Law / Frameworks / MIT mitigations Draft / Operational Process Controls
MIT mitigations 3.2Data Governance
Policies and procedures that govern responsible data acquisition, curation, and usage to ensure compliance, quality, user privacy, and removal of harmful content.MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, preliminary taxonomy, July 2025, 3.2
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .
The kinds of duty that reach it: TDM, access restriction, attribution, biometric, consent, data subject rights, retention, transfer.
- 214
- laws
- 131
- jurisdictions
- 5
- with court rulings behind them
- 9
- not yet in force
- 2
- proposed, not law
Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both
- NIST AI RMFMAP 4.1 Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components –..., 198 laws
- NIST AI RMFMAP 1.6 System requirements (e.g., “the system shall respect the privacy of its..., 5 laws
- NIST AI RMFMEASURE 2.9 The AI model is explained, validated, and documented, and AI system output..., 4 laws
- 6 more in the NIST AI RMF
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-12 Value Chain and Component Integration, 165 laws
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-09 Information Security, 148 laws
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-10 Intellectual Property, 57 laws
- 4 more in the NIST AI 600-1
- NIST AI 200-22.3 Apply & Measure, 5 laws
- NIST AI 200-24.3 Composing a TEVV Toolbox, 5 laws
- OWASP LLM Top 10LLM03:2026 Excessive Agency, 153 laws
- OWASP Agentic Top 10ASI03 Identity and Privilege Abuse, 148 laws
- OWASP Agentic Top 10ASI09 Human-Agent Trust Exploitation, 5 laws
- NIST Privacy FrameworkCT.PO-P1 Policies, processes, and procedures for authorizing data processing (e.g.,..., 31 laws
- NIST Privacy FrameworkCM.AW-P1 Mechanisms (e.g., notices, internal or public reports) for communicating..., 5 laws
- NIST Privacy FrameworkCT.DM-P10 Stakeholder privacy preferences are included in algorithmic design..., 3 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-018 Agent Authority Least Privilege Framework, 148 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-023 Agentic System Credential Protection Framework, 148 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-007 Legal and Contractual Frameworks for AI Systems, 57 laws
- 7 more in the FINOS AIGF
- ETSI EN 304 2235.1.2-6 Access the AI system gets to other systems and data sources is minimal and..., 148 laws
- ETSI EN 304 2235.2.4-2.1 Minimum record for training data: its source, such as a page URL, and when..., 20 laws
- ETSI EN 304 2235.1.4-3 Where oversight is a risk control, the technical measures behind it are..., 5 laws
- 7 more in the ETSI EN 304 223
A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force proposed
Computer misuse
121 laws, 105 jurisdictionsShow the other 111 laws
Copyright and text and data mining (TDM)
25 laws, 24 jurisdictionsShow the other 15 laws
Database right
23 laws, 23 jurisdictionsShow the other 13 laws
Snippet reproduction
19 laws, 19 jurisdictionsShow the other 9 laws
Press publishers' right
6 laws, 6 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act (ZAPSP), Arts. 90d and 90zh, Press Publisher Right |
Through its attribution duty. What it requires |
|
| Directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market (DSM Directive), Articles 15 and 4 |
Through its TDM, attribution duties. What it requires |
|
| Presseverleger-Leistungsschutzrecht (Press Publisher Neighbouring Right) |
Through its attribution duty. What it requires |
|
| Law 2121/1993 Article 51B, Press Publisher Neighbouring Right |
Through its attribution duty. What it requires |
|
| Legge sul Diritto d'Autore Art. 43-bis, Press Publisher Neighbouring Right |
Through its attribution duty. What it requires |
|
| Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Single Market Regulations (S.L. 415.08), Regulation 15, Press Publishers' Right |
Through its attribution duty. What it requires |
AI risk obligations
5 laws, 3 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| CCPA Automated Decisionmaking Technology Regulations |
Through its data subject rights duty. What it requires |
|
| AI Act, Article 14 (human oversight) from , in 13 months |
Through its biometric duty. What it requires |
|
| AI Act, Article 26(10) (post-remote biometric identification authorisation) from , in 13 months |
Through its biometric duty. What it requires |
|
| AI Act, Article 86 (right to explanation of individual decision-making) from , in 13 months |
Through its data subject rights duty. What it requires |
|
| Decreto Legislativo 160/2026, After-the-Fact Facial Recognition Integrated in Video Surveillance (Art. 10) |
Through its biometric duty. What it requires |
AI prohibited practices
4 laws, 4 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Promotion of an Altered Sexual Depiction; Brooke's Law platform takedown duty |
Through its data subject rights duty. What it requires |
|
| Decreto Legislativo 160/2026, Police Biometric AI: Dataset Labelling and Real-Time Remote Identification (Artt. 7-9, 13) |
Through its biometric duty. What it requires |
|
| Leading Ethical AI Development for Kids Act (Senate Bill 760, as passed by the Senate) proposed |
Through its consent duty. What it requires |
|
| Digital Voyeurism Prevention Act (HB 276, 2026 General Session), Utah Code Title 13 Chapter 72b from , in 7 weeks |
Through its consent duty. What it requires |
AI sector rules
4 laws, 4 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| HB 26-1195 (2026), Psychotherapy Artificial Intelligence Restrictions |
Through its consent duty. What it requires |
|
| Consumer Credit Act, Articles 24 and 30, Personalised Offers and Creditworthiness Assessment by Automated Processing from , in 6 days |
Through its data subject rights duty. What it requires |
|
| Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act |
Through its consent duty. What it requires |
|
| Consumer Credit Act (2026:1011), Chapter 2 Section 7 and Chapter 3 Section 15, Personalised Offers and Credit Assessment by Automated Processing from , in 6 days |
Through its data subject rights duty. What it requires |
AI transparency
2 laws, 2 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act |
Through its consent duty. What it requires |
|
| New York City | Chatbot Data Privacy, Security, and Transparency proposed |
Through its consent duty. What it requires |
Personal data
2 laws, 2 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Loi n° 24.001 portant protection des données à caractère personnel, collecte de données publiquement accessibles et transfert transfrontalier |
Through its biometric, consent duties. What it requires |
|
| Código Penal, Violación de Datos Personales |
Through its access restriction duty. What it requires |
AI governance
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Commission Guidelines on the scope of the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models under the AI Act |
Through its TDM duty. What it requires |
AI training data
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| AI Act, Article 53 (obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models) |
Through its TDM duty. What it requires |
Copyright: the exclusive rights
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this control |
|---|---|---|
| Copyright Act, Right of Reproduction, Right to Transmit to the Public, Right to Demand an Injunction and penalties |
Through its attribution duty. What it requires |
Full text of the MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, CC BY 4.0. MIT AI Risk Initiative (MIT FutureTech), AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy. Data from the MIT AI Risk Initiative is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Cite as: Mapping AI Risk Mitigations: Evidence Scan & Draft Mitigation Taxonomy Every control of the framework.