NIST AI RMF, MapMAP 5.1

If ratified and implemented, it would require carrying out risk and impact assessments of an AI system's actual and potential impact on human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, and establishing prevention and mitigation measures.

If ratified and implemented, it would require carrying out risk and impact assessments of an AI system's actual and potential impact on human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, and establishing prevention and mitigation measures.

Assess and mitigate the systemic risks your model may pose at Union level, including where those risks originate, whether in the model's development, its placing on the market, or its use.

Provide any information or documentation a market surveillance or notifying authority requests under Article 21 or Article 45, carry out or update the fundamental rights impact assessment Article 27 requires, and give an affected person the explanation Article 86 requires when you operate a high-risk AI system for one of the purposes Annex III lists: failing to do so can carry a German administrative fine of up to 50,000 euros, separate from the Regulation's own fines.

If ratified and implemented, it would require carrying out risk and impact assessments of an AI system's actual and potential impact on human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, and establishing prevention and mitigation measures.

If your AI system was trained using cumulative compute of 10^26 floating-point operations or more, applies the most advanced AI technology currently in use, and could broadly and seriously affect people's life, physical safety or fundamental rights, identify, assess and mitigate risk across the system's full life cycle.

If you are a body governed by public law, a private entity providing a public service, or a deployer of a credit-scoring or life-and-health-insurance-risk-pricing high-risk AI system (Annex III points 5(b) or (c)), assess the impact on fundamental rights of a high-risk AI system before its first use, unless the system is the Annex III point 2 critical-infrastructure use case.

Update the assessment if any of those elements changes during use, rather than treating it as a one-time exercise.

Identify and analyze the known and reasonably foreseeable risks the system can pose to health, safety, or fundamental rights under its intended use, and estimate and evaluate risks that may emerge under intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse.

Consider whether the system is likely to adversely affect persons under 18 or other vulnerable groups, given its intended purpose, when implementing your risk management system.

Carry out iterative risk and impact assessments of an AI system's actual and potential impacts on human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, with sufficient prevention and mitigation measures.

Conduct a risk assessment and a human-rights impact assessment before deploying a high-risk system, and maintain human oversight of it.

An app whose AI system a hazard assessment finds poses increased danger to life, health, rights, the environment, defense, national security or public order must have its owner reassess that hazard at each design, development, deployment and material-change stage, and publish the assessment and its methodology on the owner's own website as open data.