LexLint.ioBeta

Know the law your code answers to.

Law / Georgia

Copyright and Related Rights, database producer right

Law of Georgia on Copyright and Related Rights, Art. 54 (A Database Producer)

In force since .

A database right rule binding public and private bodies.

Obligation class
Access restriction
Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Do not extract or re-use the whole, or a qualitatively or quantitatively significant part, of a database's contents without the database producer's authorisation.
  • Do not repeatedly or systematically extract or re-use insignificant parts of a database if doing so conflicts with the database's normal exploitation or unreasonably prejudices the producer's legitimate interests.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 4.1Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components – including the use of third-party data or software – are in place, followed, and documented, as are risks of infringement of a third party’s intellectual property or other rights.
NIST AI 600-1
OWASP LLM Top 10
OWASP Agentic Top 10
  • ASI03Identity and Privilege Abuse
MIT mitigations Draft
  • 2.1Model & Infrastructure Security
  • 3.2Data Governance
FINOS AIGF
ETSI EN 304 223
  • 5.1.2-6Access the AI system gets to other systems and data sources is minimal and risk assessed.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Identifiers refer to ETSI EN 304 223 V2.1.1 (2025-12), © ETSI 2025, all rights reserved. ETSI owns the standard; no ETSI text (titles or sentences) is reproduced here. The standard is free to download from ETSI.

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Article 54 gives the database producer an exclusive right to prevent extraction or re-use of the whole or a significant part of a database, and paragraph 3 bars repeated or systematic extraction of insignificant parts that conflicts with normal exploitation. Article 54-1 lets a producer deposit a copy with Sakpatenti, which is an optional right of the producer, not a duty of the extractor. No clause requires a log or record to be made, kept or produced by the person extracting, and the article has no territorial clause.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Article 54 gives a database producer who confirms a substantial qualitative or quantitative investment in obtaining, verifying, or presenting the database's contents an exclusive right to prevent extraction or re-use of the whole content or a qualitatively or quantitatively significant part of it. That right runs for 15 years from the database's making, or from first lawful publication or communication to the public within that term.

Repeated or systematic extraction or re-use of insignificant parts is also prohibited where it conflicts with the database's normal exploitation or unreasonably prejudices the producer's legitimate interests. This sui generis right is independent of copyright in the database's contents. The right was in Article 54 of the Act as first enacted. Law No. 1585 of (Legislative Herald of Georgia, No. 31, ) later amended that article.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app crawls the web or trains models.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .