Law / Frameworks / NIST AI RMF / Manage
NIST AI RMF, ManageMANAGE 1.3
Responses to the AI risks deemed high priority, as identified by the MAP function, are developed, planned, and documented. Risk response options can include mitigating, transferring, avoiding, or accepting.NIST AI Risk Management Framework, version 1.0, January 2023 (NIST AI 100-1), MANAGE 1.3
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .
- 14
- laws
- 10
- jurisdictions
- 0
- with court rulings behind them
- 2
- not yet in force
- 6
- proposed, not law
Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-04 Data Privacy, 5 laws
- NIST AI 200-22.4 Synthesize & Interrogate, 5 laws
- MIT mitigations1.2 Risk Management, 6 laws
- MIT mitigations1.7 Societal Impact Assessment, 5 laws
- MIT mitigations3.1 Testing & Auditing, 5 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-005 System Acceptance Testing, 8 laws
- ETSI EN 304 2235.1.2-1 Business need and security risks written down and assessed before deciding..., 6 laws
- ETSI EN 304 2235.1.3-1 Threat modelling and risk management, reviewed regularly and covering..., 5 laws
A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force proposed
AI governance
9 laws, 8 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Andorra proposed |
Each Party must adopt or maintain measures for the identification, assessment, prevention and mitigation of risks posed by AI systems, considering their actual and potential impacts on human rights, democracy and the rule of law, and apply those measures iteratively throughout the activities within an AI system's lifecycle; an app operator is reached through the measures its Party adopts. |
|
| Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Armenia proposed |
Each Party must adopt or maintain measures for the identification, assessment, prevention and mitigation of risks posed by AI systems, considering their actual and potential impacts on human rights, democracy and the rule of law, and apply those measures iteratively throughout the activities within an AI system's lifecycle; an app operator is reached through the measures its Party adopts. |
|
| Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Canada proposed |
Each Party must adopt or maintain measures for the identification, assessment, prevention and mitigation of risks posed by AI systems, considering their actual and potential impacts on human rights, democracy and the rule of law; an app operator is reached through the measures its Party adopts. |
|
| AI Act, Article 55 (obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk) |
Assess and mitigate the systemic risks your model may pose at Union level, including where those risks originate, whether in the model's development, its placing on the market, or its use. |
|
| Digital Services Act, Article 37 (independent audit of very large online platforms and search engines) |
Where the audit report is not positive, adopt an audit implementation report within one month of receiving the operational recommendations, describing the measures you took, or explaining why you did not and what you did instead (Article 37(6)). |
|
| Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Moldova proposed |
Each Party to the Convention must adopt or maintain measures for the identification, assessment, prevention and mitigation of risks posed by artificial intelligence systems, considering their actual and potential impacts on human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Article 16(1)). |
|
| AI Framework Act, Article 32 (safety-assurance duty for high-compute AI systems) |
If your AI system was trained using cumulative compute of 10^26 floating-point operations or more, applies the most advanced AI technology currently in use, and could broadly and seriously affect people's life, physical safety or fundamental rights, identify, assess and mitigate risk across the system's full life cycle. |
|
| Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by the United Kingdom proposed |
Each Party to the Convention must adopt or maintain measures for the identification, assessment, prevention and mitigation of risks posed by artificial intelligence systems, considering their actual and potential impacts on human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Article 16(1)). |
|
| Artificial Intelligence Risk Management and Security Act of 2026 proposed |
Develop, publish and follow a Model Safety Plan for each AI system or model you create, substantially modify, or use in the training or evaluation of other AI models, naming the model or system, a capabilities or risk assessment, the mitigation measures for each assessed item across the product lifecycle, and the corporate officer responsible for carrying it out |
AI risk obligations
3 laws, 3 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Decision Support Systems Bias Mitigation Act (SB 503) from , in 7 weeks |
As a developer, make reasonable efforts to mitigate the known or reasonably foreseeable risk of biased impacts of each such system As a deployer, regularly monitor each such system and take reasonable and proportionate steps to mitigate the known or reasonably foreseeable risk of biased impacts |
|
| AI Act, Article 9 (risk management system) from , in 13 months |
Fold in other risks surfaced by your post-market monitoring data, and adopt targeted risk management measures for the risks you identified. Bring residual risk, per hazard and overall, down to an acceptable level: eliminate or reduce risk through design and development where technically feasible, then mitigate or control what cannot be eliminated, then provide required information and, where appropriate, deployer training, taking the deployer's likely expertise and context of use into account. |
|
| AI Framework Act, Article 34 (business-operator duties for high-impact AI) |
Establish and operate a plan to protect the users of your high-impact AI. |
AI prohibited practices
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Commission Guidelines on prohibited AI practices under the AI Act (C(2025) 5052 final) |
Providers of AI systems, including general-purpose AI systems, are expected not to place on the market or put into service a system reasonably likely to behave or be directly used in a manner prohibited by Article 5, and to take effective and verifiable safeguards to the extent reasonably foreseeable, feasible and proportionate; deployers are expected not to use any AI system in a prohibited manner, including by bypassing the provider's safety guardrails (Section 2.7, paragraphs 39 to 41). |
Comprehensive regime
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Superintendencia Circular on AI and Personal Data |
Where you cannot be certain an artificial intelligence system's processing will not cause serious, irreversible harm, refrain from that processing or adopt precautionary measures, and adapt your risk management systems to identify, measure, control and monitor the situations that could affect your compliance with personal data protection rules. |
Full text of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, public domain (a US government work). Every control of the framework.