Law / United States / Pennsylvania

S.B. 806, Artificial Intelligence Deceptive Advertising Act

Pa. S.B. 806, 2025-2026 Regular Session

Finalized, with one agreed text, dated , as of .

An AI transparency rule binding private bodies.

Enforcement body
Pennsylvania Attorney General and district attorneys
Obligation class
Content labelling, Disclosure

As of .

Where it has got to

The text described here is Printer's Number 1808, as amended on third consideration in the Senate and passed by both chambers. That print is PN 1808, published .

Locally, this stage is final passage in the House, .

The stage above is recorded at www.palegis.us.

More on this stage

The Senate amended the bill on third consideration (PN 1808) and passed it 48-2 on . The House reported it as committed from Communications and Technology on , re-reported it from Appropriations on and passed the same print 163-40 on . The bill status page shows no executive action yet. The 2025-2026 session runs through .

What it requires

  • Do not knowingly, recklessly or willfully create and disseminate, or cause to be created and disseminated, an advertisement that uses AI-generated or significantly AI-modified content in a manner that creates a false consumer perception about the nature, origin or authenticity of the goods or services advertised, without a clear and conspicuous disclosure.
  • Make the disclosure state that the advertisement contains content that was modified or generated using artificial intelligence, display it in the first instance whenever the content is presented, present it in the same medium as the content, and, to the extent technically feasible, make it permanent or extraordinarily difficult to remove.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text, as of .

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MEASURE 2.8Risks associated with transparency and accountability – as identified in the MAP function – are examined and documented.
NIST AI 600-1
OWASP Agentic Top 10
  • ASI09Human-Agent Trust Exploitation
MIT mitigations Draft
  • 2.4Content Safety Controls
  • 4.1System Documentation
  • 4.2Risk Disclosure
  • 4.6User Rights & Recourse
FINOS AIGF
ETSI EN 304 223
  • 5.1.3-2Threats developers cannot resolve are passed to operators and on to end-users.
  • 5.3.1-1Users told where and how their data is used, accessed and stored, with developers informing operators.
  • 5.3.1-2.1That guidance covers proper use, limits and likely failure modes.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Identifiers refer to ETSI EN 304 223 V2.1.1 (2025-12), © ETSI 2025, all rights reserved. ETSI owns the standard; no ETSI text (titles or sentences) is reproduced here. The standard is free to download from ETSI.

If you get it wrong

Penalty structure

As passed, a court may award a civil fine that does not exceed $3,000, together with actual attorney fees and court costs, in an action brought by the Attorney General or a district attorney.

Rule
Fixed only
As of
Currency
USD
Fixed cap
3,000

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

The Senate passed this measure 48-2 on . The House passed the same printer's number 163-40 on . The bill status page records no executive action as of .

As passed, an advertiser may not knowingly, recklessly or willfully create and disseminate, or cause to be created and disseminated, an advertisement that uses synthetic content in a manner that creates a false consumer perception about the nature, origin or authenticity of the goods or services being advertised, without clear and conspicuous disclosure. The disclosure must state that the advertisement contains content that was modified or generated using artificial intelligence.

It must be displayed in the first instance whenever the synthetic content is presented to the consumer, presented in the same medium as the synthetic content, and, to the extent technically feasible, permanent or extraordinarily difficult to remove from it. The disclosure requirement does not reach content that is evidently fictional based on the content or context of the depiction, parody, satire, commentary or criticism, or content limited to text.

The Attorney General or a district attorney may bring an action to restrain a prohibited act by temporary or permanent injunction. A court may award a civil fine that does not exceed $3,000, together with actual attorney fees and court costs. The bill provides that the act takes effect in 60 days.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app generates content with AI.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app