Law / Frameworks / NIST CSF 2.0 / Identify
NIST CSF 2.0, IdentifyID.IM-02
Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third partiesNIST Cybersecurity Framework, version 2.0, February 2024 (NIST CSWP 29), ID.IM-02
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .
- 10
- laws
- 6
- jurisdictions
- 0
- with court rulings behind them
- 0
- not yet in force
Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both
- NIST Privacy FrameworkPR.PO-P8 Response and recovery plans are tested., 5 laws
- NIST Privacy FrameworkPR.PO-P10 A vulnerability management plan is developed and implemented., 4 laws
- NIST Privacy FrameworkPR.PO-P3 Backups of information are conducted, maintained, and tested., 2 laws
- 1 more in the NIST Privacy Framework
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-005 System Acceptance Testing, 2 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-006 Data Quality & Classification/Sensitivity, 2 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-024 Human-in-the-Loop Action Approval Gate, 2 laws
- 10 more in the FINOS AIGF
- ENISA NIS2 guidance1.1 Policy on the security of network and information systems, 2 laws
- ENISA NIS2 guidance1.2 Roles, responsibilities and authorities, 2 laws
- ENISA NIS2 guidance2.2 Compliance monitoring, 2 laws
- 10 more in the ENISA NIS2 guidance
Sector security regimes
9 laws, 5 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| DORA-Vollzugsgesetz (DORA-VG), Competent Authority, Scope Extension and ICT Risk Penalties |
If you are identified under DORA Article 26(8), carry out the advanced threat-led penetration testing that Articles 26(1) to (6) and (8) and 27 require (Section 7(1)(5)). |
|
| DORA Technical Standards on ICT Risk Management Tools, Methods, Processes and Policies and the Simplified ICT Risk Management Framework |
Include in the ICT business continuity policy the objectives, scope, timeframe, activation and deactivation criteria, governance and recovery objectives set out in Article 24(1). If you are a central counterparty, set a maximum recovery time for your critical functions of not longer than 2 hours. If you are a central securities depository, ensure a recovery time objective of not longer than 2 hours for your critical or important functions. If you are a trading venue, ensure that trading can be resumed within or close to 2 hours of a disruptive incident and that the maximum amount of data lost is close to zero (Article 24(2) to (4)). Test the plans on scenarios that simulate potential disruptions, including severe but plausible scenarios, include the ICT services provided by ICT third-party service providers where applicable, document the results, and report identified deficiencies to the management body (Article 25). |
|
| DORA, Articles 24-27 (Digital Operational Resilience Testing and Threat-Led Penetration Testing) |
Unless you are a microenterprise, establish, maintain and review a sound and comprehensive digital operational resilience testing program as an integral part of your ICT risk-management framework, follow a risk-based approach that takes account of the evolving landscape of ICT risk and the criticality of your information assets and services, and ensure that tests are undertaken by independent parties, internal or external, with sufficient resources and no conflict of interest where the tester is internal (Article 24(1) to (4)). Unless you are a microenterprise, establish procedures and policies to prioritize, classify and remedy all issues the tests reveal, set up internal validation methodologies to ascertain that all identified weaknesses, deficiencies or gaps are fully addressed, and ensure at least yearly that appropriate tests are conducted on all ICT systems and applications supporting critical or important functions (Article 24(5) and (6)). +2 more |
|
| DORA, Articles 5-16 (ICT Risk Management Framework) |
Put in place a comprehensive ICT business continuity policy and ICT response and recovery plans, and conduct a business impact analysis of your exposures to severe business disruptions. Test the continuity and the response and recovery plans at least yearly and on substantive changes to systems supporting critical or important functions, and test your crisis communication plans. Keep readily accessible records of activities before and during disruption events. Unless you are a microenterprise, include cyber-attack and switchover scenarios in the tests, have a crisis management function, and report to your competent authority on request an estimate of the aggregated annual costs and losses caused by major ICT-related incidents (Article 11). |
|
| DFS Advisory: Heightened Cybersecurity Risks Associated with Frontier AI Models |
The Department says you should consider whether your logging and security event alerting capabilities are sufficient to address heightened threats, and review and test your threat-relevant operational resilience procedures, which may require more frequent use as AI-enabled cyber capabilities evolve. |
|
| DFS Guidance: Measures Regulated Entities Should Consider in a Heightened Cybersecurity Threat Environment |
The Department says you should consider testing the integrity, immutability and restorability of backups, including validation of recovery time objectives, and reviewing and testing threat-relevant operational resilience procedures, such as incident response and business continuity plans, to protect and restore critical functions, information systems and nonpublic information. |
|
| New York Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Regulation, Incident Response and Business Continuity Management |
Test your incident response and business continuity and disaster recovery plans with all staff and management critical to the response, and your ability to restore critical data and information systems from backups, periodically and at least annually, and revise the plans as necessary. |
|
| Lei n.ยบ 73/2025, Digital Operational Resilience of the Financial Sector |
Give the competent authority and your clients information that is complete, true, current, clear, objective and lawful, and cooperate with the authorities in crisis-management and contingency exercises that involve cyber-attack scenarios (Article 10(1)(a) and (b)). |
|
| Lag (2024:1278), DORA Supplementary Provisions |
If the Finansinspektionen designates you to carry out threat-led penetration tests under DORA Article 26, carry them out as often as it decides, and give the Riksbank the information it requests for its oversight and coordination of the tests (chapter 2, sections 1 and 4). |
Security baseline statutes
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Privacy Protection Regulations (Data Security), information security programme |
At the high tier, conduct a data security risk assessment and a penetration test of the database's systems at least once every 18 months, and hold a quarterly internal discussion of security incidents. |
Full text of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, public domain (a US government work). Every control of the framework.