Law on Artificial Intelligence, transparency and disclosure duties
Law No. 230-VIII (), Arts. 7, 21
In force since .
An AI transparency rule binding public and private bodies.
- Obligation class
- Content labelling, Disclosure
- Audit expectation
- none
- Setting the rule reaches
- General
What it requires
- Give users full information about an AI system's operational characteristics and limitations, and inform a user subject to an AI-assisted decision of the automated processing, its consequences, and how to object.
- Inform users that goods, works or services are produced or provided using an AI system.
- Label synthetic audio, video, image or text output in machine-readable form and accompany it with a visual or other warning a user can perceive without impediment before distributing it.
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.
In the frameworks
- NIST AI RMF
- MEASURE 2.8Risks associated with transparency and accountability – as identified in the MAP function – are examined and documented.
- NIST AI 600-1
- GAI-RISK-07Human-AI Configuration
- GAI-RISK-08Information Integrity
- OWASP Agentic Top 10
- ASI09Human-Agent Trust Exploitation
- MIT mitigations Draft
- FINOS AIGF
- AIR-DET-021Agent Decision Audit and Explainability
- ETSI EN 304 223
Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law
Identifiers refer to ETSI EN 304 223 V2.1.1 (2025-12), © ETSI 2025, all rights reserved. ETSI owns the standard; no ETSI text (titles or sentences) is reproduced here. The standard is free to download from ETSI.
What it makes you log
Logging duty
Article 7 gives a user a right to be informed of automated processing and to object, and Article 21 requires machine-readable labelling and a visible warning on synthetic output, with responsibility for informing users assigned to the system's owner or holder. Neither provision names a log, a record, an event-recording capability or an audit trail, nor does either require the owner or holder to demonstrate, prove or produce on demand something only a record could show; each is satisfied by the labelling or disclosure act itself.
- Kind
- None
- As of
What this law does
Article 7 requires that users be given full information about an AI system's operational characteristics and limitations so it is used for its intended purpose, and gives a user subject to a decision made with an AI system the right to be informed of the automated processing and its consequences, the possibility of objecting to it, and how to protect their rights.
Article 21 requires users to be informed that goods, works or services are produced or provided using an AI system, and permits distributing synthetic output only where it carries a machine-readable label and a visual or other warning that a user can perceive without methods that impede that perception; responsibility for informing users about synthetic output rests on the system's owner or holder.
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app generates content with AI, generates text with AI, generates images with AI, generates video with AI, generates audio with AI, deploys a chatbot or makes high-risk automated decisions.
Back to the example · Lint your app
Page updated .