Law / United States /
Oregon
Campaign communication disclosure of synthetic media (SB 1571)
ORS 260.268 (created by 2024 Or. Laws ch. 62 (SB 1571))
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force since 27 March 2024.
An AI transparency rule binding public and private bodies.
As of 6 September 2026.
What it requires
- Include a disclosure stating that the recording has been manipulated, when a campaign communication includes synthetic media that depicts a candidate's appearance, speech or conduct in a realistic but false way.
- This duty binds whoever distributes the campaign communication, not only whoever created the synthetic media.
- An interactive computer service, a bona fide news broadcast, a paid platform, a periodical carrying a corrective statement, and satire or parody are excluded from the duty.
If you get it wrong
Private right of actionNo
Penalty structure
Civil penalty imposed by a circuit court upon proof of a violation, sought only by the Secretary of State or, in specified cases, the Attorney General; the statute makes this the exclusive remedy for a violation.
- Rule
- Fixed only
- As of
- 6 September 2026
- Currency
- USD
- Fixed cap
- 10,000
What it reaches
Obligation class
Disclosure, Content labelling
What it makes you log
Logging duty
Section 260.268 requires a disclosure on the campaign communication itself when it includes synthetic media; it creates no duty to keep any log, record or other documentation, and names nobody who may check one.
- Kind
- None
- As of
- 21 September 2026
Who checks it
Audit expectation
none
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
A campaign communication that includes synthetic media, an image, audio or video recording of a candidate's appearance, speech or conduct intentionally manipulated with artificial intelligence or similar digital technology to create a realistic but false depiction, must include a disclosure that the recording has been manipulated.
The Secretary of State, and in specified cases the Attorney General, may sue to enjoin a violation, and a court may impose a civil penalty of up to $10,000, which the statute makes the exclusive remedy. Interactive computer services, bona fide news coverage, paid broadcasters, periodicals that carry a corrective statement, and satire or parody are excluded.
When LexLint raises it
generates_content
Read the law
Oregon State Legislature, current Oregon Revised Statutes chapter 260
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.