Law / Frameworks / MIT mitigations / Transparency & Accountability Controls

MIT mitigations 4.6User Rights & Recourse

Frameworks and procedures that enable users to identify and understand AI system interactions, report issues, request explanations, and seek recourse or remediation when affected by AI systems.MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, preliminary taxonomy, July 2025, 4.6

We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Corpus as of .

The kinds of duty that reach it: content labelling, data subject rights, design code, disclosure.

66
laws
42
places
2
with court rulings behind them
13
not yet in force
1
blocked by a court
9
proposed, not law

The same ground elsewhere linked through the kinds of duty both controls are mapped from

A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force blocked by a court proposed

  • Alabama
  • Andorra
  • Armenia
  • Belize
  • Brazil
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Delaware
  • European Union
  • Gabon
  • Georgia
  • Greece
  • Idaho
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Jamaica
  • Kentucky
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Michigan
  • Moldova
  • Nebraska
  • Nevada
  • New Mexico
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Peru
  • Puerto Rico
  • Russia
  • South Korea
  • Texas
  • Turkey
  • United States
  • Utah
  • Vatican City
  • Vermont
  • Wisconsin

AI transparency

45 laws, 34 places
PlaceLawHow it reaches this control
Alabama Distribution of Materially Deceptive Media to Influence an Upcoming Election

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Belize Practice Direction No. 18 of 2025, ethical use of generative AI in court proceedings

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Brazil TSE Resolution, AI-Generated Content Disclosure Duty

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

California AB 2839, election materially deceptive deepfake disclaimer law blocked by a court

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

California AB 730, as extended by AB 972, election deepfake disclosure law

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

California California AI Transparency Act (SB 942, as amended by AB 853)

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

California Companion Chatbot Safety and Accountability Act (SB 243)

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Colorado HB 26-1263 (2026), Conversational AI Service Operator Requirements from , in 3 months

Through its content labelling, design code duties. What it requires

Delaware House Bill 306 (pending), Computer Communication Act proposed

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

European Union AI Act, Article 50 (transparency obligations for AI systems and synthetic content)

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Show the other 35 laws
European Union Digital Services Act, Article 35(1)(k) (systemic risk mitigation, synthetic media marking)

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

Gabon Ordonnance n°0011/PR/2026, marquage des contenus générés par intelligence artificielle

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

Greece Law 5321/2026, National AI Act Implementation Law

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

Idaho Conversational AI Safety Act from , in 9 months

Through its content labelling, design code duties. What it requires

Idaho FAIR Elections Act, disclosure duty for synthetic media in electioneering communications

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

Idaho Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education Act, vendor disclosure duty

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Indiana Use of Digitally Altered Media in Elections (House Enrolled Act 1133, 2024)

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Iowa Conversational AI Services Act (Senate File 2417) from , in 9 months

Through its content labelling, design code duties. What it requires

Jamaica Practice Direction No. 1 of 2025, Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court Proceedings

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Kentucky Synthetic Media Disclosure in Electioneering Communications

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Kyrgyzstan Digital Code, Chapter 23: AI interaction and deepfake disclosure duties

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Louisiana Act 250 (HB 178), attorney duty to verify and disclose AI-generated evidence

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Louisiana Act 559 (HB 639), AI-generated voice telephone campaign communication disclosure

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

Louisiana Act 806 (HB 459), AI-manipulated electioneering communication disclosure

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

Maine Synthetic media disclosure in campaign advertising from a date not yet set

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

Michigan AI-Generated Political Advertisement and Robocall Disclosure (Public Act 263 of 2023)

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Michigan Distribution of Materially Deceptive Election Media (Public Act 265 of 2023)

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

Nebraska Conversational Artificial Intelligence Safety Act (LB 525, §§ 12-18) from , in 9 months

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Nevada AB 73 (2025), AI-manipulated media disclosure in paid political communications

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

New Mexico HB 182 (2024), AI-generated and manipulated media disclosure and disclaimer requirements in campaign advertising

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

North Dakota House Bill 1167 (2025), AI-generated political content disclosure

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Ohio S.B. 163, AI-Generated Content Watermark and Provenance Mandate proposed

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Oregon AI Companion Chatbot Safety Act (SB 1546) from a date not yet set

Through its content labelling, design code, disclosure duties. What it requires

Oregon Campaign communication disclosure of synthetic media (SB 1571)

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Pennsylvania S.B. 1090, SAFECHAT Act proposed

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Puerto Rico AI disclosure in political advertising and electoral communications

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Russia Federal Law No. 243-FZ, Article 9, AI-Generated Content Notice from , in 5 months

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

Texas TRAIGA (H.B. 149, 2025), consumer AI-interaction disclosure duty

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Turkey Commercial Advertising Regulation, AI Disclosure Duty

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

United States AI Labeling Act of 2026 proposed

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

United States FCC AI Political Ad Disclosure Rulemaking, Docket 24-211 proposed

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Utah Digital Content Provenance Standards Act (HB 276, 2026 General Session), Utah Code Title 13 Chapter 72c from , in 3 months

Through its content labelling, disclosure duties. What it requires

Vermont Vermont Synthetic Media in Elections Act

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Wisconsin 2023 Wisconsin Act 123, AI-Generated Content Disclosure in Political Communications

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

AI risk obligations

9 laws, 7 places
PlaceLawHow it reaches this control
California CCPA Automated Decisionmaking Technology Regulations

Through its data subject rights, disclosure duties. What it requires

European Union AI Act, Article 26(11) (informing individuals subject to an Annex III decision) from , in 14 months

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

European Union AI Act, Article 26(7) (informing workers before workplace use) from , in 14 months

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

European Union AI Act, Article 86 (right to explanation of individual decision-making)

Through its data subject rights duty. What it requires

Georgia Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI, Georgia's signature proposed

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Indiana Downcoding of Health Benefits Claims, automated and AI decision-making (House Enrolled Act 1271, 2026)

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Nebraska Ensuring Transparency in Prior Authorization Act, artificial-intelligence utilization review restriction

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Peru Reglamento de la Ley 31814, high-risk AI system duties

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

South Korea AI Framework Act, Article 34 (business-operator duties for high-impact AI)

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

AI governance

6 laws, 6 places
PlaceLawHow it reaches this control
Andorra Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Andorra proposed

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Armenia Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Armenia proposed

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

California Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 53)

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act from , in 3 months

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Moldova Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Moldova proposed

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Vatican City Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence of Vatican City State (Decree No. DCCII)

Through its content labelling duty. What it requires

AI sector rules

6 laws, 6 places
PlaceLawHow it reaches this control
Alabama SB 63 (2026), Artificial Intelligence in Health Insurance Prior Authorization from , in 2 days

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

California Healthcare AI Patient-Communication Disclosure Act (AB 3030)

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Illinois Illinois Human Rights Act, use of artificial intelligence in employment decisions

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000, use of artificial intelligence in job postings

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Texas S.B. 1188 (2025), AI diagnostic disclosure duty in electronic health records

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Utah Health Insurance Preauthorization AI Disclosure (SB 319, 2026 General Session) from , in 3 months

Through its disclosure duty. What it requires

Full text of the MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, CC BY 4.0. MIT AI Risk Initiative (MIT FutureTech), AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, https://airisk.mit.edu/ai-risk-mitigations. Data from the MIT AI Risk Initiative is licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Cite as: Mapping AI Risk Mitigations: Evidence Scan & Draft Mitigation Taxonomy, https://airisk.mit.edu/blog/mapping-ai-risk-mitigations Every control of the framework.