Law / Frameworks / MIT mitigations Draft / Transparency & Accountability Controls
MIT mitigations 4.3Incident Reporting
Formal processes and protocols that document and share AI safety incidents, security breaches, near-misses, and relevant threat intelligence with appropriate stakeholders to enable coordinated responses and systemic improvements.MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, preliminary taxonomy, July 2025, 4.3
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .
The kinds of duty that reach it: breach notice, reporting.
- 26
- laws
- 16
- jurisdictions
- 1
- with court rulings behind it
- 7
- not yet in force
- 1
- proposed, not law
Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both
- NIST AI RMFGOVERN 1.1 Legal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and..., 15 laws
- NIST AI RMFMANAGE 4.3 Incidents and errors are communicated to relevant AI actors, including..., 8 laws
- NIST AI RMFGOVERN 4.2 Organizational teams document the risks and potential impacts of the AI..., 7 laws
- 1 more in the NIST AI RMF
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-09 Information Security, 26 laws
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-07 Human-AI Configuration, 16 laws
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-08 Information Integrity, 5 laws
- NIST AI 200-22.3 Apply & Measure, 12 laws
- NIST AI 200-24.3 Composing a TEVV Toolbox, 12 laws
- OWASP LLM Top 10LLM03:2026 Excessive Agency, 12 laws
- OWASP Agentic Top 10ASI09 Human-Agent Trust Exploitation, 13 laws
- NIST Privacy FrameworkGV.PO-P5 Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding privacy are..., 2 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-DET-004 AI System Observability, 26 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-DET-021 Agent Decision Audit and Explainability, 25 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-005 System Acceptance Testing, 12 laws
- 3 more in the FINOS AIGF
- ETSI EN 304 2235.2.2-5 AI-specific incident management and recovery plans that are created, tested..., 26 laws
- ETSI EN 304 2235.1.4-1 Capability for human oversight designed in and maintained., 12 laws
- ETSI EN 304 2235.2.1-1 Full inventory of assets, including their dependencies and connections., 12 laws
- 5 more in the ETSI EN 304 223
A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force proposed
AI risk obligations
7 laws, 3 jurisdictionsAI governance
6 laws, 6 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Digital Services Act, Article 37 (independent audit of very large online platforms and search engines) |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| Gesetz zur Marktüberwachung und Innovationsförderung von künstlicher Intelligenz (KI-MIG), AI Market Surveillance and Innovation Promotion Act |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| Government Decree 344/2025 Implementing the Hungarian AI Act: Designated Authorities, Notified-Body Reports and Fine Ceilings |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act from , in 7 weeks |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| AI Framework Act, Article 32 (safety-assurance duty for high-compute AI systems) |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| Artificial Intelligence Risk Management and Security Act of 2026 proposed |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
AI sector rules
6 laws, 6 jurisdictionsAI transparency
5 laws, 5 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Companion Chatbot Safety and Accountability Act (SB 243) |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| HB 26-1263 (2026), Conversational AI Service Operator Requirements |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| Ordonnance n°0011/PR/2026, marquage des contenus générés par intelligence artificielle |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| AI Companion Chatbot Safety Act (SB 1546) from , in 7 weeks |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
AI prohibited practices
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Code Pénal Arts. 294-3 to 294-4, Child Sexual Abuse Material Including Realistic and AI-Generated Depictions |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
Computer misuse
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Loi n° 09-04 relative à la prévention et à la lutte contre les infractions liées aux technologies de l'information et de la communication |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
Full text of the MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, CC BY 4.0. MIT AI Risk Initiative (MIT FutureTech), AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy. Data from the MIT AI Risk Initiative is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Cite as: Mapping AI Risk Mitigations: Evidence Scan & Draft Mitigation Taxonomy Every control of the framework.