Ghana is a member state of the Economic Community of West African StatesThe 3 researched instruments of the Economic Community of West African States are listed on the Economic Community of West African States page, not here. Whether each is in force in Ghana is not yet researched. The law of Ghana, described on this page below, applies here.
21 of 24 named instruments researched to a stage, across four of the ten areas of law we track: 21 in force. As of .
When each starts18 of 21 carry a date, 3 do not. Earlier is before 2014.
in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force
Ghana's comprehensive personal-data statute is the Data Protection Act, 2012 (Act 843), which binds the Republic and every private data controller or processor established in Ghana, or using equipment or a processor in Ghana, and is enforced by the Data Protection Commission.
The Act now files as five provision-scoped instruments: the omnibus regime (registration, security measures, and exemptions), special personal data, the rights of data subjects, notification of security compromises, and enforcement, offences and penalties.
Processing special personal data, including an individual's DNA, health, ethnic origin, religious belief, political opinion, or sexual life, is prohibited unless a listed exception applies, and a data subject has a right to demand that a decision significantly affecting them is not based solely on automated processing.
A data controller must notify both the Commission and the data subject of unauthorized access to personal data as soon as reasonably practicable, and the Act sets no adequacy test or other substantive condition on transferring personal data outside Ghana, though a registering data controller must disclose the countries to which it may transfer data.
The Ministry of Communication, Digital Technology and Innovations announced in March 2026 that a new Data Protection Bill and a separate Emerging Technologies Bill are being developed to address artificial intelligence, automated decision-making, and cross-border data flows, and to provide structured oversight of AI systems and digital platforms, but neither has been tabled in Parliament.
The National Identity Register Act, 2008 (Act 750) provides that a user agency that accesses, uses, retains or discloses personal information from the National Identification Authority must comply with the applicable provisions of Part II of that Act and the guidelines the Authority issues.
Regulation 7(2) of the National Identity Register Regulations, 2012 (Legislative Instrument 2111) requires an organisation that offers any of the services in respect of the transactions listed in regulation 7(1) to demand the presentation of a national identity card from the individual concerned before providing the relevant service.
Section 31(1) requires a data controller, or a third party processing data under its authority, to notify the Data Protection Commission and the affected data subject where there are reasonable grounds to believe personal data has been accessed or acquired by an unauthorised person. Section 31(2) requires that notification to be made as soon as reasonably practicable after discovery of the unauthorised access or acquisition.
Section 31(3) requires the data controller to take steps to restore the integrity of the information system. Section 31(4) lets the data controller delay notifying the data subject where a security agency or the Commission says notification would impede a criminal investigation.
Section 31(5) lets the notification to a data subject be made by registered mail, electronic mail, prominent placement on the responsible party's website, publication in the media, or another manner the Commission directs. Section 31(6) and (7) require the notification to give the data subject enough information to take protective measures, including the identity of the unauthorised person if it is known to the data controller.
Section 31(8) lets the Commission direct the data controller to publicise the compromise where publicity would protect an affected data subject.
The Data Protection Act, 2012 (Act 843) is administered by the Data Protection Commission, an independent statutory body it establishes. A data controller or processor established in Ghana, or using equipment or a processor in Ghana, must have a lawful basis before processing personal data, and section 27 requires it to register with the Commission before processing begins.
Section 27(2) requires a data controller collecting personal data to tell the data subject the nature of the data, the purpose of collection, the recipients, and whether supplying the data is mandatory or discretionary. Sections 28 to 30 require appropriate, reasonable technical and organisational measures to secure personal data against loss, damage, or unlawful access, and require a data processor acting for a data controller to maintain the same measures under a written contract.
Sections 45 to 59 establish the Data Protection Register and govern an application for registration, its refusal, grant, renewal, removal, and cancellation, and section 47(1)(g) requires an applicant to disclose the countries to which it may transfer the data it holds. Sections 60 to 74 exempt processing carried out for national security, crime and taxation, health, education and social work, regulatory activity, journalism, and research, among other listed purposes.
Section 82 bars a person providing goods, facilities, or services to the public from requiring a person to supply a particular record as a condition of that provision, and section 83 bars demanding a record of a person's physical or mental health or condition. The Act binds the Republic itself, treating each government department as a data controller. The Act was gazetted on . Its commencement was left to a date the Minister specifies by notice in the Gazette. The Data Protection Commission gives as the day the Act came into force.
Section 41 entitles an individual, by written notice to a data controller, to require that any decision significantly affecting them is not based solely on the automatic processing of their personal data.
Even without a prior notice, if a controller does base such a significant decision solely on automated processing, it must notify the individual as soon as reasonably practicable, and the individual may then require the controller to reconsider the decision within twenty-one days of that notification. The controller must then answer in writing, within twenty-one days after receiving the individual's notice, what steps it intends to take to comply.
The right does not apply to a decision made in the course of considering or performing a contract with the data subject, one authorized or required by an enactment, or other circumstances the Minister prescribes.
Section 35 gives a data subject the right to be told the personal data a data controller holds about them, the purpose of processing, the recipients, and the source of the data, communicated in an intelligible form. Section 35(10) requires a data controller to comply with an access request promptly and in any event within forty days of receiving it.
Section 33 gives a data subject the right to have inaccurate, irrelevant, excessive, out of date, incomplete, misleading, or unlawfully obtained personal data corrected or deleted, and requires the data controller to tell every person the data was disclosed to of the correction. Section 39 lets an individual require a data controller to cease or not begin processing personal data that causes or is likely to cause them unwarranted damage or distress.
Section 40 bars a data controller from using a data subject's personal data for direct marketing without their prior written consent, and lets the data subject object to direct marketing at any time. Section 42 gives a data subject the right to require the rectification, blocking, erasure, or destruction of exempt manual data that is inaccurate or incomplete.
Section 44 lets the Commission order a data controller to rectify, block, erase, or destroy personal data on a data subject's complaint that it is inaccurate. Section 36 applies these rights to a credit bureau acting as a data controller, letting a data subject limit an information request to their financial standing and history for the twelve months before the request.
Section 75 lets the Commission serve a data controller who has contravened or is contravening a data protection principle with an enforcement notice requiring it to take or refrain from taking specified steps within a stated time, or to stop processing specified personal data. Section 76 lets the Commission cancel or vary an enforcement notice on its own motion or on the application of the person it was served on.
Section 77 lets a person affected by processing request the Commission to assess whether it complies with the Act, and section 78 lets the Commission make a formal determination that processing is inconsistent with the Act. Section 80 makes it an offence, carrying a fine of not more than one hundred and fifty penalty units or imprisonment of not more than one year or both, to fail to comply with an enforcement notice or an information notice, or to make a false statement in response to one.
Section 43 entitles an individual who suffers damage or distress through a data controller's contravention of the Act to compensation from that data controller, subject to the defence that the data controller took reasonable care to comply. Section 88 bars a person from purchasing, knowingly obtaining, or knowingly or recklessly disclosing another person's personal data, and section 89 bars selling or offering to sell personal data.
Section 95 sets the residual penalty for an offence under the Act with no penalty otherwise specified at a fine of not more than five thousand penalty units or imprisonment of not more than ten years, or both. The Judicial Service of Ghana's criminal bench book states that a penalty unit is twelve Ghana cedis (GH¢12), which puts the most that section 95 allows at sixty thousand Ghana cedis.
Section 37(1) prohibits processing personal data relating to a child under parental control, or to an individual's religious or philosophical beliefs, ethnic origin, race, trade union membership, political opinions, health, sexual life, or criminal behaviour, unless the Act otherwise provides.
Section 37(2) permits a data controller to process special personal data only where the processing is necessary or the data subject consents, and section 37(3) treats processing as necessary where it exercises or performs a right or obligation the law imposes on an employer. Section 37(4) permits processing without consent only to protect the vital interests of a data subject who cannot give it, cannot reasonably be expected to give it, or has unreasonably withheld it.
Section 37(5) permits processing for the legitimate activities of a non-profit political, philosophical, religious, or trade union body, limited to its own members and never disclosed to a third party without the data subject's consent. Section 37(8) bars processing special personal data about race or ethnic origin unless it is necessary to identify and eliminate discriminatory practices and is carried out with appropriate safeguards for the data subject's rights and freedoms.
Section 38 exempts a spiritual or religious organisation, or an institution founded on religious or philosophical principles, from the prohibition on processing data about religious or philosophical belief where the processing concerns its own members, employees, or persons belonging to it.
The National Identity Register Act, 2008 (Act 750) was assented to on and notified in the Gazette on . Section 2 establishes the National Identity Register as an electronic database that the Executive Secretary of the National Identification Authority keeps and maintains. Section 4(3) requires the personal information of a registered individual to include a recorded fingerprint or other biometric information determined by the Board, and a photograph.
Section 75 defines a national identity card as an identity card with a personal identification number issued by the Authority for the identification of the individual to whom it is issued.
Section 75 defines a user agency as including the Social Security and National Insurance Trust, the National Health Insurance Service, the Revenue Agencies Governing Board, the Ghana Immigration Service and any other public or private organisation approved of by the Minister which requires identity data from the Authority.
Section 48(1) permits the Authority to provide a person with personal information from an individual's entry in the Register if that person obtains the prior consent of the individual and makes the application with the authority of that individual. Section 48(3) bars a person provided with personal information under section 48(1) from using it for any other purpose unless one of four listed grounds applies.
Section 50(3) bars a person from making available any record of personal information received by a registration official to an unauthorised person or a person not entitled to receive the information. Section 50(4) makes a contravention of section 50 an offence punishable on summary conviction by a fine of not more than 250 penalty units or imprisonment of not more than two years or both.
Section 53(2) requires a user agency that accesses, uses, retains or discloses personal information from the Authority to comply with the applicable provisions of Part II of the Act and the guidelines the Authority issues.
Section 54(1) requires a user agency that intends to access an individual's personal information from the Authority's database to take reasonable steps to ensure that the individual is aware of the authority for the access, the purpose for which the information is required and the intended recipient.
Section 56 bars a user agency from using personal information obtained from the Authority for any purpose other than the one it was obtained for, unless the individual authorises the use, the use is authorised or required by law, or another ground listed in that section applies.
Section 57(1) bars a user agency from disclosing personal information it holds to any other person unless the individual has consented, the disclosure is required or authorised by law, or another ground listed in that subsection applies. Section 57(2) bars a person to whom personal information is disclosed from disclosing it for a purpose other than the purpose for which it was provided.
Section 58(1) permits a user agency to use or disclose personal information only where the use or disclosure does not invade the privacy of the individual concerned. Section 59 requires a user agency that holds personal information to secure and store it in accordance with the guidelines the Authority issues.
Section 41(1) makes it an offence, punishable on summary conviction by a fine of not more than 450 penalty units or imprisonment of not more than three years or both, to use a national identity card other than the one issued for the person's own use, or to permit another person to use a card issued to someone else, among other listed acts.
Section 41(3) makes it an offence, punishable on summary conviction by a fine of not more than 500 penalty units or imprisonment of not more than four years or both, to take or keep possession without reasonable cause of a national identity card that is false, that the person knows to be improperly obtained, or that belongs to another person.
Section 42 bars a person from using equipment or apparatus to produce a national identity card without the approval of the Authority, or to produce a false card, and makes a contravention punishable on summary conviction by imprisonment of not more than five years.
Section 66(1) makes it an offence, punishable on summary conviction by a fine of not more than 5,000 penalty units or imprisonment of not more than ten years or both, for an unauthorised person to cause a computer or other electronic device of the Authority to perform a function with intent to obtain access to a programme or data it holds, or to attempt to access personal information it holds contrary to the Act.
Section 68 bars a person from communicating to any other person a number, code, password or other means to access personal information contained in a computer of the Authority, other than to a person the first person is duly authorised to communicate it to, and makes a contravention punishable on summary conviction by a fine of not more than 2,500 penalty units or imprisonment of not more than five years or both.
Section 70(1) sets a penalty for an offence under the Act for which no penalty is specified of a fine of not more than 250 penalty units or imprisonment of not more than two years or both.
Section 70(2) makes every director, manager, partner, secretary or officer of a body corporate that commits an offence under the Act liable to the penalty provided for that offence, and section 70(3) excuses a person who proves the offence was committed without that person's consent or connivance and that due diligence was exercised.
Section 73(1)(f) lets the Minister make regulations to provide that every public office should demand the presentation of an identity card as a condition precedent to the provision of its service. Section 73(2) sets the penalty for contravention of regulations made under the Act at a fine of not more than 2,500 penalty units or imprisonment for a term of not more than five years.
The Authority states that section 3 of the National Identity Register (Amendment) Act, 2017 (Act 950) requires an applicant for registration to establish eligibility by providing any one of a birth certificate, a valid passport, a valid certificate of acquired citizenship, or other information the Authority requires.
The National Identity Register Regulations, 2012 (Legislative Instrument 2111) were made on under section 73(1) of the National Identity Register Act, 2008 (Act 750). The Regulations were notified in the Gazette on and entered into force on .
Regulation 7(1) provides that a national identity card issued to an individual is to be used for the listed transactions where identification is required, including opening of individual or personal bank accounts, purchase of insurance policies, consumer credit transactions, payment of taxes and registration of SIM cards.
Regulation 7(2) requires an organisation that offers any of the services in respect of the transactions listed in regulation 7(1) to demand the presentation of a national identity card from the individual concerned before providing the relevant service to the individual.
The Authority published Gazette No. 65 of in exercise of its power under regulation 7(1)(n), which lists admission into an educational institution, issuance of a residence permit to a foreign national, issuance of a permit to foreign nationals permanently resident and all financial transactions as transactions requiring the mandatory use of the national identity card.
Regulation 8(1) allows the Authority, a user agency, a person authorised by law, or a law enforcement officer to request an individual who has been issued with a national identity card to produce it for inspection, and requires the card to be returned immediately unless there is reasonable suspicion of the commission of an offence.
Regulation 9(1) allows a person who has requested a card under regulation 8(1) and has reason to believe that it was not issued by the Authority to use a portable identity card reader to view the information stored on the card and to scan the individual's fingerprints and match them against the template stored on the card or in the national database through a secured link.
Regulation 22 defines a portable identity card reader as an instrument that cannot keep a record of any fingerprint that is scanned and is of a type approved by the Authority.
Regulation 9(2) makes it an offence, punishable on summary conviction by a fine of not more than 100 penalty units or imprisonment of not more than six months or both, for a person without reasonable excuse to refuse to surrender a national identity card to allow a law enforcement officer or an authorised person to view the information or scan a fingerprint on the card.
Regulation 13(1) provides that the conditions under which data in the custody of the Authority may be accessed are in accordance with a personal information sharing agreement as set out in Form Three of the Schedule, in addition to other conditions specified in the Regulations.
Regulation 15(2) requires a user agency that intends to access personal information of an individual to state the purpose for which the information is required and to satisfy the Authority that the individual is aware of and has authorised the request. Regulation 18(1) requires a user agency that uses personal information for administrative purposes to retain it only for a period determined by the Authority under its guidelines or as specified in the Data Sharing Agreement Form.
Regulation 18(2) requires a user agency that obtains personal information to secure and store it in accordance with the Authority's guidelines or as specified in the Data Sharing Agreement.
Ghana's general computer-misuse authority is the Electronic Transactions Act, 2008 (Act 772), which punishes knowingly and without authority causing a computer to perform any function to secure access to a programme or electronic record, with no carve-out for a publicly accessible, unauthenticated page; a person who accesses a protected computer holding financial, government, or national-security information without authorization faces the Act's highest tier.
The Cybersecurity Act, 2020 (Act 1038) adds a narrower offence, retrieving subscriber information or intercepting traffic or content data without lawful authority, which binds a person dealing in communications data rather than a general web crawler. No statute or reported case addresses terms-of-service enforceability, or whether login or acceptance of terms changes the legal picture; this is unsettled rather than a specific regime.
Copyright protects a database only as a compilation, never through a separate sui generis right: the Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690) protects a collection such as an encyclopedia, dictionary, or database, whether in machine-readable form, only where the collection is original by reason of the selection or arrangement of its contents, and its personal-use exception expressly does not extend to reproducing the whole or a substantial part of a database in digital form.
The Data Protection Act, 2012 (Act 843) reaches scraped public personal data: its definition of personal data carries no exemption for publicly available information, so a scrape of a public page that captures personal data about an identifiable individual still needs a lawful basis and registration under that Act.
No specific unfair-competition or misappropriation doctrine addresses scraping, and no case law or regulatory statement gives robots.txt legal weight or addresses AI-training-specific access rules.
Section 94 punishes a person who, without lawful authority, retrieves subscriber information or intercepts traffic data or content data. This offence is narrower than the Electronic Transactions Act's general unauthorized-access offences: it binds a person dealing in communications data held by or passing through a service provider, rather than a general web crawler collecting data from public pages it does not own.
The Act also imposes retention and cooperation duties on a service provider, and creates a licensing regime for cybersecurity service providers, enforced by the Cyber Security Authority.
Section 124 punishes a person who intentionally accesses or intercepts an electronic record without authority or permission. Section 130 punishes a person who knowingly and without authority causes a computer to perform any function to secure access to a programme or electronic record held in that computer or any other computer, and section 131 punishes an unauthorized modification of a programme or electronic record.
Section 133 creates an aggravated offence, whoever knowingly accesses a computer without authorisation or exceeds authorised access to a protected computer, one holding information from a financial institution, a government department, a national-security matter, or otherwise designated protected, and carries the Act's highest tier. Section 134 punishes intentionally causing a computer to cease to function, including by virus or worm.
None of these provisions exempts a publicly accessible, unauthenticated page from the definition of unauthorized access, which the Act defines as access a person is neither personally entitled to nor has been given consent to obtain.
The Act's definition of a literary work, which section 1 makes eligible for copyright, includes encyclopedias, dictionaries, directories, time tables, anthologies, databases, or a compilation of data or other material, whether in machine-readable form, which by reason of the selection or arrangement of contents constitutes an intellectual creation.
Ghana has no separate sui generis database right: a database that is a mere collection of facts, without an original selection or arrangement, is not protected on that basis alone. Section 19's personal-use exception, which otherwise permits reproduction for a person's exclusive personal use, expressly does not extend to reproducing the whole or a substantial part of a database in digital form.
Ghana's cyber-resilience law sits in the Cybersecurity Act, 2020 (Act 1038), assented to on , which establishes the Cyber Security Authority (the Authority) and gives it standards-setting, licensing and enforcement powers over private and public actors alike.
Section 47(5) places a general duty on the person in charge of any institution, public or private, with no size or sector gate, to report a cybersecurity incident to the relevant Sectoral or National Computer Emergency Response Team within twenty-four hours of its detection, backed by an administrative penalty under section 47(6); a licensed cybersecurity service provider carries a further periodic operations report under section 47(2).
Section 49 separately requires a person to hold an Authority-issued licence before providing a cybersecurity service, a term the First Schedule defines broadly enough to reach a vendor who designs, sells, imports, exports, installs, maintains, repairs or services a cybersecurity solution, so a company distributing security software for reward in Ghana needs the licence even if it performs none of the Schedule's other listed activities such as penetration testing or incident response.
Section 59 gives the Authority a broader standards mandate, to develop, adopt, publish and enforce cybersecurity standards covering education, hardware and software engineering, governance and risk management and research and development, against the public and private sectors generally, with an administrative penalty for breach; the specific content of an adopted standard is set by the Authority outside the Act's own text.
A narrower duty runs to the owner of a computer system the Minister designates a critical information infrastructure under section 35: a twenty-four-hour incident report, an audit and a copy of the audit report to the Authority under section 39.
Section 40's offence of securing or attempting to secure unauthorised access to a critical information infrastructure, and section 94's separate offence of unlawfully retrieving subscriber information or intercepting traffic or content data, both bind the intruder rather than the operator and stay with the scraping topic's existing Ghana row.
The Electronic Transactions Act, 2008 (Act 772) carries an older, narrower critical-database designation regime of its own (sections 55 to 62) and a licensing regime for a certifying agency issuing digital signatures (sections 28 to 45), whose procedures duty in section 45 binds only a person already licensed as a certifying agency; neither reaches a business by a size, sector or product test broader than that narrow licensed class, so neither is filed here.
The Data Protection Act, 2012 (Act 843) carries its own security measures and security-compromise notification duties at sections 28 to 31, addressed to a data controller and processor as such; that is Ghana's privacy row rather than repeated here, the same architecture as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 32. Every fine in Act 1038 is denominated in penalty units under Ghana's general Fines (Penalty Units) Act framework rather than stated as a cedi amount on the face of the Act.
Section 36(1) of the Cybersecurity Act, 2020 (Act 1038) requires the Cyber Security Authority to register a critical information infrastructure. Section 39(1)(a) of the Act requires the owner of a critical information infrastructure to report a cybersecurity incident within twenty-four hours after it is detected. The Cyber Security Authority's Directive for the Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure comes into effect on .
The same Directive requires a designated owner to disclose and report any vulnerabilities identified or discovered through internal or external security audits and assessments within 72 hours. The Bank of Ghana's Cyber and Information Security Directive requires the board of a regulated financial institution to appoint a Chief Information Security Officer, subject to the prior written approval of the Bank of Ghana.
The same Bank of Ghana Directive requires a regulated financial institution to report cyber and information security incidents to the Bank of Ghana on a monthly basis.
The Bank of Ghana issued this Directive under section 92(1) of the Banks and Specialised Deposit-Taking Institutions Act, 2016, among other powers. The Directive applies to institutions licensed or registered under the Banks and Specialised Deposit-Taking Institutions Act, 2016, and to those licensed under six further Acts, among them the Payment Systems and Services Act, 2019 and the Virtual Service Providers Act, 2025 as the Directive names it.
A regulated financial institution must be ISO/IEC 27001 certified and adopt ISO/IEC 27032. The board of a regulated financial institution must appoint a Chief Information Security Officer, subject to the prior written approval of the Bank of Ghana. A regulated financial institution must conduct a cyber and information security risk analysis at least once a year.
A regulated financial institution must conduct controlled penetration tests that cover network infrastructure, external and internal perimeters, and critical applications. A regulated financial institution must seek the prior approval of the Bank of Ghana to engage a managed security service provider. The Directive states that failure to comply with it will attract appropriate sanctions in accordance with applicable laws.
The Bank of Ghana's procedures for issuing directives state that a final directive has the force of law as prescribed under Act 930.
The Cyber Security Authority issued this Directive pursuant to sections 35 to 40 and 92 of the Cybersecurity Act, 2020. The Directive applies to all designated critical information infrastructure owners. A designated owner must appoint an accountable officer of senior management rank. A designated owner must review its approved cybersecurity policy at least once a year. A designated owner must conduct a quarterly cybersecurity risk assessment.
A designated owner must conduct yearly cybersecurity audits. A designated owner must create and keep a cybersecurity risk register. A designated owner must seek clearance from the Authority within one month before any major organisational change in operation, personnel and infrastructure. A designated owner must submit copies of reports covering audits, its risk register and any cybersecurity activities conducted, as the Directive requires.
An owner that fails to comply with a directive the Authority issues under section 92 of the Act is liable to an administrative penalty of not less than two hundred and fifty penalty units and not more than ten thousand penalty units.
The Minister may, on the advice of the Cyber Security Authority, designate a computer system or computer network as a critical information infrastructure where it is essential for national security or the economic and social well-being of citizens, and must publish the designation in the Gazette. The Authority must register each critical information infrastructure.
The owner of a registered critical information infrastructure must inform the Authority within seven days after any change in its legal ownership. The owner of a critical information infrastructure must cause an audit to be performed on it and submit a copy of the audit report to the Authority. The Authority carries out a periodic audit and inspection of each critical information infrastructure.
The Minister prescribes minimum standards for the general management of a critical information infrastructure. Failing to notify a change of ownership is an administrative penalty of not less than five hundred penalty units and not more than ten thousand penalty units. Failing to cause the audit to be performed is an administrative penalty of not less than two hundred and fifty penalty units and not more than ten thousand penalty units.
Failing to submit a copy of the audit report to the Authority carries the same administrative penalty of not less than two hundred and fifty penalty units and not more than ten thousand penalty units.
A person may not provide a cybersecurity service in Ghana without a licence issued by the Cyber Security Authority. The First Schedule defines a cybersecurity service as one provided for reward and aimed at ensuring or safeguarding the cybersecurity of a computer or computer system.
Its list runs from penetration testing, forensic examination, incident response and threat hunting through to designing, selling, importing, exporting, installing, maintaining, repairing or servicing a cybersecurity solution, so a vendor distributing a security software product for reward in Ghana falls within the licensing duty even without performing any of the Schedule's other listed services.
A granted licence runs for two years and must be renewed at least one month before expiry, may not be transferred, and may not be used for a purpose other than the one for which it was granted. Providing a cybersecurity service without a licence carries an administrative penalty equal to the cost of the damage caused and the value of the financial gain made rather than a fixed sum, while transferring a granted licence is a separate criminal offence.
The Cyber Security Authority must develop, establish and adopt standards for cybersecurity covering education and skills development, hardware and software engineering, governance and risk management, research and development, and any other area it determines in line with international best practice. It must publish them on its website, and take the necessary measures to enforce them and monitor compliance by the public and private sectors.
A person who breaches an adopted standard is liable to an administrative penalty of not less than two hundred and fifty penalty units and not more than twenty-five thousand penalty units, payable to the Authority.
The Act names no size or sector gate for this duty and states no criminal penalty for a breach; the specific technical content of a standard the Authority adopts under this section, including whatever it requires of hardware and software engineering, is set outside the Act's own text and is not described here.
A regulated financial institution must report cyber and information security incidents to the Bank of Ghana on a monthly basis, in a report submitted by the 15th of each month that summarises all incidents in the past month. A regulated financial institution that recorded no cyber security incident must submit a nil report. A regulated financial institution must submit ad-hoc reports to the Bank of Ghana immediately, informing it about an incident as it starts, unfolds and terminates.
A regulated financial institution must notify the Bank of Ghana immediately of an incident damaging information integrity, a shutdown of production systems that hold sensitive information for over three hours, a leak of sensitive customer information, and the other events paragraph 50(7) lists.
A regulated financial institution must notify the Bank of Ghana immediately of any AI/ML-specific incident that results in, or has the potential to result in, material financial loss to the institution or its customers. The Directive states that failure to comply with it will attract appropriate sanctions in accordance with applicable laws. The Bank of Ghana's procedures for issuing directives state that a final directive has the force of law as prescribed under Act 930.
CII Directive (CSA, 2021) incident and vulnerability reporting para 5.3, Directive for the Protection of Critical Information InfrastructureDirective for the Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure, published by the Cyber Security Authority of Ghana (csa.gov.gh)
In force since .Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
A designated critical information infrastructure owner must report all cybersecurity incidents to the relevant Sectoral Computer Emergency Response Team, or directly to the National Computer Emergency Response Team where none exists, within twenty-four hours of becoming aware of an incident. A designated owner must establish a point of contact for reporting cybersecurity incidents and receiving cybersecurity information, including security advisories relevant to its sector.
A designated owner must disclose and report any vulnerabilities identified or discovered through internal or external security audits and assessments within 72 hours of identifying or discovering the vulnerability. An owner that fails to comply with a directive the Authority issues under section 92 of the Act is liable to an administrative penalty of not less than two hundred and fifty penalty units and not more than ten thousand penalty units.
The owner of a critical information infrastructure must report a cybersecurity incident within twenty-four hours after the incident is detected to the relevant Sectoral Computer Emergency Response Team, or to the National Computer Emergency Response Team where the infrastructure does not belong to a Sectoral Computer Emergency Response Team.
The Act defines a cybersecurity incident as any act or attempt, successful or unsuccessful, to gain unauthorised access to, disrupt or misuse an information system or information stored on such information system. Failing to report is an administrative penalty of not less than two hundred and fifty penalty units and not more than ten thousand penalty units.
The person in charge of any institution, public or private, must report a cybersecurity incident to the relevant Sectoral Computer Emergency Response Team, or to the National Computer Emergency Response Team where no Sectoral team covers that institution, within twenty-four hours after the incident is detected.
A cybersecurity service provider licensed by the Cyber Security Authority carries a further duty to submit a periodic report on its own operations, including any cybersecurity incident, within a period the Authority determines. Failing to report within the twenty-four-hour window is an administrative penalty of not less than two hundred and fifty penalty units and not more than five thousand penalty units, payable to the Authority, rather than a criminal offence.
Ghana has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code; the general copyright framework of the Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690) is the only law reaching an aggregator's reproduction of news content.
Its quotation provision permits including, with an indication of the source and the name of the author, quotations from a work in another work, including quotations from articles in newspapers or periodicals in the form of press summaries, subject to a fair-practice and extent-justified test; the provision carries no headline-length or short-extract cap and no restriction to the press industry, and no reported Ghanaian decision applies it to a systematic news aggregator as opposed to an individual quoting a published work.
Neighbouring rights under the Act protect performers and broadcasting organisations, not print or online news publishers, so there is no publisher-side neighbouring right of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive Article 15 creates. No statute or case law addresses whether a hyperlink is itself a communication to the public, or whether framing or inline display changes the answer, and no hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law exists.
The Act predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists.
Section 19(1)(b) of the Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690) permits, without the copyright owner's consent, the inclusion of quotations from a work in another work, including quotations from articles in newspapers or periodicals in the form of press summaries, provided the work quoted has been made public.
Section 19(3) makes this conditional on the quotation being compatible with fair practice, with its extent not exceeding what is justified for the purpose of the work in which it is used, and on the source and the author's name being indicated. Section 19 carries no headline-length or short-extract cap distinct from this fair-practice test, and no reported Ghanaian decision applies it to a systematic news aggregator rather than an individual quoting a published work.
Neighbouring rights under the Act, covering performers and broadcasting organisations, do not extend to a print or online news publisher's own reporting.
These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.
AI law
Ghana has not enacted a binding statute imposing an AI-transparency or output-labeling duty: a duty to disclose that content is AI-generated, to label or watermark synthetic output, or to disclose that a user is talking to a bot.
On President John Dramani Mahama launched Ghana's National Artificial Intelligence Strategy, a policy document setting a national framework for AI adoption across healthcare, agriculture, education, security, and public service delivery, and for building local AI talent and research capacity; the strategy is a policy document rather than a binding legal instrument, and no numbered bill or published draft text implementing it has been tabled.
The Ministry of Communication, Digital Technology and Innovations has said that a separate Emerging Technologies Bill, intended to provide structured oversight for AI systems, advanced analytics, digital assets, and new digital platforms, is being developed, but it has not been tabled in Parliament.
Ghana's existing binding statutes touching AI-adjacent activity address other duties: the Electronic Transactions Act, 2008 (Act 772) and the Cybersecurity Act, 2020 (Act 1038) criminalize computer-misuse conduct that could be carried out with AI tooling, but neither imposes an AI-specific transparency or labeling duty.
As of .
Age gating law
Ghana has not enacted an adult-content age-verification, social-media minor-access, app-store age-verification, or age-appropriate design code statute.
The Cybersecurity Act, 2020 (Act 1038) creates a dedicated Protection of Children Online part criminalizing taking, producing, publishing, or possessing an indecent image or photograph of a child, dealing with a child for purposes of sexual abuse, cyberstalking of a child, and sexual extortion, defining a child as a person below the age of eighteen years; the same Act repeals the Electronic Transactions Act, 2008 (Act 772)'s earlier, narrower child-pornography offence, so the Cybersecurity Act's provision is now the operative one.
Neither Act imposes an age-verification or age-gating duty on a service provider; both criminalize specific conduct against children rather than requiring a service to verify a user's age or design its product around a minor audience.
As of .
Case law
No current case law for Ghana AI law
No current case law for Ghana privacy law
No current case law for Ghana scraping law
No current case law for Ghana cybersecurity law
No current case law for Ghana communications law
No current case law for Ghana content moderation law
No current case law for Ghana product and AI liability law
No current case law for Ghana digital accessibility law
No current case law for Ghana age gating law
No current case law for Ghana reuse law
Reporting clocks that run here5 instruments
The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Ghana comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.
Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.
Report cyber and information security incidents to the Bank of Ghana every month, in the required format, by the 15th of each month, and submit a nil report in a month with no incident (paragraph 50(3)-(5)).
Submit ad-hoc reports to the Bank of Ghana immediately, informing it about an incident as it starts, unfolds and terminates (paragraph 50(6)).
Notify the Bank of Ghana immediately of an incident damaging information integrity, a shutdown of production systems holding sensitive information for over three hours, a leak of sensitive customer information, significant penetration and attack attempts, the activation of an incident response mechanism, cessation of essential services for one business day or more, and any other significant event with significant impact on data management and protection (paragraph 50(7)).
Notify the Bank of Ghana immediately of an AI or ML incident that results in or has the potential to result in material financial loss, systemic bias or widespread customer harm, compromise of the model's integrity through adversarial attack, or significant regulatory or legal action (paragraph 115(2)).
Report all cybersecurity incidents to the relevant Sectoral Computer Emergency Response Team, or directly to the National Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-GH) where no Sectoral team exists, within twenty-four hours of becoming aware of an incident (paragraph 5.3).
Disclose and report any vulnerability identified or discovered through internal or external security audits and assessments within 72 hours of identifying or discovering it (paragraph 5.3).
Report a cybersecurity incident to the relevant Sectoral Computer Emergency Response Team, or to the National Computer Emergency Response Team where the infrastructure does not belong to a Sectoral Computer Emergency Response Team, within twenty-four hours after the incident is detected (section 39(1)(a)).
Report a cybersecurity incident to the relevant Sectoral Computer Emergency Response Team, or to the National Computer Emergency Response Team where the institution has no Sectoral team, within twenty-four hours after the incident is detected.
Notify the Data Protection Commission and the affected data subject as soon as reasonably practicable after you have reasonable grounds to believe personal data has been accessed or acquired by an unauthorised person.
Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.
AIDrafted with AI
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made
This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched
to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are
counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own
primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal
advice.