Law / Kazakhstan

Law on Artificial Intelligence, transparency and disclosure duties

Law No. 230-VIII (17 November 2025), Arts. 7, 21

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force 8 months, effective 17 January 2026.

An AI transparency rule binding public and private bodies.

As of 6 September 2026.

What it requires

  • Give users full information about an AI system's operational characteristics and limitations, and inform a user subject to an AI-assisted decision of the automated processing, its consequences, and how to object.
  • Inform users that goods, works or services are produced or provided using an AI system.
  • Label synthetic audio, video, image or text output in machine-readable form and accompany it with a visual or other warning a user can perceive without impediment before distributing it.

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Article 7 gives a user a right to be informed of automated processing and to object, and Article 21 requires machine-readable labelling and a visible warning on synthetic output, with responsibility for informing users assigned to the system's owner or holder. Neither provision names a log, a record, an event-recording capability or an audit trail, nor does either require the owner or holder to demonstrate, prove or produce on demand something only a record could show; each is satisfied by the labelling or disclosure act itself.

Kind
None
As of
22 September 2026

Who checks it

Audit expectation

none

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Article 7 requires that users be given full information about an AI system's operational characteristics and limitations so it is used for its intended purpose, and gives a user subject to a decision made with an AI system the right to be informed of the automated processing and its consequences, the possibility of objecting to it, and how to protect their rights.

Article 21 requires users to be informed that goods, works or services are produced or provided using an AI system, and permits distributing synthetic output only where it carries a machine-readable label and a visual or other warning that a user can perceive without methods that impede that perception; responsibility for informing users about synthetic output rests on the system's owner or holder.

When LexLint raises it

  • generates_content
  • deploys_chatbot
  • high_risk_decisions
  • automated_outreach

Read the law

Law on Artificial Intelligence, official statute text, Adilet Legal Information System

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app