Law / Frameworks / NIST AI RMF / Govern
NIST AI RMF, GovernGOVERN 1.6
Mechanisms are in place to inventory AI systems and are resourced according to organizational risk priorities.NIST AI Risk Management Framework, version 1.0, January 2023 (NIST AI 100-1), GOVERN 1.6
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .
- 8
- laws
- 7
- jurisdictions
- 0
- with court rulings behind them
- 1
- not yet in force
Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-07 Human-AI Configuration, 7 laws
- NIST AI 200-22.3 Apply & Measure, 7 laws
- NIST AI 200-24.3 Composing a TEVV Toolbox, 7 laws
- OWASP LLM Top 10LLM03:2026 Excessive Agency, 7 laws
- OWASP Agentic Top 10ASI09 Human-Agent Trust Exploitation, 7 laws
- MIT mitigations1.1 Board Structure & Oversight, 7 laws
- MIT mitigations1.2 Risk Management, 7 laws
- MIT mitigations3.5 Post-deployment Monitoring, 7 laws
- 1 more in the MIT mitigations
- NIST Privacy FrameworkID.IM-P1 Systems/products/services that process data are inventoried., 3 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-005 System Acceptance Testing, 7 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-006 Data Quality & Classification/Sensitivity, 7 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-024 Human-in-the-Loop Action Approval Gate, 7 laws
- 3 more in the FINOS AIGF
- ETSI EN 304 2235.1.4-1 Capability for human oversight designed in and maintained., 7 laws
- ETSI EN 304 2235.2.1-1 Full inventory of assets, including their dependencies and connections., 7 laws
- ETSI EN 304 2235.2.4-1 Developers keep an audit trail of system design and post-deployment..., 7 laws
- 1 more in the ETSI EN 304 223
A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force
AI sector rules
8 laws, 7 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| OSFI Guideline E-23, Enterprise-Wide Model Risk Management for Deposit-Taking Institutions (2017) |
Maintain an up-to-date inventory of all models in use and recently decommissioned, controlled by a list of authorized individuals, and make it available to OSFI on request. A standardized institution should, at a minimum, provide OSFI with an inventory of all models in use and identify and assess its most material models. |
|
| OSFI Guideline E-23, Model Risk Management (2027) from , in 6 months |
You should identify and track all models in use or recently decommissioned, including vendor and third-party models, and keep every model with non-negligible inherent model risk in a model inventory that is comprehensive, maintained at the enterprise level, accurate and updated in a timely manner. At a minimum, maintain for each identified model its ID, name and description of key features and use, model risk rating, owner, developer and origin, and for each model in the inventory also its version, deployment date, reviewer, approver, dependencies, data sources, approved uses, limitations, most recent review date, monitoring status and next review date. |
|
| Financial Services (Robotic and Artificial Intelligence Enabled Advisory Services) Rules 2021 |
Keep, in addition to the records required by section 29 of the Financial Services Act, a copy of the advice given and the output of the investment, the client information relied on to generate the advice, and details of all algorithms and software you use (clause 12). |
|
| Michigan DIFS Bulletin 2026-03-BT/CF/CU, Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by Financial Service Providers |
Your AIS Program should document your risk identification, mitigation, and management framework and internal controls, including inventories and descriptions of Predictive Models, validation, testing, and retesting, protection of non-public information, and data and record retention (guidelines 3.1 to 3.7). |
|
| Qatar Central Bank Artificial Intelligence Guideline |
A QCB-regulated entity deploying a High-Risk AI system must maintain an AI system register, adopt an AI governance policy, conduct risk and bias assessments, and provide human oversight of the system's decisions. |
|
| Guidance Note on the Consumer Protection and Responsible Adoption and Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning by Licensed Financial Institutions in the U.A.E. |
Maintain an inventory of all AI models, systems or technologies you develop or deploy, with at least the model name, purpose and risk rating, following the Central Bank's Model Management Standards and Model Management Guidance (2022) (Section 2(f)). |
|
| Model risk management principles for banks |
Adopt the statement's definition of a model as the scope of your model risk management framework, keep a complete and accurate firm-wide inventory of models in use, under development and decommissioned, and assign each model a risk-based tier by materiality and complexity, considering where necessary alternative and unstructured data and the model's interpretability, explainability, transparency and potential for designer or data bias (Principle 1). |
|
| Interagency Supervisory Guidance on Model Risk Management (2026 revision) |
Maintain a model inventory with enough information to understand model risks at the individual and aggregate levels; the guidance calls this common industry practice. |
Full text of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, public domain (a US government work). Every control of the framework.