LexLint.ioBeta

Know the law your code answers to.

Law / Russia

Federal Law No. 243-FZ, Article 9, AI-Generated Content Notice

Federal Law No. 243-FZ, Art. 9 ()

An AI transparency rule binding private bodies.

Criminal exposure
No
How the hook was established
express
What makes it apply
User location, Market targeting
Obligation class
Content labelling
Audit expectation
none
Setting the rule reaches
General

What it requires

  • If you apply a large foundation AI model to create audio or visual informational material, give the recipient the ability to place a notice that AI technology was used; the exact format is left to agreement with the party providing the model, so it is not a mandatory watermark.
  • If you own a Russian-language personal-page platform reaching more than 500,000 Russia-based daily users, give your users the ability to place that same AI-use notice on content they distribute that was created with a large foundation AI model.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MEASURE 2.8Risks associated with transparency and accountability – as identified in the MAP function – are examined and documented.
NIST AI 600-1
OWASP Agentic Top 10
  • ASI09Human-Agent Trust Exploitation
MIT mitigations Draft
  • 2.4Content Safety Controls
  • 4.6User Rights & Recourse

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Article 9 gives a person applying a large foundation model the ABILITY to place a notice that AI technology was used (paragraph 1), leaves the notice's format and content to private agreement (paragraph 2), and requires a high-traffic Russian-language personal-page platform to give its users that same ability (paragraph 3). No paragraph names a log, a record, an event-recording capability or an audit trail, and none requires demonstrating or producing on demand something only a record could show: the notice itself, when placed, is the whole of what the article asks for.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Article 9 of Federal Law No. 243-FZ, signed , takes effect on .

It requires that a person applying a large foundation AI model (one with at least 1 billion parameters and general multi-task capability) to create audio or visual informational material be given the ABILITY to place a notice that AI technology was used; the format, content, and placement of that notice are left to agreement between the person applying the model and the person providing access to it, so displaying the notice is not itself mandatory.

Separately, the owner of a Russian-language website, information system, or program letting users distribute information through personal pages, where daily access exceeds 500,000 Russia-based internet users, must give its users the ABILITY to place that same AI-use notice on content they distribute that was created using a large foundation AI model.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app generates audio with AI, generates images with AI, generates video with AI or operates a social platform.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .