Law on Artificial Intelligence, transparency and disclosure duties
Law No. 230-VIII (17 November 2025), Arts. 7, 21
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force 8 months, effective 17 January 2026.
An AI transparency rule binding public and private bodies.
As of 6 September 2026.
What it requires
- Give users full information about an AI system's operational characteristics and limitations, and inform a user subject to an AI-assisted decision of the automated processing, its consequences, and how to object.
- Inform users that goods, works or services are produced or provided using an AI system.
- Label synthetic audio, video, image or text output in machine-readable form and accompany it with a visual or other warning a user can perceive without impediment before distributing it.
What it makes you log
Logging duty
Article 7 gives a user a right to be informed of automated processing and to object, and Article 21 requires machine-readable labelling and a visible warning on synthetic output, with responsibility for informing users assigned to the system's owner or holder. Neither provision names a log, a record, an event-recording capability or an audit trail, nor does either require the owner or holder to demonstrate, prove or produce on demand something only a record could show; each is satisfied by the labelling or disclosure act itself.
- Kind
- None
- As of
- 22 September 2026
Who checks it
Audit expectation
none
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
Article 7 requires that users be given full information about an AI system's operational characteristics and limitations so it is used for its intended purpose, and gives a user subject to a decision made with an AI system the right to be informed of the automated processing and its consequences, the possibility of objecting to it, and how to protect their rights.
Article 21 requires users to be informed that goods, works or services are produced or provided using an AI system, and permits distributing synthetic output only where it carries a machine-readable label and a visual or other warning that a user can perceive without methods that impede that perception; responsibility for informing users about synthetic output rests on the system's owner or holder.
When LexLint raises it
generates_contentdeploys_chatbothigh_risk_decisionsautomated_outreach
Read the law
Law on Artificial Intelligence, official statute text, Adilet Legal Information System
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.