Law / Frameworks / MIT mitigations / Governance & Oversight Controls
MIT mitigations 1.1Board Structure & Oversight
Governance structures and leadership roles that establish executive accountability for AI safety and risk management.MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, preliminary taxonomy, July 2025, 1.1
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Corpus as of .
The kinds of duty that reach it: governance.
- 35
- laws
- 24
- places
- 0
- with court rulings behind them
- 18
- not yet in force
The same ground elsewhere linked through the kinds of duty both controls are mapped from
- NIST AI RMFGOVERN 1.1 Legal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and documented.
- NIST AI RMFGOVERN 1.4 The risk management process and its outcomes are established through transparent...
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-07 Human-AI Configuration
- OWASP LLM Top 10LLM03:2026 Excessive Agency
- OWASP Agentic Top 10ASI09 Human-Agent Trust Exploitation
- NIST Privacy FrameworkID.IM-P4 Data actions of the systems/products/services are inventoried.
- NIST Privacy FrameworkGV.PO-P1 Organizational privacy values and policies (e.g., conditions on data processing such...
- NIST CSF 2.0GV.OC-03 Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding cybersecurity - including...
- NIST CSF 2.0GV.RR-01 Organizational leadership is responsible and accountable for cybersecurity risk and...
A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force
AI risk obligations
14 laws, 8 placesShow the other 4 laws
| Artificial Intelligence (Designation of the Information and Data Protection Commissioner for the purposes of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) Regulations, 2025 (L.N. 227 of 2025) |
Through its governance duty. What it requires |
|
| Right to Compute Act (SB 212, 2025), critical AI infrastructure risk management duty |
Through its governance duty. What it requires |
|
| AI Framework Act, Article 34 (business-operator duties for high-impact AI) |
Through its governance duty. What it requires |
|
| Law on Artificial Intelligence, risk classification and conformity assessment |
Through its governance duty. What it requires |
AI governance
11 laws, 8 placesShow the other 1 law
| Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence of Vatican City State (Decree No. DCCII) |
Through its governance duty. What it requires |
AI sector rules
7 laws, 7 placesAI prohibited practices
1 law, 1 place| Place | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Lov nr. 467 af 14. maj 2025, National Competent Authorities and Article 5 Enforcement |
Through its governance duty. What it requires |
AI training data
1 law, 1 place| Place | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| AI Act, Article 53 (obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models) |
Through its governance duty. What it requires |
AI transparency
1 law, 1 place| Place | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Practice Direction No. 1 of 2025, Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court Proceedings |
Through its governance duty. What it requires |
Full text of the MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, CC BY 4.0. MIT AI Risk Initiative (MIT FutureTech), AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, https://airisk.mit.edu/ai-risk-mitigations. Data from the MIT AI Risk Initiative is licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Cite as: Mapping AI Risk Mitigations: Evidence Scan & Draft Mitigation Taxonomy, https://airisk.mit.edu/blog/mapping-ai-risk-mitigations Every control of the framework.