Law / Qatar

Qatar Central Bank Artificial Intelligence Guideline

Qatar Central Bank Artificial Intelligence Guideline (2024)

In force.

An AI sector rules rule binding private bodies.

How the hook was established
express
What makes it apply
Operator establishment
Audit expectation
periodic
Who audits it
Self
Where the report goes
Kept

What it requires

  • A QCB-regulated financial entity must obtain QCB approval before launching a new AI system as a provider or making a material modification to one, and before signing a High-Risk AI purchase, licensing, or outsourcing agreement.NIST AI RMFGOVERN 1.1
  • A QCB-regulated entity deploying a High-Risk AI system must maintain an AI system register, adopt an AI governance policy, conduct risk and bias assessments, and provide human oversight of the system's decisions.NIST AI RMFGOVERN 1.6NIST AI RMFMEASURE 2.11NIST AI RMFMAP 3.5
  • A QCB-regulated entity must give a customer a mechanism to raise inquiries about an AI-driven decision affecting them and request a review of it.NIST AI RMFMEASURE 3.3

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • GOVERN 1.1Legal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and documented.
  • GOVERN 1.6Mechanisms are in place to inventory AI systems and are resourced according to organizational risk priorities.
  • MAP 3.5Processes for human oversight are defined, assessed, and documented in accordance with organizational policies from the GOVERN function.
  • MEASURE 2.11Fairness and bias – as identified in the MAP function – are evaluated and results are documented.
  • MEASURE 3.3Feedback processes for end users and impacted communities to report problems and appeal system outcomes are established and integrated into AI system evaluation metrics.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework, and in the NIST AI RMF, line by line beside each duty above. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

What it makes you log

Who may demand the log

Regulator

What the log must hold

System identity, Decision basis, Output reference, Data lineage

Logging duty

Section 16.1's mandatory ('must') framework for a High-Risk AI system requires, at 16.1.7, systems and procedures for record keeping of all relevant documentation and information. Section 19.2 additionally asks (using 'should' rather than 'must', softer than most of this Guideline's mandatory duties) that an Entity maintain auditable records of its experience with AI Systems, including establishing audit logs and maintaining traceability of decisions and outcomes, design documentation, records of model versions and code, and archiving the original data sets used to develop, retrain, or calibrate a model.

Kind
Explicit
As of
Provision
Sections 16.1.7 and 19.2-19.3
Trigger
high_risk_systems

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

The Guideline covers the use of AI by a QCB-regulated entity and imposes mandatory duties, using 'must' throughout, rather than voluntary recommendations. An entity must receive QCB approval before launching a new AI system as a provider, before a material modification to one, and before signing a High-Risk AI purchase, licensing, or outsourcing agreement.

A regulated entity must maintain an AI system register and a defined AI strategy, adopt an AI governance policy, conduct risk assessments including bias testing for High-Risk AI, and provide human oversight of AI-driven decisions. A regulated entity must give a customer a mechanism to raise inquiries about an AI-driven decision and request a review of it, and must handle any resulting complaint through standard customer-complaint processes.

The Guideline states that, alongside the Qatar Central Bank Law, an entity must also comply with named secondary regulations, including the Personal Data Privacy Protection Law (Law No. 13 of 2016) where personal data is involved. No Qatar Central Bank notice or circular stating the day the Guideline came into force has been located.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app makes high-risk automated decisions or provides financial services.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .