Law / Qatar

Qatar

23 of 25 named instruments researched to a stage, across five of the ten areas of law we track: 23 in force. As of .

  1. AI law 1
  2. Privacy law 12
  3. Scraping law 3
  4. Cybersecurity law 6
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

AI law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (148 words)

Qatar has no general AI statute; the national AI strategy published by the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (MCIT) is a government-facing policy document rather than a law binding third parties.

The one binding, sector-specific AI rule found at primary source is the Qatar Central Bank's Artificial Intelligence Guideline, issued for 2024 under the Qatar Central Bank Law, which imposes mandatory AI-governance, approval, and human-oversight duties on QCB-regulated financial entities.

Other Qatari regulators, including MCIT and the National Cyber Security Agency, have issued non-binding AI ethics and security guidance; because such guidance carries no statutory force, it is not authored here as an instrument.

A Qatar International Court and Dispute Resolution Centre practice direction on verifying AI-generated material in court filings governs litigation conduct before that court alone and does not impose a duty on an app or service generally, so it is likewise not authored here.

AI sector rules

Qatar Central Bank Artificial Intelligence Guideline

Qatar Central Bank Artificial Intelligence Guideline (2024)Qatar Central Bank, official guideline text

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Guideline covers the use of AI by a QCB-regulated entity and imposes mandatory duties, using 'must' throughout, rather than voluntary recommendations. An entity must receive QCB approval before launching a new AI system as a provider, before a material modification to one, and before signing a High-Risk AI purchase, licensing, or outsourcing agreement.

A regulated entity must maintain an AI system register and a defined AI strategy, adopt an AI governance policy, conduct risk assessments including bias testing for High-Risk AI, and provide human oversight of AI-driven decisions. A regulated entity must give a customer a mechanism to raise inquiries about an AI-driven decision and request a review of it, and must handle any resulting complaint through standard customer-complaint processes.

The Guideline states that, alongside the Qatar Central Bank Law, an entity must also comply with named secondary regulations, including the Personal Data Privacy Protection Law (Law No. 13 of 2016) where personal data is involved. No Qatar Central Bank notice or circular stating the day the Guideline came into force has been located.

What it requires

Privacy law12 instruments, 12 in force

Research summary (215 words)

Qatar's Personal Data Privacy Protection Law (Law No. 13 of 2016, PDPPL) is a comprehensive regime. Article 1's broad, technology-neutral Personal Data definition ("data of an individual whose identity is defined or can be reasonably defined") reaches a voiceprint or faceprint like any other identifying data, so an app deriving one from an individual in Qatar is bound by the PDPPL's ordinary duties.

Article 16's "Personal Data with Special Nature" list, the closest thing the PDPPL has to a sensitive-category provision, does not name biometric data, so a biometric identifier is outside the Article 16(3) requirement of permission from the Competent Department unless the Minister adds that category by decision (Article 16, paragraph 2).

Cross-border data flow is governed by Article 15, whose plain text bars the Controller from restricting flow except where the underlying processing already breaches the Law or risks serious damage, a permissive default rather than an adequacy gate.

Qatar also runs a separate Qatar Financial Centre (QFC) free-zone regime, the QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 (QFC Regulation No 6), whose published contents provide for a Data Protection Office and Data Protection Commissioner, data-subject rights of access, rectification, erasure, objection, restriction of processing and data portability, automated individual decision-making including profiling, transfers out of the QFC, and notification of personal data breaches.

Breach notification

Personal Data Privacy Protection Law, breach notification

Law No. 13 of 2016, Arts. 13-14official statute text, National Cyber Security Agency document library

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Art. 14 requires the Controller to inform the Individual and the Competent Department of a breach of the Art. 13 security precautions, but only if the breach may cause serious damage to Personal Data or individual privacy, a materiality-gated duty whose statutory text fixes no notification timeline.

The National Cyber Governance and Assurance Affairs states in its breach-notification guideline that controllers must notify it and individuals of a personal data breach within 72 hours of becoming aware of the breach where the breach can cause serious damage to individuals. Art. 13 separately requires the Processor to "forthwith notify the Controller" of any breach or risk, an internal Processor-to-Controller duty distinct from the Controller's own duty to the Individual and Department.

These duties apply to any Personal Data breach, including one involving a biometric identifier, since Arts. 13-14 are not limited to Art. 16's special-nature categories.

What it requires

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, breach notification

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, Art. 31Text of the QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 as reproduced in the QFC Data Protection Office guidance

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 31(1) of the QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 requires a Data Controller to notify a Personal Data Breach to the Data Protection Office without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after becoming aware of it. Article 31(2) removes the duty where the Data Controller has determined that the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and legitimate interests of Data Subjects.

Article 31(6) requires the Data Controller to consider notifying affected Data Subjects, and Article 31(7) requires a Data Processor to notify the Data Controller without undue delay after becoming aware of a breach. Article 31(5) requires the Data Controller to document any Personal Data Breaches.

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

Personal Data Privacy Protection Law, comprehensive regime

Law No. 13 of 2016, Chapter Oneofficial statute text, National Cyber Security Agency document library

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The Personal Data Privacy Protection Law (PDPPL), 27 articles, is Qatar's comprehensive personal-data statute, defining Controller, Processor, Individual, Personal Data, Cross-Border Data Flows, and other core terms in Chapter One.

Art. 1's Personal Data definition ("data of an individual whose identity is defined or can be reasonably defined") is broad and technology-neutral and plainly reaches a voiceprint or faceprint, so a biometric identifier is ordinary Personal Data bound by the PDPPL's ordinary duties even though it is absent from the Art. 16 special-nature list (see the Article 16 entry): the absence changes which heightened permission duty applies, not whether the PDPPL applies at all. Its structure is consent-and-purpose based.

What it requires

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, general regime

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, Arts. 6-10Text of the QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 as reproduced in the QFC Data Protection Office guidance

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 are the general personal-data regime of the Qatar Financial Centre (QFC), and the laws, rules and regulations of the State of Qatar on the matters they deal with do not apply in the QFC to the fullest extent the QFC Law permits. Article 7(1) applies them to the Processing of Personal Data by a Data Controller or Data Processor incorporated or registered in the QFC.

Article 8 sets the principles of lawfulness, fairness and transparency, specific purpose, data minimisation, accuracy and storage limitation, and Article 10(1) makes Processing lawful only if one of the listed bases applies, consent among them. Version 3 of the Regulations came into force on .

What it requires

Cross border transfer

Personal Data Privacy Protection Law, cross-border data flow

Law No. 13 of 2016, Art. 15official statute text, National Cyber Security Agency document library

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Art. 15 bars the Controller from restricting cross-border data flow, unless the underlying processing already breaches the Law or would cause serious damage to the Personal Data or the Individual's privacy. Read plainly, this is a permissive default favoring cross-border flow rather than an adequacy gate.

Art. 15 applies to Personal Data generally, biometric identifiers included, since Art. 16's special-nature list narrows only which processing needs Competent Department permission, not what counts as Personal Data for this provision.

What it requires

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, transfers out of the QFC

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, Arts. 23-24Text of the QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 as reproduced in the QFC Data Protection Office guidance

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 23 of the QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 allows a transfer of Personal Data to a Recipient in a jurisdiction outside the QFC if the Data Protection Office has decided that the jurisdiction has an adequate level of protection. Article 24 allows a transfer to a jurisdiction without that decision only if appropriate safeguards are provided, a listed derogation applies, the limited circumstances of paragraph (4) apply, or the transfer rests on an approved transfer mechanism.

The appropriate safeguards of Article 24(2) include a legally binding agreement between the parties that includes standard data protection clauses adopted by the Data Protection Office. Under Article 33(2)(I) the Data Protection Office may order the suspension of data transfers to a Recipient outside the QFC.

What it requires

Data subject rights

Personal Data Privacy Protection Law, rights of the individual

Law No. 13 of 2016, Arts. 5-6official statute text, National Cyber Security Agency document library

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 5 of the Personal Data Privacy Protection Law lets an Individual at any time withdraw consent to the processing of their Personal Data, object to processing that is not necessary for the purposes of collection, ask for omission or erasure when the purpose of the processing has ceased or the justifications for keeping the Personal Data cease to exist, and ask for corrections accompanied by proof of accuracy.

Article 6 lets an Individual access and review their Personal Data against any Controller, including to be notified of the processing and its purposes and to obtain a copy after paying no more than the service charge. Article 7 leaves the controls and procedures for exercising these rights to a decision of the Minister, and Article 19 exempts a Controller from Articles 5 (items 1 to 3) and 6 in listed cases such as a legal obligation or an order of a competent court.

What it requires

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, data subject rights

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, Arts. 16-21Text of the QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 as reproduced in the QFC Data Protection Office guidance

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Articles 16 to 21 of the QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 give a Data Subject the rights of access, rectification, erasure, objection, restriction of Processing and data portability against a Data Controller. Under Article 16(3) the Data Controller must give the Data Subject a copy of the Personal Data being processed when requested. Under Article 18(1) the Data Controller must erase Personal Data without undue delay on a request in the circumstances listed in Article 18(2).

Article 21(1) gives a Data Subject the right to receive Personal Data they provided in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format where the Processing rests on consent or a contract and is carried out by automated means.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Personal Data Privacy Protection Law, enforcement and penalties

Law No. 13 of 2016, Arts. 23-26official statute text, National Cyber Security Agency document library

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Art. 23 sets fines up to QAR 1,000,000 for violations of Arts. 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, and 22. Art. 24 sets fines up to QAR 5,000,000 for violations of Art. 13, Art. 16(3) (special-nature data processing without permission), and Art. 17 (children's websites). Art. 25 extends liability to a legal person committing these "crimes" in its name, confirming these are framed as criminal offenses rather than purely civil or administrative fines.

Art. 26 gives an Individual a complaint route to the Competent Department, which can issue a binding rectification order for a proven serious complaint, with a grievance route to the Minister (60-day windows both ways, silence treated as implicit rejection). The PDPPL's own text names "the Competent Department" (within the Ministry of Transport and Communications) as enforcer.

What it requires

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, supervision and penalties

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, Arts. 33-36Text of the QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 as reproduced in the QFC Data Protection Office guidance

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 33 of the QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 gives the Data Protection Office investigative powers, including to carry out data protection audits and to obtain access to premises and data processing equipment of a Data Controller or Data Processor. Article 33(2) gives it corrective powers, including to issue reprimands, to ban Processing and to impose a penalty under Article 36.

Article 34(1) gives every Data Subject, body, organisation or association the right to lodge a complaint with the Data Protection Office about an alleged infringement. Article 36(3) subjects an infringement of any provision of the Regulations, or non-compliance with an order of the Data Protection Office, to a maximum penalty of USD1,500,000.

What it requires

Sensitive categories

Personal Data Privacy Protection Law, special-nature personal data

Law No. 13 of 2016, Art. 16official statute text, National Cyber Security Agency document library

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Art. 16 lists ethnic origin, children's data, health, physical or psychological condition, religious creeds, marital relations, and criminal offenses as "Personal Data with Special Nature." Biometric data is not named; the Minister may add other categories by decision where misuse could cause serious damage (Art. 16, para. 2).

Processing special-nature data requires "permission from the Competent Department, as per the measures and controls determined by a decision issued by the Minister" (Art. 16, para. 3), and a violation carries the higher QAR 5,000,000 penalty tier under Art. 24. Qatar's PDPPL does not name biometric identifiers as a heightened category.

What it requires

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, sensitive personal data

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, Art. 12Text of the QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 as reproduced in the QFC Data Protection Office guidance

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 12 of the QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 prohibits the Processing of Sensitive Personal Data unless a listed condition applies, such as the explicit written consent of the Data Subject.

The Regulations define Sensitive Personal Data as Personal Data revealing or relating to race or ethnicity, political affiliation or opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade-union or organisational membership, criminal records, health or sex life, and genetic and biometric data used to identify an individual.

Article 12(2) provides that paragraph (1) does not apply if the Data Controller has obtained a permit from the Data Protection Office to Process the relevant Personal Data and applies adequate safeguards in the Processing.

What it requires

Scraping law3 instruments, 3 in force

Research summary (275 words)

Qatar has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

The Cybercrime Prevention Law (Law No. 14 of 2014) criminalises intentionally and illegally accessing a website, information system, or information network, exceeding authorised access, or knowingly continuing access once it is known to be unauthorised (art. 3), with a doubled penalty where the target belongs to a state authority or affiliated corporation (art. 2); no reported case addresses whether reading a public, unauthenticated page without defeating an access control fits this offence.

No Qatari court has ruled on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper.

The Copyright Protection Law (Law No. 7 of 2002) permits reproduction for personal use, non-profit teaching illustration, and brief quotation for criticism (art. 18), and lets the lawful holder of a computer program copy adapt it to the extent justified by the original purpose (art. 20), but Qatar has not enacted a text-and-data-mining exception, so bulk reproduction of copyrighted text to train a model does not fit these narrow categories.

A database or compilation is protected only if creative in the selection or arrangement of its contents (art. 3(3)); Qatar confers no separate sui generis database right, and laws, official documents, ideas, procedures, and daily news of a mere informatory nature are excluded from protection altogether (art. 4).

Personal-data reach over scraped public personal data is governed by the Personal Data Privacy Protection Law (Law No. 13 of 2016), already researched under this jurisdiction's privacy topic. No Qatari statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Cybercrime Prevention Law, unauthorised access

Law No. 14 of 2014 (Cybercrime Prevention Law), arts. 2-4official unofficial-translation text published by the Communications Regulatory Authority (CRA)

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 3 punishes any person who intentionally and illegally accesses a website, information system, information network, or information technology technique, exceeds authorised access, or knowingly continues to visit or access it once aware the access is unauthorised, with imprisonment of up to three years and a fine of up to QAR 500,000, doubled where the access results in acquiring, disclosing, destroying, or republishing data.

Article 2 imposes the same base penalty, doubled on the same grounds, for unlawful access specifically to a website or information system belonging to a state authority, body, entity, or affiliated corporation. Article 4 separately punishes unlawfully capturing, intercepting, or spying on traffic data or data in transit through an information network or technology technique, with a lower ceiling of two years and QAR 100,000.

The Law does not define 'unauthorised' by reference to a technical access control. Article 1 of the promulgating Law provides that the Cybercrime Prevention Law comes into force, without stating a day. No gazette notice stating the day has been located.

What it requires

Copyright and text and data mining (TDM)

Copyright Protection Law, exceptions to copyright

Law No. 7 of 2002, arts. 18, 20-21official English translation of Law No. 7 of 2002, WIPO Lex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 18 permits using a protected work without the author's authorisation for exclusively personal use (reproduction, translation, or quotation among other means), and for non-profit teaching illustration with source and author attribution. Article 20 lets the rightful owner of a copy of a computer program reproduce or adapt it, in a single copy, to the extent justified by the original purpose or for preservation, a right that lapses once possession of the program ceases to be lawful.

Article 21 permits reproduction of articles, short works, or extracts for teaching in non-commercial educational institutions, subject to conditions. Article 58 ties the Law's entry into force to the date of its publication in the Official Gazette, reported by WIPO Lex's bibliographic record for this version as . Exceeding these exceptions is an ordinary infringement, punishable under article 48.

What it requires

Database right

Copyright Protection Law, database and excluded subject matter

Law No. 7 of 2002, arts. 3(3), 4official English translation of Law No. 7 of 2002, WIPO Lex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 3(3), read against article 2's list of originally protected works, protects a database as a derived work only 'if creative in the arrangement of selection of their subject matter', the same originality-in-selection standard the article applies to encyclopedia collections and folklore compilations; Qatar confers no separate sui generis database right beyond this compilation standard.

Article 4 excludes laws, legal provisions, administrative decisions, international treaties, and official documents from protection (though a creative compilation of such material is still protected), along with daily news and other news of a mere informatory nature, and ideas, procedures, operational methods, mathematical concepts, principles, and mere data, while any derivative expression of the latter category remains protectable.

A scraper copying data from a non-creatively-arranged database, or copying facts, ideas, or bare daily news, does not infringe a copyright interest in that material under this Law.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law6 instruments, 6 in force

Research summary (522 words)

Qatar's National Cyber Security Agency (NCSA) was established by Amiri Decree No. (1) of 2021 and operates under the direct supervision of the Prime Minister; NCSA's own published index of Laws and Legislations names only the Personal Data Privacy Protection Law (Law No. 13 of 2016), already this jurisdiction's privacy row, and no separate enacted statute setting security requirements a software product or connected device must meet before or after it reaches the market.

NCSA instead maintains a National Information Assurance (NIA) accreditation and certification scheme and a companion Qatar Common Criteria Scheme (QCCS), together with a Qatar Cybersecurity Framework, all filed by NCSA itself as Standards and Frameworks or Policies rather than as legislation; whether any class of entity is legally required to hold NIA or QCCS certification is not established in the pages reached, and if such a mandate exists its bound party would be a government or critical-sector entity NCSA designates, a role this corpus's activity vocabulary cannot express regardless, the same treatment this profile gives DORA's financial entities and Singapore's critical-information-infrastructure owners.

NCSA's National Incident Management Framework classifies a cyber incident as nationally, sectorally, or locally coordinated, or of no national significance, and lays out a five-stage response lifecycle NCSA itself follows, but the framework describes NCSA's own coordination role rather than stating a codified reporting clock or a duty reaching a private business generally.

The Qatar Central Bank (QCB) names an Information Security item in its own Policies and Legislation index and runs a national information-security awareness campaign; QCB's Artificial Intelligence Guideline requires an Entity to comply with a Sector-Specific Security Regulation in every AI deployment and lists a Technology Risks Circular (January 2018) and a Cloud Computing Regulation (2024) among the further regulations a QCB-supervised entity must observe.

QCB publishes the Technology Risks Regulation for Banks (January 2018), the Insurance Sector Cyber Security Regulation (2019) and the Technology Risk Instructions for Financial Services Operators (2022), and each is a sector security regime row and an incident reporting row of this jurisdiction.

Article 216 of the Qatar Central Bank Law (Law No. 13 of 2012) lets QCB impose a financial penalty of up to 10,000,000 riyals for every violation of the Law or of the regulations, decisions or instructions issued in implementation of it, and up to 100,000 riyals a day for a continuing violation.

The Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority (QFCRA), established by Law No. 7 of 2005, regulates every firm authorised to conduct financial services in or from the Qatar Financial Centre under its own principles-based rulebook; a technology or cybersecurity module of that rulebook was not located.

No enacted Qatar statute was found to impose a general reasonable-security or information-security-programme duty on a business simply because it holds covered data; the Personal Data Privacy Protection Law's own safeguards and breach-notification duties are already this jurisdiction's privacy row and are not repeated here.

The Cybercrime Prevention Law's (Law No. 14 of 2014) unauthorised-access offence, Art. 3, doubled where the target belongs to a state authority under Art. 2, binds an intruder rather than a product or system operator and is already this jurisdiction's scraping-topic material.

Sector security regimes

Qatar Central Bank Insurance Sector Cyber Security Regulation, cyber security requirements

Qatar Central Bank Insurance Sector Cyber Security Regulation (2019), Sections 1 to 9Qatar Central Bank, Cyber Security Regulation for Insurance Sector (2019), published on the Qatar Central Bank website

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Insurance Sector Cyber Security Regulation is addressed to the insurance sector in Qatar, which it says is required to comply with its requirements. An insurance company's board and senior management must oversee its technology risks. An insurance company must have its information systems audited at least once every year, or whenever a change may affect their security. An insurance company must submit a compliance report to QCB on an annual basis at a minimum.

An insurance company must obtain QCB's prior approval before entering into an outsourcing agreement. Article 216 of the Qatar Central Bank Law (Law No. 13 of 2012) lets the Qatar Central Bank impose a financial penalty of up to 10,000,000 riyals for every violation of the Law or of the regulations, decisions or instructions issued in implementation of it, and up to 100,000 riyals a day for a continuing violation.

The Qatar Central Bank's enforcement guidance lists a breach of the Law or its implementing resolutions or instructions among the grounds on which a licence can be canceled or suspended under Article 90 of the Law.

What it requires

Qatar Central Bank Technology Risk Instructions for Financial Services Operators, security requirements

Qatar Central Bank Technology Risk Instructions for Financial Services Operators (2022), Sections 1 to 3Qatar Central Bank, Technology Risk Instructions for Financial Service Operators (2022), published on the Qatar Central Bank website

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Technology Risk Instructions apply to all Financial Service Operators, meaning exchange houses, investment companies, finance houses and their relevant brokers operating in Qatar and regulated by the Qatar Central Bank. A Financial Service Operator is required to comply with the requirements defined in the Instructions. The board and executive management of a Financial Service Operator must ensure an Information Security program is in place.

A Financial Service Operator must define and establish a risk management framework to manage technology risks. A Financial Service Operator must report its compliance with the requirements of the Instructions. The Instructions list the Qatar Central Bank Law (Law No. 13 of 2012) among the Qatar laws a Financial Service Operator must comply with.

Article 216 of the Qatar Central Bank Law (Law No. 13 of 2012) lets the Qatar Central Bank impose a financial penalty of up to 10,000,000 riyals for every violation of the Law or of the regulations, decisions or instructions issued in implementation of it, and up to 100,000 riyals a day for a continuing violation.

The Qatar Central Bank's enforcement guidance lists a breach of the Law or its implementing resolutions or instructions among the grounds on which a licence can be canceled or suspended under Article 90 of the Law.

What it requires

Qatar Central Bank Technology Risks Regulation for Banks, cyber security requirements

Qatar Central Bank Technology Risks Regulation for Banks (January 2018), Sections 1 to 9Qatar Central Bank, Technology Risks Regulation for Banks (January 2018), published on the Qatar Central Bank website

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Technology Risks Regulation is addressed to banks in Qatar, which it says are required to comply with its requirements. A bank's board and senior management must oversee its technology risks. A bank must have its information systems audited at least once every year, or whenever a change may affect their security. A bank must submit a compliance report to QCB on an annual basis at a minimum. A bank must obtain QCB's prior approval before entering into an outsourcing agreement.

QCB's published sanctions part for banks provides that penalties are imposed for any violation of the instructions on Modern Technology and Electronic Banking Services Risks, the circular whose requirements this Regulation says it has enhanced.

Article 216 of the Qatar Central Bank Law (Law No. 13 of 2012) lets the Qatar Central Bank impose a financial penalty of up to 10,000,000 riyals for every violation of the Law or of the regulations, decisions or instructions issued in implementation of it, and up to 100,000 riyals a day for a continuing violation.

The Qatar Central Bank's enforcement guidance lists a breach of the Law or its implementing resolutions or instructions among the grounds on which a licence can be canceled or suspended under Article 90 of the Law.

What it requires

Vulnerability and incident reporting

Qatar Central Bank Insurance Sector Cyber Security Regulation, incident management and reporting

Qatar Central Bank Insurance Sector Cyber Security Regulation (2019), Section 8.2Qatar Central Bank, Cyber Security Regulation for Insurance Sector (2019), published on the Qatar Central Bank website

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Insurance Sector Cyber Security Regulation is addressed to the insurance sector in Qatar, which it says is required to comply with its requirements. An insurance company must establish an Incident Management Framework and an Incident Management Policy and procedures to protect, detect, evaluate and respond to cyber incidents. Critical incidents must be reported immediately to QCB or within 1 hour of identification of the incident.

An insurance company must test its predetermined escalation and response plan for security incidents on an annual basis. Article 216 of the Qatar Central Bank Law (Law No. 13 of 2012) lets the Qatar Central Bank impose a financial penalty of up to 10,000,000 riyals for every violation of the Law or of the regulations, decisions or instructions issued in implementation of it, and up to 100,000 riyals a day for a continuing violation.

The Qatar Central Bank's enforcement guidance lists a breach of the Law or its implementing resolutions or instructions among the grounds on which a licence can be canceled or suspended under Article 90 of the Law.

What it requires

Qatar Central Bank Technology Risk Instructions for Financial Services Operators, incident management and notification

Qatar Central Bank Technology Risk Instructions for Financial Services Operators (2022), Section 1.4Qatar Central Bank, Technology Risk Instructions for Financial Service Operators (2022), published on the Qatar Central Bank website

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Technology Risk Instructions apply to all Financial Service Operators, meaning exchange houses, investment companies, finance houses and their relevant brokers operating in Qatar and regulated by the Qatar Central Bank. A Financial Service Operator must develop and maintain an information security incident management policy and plan with various levels of escalation and response.

A Financial Service Operator must communicate all incidents internally according to the escalation plan, ensuring QCB and NCSA are notified immediately based on the severity of the incident, and must notify the Ministry of Interior in the case of a cybercrime. A Financial Service Operator must ensure periodic exercising and simulation of its incident response plans relevant to critical business processes and key risks.

Article 216 of the Qatar Central Bank Law (Law No. 13 of 2012) lets the Qatar Central Bank impose a financial penalty of up to 10,000,000 riyals for every violation of the Law or of the regulations, decisions or instructions issued in implementation of it, and up to 100,000 riyals a day for a continuing violation.

The Qatar Central Bank's enforcement guidance lists a breach of the Law or its implementing resolutions or instructions among the grounds on which a licence can be canceled or suspended under Article 90 of the Law.

What it requires

Qatar Central Bank Technology Risks Regulation for Banks, incident management and reporting

Qatar Central Bank Technology Risks Regulation for Banks (January 2018), Section 8.2Qatar Central Bank, Technology Risks Regulation for Banks (January 2018), published on the Qatar Central Bank website

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Technology Risks Regulation is addressed to banks in Qatar, which it says are required to comply with its requirements. A bank must establish an incident management framework and an Incident Management Policy and procedures to protect, detect, evaluate and respond to cyber incidents. All critical incidents must be reported to QCB and the relevant governmental authorities within 1 hour of identification.

A bank must test its predetermined escalation and response plan for security incidents on an annual basis. QCB's published sanctions part for banks provides that penalties are imposed for any violation of the instructions on Modern Technology and Electronic Banking Services Risks, the circular whose requirements this Regulation says it has enhanced.

Article 216 of the Qatar Central Bank Law (Law No. 13 of 2012) lets the Qatar Central Bank impose a financial penalty of up to 10,000,000 riyals for every violation of the Law or of the regulations, decisions or instructions issued in implementation of it, and up to 100,000 riyals a day for a continuing violation.

The Qatar Central Bank's enforcement guidance lists a breach of the Law or its implementing resolutions or instructions among the grounds on which a licence can be canceled or suspended under Article 90 of the Law.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (184 words)

Qatar has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code; neighbouring rights under the Copyright Protection Law (Law No. 7 of 2002) protect performers, sound-recording producers, and broadcasting organisations, not a print or online news publisher's own reporting. The Law's general framework is the only regime reaching an aggregator's reproduction.

Its press-article provision permits reproducing, broadcasting, or otherwise communicating to the public an article on current political, economic, social, cultural, or religious topics published in a newspaper or periodical, subject to source and author attribution, unless the publisher has explicitly reserved the reproduction right (art. 19); it also excludes daily news of a mere informatory nature from copyright protection altogether (art. 4(2)).

No statute or reported case addresses whether a hyperlink is itself a communication to the public, or whether framing or inline display changes the answer, and no hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from this copyright framework exists. The Law carries no machine-readable text-and-data-mining opt-out; article 19's reservation is a general publication right a publisher can invoke against a reproducer, not a technical opt-out mechanism aimed at automated indexing or training.

Snippet reproduction

Copyright Protection Law, press-article reproduction exception

Law No. 7 of 2002, art. 19official English translation of Law No. 7 of 2002, WIPO Lex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 19 permits reproducing an article in a newspaper or periodical, or broadcasting or otherwise communicating to the public an article published in a newspaper or periodical on current political, economic, social, cultural, or religious topics (or a broadcast work of the same character), subject to clearly indicating the source and the author's name where known.

The permission does not apply where the author has explicitly reserved the right of reproduction or communication to the public, so a publisher can withdraw the exception for its own content by express reservation. Article 4(2) separately excludes daily news and other news of a mere informatory nature from copyright protection altogether, so a bare factual news item carries no copyright interest to begin with, independent of article 19's conditional permission for full articles.

Neighbouring rights under article 1's definitions protect performers, sound-recording producers, and broadcasting organisations, not a print or online news publisher as such, so no press-publisher neighbouring right of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive article 15 creates exists in Qatar. A reproduction that does not meet article 19's conditions, or that a publisher has reserved, is an ordinary infringement under article 48.

What it requires

Where nothing was found1 area of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

Age gating law

Qatar has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code as of the date below.

The Cybercrime Prevention Law (Law No. 14 of 2014) criminalises producing, importing, selling, offering, circulating, transferring, disseminating, publishing, or transmitting child pornography, and separately criminalises possessing it, defining a child as any person under 18 (arts. 7-8), but this is a criminal prohibition running to any person who commits the underlying act; it imposes no age-verification, age-gating, or minor-access duty on a service that publishes, hosts, or operates a platform.

No further age-verification, social-media, app-store, or design-code statute was located at primary source for this visit.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Qatar AI law
  • No current case law for Qatar privacy law
  • No current case law for Qatar scraping law
  • No current case law for Qatar cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Qatar communications law
  • No current case law for Qatar content moderation law
  • No current case law for Qatar product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Qatar digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Qatar age gating law
  • No current case law for Qatar reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here5 instruments

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Qatar comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

72 hours
Breach notificationprivacy law
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of Qatar

72 hours

Personal Data Privacy Protection Law, breach notification

Law No. 13 of 2016, Arts. 13-14privacy law, in force since

The sentence the clocks are read from

An app that is a Processor handling the personal data of an individual in Qatar, including a voiceprint or faceprint, must forthwith notify its Controller of any breach or risk of one, and a Controller must inform the affected individual and the Competent Department where a breach of security precautions may cause serious damage to the data or the individual's privacy; the National Cyber Governance and Assurance Affairs' guideline requires that notice within 72 hours of becoming aware of the breach.

72 hours

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, breach notification

QFC Data Protection Regulations 2021, Art. 31privacy law, in force

The sentences the clocks are read from

An app that is a Data Controller subject to the QFC Regulations must notify the QFC Data Protection Office of a personal data breach without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours of becoming aware of it, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and legitimate interests of data subjects.

A Data Processor must notify the Data Controller without undue delay after becoming aware of a breach, and a Data Controller must document every breach and consider notifying the affected data subjects.

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.