Law / Frameworks / NIST AI RMF / Manage
NIST AI RMF, ManageMANAGE 4.1
Post-deployment AI system monitoring plans are implemented, including mechanisms for capturing and evaluating input from users and other relevant AI actors, appeal and override, decommissioning, incident response, recovery, and change management.NIST AI Risk Management Framework, version 1.0, January 2023 (NIST AI 100-1), MANAGE 4.1
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .
- 22
- laws
- 15
- jurisdictions
- 1
- with court rulings behind it
- 5
- not yet in force
Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-09 Information Security, 6 laws
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-04 Data Privacy, 3 laws
- MIT mitigations4.3 Incident Reporting, 6 laws
- MIT mitigations4.2 Risk Disclosure, 5 laws
- MIT mitigations4.5 Third-Party System Access, 5 laws
- 2 more in the MIT mitigations
- FINOS AIGFAIR-DET-021 Agent Decision Audit and Explainability, 8 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-DET-004 AI System Observability, 7 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-006 Data Quality & Classification/Sensitivity, 3 laws
- ETSI EN 304 2235.2.2-5 AI-specific incident management and recovery plans that are created, tested..., 6 laws
A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force
AI prohibited practices
6 laws, 6 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Civil Action and Platform Takedown Duty for Synthetically Created Intimate Images |
On receiving a valid removal request, remove the image and make reasonable efforts to remove copies within forty-eight hours. |
|
| Promotion of an Altered Sexual Depiction; Brooke's Law platform takedown duty |
Remove a validly requested altered sexual depiction, and make reasonable efforts to remove known identical copies, within 48 hours of receiving the request. |
|
| Code Pénal Arts. 294-3 to 294-4, Child Sexual Abuse Material Including Realistic and AI-Generated Depictions |
As a telecommunications or electronic communications network operator or service provider, act to bar public access to such an image once you become aware of it through your professional activity, and make it available to the judicial authority. |
|
| S.B. 441 (2025), civil liability for artificial intimate visual material and nudification applications |
If you own a website, application, or social media platform on which such material is disclosed, you are liable for damages if the depicted person requests removal and you fail to remove it, and known identical copies, within 72 hours. |
|
| Digital Voyeurism Prevention Act (HB 276, 2026 General Session), Utah Code Title 13 Chapter 72b from , in 7 weeks |
Give users a clear way to report a non-consensual counterfeit intimate image and remove a reported image within 48 hours of notice, if you operate a covered platform |
|
| Disclosure of sexually explicit images without consent, digitized and computer-generated images |
An operator of a website, online service, or application may not accept a fee or other consideration to remove, delete, or refrain from posting such an image when the depicted person requests it. |
AI risk obligations
6 laws, 3 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| CCPA Automated Decisionmaking Technology Regulations |
Let a consumer opt out of your use of ADMT to make a significant decision about them, unless you offer an appeal to a human reviewer with authority to overturn the decision or another exception listed in the regulation applies |
|
| AI Act, Article 14 (human oversight) from , in 13 months |
Provide the system so the assigned overseers can decide, in a particular situation, not to use it, or can disregard, override or reverse its output. |
|
| AI Act, Article 17 (quality management system) from , in 13 months |
If you are a financial institution subject to internal-governance requirements under Union financial services law, you meet this duty by complying with those internal-governance rules, except that you must still have the risk management system, the post-market monitoring system and the serious-incident reporting procedures of Article 17(1), points (g), (h) and (i); harmonised standards referred to in Article 40 are taken into account to that end. |
|
| AI Act, Article 43 (conformity assessment procedures) from , in 13 months |
Undergo a new conformity assessment procedure if you substantially modify a high-risk AI system that has already been assessed, whether or not the modified system is intended to be further distributed or continues to be used by the current deployer; for a system that continues to learn after it is placed on the market or put into service, changes you pre-determined at the initial assessment and set out in the technical documentation under point 2(f) of Annex IV are not a substantial modification. |
|
| AI Act, Article 72 (post-market monitoring by providers and post-market monitoring plan) from , in 13 months |
If you are the provider of a high-risk AI system, establish and document a post-market monitoring system proportionate to the nature of the AI technologies and the risks of the system. Base the post-market monitoring system on a post-market monitoring plan, and make the plan part of the technical documentation referred to in Annex IV. |
|
| Law on Artificial Intelligence, incident management and reporting obligation |
Continuously keep your AI system safe, secure, and reliable, and promptly detect and remedy any incident capable of harming people, property, data, or social order, regardless of the system's risk tier. |
AI governance
3 laws, 2 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services, Article 14 |
If you discover a user has used the service to engage in illegal activity, warn the user, restrict their access to features, or suspend or terminate their access, in accordance with law and your service agreement. |
|
| Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis Internet Information Services, Article 10 |
Separately take measures against the responsible user, such as warning, restricting features, suspending the service, or closing the account, in accordance with law and your service agreement. |
|
| H.B. 3133 (2025), social media platform complaint system for explicit deep fake material |
On receiving a report of explicit deep fake material, immediately confirm to the user that you are aware of it, remove the reported content and any identical known copies, and provide the user a written status update within seven days. If you determine reported content is explicit deep fake material, take measures to keep the same material from being posted again. |
AI sector rules
2 laws, 2 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| MiFID II Algorithmic Trading Controls: Resilient Systems, Testing, Kill Functionality, Records and Notification (Article 17 and RTS 6) |
Keep records of any material change made to the software used for algorithmic trading, allowing you to determine when a change was made, the person that made it, the person that approved it and the nature of the change (Article 5(7)); have a person designated by senior management review any proposed material change to the production environment related to algorithmic trading before it is made, and communicate any change to the functionality of your systems to the traders in charge of the trading algorithm and to the compliance and risk management functions (Article 11). |
|
| Central Bank of Jordan Artificial Intelligence Framework for the Banking Sector, Version 1.0 |
The CBJ expects you to offer opt-out or alternative service options to customers who prefer not to interact with AI-driven systems, without compromising their access to essential banking services, to let customers access, correct and request deletion of their personal data where applicable, and to keep open channels for customers to question and appeal AI decisions that affect them (sections 2.3 and 2.4). |
AI transparency
2 laws, 2 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act |
Delete an applicant's interview video, and instruct anyone else who received a copy to do the same, within 30 days of the applicant's request. |
|
| Media Act (ZMed-1), Articles 66 and 67, Labelling of AI-Generated Media Content and Publisher Responsibility |
Where a violation is found, remove AI-generated programme content as soon as possible and at the latest within one working day of a report (Article 67). |
Computer misuse
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Loi n° 09-04 relative à la prévention et à la lutte contre les infractions liées aux technologies de l'information et de la communication |
As an internet access provider, remove or block access to illicit content as soon as you become aware of it, directly or indirectly (not only on judicial order), and assist the competent judicial authorities in an investigation. |
Linking and framing
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Electronic Transactions Act 2000, intermediary liability limitation |
Remove information as soon as practicable, and notify the Minister or the appropriate law enforcement agency, once you acquire actual knowledge that it gives rise to civil or criminal liability. If you become aware of facts suggesting a likelihood of liability, follow an approved code of conduct or notify the Minister, who may then direct removal. |
Personal data
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Personal Information Protection Law, Arts. 13(6) and 27 (processing already-public personal information) |
Stop processing an individual's already-public personal information once they expressly decline, even though no prior consent was required. |
Full text of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, public domain (a US government work). Every control of the framework.