections 77a to 77g of the Medienstaatsvertrag) proposed

Name an authorized recipient of service in Germany and point to that person in an easily recognizable and directly accessible way in your offering.

Do not discriminate against third-party journalistic and editorial offerings without an objective reason.

+1 more
Louisiana Act 250 (HB 178), attorney duty to verify and disclose AI-generated evidence

As an attorney appearing in a Louisiana court, exercise reasonable diligence to verify the authenticity of evidence, including evidence that may be artificially generated or altered, before offering it to the court.

New York City Chatbot Data Privacy, Security, and Transparency proposed

It would give each user a right to access, at any time, the user's own retained chat logs in a downloadable, human- and machine-readable format.

Pennsylvania H.B. 811, civil liability for fraudulent misrepresentation of candidates by deepfake proposed

Comply with a court order for the immediate removal of the campaign advertisement and cessation of the activity complained of, which a court may issue while an aggrieved candidate's civil action is pending.

AI risk obligations 6

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
European Union AI Act, Article 16 (obligations of providers of high-risk AI systems) from , in 13 months

If you are the provider of a high-risk AI system, indicate your name, registered trade name or registered trade mark and the address at which you can be contacted on the system or, where that is not possible, on its packaging or its accompanying documentation.

Ensure that your high-risk AI system complies with accessibility requirements in accordance with Directives (EU) 2016/2102 and (EU) 2019/882.

European Union AI Act, Article 6(2) and Annex III, point 5(b) (creditworthiness and credit-scoring systems: provider duties) from , in 13 months

Indicate your name, registered trade name or registered trade mark and the address at which you can be contacted on the system or, where that is not possible, on its packaging or its accompanying documentation.

Ensure the system complies with the accessibility requirements of Directives (EU) 2016/2102 and (EU) 2019/882.

European Union AI Act, Articles 60 and 61 (testing in real world conditions outside AI regulatory sandboxes, with informed consent)

Be established in the Union or appoint a legal representative who is established in the Union (Article 60(4), point (d)).

Transfer data collected and processed for the testing to third countries only with appropriate and applicable safeguards under Union law (Article 60(4), point (e)).

+1 more
Italy Decreto Legislativo 160/2026, After-the-Fact Facial Recognition Integrated in Video Surveillance (Art. 10)

Keep personal data in the reference database for seven days from collection, then delete it automatically (art. 10, comma 7).

New Jersey AI-based electronic monitoring and automated employment decision systems in employment and public services (S4075 / A4981) proposed

Notify the department and each affected employee or service beneficiary in writing within 48 hours of a security breach of their data, describing the categories of data accessed or acquired and the steps you will take (Section 5).

South Korea AI Framework Act, Article 34 (business-operator duties for high-impact AI)

Keep that documentation, and the basis for it, for five years, including in electronic form.

AI prohibited practices 2

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
Michigan Leading Ethical AI Development for Kids Act (Senate Bill 760, as passed by the Senate) proposed

Do not treat a user's own statement that the user is not a minor as enough by itself to establish actual knowledge of age.

Delete the personal data you collect from a user immediately after using it to determine whether the user is a minor.

Utah Identity Protection Modifications, AI Defamation and Identity Replication (SB 256, 2026 General Session)

Give a person written notice before filing a defamation action over digitally created content; if you are the publisher and remove the content within 10 days of that notice, the plaintiff's recovery is limited to actual damages

AI training data 1

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
United Kingdom CMA Publisher Conduct Requirement on Google's general search services from , in 3 weeks

Provide publishers with clear and detailed metrics on user engagement with their search content where it is used in search generative AI features.

Scraping duties no NIST framework has a home for

165 lines in 116 laws

The AI RMF's third-party data controls, MAP 4.1 and GOVERN 6.1, are the only NIST home for a duty not to collect without authorization. Each line below fits neither, and was recorded as having no control.

Computer misuse 93

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
Afghanistan Penal Code, Part Twelve, Chapter One (Cyber Crimes and Punishment)

Do not alter, damage, destroy, disrupt, or otherwise interfere with a computer system, program, or data without authorization, including by installing a virus, hijacking a network connection, or forging or deceptively accessing a computer system.

Do not disclose a password, access code, or other means of access to a program, computer system, or data without authorization.

+1 more
Alaska Criminal use of a computer

Do not introduce false information into, or tamper with, disrupt, or disable, a computer, computer system, program, or network you access without a right to do so.

Algeria Code pénal, atteintes aux systèmes de traitement automatisé de données

Do not introduce, delete, or modify data held in a system without authorization.

Andorra Penal Code, Attacks on Information Systems

Do not obstruct or interrupt a network or information system, or delete, damage, alter, or make inaccessible data within one, without authorization.

Arizona Computer tampering (Arizona's computer-misuse statute)

Do not design a crawler or bot to prevent a user from exiting a site or a connected location in order to compel the user's device to keep communicating with or displaying your service.

Arizona Unauthorized release of proprietary or confidential computer security information

Do not communicate, release, or publish proprietary or confidential security information, security-related measures, algorithms, or encryption devices specific to a particular computer, system, or network without that system's owner's or operator's authorization.

Arizona Unlawful possession of an access device

Do not knowingly possess, traffic in, publish, or control another person's access device, a credential or similar means of reaching an account or system, without the consent of its issuer, owner, or authorized user and with intent to use or distribute it; this can reach obtaining or trading in login credentials used to collect data from behind a login wall.

Arkansas Unlawful interference with access to computers; unlawful use or access of computers

Do not knowingly and without authorization interfere with, deny, or cause the denial of access to a computer, system, or network to a person who has the duty and right to use it.

Austria StGB Sections 118a and 126a to 126c, Computer-Misuse Offenses

Do not alter, delete, suppress, or render unusable data over which you lack sole authority, in a way that damages another, per StGB Section 126a.

Do not seriously disrupt a computer system's functioning by entering or transmitting data, per StGB Section 126b.

+1 more
Azerbaijan Criminal Code, unauthorised access, illegal interception, and system interference

Do not intentionally damage, delete, corrupt, modify, or block computer data, or seriously obstruct a computer system's operation, in a way that causes significant damage.

Show the other 83 laws
Belarus Criminal Code, Crimes Against Computer Security

Do not develop, use, distribute, or sell a program or device known to be intended for defeating a protection system or for unauthorized access to, or destruction, blocking, or modification of, computer information.

Belgium Code pénal, Livre II, articles 524 à 533, accès non autorisé et sabotage dans un système informatique

Do not, knowing you are not authorized, introduce, modify or erase data in a computer system, or change the normal use of data in it by any technological means.

Benin Loi n°2017-20 portant Code du Numérique en République du Bénin, Livre VI (cybercriminalité), atteintes aux réseaux et systèmes d'information

Do not cause an interruption of a computer system's normal operation, or damage, delete, deteriorate, alter, or suppress computer data, without right.

Do not produce, sell, obtain for use, import, export, distribute, or otherwise make available a device, including computer data or computer programs, principally designed or adapted to permit the commission of an offense in Title I of this Book.

+1 more
Bermuda Computer Misuse Act 1996, unauthorised access and modification offences

Do not modify computer material, or cause a computer to cease to function, without authorisation.

Bhutan Information, Communications and Media Act of Bhutan 2018, unauthorized access and tampering with computer systems

Do not cause a stoppage or denial of service, delete or alter data, diminish a system's value or utility, or introduce a computer contaminant, with intent to cause or knowing it is likely to cause wrongful loss, gain, or damage; this is punishable as tampering with computer material under the Penal Code of Bhutan.

Bolivia Código Penal, Manipulación Informática

Do not manipulate a computer data-processing or data-transfer operation to produce an incorrect result, or to avoid a process that would otherwise have produced a correct one, in order to obtain an undue benefit at a third party's expense.

Botswana Cybercrime and Computer Related Crimes Act, 2018 (Act No. 18 of 2018)

Do not damage, delete, alter, or interfere with computer data, or hinder or interfere with the functioning of a computer or computer system, without lawful excuse.

Do not manufacture, sell, distribute, or possess a device, password, or access code designed or adapted to commit an offence under the Act.

+1 more
Burkina Faso Loi n°025-2018/AN du 31 mai 2018 portant Code pénal, computer and data systems offenses (Livre VII, Titre I, Chapitre 1)

Do not hinder or falsify the operation of a computer system, or introduce, damage, delete, alter, or suppress computer data without right.

Do not produce, sell, obtain, import, or distribute a device, program, password, or access code intended to commit any of the above offenses, unless it is for authorized testing or protecting a computer system.

+1 more
Canada Criminal Code, unauthorized use of a computer

Do not use, possess, traffic in, or permit another person to have access to a computer password to commit either of the above.

China Criminal Law, Arts. 285-286 (unauthorized computer intrusion and system destruction)

Do not damage or destroy a computer information system's function, data, or programs (Art. 286).

Croatia Kazneni zakon, Computer Crime Chapter (Arts. 266-273)

Do not make, acquire, sell, possess, distribute or make available a device, computer program or computer data created or adapted to commit any of these offences; doing so is itself a criminal offence carrying up to three years' imprisonment, or up to two years for passwords, access codes or similar data.

Cyprus Attacks against Information Systems Law, Articles 3, 4, 7, 11-12 (Illegal Access, System Interference, Tools, Corporate Liability)

Do not intentionally and without right seriously hinder or interrupt an information system's operation, including by inputting, transmitting, damaging, deleting, deteriorating, altering or suppressing its data or by blocking access to it.

Do not, intentionally and without right, produce, sell, procure for use, import, distribute or otherwise make available a computer program designed or adapted primarily to commit an offence under articles 3 to 6, or a password, access code or similar data giving access to an information system, intending it to be used to commit such an offence.

Djibouti Digital Code, Book VI: Fraudulent Access to Information Systems

Do not introduce, or attempt to introduce, data into an information system without authorization.

Dominican Republic Ley No. 53-07 sobre Crímenes y Delitos de Alta Tecnología, Acceso Ilícito

Do not divulge, generate, copy, capture, use, alter, traffic in, or decode an access code or similar mechanism used to achieve illicit access to such a system, and do not falsify an access device.

Ecuador COIP, ataque a la integridad de sistemas informáticos

Do not destroy, damage, delete, deteriorate, alter, suspend, obstruct, or suppress computer data or an information system's logical components, and do not design, acquire, or distribute malicious software meant to do so.

Egypt Law No. 175 of 2018 on Anti-Cyber and Information Technology Crimes

Do not disrupt, slow, damage, or alter the design of a website, email account, or information system without authorization.

Estonia Karistusseadustik (Penal Code) Sections 206 and 207, Interference with Computer Data and Hindering of Functioning of Computer Systems

Do not alter, delete, damage or block data in a computer system, and do not interfere with or hinder the functioning of a computer system, including by an automated crawler's request volume or behavior.

European Union Cybercrime Directive, Articles 2(d) and 3 to 12 (offenses against information systems, penalties and jurisdiction)

Do not intentionally and without right seriously hinder or interrupt the functioning of an information system by inputting computer data, or by transmitting, damaging, deleting, deteriorating, altering or suppressing such data, or by rendering such data inaccessible; Member States must make this a criminal offense, at least for cases which are not minor (Article 4).

Do not intentionally and without right delete, damage, deteriorate, alter or suppress computer data on an information system, or render such data inaccessible; Member States must make this a criminal offense, at least for cases which are not minor (Article 5).

+2 more
France Code pénal STAD Offenses, Unauthorized Access to and Interference with Automated Data Processing Systems

Do not impair, falsify, corrupt, or delete data on a French computer system in the course of an automated crawl, which Articles 323-2 and 323-3 punish separately from unauthorized access itself, with a higher penalty where the system is a State personal-data system.

Gambia Information and Communications Act, 2009, Computer Misuse and Cyber Crime part

Do not modify data held in a computer system, or degrade, interrupt, or deny access to a computer system, without lawful authority or excuse.

Do not manufacture, sell, import, distribute, or possess a device or data designed or adapted primarily to commit an offence under this Part.

+1 more
Germany Ausspaehen, Abfangen und Manipulation von Daten (Computer Misuse and Data Interference)

Do not produce, obtain, sell, or distribute passwords, security codes, or software designed to commit these offences.

Do not unlawfully delete, suppress, render unusable, or alter data.

+1 more
Ghana Electronic Transactions Act, Cyber Offences

Do not disclose a password or access code, or modify a programme or electronic record, without authority.

Greece Penal Code Articles 292B (292Β) and 292C (292Γ), Hindering the Operation of Information Systems and Related Devices

Do not, without right, seriously hinder or interrupt the operation of an information system by entering, transmitting, deleting, destroying or altering digital data or by blocking access to it.

Do not produce, sell, obtain for use, import, possess or distribute, without right and in order to commit that offense, devices, computer programs, passwords or access codes designed or adapted for it.

Guatemala Código Penal, Decreto 17-73, Arts. 274 'A' a 274 'G' (Delitos Informáticos)

Do not destroy, erase, or render useless another's computer records or the programs a computer uses, and do not distribute destructive programs capable of damaging computerized records, programs, or equipment.

Hawaii Hawaii Computer Crime Law, Part IX (unauthorized computer access, computer fraud, computer damage)

Knowingly accessing a computer with intent to commit theft is computer fraud, graded by the degree of theft intended, up to a class A felony.

Knowingly or intentionally causing unauthorized damage to a computer, computer system, or computer network is computer damage, graded up to a class A felony where the computer manages or controls critical infrastructure.

Honduras Código Penal, seguridad de las redes y de los sistemas informáticos

Do not introduce, delete, alter or suppress computer data, or disable a computer system's operation, without authorization.

Hungary Büntető Törvénykönyv (Criminal Code), Sections 423-424, Violation of Information Systems or Data

Do not hinder an information system's operation, or modify, delete, or render inaccessible data stored in it, without authorization; Btk. Section 423(2) makes this a felony independent of Section 423(1)'s access offense.

Ireland Criminal Justice (Offences Relating to Information Systems) Act 2017

Do not intentionally hinder or interrupt an information system, or delete, damage, alter, suppress or intercept data on it, without lawful authority (ss. 3-5).

Do not produce, distribute or make available a computer programme, password, code or similar data designed for committing any of the section 2 to 5 offences (s. 6).

Italy Codice Penale Art. 615-quater, Illicit Possession or Distribution of Access Devices

Do not obtain, hold, produce, reproduce, distribute, or supply codes, passwords, devices, or other means suited to accessing a computer or telematic system protected by security measures, or instructions enabling that access, without authorization.

Japan Penal Code, creation, provision and use of unauthorized command electronic records (computer viruses)

Do not, without a legitimate reason, create or provide to another person an electronic record that gives an improper command making a computer, when a person uses it, fail to act as that person intends or act contrary to that intent, or a record describing such a command, where the purpose is to have it run on another person's computer.

Do not, without a legitimate reason, put a record that itself gives such an improper command into a state in which it is executed on another person's computer; an attempt is also an offence.

+1 more
Kansas Unlawful acts concerning computers (Kansas's computer-crime statute)

Do not knowingly and without authorization disclose a password, code, or other means of access to a computer, computer network, social networking website, or another person's personal electronic content.

Kazakhstan Penal Code, disruption of an informatization object

Do not carry out intentional acts or omissions directed at disrupting the operation of an informatization object, such as a server or online service.

Latvia Krimināllikums Sections 241, 243, 244, Automated Data Processing System Offences

Do not modify, damage, destroy, impair, or conceal information in an automated data processing system without authorization, or knowingly enter false information into it, per Section 243.

Do not manufacture, adapt, distribute, acquire, transport, or store a tool, device, software, password, or access code intended to influence such a system's resources, or to gain unauthorized access to it for committing a crime, per Section 244.

Lebanon Law No. 81/2018 on Electronic Transactions and Personal Data, Illegal Access to an Information System and Related IT-System Offences

Do not fraudulently damage or hinder the operation of an information system, or fraudulently enter, delete, or modify digital data hosted by one.

Do not intentionally hinder, disturb, or disrupt access to a service, hardware, software, or data source through the information network.

Lesotho Penal Code Act, 2010, Misuse of Property of Another

Do not interfere with a computer or electronic storage device owned by another, or the data or programmes on it, without the owner's consent, if you intend to secure an advantage for yourself or cause damage.

Liechtenstein Strafgesetzbuch Arts. 126a to 126c, Data Damage, System Interference and Misuse of Devices

Do not change, delete, or otherwise make unusable or suppress data processed, transmitted, or supplied by automation that is not at your sole disposal, in a way that causes damage to another person.

Do not seriously interfere with the functioning of a computer system that you may not use, or may not use alone, by entering or transmitting data.

+1 more
Lithuania Criminal Code Art. 198-2, Unlawful Disposal of Devices, Software, Passwords and Access Codes

Do not, for criminal purposes or otherwise unlawfully, produce, transport, import, sell, give access to, distribute, acquire or hold devices or software directly intended or adapted to commit criminal offenses, or passwords, codes or similar data intended for connecting to an information system or a part of it.

Maine Aggravated criminal invasion of computer privacy

Do not intentionally or knowingly damage a computer resource, or introduce or allow the introduction of a computer virus into one, without a reasonable ground to believe you have the right to do so.

Malta Criminal Code Article 337D, Misuse of Hardware

Do not modify, damage, destroy, or impair the operation of computer equipment, a computer, a computer system, or a computer network without authorisation while crawling or otherwise interacting with it in Malta, under Article 337D of the Criminal Code.

Massachusetts Obtaining computer services by fraud or misrepresentation; penalties

Do not obtain, or attempt to obtain, a subscription-based or otherwise paid commercial computer service by false representation, false statement, unauthorized account charging, equipment tampering, or any other fraudulent means.

Missouri Tampering with computer data, computer equipment, and computer users

Do not deny computer system services to an authorized user.

Monaco Code Pénal Arts. 389-1 to 389-9, Unauthorized Access, System Interference and Data Damage

Do not produce, hold, or supply a tool, device, password or access code principally designed to commit these offences, other than for authorized testing, research, or protecting an information system.

Mozambique Electronic Transactions Law, Computer Misuse Contraventions

Do not damage, delete, deteriorate, alter, or suppress data belonging to a computer system without authorisation.

Do not intentionally affect the functioning of a computer system or network by introducing, transmitting, damaging, deleting, deteriorating, altering, or suppressing data.

New Mexico Computer Crimes Act, unauthorized computer use

Do not alter, damage, disrupt or destroy computer property or a computer service, or introduce data known to be false with intent to harm another's property or financial interests.

New Zealand Copyright Act 1994, Technological Protection Measures

Do not make, import, sell, distribute, or advertise a device, or provide a service or publish information, intended to circumvent a technological protection measure if you know or have reason to believe it will be used to infringe copyright in the protected work.

Nicaragua Ley No. 1042, interference with and damage to computer systems, as reformed by Ley No. 1219

Do not interfere with, alter, damage, or disable a computer system or the data it holds.

Niger Loi n° 2019-33, accès illégal et maintien frauduleux

Do not cause the suppression, modification or alteration of data, or a malfunction of the system, when accessing or remaining present in it without right.

North Korea Criminal Code, Computer and Information Offenses

Do not violate electronic business order.

North Macedonia Criminal Code, Damage and Unauthorized Entry into a Computer System

Do not delete, alter, damage or conceal computer data, a program, or a computer system without authorization, or otherwise disable or hinder the use of a computer system, data, program or computer communication.

Oregon Oregon Computer Crime, without-authorization access and alteration

Do not knowingly alter, damage or destroy a computer, computer system, computer network, or its software, programs, documentation or data without authorization, and do not access or use one for the purpose of defrauding, obtaining money, property or services by false pretenses, or committing theft.

Pakistan Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016, unauthorized access and interference offences

Do not interfere with, damage, or disrupt an information system or data in Pakistan without authorization, which section 5 of the Act separately punishes.

Paraguay Código Penal, arts. 146 b y 174 b, introducidos por la Ley N° 4439/2011, acceso indebido a datos y a sistemas informáticos

Do not obstruct a data-processing operation by destroying, disabling, removing or altering the infrastructure that carries it out.

Peru Ley 30096, unauthorized access and data/system integrity offenses

Do not damage, introduce, delete, deteriorate, alter, suppress, or make inaccessible another party's computer data.

Do not disable a computer system, impede access to it, or hinder or prevent its operation or the provision of its services.

+1 more
Poland Kodeks karny, Unauthorized Access to Information and Computer-Misuse Offenses

Do not produce, obtain, sell, or supply a device, computer program, password, or access code adapted to commit an Art. 267, 268a, 269, or 269a offense; doing so is a separate offense under Art. 269b carrying imprisonment up to 5 years, unless you act solely to secure a system or to develop a securing method.

Republic of the Congo Law on Combating Cybercrime, Unauthorised Access, Interference and Fraudulent Copying of Data

Do not hinder or attempt to hinder the functioning of an information system.

Rhode Island Rhode Island Computer Crime chapter, unauthorized access and computer trespass

Do not use a computer or network without authority and with intent to disable, alter, or erase data or programs, or to cause a malfunction, even where no fraudulent purpose is involved.

Romania Cod penal, Art. 360-366, Infracțiuni contra siguranței și integrității sistemelor și datelor informatice (Offences Against the Security and Integrity of Computer Systems and Data)

Do not produce, distribute, or possess a device, program, password, or access code intended to commit one of these offences, per Cod penal art. 365.

Russia Criminal Code Article 273, Creation, Use and Distribution of Malicious Computer Programs

Do not create, use, or distribute computer programs, or other computer information, known to be intended for unauthorized destruction, blocking, modification, or copying of computer information, or for defeating computer-information security tools, under Criminal Code Article 273; this reaches tools built to circumvent a site's technical access controls.

Saint Kitts and Nevis Electronic Crimes Act, illegal access and related computer-misuse offences

Do not interfere with data on, or the operation of, a computer system without lawful excuse or justification.

Saint Lucia Computer Misuse Act, unauthorized access, interception and modification

Do not modify data held in a computer system without authorization, including to impair the system's operation or the reliability of the data it holds.

Samoa Crimes Act 2013, computer-access and interference offences

Do not produce, sell, procure, import, distribute, or make available a device, access code, or password designed or intended for use in accessing an electronic system without authorisation.

San Marino Computer Crimes Law, Unlawful Access to Computer or Telematics Systems

Do not hold or access tools suited to enter a security-measure-protected system, or equipment or programmes designed to alter such a system or its data, without justified reason.

Serbia Criminal Code, Offences Against the Security of Computer Data

Do not delete, alter, damage, or conceal computer data or a program without authorisation.

Slovakia Trestný zákon, Unauthorized Access to a Computer System and Related Offences

Do not interfere with a computer system's operation or with computer data within it without authorization, including by unauthorized insertion, transmission, damage, deletion, degradation, alteration, suppression, or blocking of computer data.

Do not produce, import, procure, sell, exchange, distribute, or otherwise make available a device, computer program, password, access code, or similar data created to enable unauthorized access to a computer system.

South Dakota South Dakota Unlawful Use of a Computer System, Software, or Data

Do not disrupt, deny, or inhibit access to software, data, or a computer system, or modify, change, alter, destroy, or disable software, data, or a computer system, without the owner's consent; these acts carry felony exposure up to a Class 2 felony (up to twenty-five years and a $50,000 fine) where the access is also part of a deceptive scheme to obtain money, property, or services.

South Korea Information and Communications Network Act, Article 48 (network intrusion and anti-circumvention)

Do not build, install, or distribute a tool whose purpose is to bypass a network's normal access-control or authentication procedures.

South Sudan Penal Code Act, 2008, computer and electronic related offences

Do not deliberately introduce a computer virus into a computer or computer network without authority from its owner.

Sri Lanka Computer Crime Act, unauthorised access, modification and dealing with unlawfully obtained data

Do not intentionally cause unauthorised modification or damage to a computer, computer system, or computer programme in the course of an automated collection process.

State of Palestine Law by Decree No. 10 of 2018 on Cybercrime, Unauthorised Access and Computer Interference

Do not obstruct or disrupt access to a service, device, programme, or data source on the network (art. 5).

Do not introduce anything that suspends or disrupts a system's operation, or damages, deletes, or modifies a programme, on the network (art. 6).

Suriname Wetboek van Strafrecht, Hacking and Denial of Access (arts. 187b-187c)

Do not hinder another person's access to or use of a computer system by flooding it with data.

Taiwan Criminal Code, Offenses Against Computer Security

Do not build or use a program whose purpose is committing one of the offenses in this chapter (Article 362).

Turkey Turkish Penal Code, Information System Crimes

Do not obstruct or disrupt a computer system's operation, or corrupt, destroy, alter, or render inaccessible the data it holds, or insert or transmit its data without authorisation, regardless of whether the data taken is personal.

Ukraine Criminal Code, Creation and Distribution of Malicious Software

Do not create, distribute or sell software or technical means designed for unauthorized interference in the operation of an information, electronic communications or information-and-communications system or network.

Ukraine Criminal Code, Unauthorized Interference with Information Systems

Do not interfere, without authorization, in the operation of an information, electronic communications or information-and-communications system or network.

United States Virgin Islands Virgin Islands Computer Crimes Act, unauthorized access and computer trespass

Do not access or cause to be accessed a computer, computer system, or computer network to devise or execute a scheme to defraud, or to obtain money, property, or services by false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises.

Do not access, without authorization and for a fraudulent or other illegal purpose, a computer, computer system, computer network, computer software, computer program, or the data it contains, to alter, damage, or destroy it.

Uruguay Código Penal arts. 297 bis, 297 ter, 297 quater, 358 quater, and 358 quinquies, computer-offence provisions inserted by Ley N° 20.327

Do not destroy, alter, or render unusable data or computer systems belonging to another without authorization.

Vanuatu Cybercrime Act 2021, computer-access and interference offences

Do not do any act that causes unauthorised interference to a computer system, program or data; the fine and prison term rise sharply where the interference causes a financial loss over VT1,000,000, threatens national security or public health or safety, or causes physical injury or death.

Do not produce, sell, import, export, distribute or make available software, a device, a password or an access code for the purpose of unauthorised interception or interference with a computer system, except for authorised training, testing or protection of a computer system.

Vatican City Unauthorised access to a protected computer or telematic system (Legge N. DXXXI, arts. 158 ter-158 quater)

Do not cause the destruction or damage of a system, or of the data, information, or programs it holds, or interrupt its operation, when you access it; the penalty is higher where the system belongs to the Holy See, Vatican City State, or another public authority.

Do not obtain, reproduce, disseminate, or supply passwords or other means of accessing a protected system, or instructions for doing so, for profit or to cause harm.

Venezuela Ley Especial contra los Delitos Informáticos, unauthorized access and sabotage of systems (Arts. 6-11)

Do not import, distribute, sell, or use equipment or programs meant to defeat a system's security measures.

Virginia Virginia Computer Trespass, malicious intent or deceptive means requirement

Intentionally deceptive circumvention of a technical barrier to disable or alter data or programs squarely fits this statute's elements.

West Virginia West Virginia Computer Crime and Abuse Act

Do not knowingly and willfully access a computer, computer service, or computer network to execute a scheme to defraud or to obtain money, property, or services by fraudulent pretenses; this is a felony punishable by up to $10,000 and ten years, or both.

Do not introduce ransomware into a computer, computer system, or computer network with intent to extort money or other consideration; this is a separate felony punishable by up to $100,000 and ten years, or both.

Wisconsin Wisconsin computer crimes statute

Intentionally flooding a computer, program, system, or network with messages that exceed its processing capacity, causing an interruption in service, is a separate offense under this statute regardless of whether any data is altered.

Zimbabwe Cyber and Data Protection Act, Insertion of Computer-Misuse Offences into the Criminal Law Code

Do not damage, delete, alter, or block access to computer data, or interfere with the functioning of a computer or information system, without lawful authority.

Do not communicate, disclose, or use an access code, password, or programme designed to gain unauthorised access to data or a computer system.

Copyright and text and data mining (TDM) 12

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
Cook Islands Copyright Act 2013, economic rights, computer program copying, and technological protection measures

Do not manufacture, import for sale or rental, or supply a device or means designed to circumvent a technological measure applied to a work, sound recording, or communication to the public to prevent or restrict its copying.

European Union Information Society Directive, Protection of Technological Measures and Rights-Management Information

Do not manufacture, import, distribute, sell, rent, advertise for sale or rental, or possess for commercial purposes a device, product or component, or provide a service, that is promoted for circumvention, has only a limited commercially significant purpose or use other than circumvention, or is primarily designed to enable or facilitate it (Art. 6(2)).

France CPI Technical Protection Measures, Protection of Effective Technical Measures and the Offences of Circumventing Them

Do not knowingly procure or offer to others, directly or indirectly, means designed or specially adapted to defeat an effective technical measure, whether by manufacturing or importing an application, device or component other than for research, holding one for sale, loan or hire or making it available to the public, providing a service for that purpose, or inciting its use or advertising any of those processes (Article L. 335-3-1, II).

If you are a rightholder that uses technical protection measures, take the useful steps so that they do not deprive the beneficiaries of the exceptions in point 2° of Article L. 331-28 of their effective exercise (Article L. 331-7).

+2 more
Germany Schutz technischer Massnahmen und Durchsetzung von Schrankenbestimmungen (Protection of Technological Measures)

Do not manufacture, import, distribute, sell, rent, advertise for sale or rental, or possess for commercial purposes, a device, product or component, or provide a service, that is marketed to circumvent effective technical measures, has only a limited commercial purpose beyond circumvention, or is mainly designed or provided to enable or facilitate circumvention.

Where you apply technical measures to a work, give the beneficiaries of the listed copyright exceptions, including text and data mining under section 44b, who have lawful access to the work, the means needed to use the exception to the extent required; an agreement excluding this duty is void.

Germany Text und Data Mining (General Text and Data Mining Exception)

May reproduce lawfully accessible works for text and data mining, but must delete the reproduction once it is no longer needed for that purpose.

Hungary Szjt. Section 35/A, Text and Data Mining Exception

Keep any copies made for text-and-data mining only for as long as the mining itself requires.

Ireland Text and Data Mining Exceptions, Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000 ss. 53A-53B

A reproduction made under the research and non-commercial text-and-data-mining exception must be stored in a secure manner appropriate to the work, and may be retained for the purposes of research, including verification of results (s. 53A(3A)).

Italy Legge sul Diritto d'Autore Artt. 70-ter and 70-quater, Text-and-Data-Mining Exceptions

Keep any copy made under Article 70-quater only for as long as needed for text and data mining, and secure it to at least the level Article 70-ter requires.

Latvia Autortiesību likums Article 21.1, Text and Data Mining Exception (Scraping and AI Training)

Keep a copy made under the text-and-data-mining exception only as long as needed for the mining itself, per Article 21.1(2).

Netherlands Auteurswet, artt. 15n and 15o, Text and Data Mining Exceptions

Keep a reproduction made under either exception only as long as needed for the text-and-data-mining purpose.

Show the other 2 laws
Romania Legea nr. 8/1996 privind dreptul de autor și drepturile conexe, art. 36^1-36^2, Text and Data Mining Exceptions, inserted by Legea nr. 69/2022

A research organization or cultural-heritage institution carrying out scientific research may reproduce and extract text and data from a lawfully accessible work without the rights holder's authorization, and must store the copies with appropriate security measures, per art. 36^1.

Slovakia Autorský zákon, TDM Exception

Keep a reproduction made under the general text-and-data-mining exception only for as long as the mining requires.

Unfair competition 7

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
Austria UWG Section 1, General Unfair Commercial Practices Clause

Do not apply, in the course of trade, an unfair commercial practice or other unfair conduct capable of more than trivially disadvantaging a competing undertaking, per UWG Section 1.

California Unfair Competition Law (unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business practices)

Do not engage in an unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business act or practice in connection with scraping or the use of scraped data.

Causing measurable harm to, or impairing the operation of, a target's computer system through your crawling can expose you to trespass to chattels; merely unwanted access without such harm does not, under Intel Corp. v. Hamidi (Cal. 2003).

European Union Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Annex I point 23a (reselling event tickets acquired by automated means that circumvent a purchase limit)

Do not resell event tickets to consumers if you acquired them by using automated means to circumvent any limit imposed on the number of tickets that a person can buy or any other rules applicable to the purchase of tickets (Annex I, point 23a); the practice is in all circumstances regarded as unfair (Article 5(5)).

Germany Verbot unlauterer geschaeftlicher Handlungen und Mitbewerberschutz (General Clause and Competitor Protection)

Do not denigrate or disparage a competitor's identifying marks, goods, services, activities, or personal or business circumstances.

Do not assert or spread unproven facts capable of damaging a competitor's business or credit.

+2 more
Oklahoma Oklahoma Deceptive Trade Practices Act

Do not pass off your goods or services as another's, or make a false representation about the source, sponsorship, approval, affiliation, characteristics, or quantity of goods or services, in the course of business.

South Korea Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act, Art. 2(1) items ka and pa (data misappropriation and general catch-all)

Do not create, provide, or distribute a technology or device whose main purpose is to circumvent a technical measure protecting data.

Taiwan Fair Trade Act, general clause against deceptive or unfair competitive conduct

Do not engage in deceptive conduct, or conduct that is obviously unfair and capable of affecting trading order, toward a competitor; Article 25 is a residual clause the Fair Trade Commission can apply to a novel unfair-competition claim, including one framed around reuse of a competitor's content or data, that no more specific provision of the Act covers.

Contract terms of service (ToS) 2

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
Ontario Electronic Commerce Act, 2000, electronic contracts

Treat terms you accept by touching or clicking on an icon or other place on a computer screen as capable of forming a contract, unless you and the other party agree otherwise (s. 19).

Do not assume that a contract is invalid or unenforceable only because it was made in electronic form (s. 19(3)).

+2 more
Samoa Electronic Transactions Act 2008, electronic contract and signature recognition

Do not rely on an electronic signature to satisfy a signature requirement unless it identifies the signatory, indicates their approval, is as reliable as the purpose requires, and the recipient consents to receiving it.

Personal data 2

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
Barbados Data Protection Act, 2019, reach over scraped personal data

Before moving scraped personal data outside Barbados, confirm an adequate level of protection or an appropriate safeguard.

Central African Republic Loi n° 24.001 portant protection des données à caractère personnel, collecte de données publiquement accessibles et transfert transfrontalier

Before transferring personal data you collected in the Central African Republic, or personal data about a person there, to another country, confirm the destination offers a similar level of protection or rely on one of the Act's specific derogations.

Give the data protection agency prior notice before transferring personal data to a State outside the CEMAC or CEEAC, and rely on the agency's authorization, supported by appropriate contractual guarantees, where the destination lacks equivalent protection.

News-aggregation duties no NIST framework has a home for

38 lines in 24 laws

The AI RMF's third-party data controls, MAP 4.1 and GOVERN 6.1, are the only NIST home for a duty about reusing a publisher's content. Paying and bargaining with publishers, and licensing and running a news service, fall outside both. Each line below was recorded as having no control.

News media bargaining code 7

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
Australia News Media Bargaining (Administration) Act 2026, News Media Bargaining Charge Act 2026 and Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) Act 2026

Pay the news media bargaining charge at 2.75% of the service group's relevant Australian digital advertising revenue for the second-most-recent financial year, if you are the parent entity of a service group that provides a significant social media or search service and the group's revenue for that service exceeds A$250 million.

Offset the charge by providing consideration to registered news businesses: the offset needs new eligible expenditure in relation to at least 8 different news business corporate groups, counts expenditure on groups made up only of small or medium business entities at 200% and on other groups at 150%, and cannot exceed the charge.

+1 more
Australia Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code) Act 2021

If designated, bargain with registered news businesses under the mandatory framework in Part IVBA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).

Canada CRTC Decision 2024-262, Google exemption order under the Online News Act

If you are Google, contribute C$100 million annually to the Canadian Journalism Collective for distribution to eligible Canadian news businesses; payment was required within 60 days of the decision.

Admit new eligible news businesses to the Collective each year, observe a 2% cap on indemnity claims, and give notice of any agreement changes or breaches.

Canada Online News Act

If designated, bargain with eligible Canadian news businesses and reach compensation agreements with them.

Canada Online News Act Application and Exemption Regulations

If you are the largest search engine by Canadian advertising market share, provide at least C$100 million per year (indexed to CPI by formula) to news businesses as a condition of exemption eligibility.

Canada Online News Regulatory Policy CRTC 2024-327, mandatory bargaining framework

Bargain within a 90-day bargaining period, followed by a 120-day mediation phase and a 45-day final offer arbitration period.

Provide the data the framework mandates from platforms, which supports annual auditor reports.

Italy AGCOM Regulation (Delibera 3/23/CONS), Criteria and Procedure for the Equitable Compensation under LDA Article 43-bis

Do not limit the visibility of publishers' content in search results while negotiating the compensation (Article 8(2)).

On the request of the interested party or of AGCOM, make available within thirty days the data needed to apply the compensation criteria (Articles 5 and 7).

Press publishers' right 7

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
Belgium Code de droit économique, article XI.216/2, droit voisin des éditeurs de presse

Negotiate in good faith with the publisher over that use and the remuneration due; either side may refer an unresolved dispute to the Belgian Institute for Postal Services and Telecommunications, which can decide the remuneration and take a binding administrative decision.

On the publisher's written request, give it updated, relevant and complete information on the number of consultations and the revenue you draw from its publications.

Czech Republic Autorský zákon Section 87b, Press Publisher Neighbouring Right

Negotiate the authorization in good faith, on equal and non-discriminatory terms, and pay a reasonable fee; if no fee is agreed within 60 days of the start of negotiations either side may ask the Ministry of Culture to set it, and you must not refuse to supply the data it needs to do so.

France CPI Articles L218-1 to L218-5, Press Publisher and News Agency Neighbouring Right

Pay the publisher remuneration calculated on revenue from every kind of direct or indirect exploitation of the publication, or a flat assessment where that revenue cannot be established (Art. L218-4).

Hungary Szjt. Sections 82/A-82/C, Press Publisher's Right

Pay the publisher remuneration for that use, unless the law provides otherwise (Section 82/B(2)).

Italy Legge sul Diritto d'Autore Art. 43-bis, Press Publisher Neighbouring Right

Pay the publisher equitable compensation ('equo compenso') for online use, on the criteria in AGCOM's regulation (among them online consultations of the article, the publisher's market relevance and journalists employed, and both parties' investment costs and benefits).

Portugal CDADC Article 188.º-A, Press Publisher Online Rights

Give a press publisher, or the collective management body that represents it, relevant and reliable information on your users' uses of its press publications, to the extent reasonable, necessary and proportionate (art. 188.º-B(3)).

Spain TRLPI Article 129 bis, Press Publisher and News Agency Online Rights

Negotiate authorizations in line with the principles of good faith, due diligence, transparency and free competition; disputes go to the Intellectual Property Commission (Comisión de Propiedad Intelectual) rather than a designated bargaining process.

Snippet reproduction 4

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
China Provisions on the Administration of Internet News Information Services, licensing and reprint sourcing duties (Arts. 5-6, 11, 15)

Obtain an internet news information service licence before providing an internet news information service to the public, including a news-reprinting service or a news-dissemination platform service; do not operate without one or beyond its scope.

Meet the licence conditions: be a legal person lawfully established within China, with a PRC-citizen principal officer and editor-in-chief, and keep dedicated editorial, content-review and technical-security staff and systems.

+2 more
Norway Copyright Act, Quotation and Current-Event Reproduction Exceptions

Pay remuneration if you reproduce a published work of art, photograph or film connected to, but not part of, the event; you may do so on the same terms, and no remuneration is due where the work was created in the course of trade for the purpose of reproduction in the media (s. 36).

Poland Ustawa o prawie autorskim, Press Review, Quotation, and Reporting Exceptions

Pay the author remuneration for reproduced articles and reporters' photographs; the same rules apply to making a work available online so that anyone can access it at a place and time of their own choosing (art. 25).

Russia Federal Law No. 149-FZ, Article 10.4, News Aggregator Duties

Verify the accuracy of socially significant information before distributing it, and do not conceal or falsify it.

Do not distribute news information in a defamatory or discriminatory way.

+3 more

Text and data mining (TDM) opt-out 4

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
Greece Law 2121/1993 Articles 21A-21B, Text and Data Mining Exception

Keep copies made for mining only as long as the mining purpose requires.

Latvia Autortiesību likums Article 21.1, Text and Data Mining Exception (News Indexing and Aggregation)

Keep copies made for text and data mining only as long as the mining needs them.

Slovakia Autorský zákon, TDM Exception (Aggregation)

Keep a reproduction made under the exception only for as long as the mining requires it (s. 51c).

Spain RDL 24/2021 Article 67, Text and Data Mining Exception

Research organizations and cultural-heritage institutions that reproduce works for text and data mining for scientific research must store the reproductions with an adequate level of security and may keep them to verify research results; rightsholders may apply measures whose only purpose is the security and integrity of the networks and databases holding the works (Art. 67(4)).

Copyright: the exclusive rights 1

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
United States Copyright Act, first sale and computer program copies, 17 U.S.C. §§ 109 and 117

You may make another copy or adaptation of a computer program you own a copy of, without infringing, only as an essential step in using the program with a machine and for no other use, or for archival purposes only, and you must destroy all archival copies if continued possession of the program ceases to be rightful (s. 117(a)).

Hot news misappropriation 1

JurisdictionLawThe duty, as read
Germany Gezielte Behinderung von Mitbewerbern und aggressive geschäftliche Handlungen (Targeted Obstruction of Competitors and Aggressive Commercial Practices)

Do not target a competitor for obstruction (section 4, number 4).

Do not commit an aggressive commercial practice, meaning one that in the concrete case is capable of significantly impairing the freedom of decision of a consumer or other market participant through harassment, coercion or undue influence, and is capable of leading that person to a commercial decision they would not otherwise have taken (section 4a(1)).

Where the law and the framework part

22 of the 72 controls have no law we track under them.

599 requirement lines were read as having no control in this framework to sit under; they are listed above.

The framework's text

Full text of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, public domain (a US government work).

Read it from the publisher: nvlpubs.nist.gov