Law / Frameworks / NIST AI RMF / Govern
NIST AI RMF, GovernGOVERN 1.5
Ongoing monitoring and periodic review of the risk management process and its outcomes are planned and organizational roles and responsibilities clearly defined, including determining the frequency of periodic review.NIST AI Risk Management Framework, version 1.0, January 2023 (NIST AI 100-1), GOVERN 1.5
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Corpus as of .
- 2
- laws
- 2
- places
- 0
- with court rulings behind them
- 0
- not yet in force
AI governance
2 laws, 2 places| Place | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
 California |
Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 53) |
If you are a large frontier developer (a frontier developer whose group had annual gross revenues over $500,000,000 in the prior calendar year), write, implement and publish on your website a frontier AI framework describing how you define and assess catastrophic-risk thresholds for your frontier models and apply mitigations, and review that framework at least once a year |
 New York |
Responsible AI Safety and Education Act (RAISE Act) |
Review your safety and security protocol at least once a year, and if that review materially modifies it, publish the modified protocol and transmit it to the Attorney General and the Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services the same way you published the original |
Full text of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, public domain (a US government work). Every control of the framework.