Law / Indonesia

Electronic Information and Transactions Law, electronic agent liability

Law No. 11 of 2008, Articles 21-22, Electronic Information and Transactions Law

In force since .

An AI governance rule binding public and private bodies.

How the hook was established
express
What makes it apply
Place of effect
Obligation class
Governance
Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • An operator of an automated Electronic Agent (including a chatbot or another AI-driven agent) that conducts an electronic transaction on a user's behalf in Indonesia is legally responsible for the outcome of that transaction.
  • A qualifying Electronic Agent operator must let a user correct information they submitted while a transaction is still in process.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Article 21 allocates legal responsibility for a transaction conducted through an Electronic Agent to whoever operates it, and Article 22 requires a feature letting a user correct information while a transaction is still in process. Neither creates a duty to keep, create or produce a log or record of a transaction or a correction.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Article 1 defines an Electronic Agent as a device of an Electronic System built to perform an action against particular electronic information automatically, on behalf of a Person, a definition that reaches a chatbot, an automated transaction system, or another AI-driven agent acting without a human directly initiating each step.

Article 21 allocates legal responsibility for an electronic transaction conducted through an Electronic Agent to the party who operates that Electronic Agent, and separately makes the operator of a failed Electronic Agent responsible for resulting loss where the failure was caused by a third party's direct action against the Electronic System.

Article 22 requires the operator of a certain Electronic Agent to provide a feature letting a user correct information while a transaction is still in process, with further detail on which operators this reaches left to a Government Regulation. Neither provision has been amended by the Law's 2016 or 2024 amendments.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app deploys a chatbot or makes high-risk automated decisions.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .