Law / Canada / Quebec

Automated decision-making notice and review right

CQLR c P-39.1, s. 12.1

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force since 22 September 2023.

A data subject rights rule binding private bodies.

As of 24 September 2026.

What it requires

  • Before or at the time you communicate a decision based exclusively on automated processing of personal information, tell the person that the decision was made this way.
  • On the person's request, disclose the personal information used to reach the decision, the reasons and the principal factors and parameters that led to it, and their right to have that personal information corrected.
  • Give the person an opportunity to submit observations to a staff member who is in a position to review the automated decision.

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

A person carrying on an enterprise who uses personal information to render a decision based exclusively on automated processing of that information must inform the person concerned of that fact no later than when the decision itself is communicated.

On request, the enterprise must also disclose the personal information used to render the decision, the reasons and the principal factors and parameters that led to it, and the person's right to have that personal information corrected, and must give the person an opportunity to submit observations to a staff member able to review the decision. This right was newly created by Law 25 and did not exist in the Act before September 22, 2023.

When LexLint raises it

  • high_risk_decisions

Read the law

official consolidated statute text, LégisQuébec (Éditeur officiel du Québec)

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app