Law / Frameworks / MIT mitigations Draft / Governance & Oversight Controls

MIT mitigations 1.7Societal Impact Assessment

Processes that assess AI systems' effects on society, including impacts on employment, power dynamics, political processes, and cultural values.MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, preliminary taxonomy, July 2025, 1.7

We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .

The kinds of duty that reach it: DPIA.

14
laws
12
jurisdictions
0
with court rulings behind them
2
not yet in force
6
proposed, not law

Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both

A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force proposed

  • Andorra
  • Armenia
  • Canada
  • El Salvador
  • European Union
  • Hungary
  • Italy
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Mauritius
  • Moldova
  • New Jersey
  • United Kingdom

AI governance

7 laws, 7 jurisdictions
JurisdictionLawHow it reaches this control
Andorra Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Andorra proposed

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

Armenia Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Armenia proposed

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

Canada Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Canada proposed

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

El Salvador Ley de Fomento a la Inteligencia Artificial y Tecnologías, marco institucional, registro y evaluación de riesgos

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

European Union AI Act, Article 26(9) (using Article 13 information for a data protection impact assessment) from , in 13 months

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

Moldova Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Moldova proposed

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

United Kingdom Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by the United Kingdom proposed

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

AI risk obligations

4 laws, 4 jurisdictions
JurisdictionLawHow it reaches this control
European Union AI Act, Article 27 (fundamental rights impact assessment) from , in 13 months

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

Italy Decreto Legislativo 160/2026, After-the-Fact Facial Recognition Integrated in Video Surveillance (Art. 10)

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

Kyrgyzstan Digital Code, Chapter 23: AI system design and risk-management obligations

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

New Jersey AI-based electronic monitoring and automated employment decision systems in employment and public services (S4075 / A4981) proposed

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

AI prohibited practices

1 law, 1 jurisdiction
JurisdictionLawHow it reaches this control
Italy Decreto Legislativo 160/2026, Police Biometric AI: Dataset Labelling and Real-Time Remote Identification (Artt. 7-9, 13)

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

AI sector rules

1 law, 1 jurisdiction
JurisdictionLawHow it reaches this control
Mauritius FSC Fintech Series Guidance Notes 4, responsible use of artificial intelligence in financial services

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

AI training data

1 law, 1 jurisdiction
JurisdictionLawHow it reaches this control
Hungary Act XLVII of 1997 on Health Data, Section 35/A(4) to (8), Conditions for AI Development on Electronic Health Service Space Data

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

Full text of the MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, CC BY 4.0. MIT AI Risk Initiative (MIT FutureTech), AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy. Data from the MIT AI Risk Initiative is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Cite as: Mapping AI Risk Mitigations: Evidence Scan & Draft Mitigation Taxonomy Every control of the framework.