Law / Frameworks / NIST CSF 2.0 / Identify
NIST CSF 2.0, IdentifyID.RA-04
Potential impacts and likelihoods of threats exploiting vulnerabilities are identified and recordedNIST Cybersecurity Framework, version 2.0, February 2024 (NIST CSWP 29), ID.RA-04
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .
- 4
- laws
- 3
- jurisdictions
- 0
- with court rulings behind them
- 0
- not yet in force
Product security requirements
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| EUCC Certification Scheme, Vulnerability Management by the Holder of a Certificate |
Refer the vulnerability impact analysis to the target of evaluation and the assurance statements contained in the certificate, carry it out in a timeframe appropriate for the exploitability and criticality of the potential vulnerability and, where applicable, perform an attack potential calculation to determine its exploitability, taking the AVA_VAN level of the certificate into account (Article 34(1) and (2)). |
Sector security regimes
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| DNSC Order 2/2025, Service-Disruption Criteria and Entity Risk-Level Methodology |
If you are an entity within Annex 1 or 2 of Ordonanța de urgență nr. 155/2024 that has not been qualified as essential or important under its Articles 5, 6 and 9 criteria, assess the degree of disruption of each service you provide that falls within those Annexes, using the thresholds in Annex 1 to Order 2/2025, and use the result to complete the registration information (Article 1). |
Security baseline statutes
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Tort Liability for Cybersecurity Programs, affirmative defense for a reasonable security program |
To claim the defense against a tort claim alleging that a failure to implement reasonable information security controls resulted in a data breach of personal information or restricted information, create, maintain, and comply with a written cybersecurity program containing administrative, technical, operational, and physical safeguards, designed to continually evaluate and mitigate reasonably anticipated threats, evaluate the maximum probable loss from a data breach at least annually, and communicate to affected parties the extent of any risk and steps to reduce damages once a breach is known to have occurred. |
Vulnerability and incident reporting
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| EUCC Certification Scheme, Vulnerability Impact Analysis Report and Disclosure |
It reaches you if you hold an EUCC certificate for an ICT product (Article 32). Where your vulnerability impact analysis shows that a vulnerability has a likely impact on the conformity of the ICT product with its certificate, produce a vulnerability impact analysis report that assesses the impact of the vulnerability on the certified ICT product, possible risks associated with the proximity or availability of an attack, whether the vulnerability may be remedied and, where it may, possible resolutions (Article 35(1) and (2)). Include in the report, where applicable, details about the possible means of exploitation of the vulnerability, and handle that information under appropriate security measures that protect its confidentiality and ensure, where necessary, its limited distribution (Article 35(3)). |
Full text of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, public domain (a US government work). Every control of the framework.