Law / United States / Texas

TRAIGA (H.B. 149, 2025), consumer AI-interaction disclosure duty

Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 552.051

In force since .

An AI transparency rule binding public and private bodies.

Obligation class
Disclosure
Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • If you are a governmental agency making an AI system available to interact with consumers, disclose before or at the time of interaction that the consumer is interacting with an AI system, even if that would already be obvious to a reasonable consumer.
  • The disclosure must be clear and conspicuous, written in plain language, and may not use a dark pattern; a hyperlink to a separate page satisfies it.
  • If you are a provider of health care service or treatment, public or private, and you use an AI system in that service or treatment, give the same disclosure to the patient or the patient's representative by the time the service or treatment is first provided, or as soon as reasonably possible in an emergency.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MEASURE 2.8Risks associated with transparency and accountability – as identified in the MAP function – are examined and documented.
NIST AI 600-1
MIT mitigations Draft
  • 4.1System Documentation
  • 4.2Risk Disclosure
  • 4.6User Rights & Recourse
FINOS AIGF
ETSI EN 304 223
  • 5.1.3-2Threats developers cannot resolve are passed to operators and on to end-users.
  • 5.3.1-1Users told where and how their data is used, accessed and stored, with developers informing operators.
  • 5.3.1-2.1That guidance covers proper use, limits and likely failure modes.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Identifiers refer to ETSI EN 304 223 V2.1.1 (2025-12), © ETSI 2025, all rights reserved. ETSI owns the standard; no ETSI text (titles or sentences) is reproduced here. The standard is free to download from ETSI.

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Section 552.051 requires a governmental agency, and a health care provider using an artificial intelligence system in service or treatment, to disclose to a consumer or patient that they are interacting with an artificial intelligence system. It states no duty to create, keep, or later produce a log or record of any disclosure given. Section 552.103, elsewhere in the chapter, is the same attorney general investigative power that reaches Sections 552.052 and 552.055-552.057; it reaches a reported violation of this section too but creates no duty to make or keep anything.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

A governmental agency that makes an AI system available to interact with consumers must disclose, before or at the time of interaction, that the consumer is interacting with an AI system, regardless of whether that would already be obvious; the disclosure must be clear, conspicuous, in plain language, free of dark patterns, and may be given by hyperlink.

The same disclosure duty extends to any provider of a health care service or treatment, public or private, that uses an AI system in that service or treatment, who must give it to the patient or the patient's representative by the time the service is first provided, or as soon as reasonably possible in an emergency.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app deploys a chatbot.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .