Law / Frameworks / MIT mitigations / Transparency & Accountability Controls

MIT mitigations 4.4Governance Disclosure

Formal disclosure mechanisms that communicate governance structures, decision frameworks, and safety commitments to enhance transparency and enable external oversight of high-stakes AI decisions.MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, preliminary taxonomy, July 2025, 4.4

We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Corpus as of .

The kinds of duty that reach it: licensing.

2
laws
2
places
0
with court rulings behind them
1
not yet in force

The same ground elsewhere linked through the kinds of duty both controls are mapped from

A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force

  • European Union
  • Vanuatu

AI governance

2 laws, 2 places
PlaceLawHow it reaches this control
European Union AI Act, Article 26(8) (public-authority deployer registration) from , in 14 months

Through its licensing duty. What it requires

Vanuatu Digital Transformation Act 2025, ICT service permit for AI and AI-related data services

Through its licensing duty. What it requires

Full text of the MIT AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, CC BY 4.0. MIT AI Risk Initiative (MIT FutureTech), AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy, https://airisk.mit.edu/ai-risk-mitigations. Data from the MIT AI Risk Initiative is licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Cite as: Mapping AI Risk Mitigations: Evidence Scan & Draft Mitigation Taxonomy, https://airisk.mit.edu/blog/mapping-ai-risk-mitigations Every control of the framework.