Law / United States / Washington

Forged digital likeness act (Personality Rights Law amendment)

RCW 63.60, as amended by SSB 5886, ch. 69, Laws of 2026

In force since .

An AI prohibited practices rule binding public and private bodies.

How the hook was established
express
What makes it apply
Place of effect
Obligation class
Prohibition, Consent
Audit expectation
none
Setting the rule reaches
General, Advertising

What it requires

  • Do not use or authorize the use of a person's forged digital likeness, a digitally created or altered visual or audio depiction of them indistinguishable from an authentic one, without their written or oral consent, in commerce, advertising, merchandise, or solicitation.
  • Infringing this right exposes you to a $3,000 civil penalty, liability for actual damages and attributable profits, and, where a forged digital likeness is involved, noneconomic damages regardless of whether you profited.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 3.3Targeted application scope is specified and documented based on the system’s capability, established context, and AI system categorization.
NIST AI 600-1
MIT mitigations Draft
  • 1.5Safety Decision Frameworks
  • 3.3Access Management
FINOS AIGF
ETSI EN 304 223
  • 5.1.2-1Business need and security risks written down and assessed before deciding to build an AI system.
  • 5.1.4-5End-users told which uses of the system are prohibited.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Identifiers refer to ETSI EN 304 223 V2.1.1 (2025-12), © ETSI 2025, all rights reserved. ETSI owns the standard; no ETSI text (titles or sentences) is reproduced here. The standard is free to download from ETSI.

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureNo

Private right of actionYes

Penalty structure

RCW 63.60.060(2) subjects any person who infringes the rights under the chapter to a civil penalty of $3,000, in addition to actual damages and attributable profits. Use of a name, voice, signature, photograph, forged digital likeness, or likeness in or related to one work is a single act of infringement regardless of the number of copies made or the number of times it is displayed. The section does not say who collects the penalty.

Rule
Per violation only
As of
Currency
USD
Per violation unit
Violation
Per violation amount
3,000

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

No public body is named: the owner of the right, or a successor or transferee who owns it, enforces the chapter in the superior courts, which may grant injunctions and order impoundment.

Settledness

As of
Open questions
  • Is the $3,000 civil penalty in RCW 63.60.060(2) payable to the injured party or to the State, and is it in addition to the actual damages and profits listed beside it?
  • Do the exemptions in RCW 63.60.070(1) and (2), which name "name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness" but not "forged digital likeness", protect a forged digital likeness used for commentary, parody, or news?
  • Does the exemption in RCW 63.60.070(4) for owners or employees of a medium used for advertising, including "online service providers", reach a provider whose generative tool created the forged digital likeness that an advertisement uses?

What it makes you log

Logging duty

The statute gives every individual a property right against an unauthorized forged digital likeness and a damages, penalty, and injunctive remedy for infringing it. It states no duty for anyone to create, keep, or produce a log or record of a use of a person's name, voice, or likeness.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Washington's Personality Rights Law gives every individual or personality a property right in their name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness, and a 2026 amendment extended that right to a 'forged digital likeness': a persistent or real-time visual or audio representation of an actual, identifiable individual that has been digitally created, adapted, altered, or modified to be indistinguishable from an authentic depiction.

Using or authorizing use of a person's forged digital likeness without written or oral consent, in commerce, advertising, merchandise, or solicitation, infringes the right.

An infringer is subject to a $3,000 civil penalty and liable for actual damages, attributable profits, and, where the infringement involves a forged digital likeness specifically, noneconomic damages regardless of whether the infringement produced any profit; the superior courts may also grant injunctive relief and order impoundment of infringing materials.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app generates audio with AI, generates images with AI or generates video with AI.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .