Law / Ghana

Copyright Act, Database Protection

Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690), ss. 1, 19 (Database Protection)

In force since .

A database right rule binding private bodies.

Obligation class
Access restriction
Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Do not reproduce a database whose selection or arrangement of contents is an original intellectual creation without the rightsholder's authorization; Ghana has no sui generis database right, so an unoriginal, purely factual database is not itself protected on that basis.
  • Do not rely on the personal-use exception to copy the whole or a substantial part of a database in digital form; that exception does not extend to a database.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 4.1Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components – including the use of third-party data or software – are in place, followed, and documented, as are risks of infringement of a third party’s intellectual property or other rights.
NIST AI 600-1
OWASP LLM Top 10
OWASP Agentic Top 10
  • ASI03Identity and Privilege Abuse
MIT mitigations Draft
  • 2.1Model & Infrastructure Security
  • 3.2Data Governance
FINOS AIGF
ETSI EN 304 223
  • 5.1.2-6Access the AI system gets to other systems and data sources is minimal and risk assessed.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Identifiers refer to ETSI EN 304 223 V2.1.1 (2025-12), © ETSI 2025, all rights reserved. ETSI owns the standard; no ETSI text (titles or sentences) is reproduced here. The standard is free to download from ETSI.

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureYes

Criminal exposure note

A person who infringes a right protected under the Act commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine of not more than one thousand penalty units and not less than five hundred penalty units, or imprisonment of not more than three years, or both; a continuing offence carries a further fine of not less than twenty-five penalty units and not more than one hundred penalty units for each day it continues (s. 43).

Penalty structure

Section 43 (Penalty for copyright offence) sets a fine of not more than one thousand penalty units and not less than five hundred penalty units, or imprisonment of not more than three years, or both, with a further fine of twenty-five to one hundred penalty units for each day a continuing offence persists. One penalty unit equals twelve Ghana cedis under the Fines (Penalty Units) Act, 2000 (Act 572), as recorded by the Ghana Revenue Authority, making the base ceiling twelve thousand Ghana cedis.

Rule
Fixed only
As of
Currency
GHS
Fixed cap
1,000

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

Copyright Office; prosecuted before the ordinary criminal courts

Settledness

As of
Open questions
Does a website database whose contents are assembled from user submissions and listed in date order meet the test that the "selection or arrangement of contents constitutes intellectual creations", so that it is a literary work protected under the Act?

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Section 1 makes a work eligible for copyright if it is original and fixed, and section 19(2)(c) takes reproduction of the whole or a substantial part of a database in digital form outside the personal-use permission. The Act has no database-specific record duty, and neither cited section requires a log or record to be made, kept or produced. The eligibility test in section 1 (a citizen or resident author, first publication in Ghana, or a treaty obligation) describes protected works, not a hook for the person copying.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

The Act's definition of a literary work, which section 1 makes eligible for copyright, includes encyclopedias, dictionaries, directories, time tables, anthologies, databases, or a compilation of data or other material, whether in machine-readable form, which by reason of the selection or arrangement of contents constitutes an intellectual creation.

Ghana has no separate sui generis database right: a database that is a mere collection of facts, without an original selection or arrangement, is not protected on that basis alone. Section 19's personal-use exception, which otherwise permits reproduction for a person's exclusive personal use, expressly does not extend to reproducing the whole or a substantial part of a database in digital form.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app crawls the web or trains models.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .