Law / Frameworks / MIT mitigations Draft / Governance & Oversight Controls
MIT mitigations 1.7Societal Impact Assessment
Processes that assess AI systems' effects on society, including impacts on employment, power dynamics, political processes, and cultural values.MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, preliminary taxonomy, July 2025, 1.7
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .
The kinds of duty that reach it: DPIA.
- 14
- laws
- 12
- jurisdictions
- 0
- with court rulings behind them
- 2
- not yet in force
- 6
- proposed, not law
Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both
- NIST AI RMFMAP 5.1 Likelihood and magnitude of each identified impact (both potentially..., 10 laws
- NIST AI RMFMANAGE 1.3 Responses to the AI risks deemed high priority, as identified by the MAP..., 5 laws
- NIST AI RMFMEASURE 2.10 Privacy risk of the AI system – as identified in the MAP function – is..., 4 laws
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-04 Data Privacy, 14 laws
- NIST AI 200-22.4 Synthesize & Interrogate, 14 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-005 System Acceptance Testing, 14 laws
- ETSI EN 304 2235.1.2-1 Business need and security risks written down and assessed before deciding..., 14 laws
- ETSI EN 304 2235.1.3-1 Threat modelling and risk management, reviewed regularly and covering..., 14 laws
A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force proposed
AI governance
7 laws, 7 jurisdictionsAI risk obligations
4 laws, 4 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| AI Act, Article 27 (fundamental rights impact assessment) from , in 13 months |
Through its DPIA duty. What it requires |
|
| Decreto Legislativo 160/2026, After-the-Fact Facial Recognition Integrated in Video Surveillance (Art. 10) |
Through its DPIA duty. What it requires |
|
| Digital Code, Chapter 23: AI system design and risk-management obligations |
Through its DPIA duty. What it requires |
|
| AI-based electronic monitoring and automated employment decision systems in employment and public services (S4075 / A4981) proposed |
Through its DPIA duty. What it requires |
AI prohibited practices
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Decreto Legislativo 160/2026, Police Biometric AI: Dataset Labelling and Real-Time Remote Identification (Artt. 7-9, 13) |
Through its DPIA duty. What it requires |
AI sector rules
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| FSC Fintech Series Guidance Notes 4, responsible use of artificial intelligence in financial services |
Through its DPIA duty. What it requires |
AI training data
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Act XLVII of 1997 on Health Data, Section 35/A(4) to (8), Conditions for AI Development on Electronic Health Service Space Data |
Through its DPIA duty. What it requires |
Full text of the MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, CC BY 4.0. MIT AI Risk Initiative (MIT FutureTech), AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy. Data from the MIT AI Risk Initiative is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Cite as: Mapping AI Risk Mitigations: Evidence Scan & Draft Mitigation Taxonomy Every control of the framework.