Law / Frameworks / Crosswalk / MIT mitigations to NIST Privacy Framework
The MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, mapped to the NIST Privacy Framework
14 of MIT mitigations' controls connect to 8 of NIST Privacy Framework's through 99 laws in 67 jurisdictions. Two controls connect when the same duties, in at least 2 laws we track, reach both. The connections are our own reading of the law; no framework publisher has reviewed or endorsed them.
- From
- MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, preliminary taxonomy, July 2025, MIT AI Risk Initiative
- To
- NIST Privacy Framework, version 1.0, January 2020, National Institute of Standards and Technology
- See also
- NIST Privacy Framework to MIT mitigations, the other way · every pair in the crosswalk · law library as of
Download this mapping, with every law behind each connection: mit-ai-risk-mitigations--nist-privacy-framework.csv · mit-ai-risk-mitigations--nist-privacy-framework.json
Not connected to the NIST Privacy Framework: 9 of MIT mitigations' controls
Short of 2 laws
The same duties reach these and a NIST Privacy Framework control, in fewer than 2 of the laws we track.
- 1.7 Societal Impact Assessment: with ID.RA-P4 through FSC Fintech Series Guidance Notes 4, responsible use of artificial intelligence in financial services, Mauritius
- 3.1 Testing & Auditing: with ID.RA-P4 through FSC Fintech Series Guidance Notes 4, responsible use of artificial intelligence in financial services, Mauritius
No NIST Privacy Framework control on the same duties
Laws reach these, but no duty that reaches one of them also reaches a NIST Privacy Framework control.
No law we track reaches these
No duty in the laws we track reaches these controls.
Lines of the news aggregation laws we track were not read against the NIST Privacy Framework, so none of them connects the two here (how each subject's lines were read).
How these connections are drawn
Each requirement line in the laws we track is read against the framework for its subject (the AI, scraping and news aggregation laws against the NIST AI RMF, the privacy, communications and age assurance laws against the NIST Privacy Framework, the cybersecurity laws against the NIST CSF 2.0); laws on liability and content moderation are not read against any framework yet. A line reaches the MIT mitigations through a kind of duty its law carries, and only where that kind of duty also reaches, on that same line, the NIST framework for the line's own subject. Two controls connect when lines in at least 2 laws reach both. That says the same duties reach both; it does not say the two are alike, or that running either one does what a law asks.
A line placed on a control in the framework for its own subject, whose law carries a kind of duty that reaches another of the three frameworks read line by line, is read against that one as well: every such line, or only those whose wording reaches into it. For these two:
| Laws on | Read against the NIST Privacy Framework |
|---|---|
| AI | such lines on personal data and privacy, biometrics, likeness and identity, profiling, surveillance and consent |
| scraping | such lines on interception, monitoring, personal data and privacy |
| news aggregation | not read |
Every duty line in the AI and scraping laws we track has been read against the framework for its subject.
Sources and licenses
MIT AI Risk Initiative (MIT FutureTech), AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy. Data from the MIT AI Risk Initiative is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Cite as: Mapping AI Risk Mitigations: Evidence Scan & Draft Mitigation Taxonomy