Canada law applies in QuebecQuebec is a province of Canada, whose 48 researched instruments are listed on the Canada page, not here. The law of Quebec, described on this page below, applies here too.
All 19 named instruments researched to a stage, across four of the ten areas of law we track: 19 in force. As of .
When each starts16 of 19 carry a date, 3 do not. Earlier is before 2014.
in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force
Québec's private-sector personal-information regime is the Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector (CQLR c P-39.1), rebuilt by the Act to modernize legislative provisions as regards the protection of personal information (S.Q. 2021, c. 25, known as Law 25), assented to .
Law 25 phased in its private-sector amendments in three stages under its own section 175: the duty to designate a person in charge of protection and the confidentiality-incident notification and register regime took effect ; the bulk of the modernized regime, including consent, privacy impact assessments, the profiling-technology notice, the automated-decision notice and review right, cross-border transfer assessment, administrative monetary penalties, penal offences and the punitive-damages action, took effect ; and the right to data portability (s. 27, third paragraph) took effect , completing the rollout.
The federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) has long recognized this Québec statute as substantially similar legislation, so an organization's handling of personal information within Québec in the course of commercial activity is governed by this Act rather than by PIPEDA's own Part 1. Biometric identifiers are reached through the sensitive personal information category and its express-consent duty in the private-sector Act.
Separately, section 44 of the Act to establish a legal framework for information technology (CQLR c C-1.1) bars verifying or confirming a person’s identity by a process that uses biometric characteristics or measurements unless the verification has first been disclosed to the Commission d’accès à l’information and the person concerned has expressly consented, and requires the recorded characteristics to be destroyed once the purpose of the verification has been met.
Section 45 of that Act requires the creation of a database of biometric characteristics and measurements to be disclosed to the Commission d’accès à l’information not later than 60 days before it is brought into service. Section 24 of the Act to establish a legal framework for information technology (CQLR c C-1.1) restricts the use of extensive search functions in a technology-based document containing personal information made public for a specific purpose to that purpose.
Division VI of the Act requires every personal information agent carrying on an enterprise in Québec to register with the Commission d’accès à l’information. Under the Regulation respecting confidentiality incidents, the register of confidentiality incidents must contain a description of the personal information covered by the incident and a brief description of its circumstances, among other particulars.
Every person who establishes a file on another person must, under article 37 of the Civil Code of Québec, have a serious and legitimate reason for doing so. Under the Credit Assessment Agents Act, a person concerned by a record that a credit assessment agent holds is entitled to obtain from the agent communication of his or her credit rating. Section 5 of the Québec Charter of human rights and freedoms gives every person a right to respect for his private life.
The Act respecting health and social services information treats a person or group operating a private health facility, a specialized medical centre, a laboratory or a private seniors’ residence, among others named in its Schedule II, as a health and social services body.
Under section 91 of the Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector, identifying or attempting to identify a natural person using de-identified information without the authorization of the person holding the information, or using anonymized information, is an offence.
The Regulation respecting the anonymization of personal information requires a body that has anonymized information to assess it periodically, by updating its latest re-identification risk analysis, to ensure that it remains anonymized.
A notice to the Commission d’accès à l’information that a confidentiality incident presents a risk of serious injury must be in writing and must contain the particulars that section 3 of the Regulation lists, among them the name of the body, a description of the personal information concerned, the number of persons concerned and the measures the body has taken or intends to take.
The body must promptly send the Commission d’accès à l’information any further information listed in section 3 that it becomes aware of after sending the notice. A notice to a person concerned by an incident that presents a risk of serious injury must describe the personal information concerned, the circumstances of the incident, the date or period, the measures the body has taken or intends to take, the measures the person may take and where to obtain more information.
A notice to the persons concerned is given by public notice when sending it would likely cause increased injury to the person or undue hardship for the body, or when the body lacks the person’s contact information.
The register of confidentiality incidents must contain a description of the personal information concerned, the circumstances, the dates, the number of persons concerned, the elements behind the risk assessment, the transmission dates of the notices and the measures the body has taken. The information in the registers must be kept up to date and kept for at least five years after the body became aware of the incident.
A person carrying on an enterprise who has cause to believe that a confidentiality incident involving personal information the person holds has occurred must take reasonable measures to reduce the risk of injury and to prevent further incidents of the same nature. A confidentiality incident is access, use or communication of personal information not authorized by law, or the loss of personal information, or any other breach of its protection.
Where the incident presents a risk of serious injury, judged by the sensitivity of the information, the anticipated consequences and the likelihood of injurious use, the enterprise must promptly notify the Commission d’accès à l’information and each affected person, and must keep a register of confidentiality incidents, a copy of which must be sent to the Commission on request.
Any person carrying on an enterprise in Québec must designate a person in charge of the protection of personal information, by default the enterprise's own highest-ranking officer, and publish that person's title and contact information.
The enterprise must establish and implement governance policies and practices for personal information, covering retention and destruction, and must conduct a privacy impact assessment before acquiring, developing or overhauling an information system or electronic service delivery system that collects, uses, communicates, keeps or destroys personal information.
Consent to use or communicate personal information for a new purpose must be clear, free, informed, requested for each specific purpose and given expressly where the information is sensitive. A person who collects personal information using technology that can identify, locate or profile the individual must first disclose the use of that technology and how to activate its identifying, locating or profiling functions.
The duty to designate a person in charge took effect a year earlier than the rest of this row, on ; the governance-policy, privacy impact assessment, technology-notice and consent duties took effect . The consent and use rules of this row do not reach personal information that is public by law.
CQLR c C-1.1, s. 24official consolidated statute text, LégisQuébec (Les Publications du Québec)
In force since .Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
The use of extensive search functions in a technology-based document containing personal information that is made public for a specific purpose must be restricted to that purpose. The person responsible for access to the document must see to it that appropriate technological means are in place to achieve that end. The person responsible for access may also set conditions for the use of such search functions, in accordance with the criteria determined under paragraph 2 of section 69 of the Act.
A technology-based document is a document in any medium based on any information technology referred to in paragraph 2 of section 1 of the Act. The Act came into force on , except section 104, which took effect on .
CQLR c P-39.1, s. 17official consolidated statute text, LégisQuébec (Éditeur officiel du Québec)
In force since .Binds private bodies.
What this law does
Before communicating personal information outside Québec, or entrusting a person or body outside Québec with collecting, using, communicating or keeping personal information on its behalf, a person carrying on an enterprise must conduct a privacy impact assessment weighing the sensitivity of the information, the purposes for which it will be used, the protection measures that would apply including contractual ones, and the legal framework applicable in the destination jurisdiction.
The communication must be the subject of a written agreement reflecting the assessment's results and any risk-mitigation terms. This duty does not reach personal information that is public by law.
A credit assessment agent is a personal information agent, within the meaning of the second paragraph of section 70 of the Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector, that the Autorité des marchés financiers has designated. The Autorité des marchés financiers supervises and controls the commercial practices and management practices of credit assessment agents.
A person concerned by a record a credit assessment agent holds is entitled to obtain from the agent communication of his or her credit rating, with the explanations necessary to understand it, and to have the agent take each of the protection measures that Division I provides for.
A security freeze prohibits the agent from communicating personal information in the record for the purpose of entering into a credit contract, increasing credit extended under such a contract or entering into a long-term contract of lease of goods or a contract involving sequential performance for a service provided at a distance. A person must be able to exercise a right that the Act confers, other than the right to have a security freeze placed on a record, free of charge.
A credit assessment agent must allow any person concerned by a record the agent holds to access, free of charge, the personal information it contains via Internet. A credit assessment agent must adhere to sound commercial practices, which include adopting a complaints processing and dispute resolution policy and keeping a complaints register. A credit assessment agent must prepare an annual statement of the position of its affairs in Québec.
A credit assessment agent must declare to the Autorité des marchés financiers within 30 days any change required to be made to the information about it in the register of credit assessment agents. Anyone who contravenes an order of the Autorité des marchés financiers commits an offence and is liable, in the case of a natural person, to a fine of $5,000 to $100,000 or to a maximum term of imprisonment of 18 months, or to both, and in any other case to a fine of $30,000 to $2,000,000.
The Act came into force on , except for the provisions on security freezes and sections 9, 18, 108 and 111, which come into force on the date the Government sets.
A personal information agent carrying on an enterprise in Québec must be registered with the Commission d’accès à l’information. A personal information agent is any person who, on a commercial basis, personally or through a representative, establishes files on other persons and prepares and communicates to third parties credit reports bearing on the character, reputation or solvency of the persons to whom the information in the files relates.
Every agent must establish and apply a method of operation that ensures the information it communicates is up to date and accurate and is communicated in accordance with the Act. Every agent must establish and apply rules of conduct that allow any person to whom the agent’s information relates to have access to it and to cause it to be rectified. Every agent must publish on its website, or by another appropriate means if it has none, the facts and particulars that section 79 lists.
An agent must destroy personal information collected more than seven years earlier, except information in a file established for an inquiry to prevent, detect or repress a crime or statutory offence.
CQLR c P-39.1, s. 12.1official consolidated statute text, LégisQuébec (Éditeur officiel du Québec)
In force since .Binds private bodies.
What this law does
A person carrying on an enterprise who uses personal information to render a decision based exclusively on automated processing of that information must inform the person concerned of that fact no later than when the decision itself is communicated.
On request, the enterprise must also disclose the personal information used to render the decision, the reasons and the principal factors and parameters that led to it, and the person's right to have that personal information corrected, and must give the person an opportunity to submit observations to a staff member able to review the decision. This right was newly created by Law 25 and did not exist in the Act before .
Every person has a right to the respect of his reputation and privacy, and the privacy of a person may not be invaded without the consent of the person or without the invasion being authorized by law.
The acts that may be considered invasions of the privacy of a person include intentionally intercepting or using his private communications, keeping his private life under observation by any means, and using his name, image, likeness or voice for a purpose other than the legitimate information of the public. Every person who establishes a file on another person must have a serious and legitimate reason for doing so.
A person who establishes a file may gather only information relevant to the stated objective of the file, and may not, without consent or authorization by law, communicate it to third persons or use it for purposes inconsistent with those for which the file was established. Except as otherwise provided by law, any person may, free of charge, examine and cause the rectification of a file kept on him by another person with a view to making a decision in his regard or to informing a third person.
A person keeping a file on a person may not deny him access to the information in it unless the keeper has a serious and legitimate reason for doing so or the information may seriously injure a third person. Every person may cause inaccurate, incomplete or equivocal information in a file concerning him to be rectified, may cause obsolete information or information not justified by the purpose of the file to be deleted, and may deposit his written comments in the file.
Notice of a rectification is given without delay to every person who received the information in the preceding six months.
Section 23 requires a person carrying on an enterprise, when the purposes for which personal information was collected or used are achieved, to destroy the information or to anonymize it to use it for serious and legitimate purposes, subject to any preservation period provided for by an Act.
Information concerning a natural person is anonymized if it is, at all times, reasonably foreseeable in the circumstances that it irreversibly no longer allows the person to be identified directly or indirectly. Information anonymized under the Act must be anonymized according to generally accepted best practices and according to the criteria and terms determined by regulation.
Under section 12, personal information is de-identified if it no longer allows the person concerned to be directly identified. Under section 12, personal information may be used for another purpose without the consent of the person concerned if its use is necessary for study or research purposes or for the production of statistics and the information is de-identified.
Every person carrying on an enterprise who uses de-identified information must take reasonable measures to limit the risk of someone identifying a natural person using de-identified information. Section 91 makes it an offence to identify or attempt to identify a natural person using de-identified information without the authorization of the person holding the information, or using anonymized information.
The section 91 offence carries a fine of $5,000 to $100,000 in the case of a natural person and, in all other cases, of $15,000 to $25,000,000 or, if greater, the amount corresponding to 4% of worldwide turnover for the preceding fiscal year. Under section 92.1, in the case of a subsequent offence the fines under Division VII of the Act are doubled.
Under section 93, where an offence under the Act is committed by a legal person, the administrator, director or representative who ordered or authorized the act or omission, or who consented to it, is a party to the offence and is liable to the prescribed penalty. Under section 92, the Commission may institute penal proceedings for an offence under Division VII of the Act in accordance with article 10 of the Code of Penal Procedure.
The Regulation respecting the anonymization of personal information applies to public bodies, to any person carrying on an enterprise to which the Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector applies, and to professional orders to the extent the Professional Code provides.
Before beginning a process of anonymization, a body must establish the purposes for which it intends to use the anonymized information and ensure that they are consistent with section 23 of the private-sector Act or, for a public body, section 73 of the Access Act. The process of anonymization must be carried out under the supervision of a person qualified in the field.
Under section 5, at the beginning of a process of anonymization a body must remove from the information all personal information that allows the person concerned to be directly identified, and must then conduct a preliminary analysis of the re-identification risks considering the individualization, correlation and inference criteria and the risk that other reasonably available information, in particular in the public space, is used to identify a person.
Under section 6, on the basis of the re-identification risks determined under section 5, a body must establish anonymization techniques consistent with generally accepted best practices, and reasonable protection and security measures to reduce re-identification risks.
Under section 7, after implementing the anonymization techniques and the protection and security measures, a body must analyze the re-identification risks, and the results must show that it is at all times reasonably foreseeable in the circumstances that the information irreversibly no longer allows the person to be identified directly or indirectly.
Under section 7, a body need not demonstrate zero risk of re-identification, but the results of its analysis must show that the residual risks of re-identification are very low.
Under section 8, a body must periodically assess the information it has anonymized to ensure that it remains anonymized, by updating its latest re-identification risk analysis in light of technological advancements, and if the updated results do not meet the section 7 standard the information is no longer considered anonymized.
Under section 8, the intervals at which a body must assess the information it has anonymized are determined according to the residual risks identified in its latest re-identification risk analysis. Under section 9, a body that anonymizes personal information must record in a register a description of the information anonymized, the purposes for which it intends to use it, the techniques and the protection and security measures, and the dates of the risk analysis and of any update.
The Regulation respecting the anonymization of personal information came into force on the fifteenth day after its publication in the Gazette officielle du Québec, except section 9, which came into force on . The Gazette officielle du Québec published the Regulation respecting the anonymization of personal information on .
Every person has a right to respect for his private life. Any unlawful interference with any right or freedom recognized by the Charter entitles the victim to obtain the cessation of the interference and compensation for the moral or material prejudice resulting from it. In case of unlawful and intentional interference, the tribunal may, in addition, condemn the person guilty of it to punitive damages.
The Commission d’accès à l’information, the same body established under the Act respecting Access to documents held by public bodies and the Protection of personal information, oversees and enforces this Act.
A person designated by the Commission may impose a monetary administrative penalty of up to $50,000 on a natural person and, in any other case, up to $10,000,000 or, if greater, 2% of worldwide turnover for the preceding fiscal year, for a failure such as not informing persons concerned as required, unlawfully collecting, using, communicating, keeping or destroying personal information, or not reporting a confidentiality incident.
The same conduct, prosecuted as a penal offence, carries a fine of $5,000 to $100,000 for a natural person and, in any other case, $15,000 to $25,000,000 or, if greater, 4% of worldwide turnover for the preceding fiscal year. Separately, a court that finds an unlawful infringement of a right under this Act, or under articles 35 to 40 of the Civil Code, causing injury and either intentional or resulting from gross fault, must award punitive damages of not less than $1,000.
CQLR c P-39.1, ss. 12-13official consolidated statute text, LégisQuébec (Éditeur officiel du Québec)
In force since .Binds private bodies.
What this law does
Personal information is sensitive, for the purposes of this Act, if due to its nature, in particular its medical, biometric or otherwise intimate nature, or the context of its use or communication, it entails a high level of reasonable expectation of privacy.
Consent to use sensitive personal information for a purpose other than the one for which it was collected, and consent to communicate sensitive personal information to a third person, must each be given expressly rather than being inferred from conduct or a general privacy notice.
A person or group operating a private health facility, a specialized medical centre, a laboratory or a private seniors’ residence, among others named in Schedule II, is a health and social services body under the Act. A person or group that enters into an agreement with a health and social services body to provide health services or social services on behalf of that body is itself a health and social services body.
All information held by a body is confidential and, subject to the express consent of the person concerned, must not be used or communicated except in accordance with the Act. Information is considered held by a body even where the body entrusts its keeping to a third person. No body may, in the cases or circumstances a regulation under section 92 provides for, acquire or use a non-certified technological product or service.
A technological product or service supplier that supplies a certified technological product or service to a body under a contract must ensure that the body complies with the criteria a regulation under section 92 prescribes throughout the term of the contract.
A body that has cause to believe that a confidentiality incident involving information it holds has occurred, or that there is a risk of one occurring, must take reasonable measures to reduce the risk of injury and to prevent new incidents of the same nature. If the incident presents a risk of serious injury, the body must promptly notify the Minister and the Commission d’accès à l’information, and must also notify any person whose information is concerned by the incident.
A body must keep a register of confidentiality incidents. Anyone who sells or otherwise alienates information held by a body, or who contravenes section 93 or 94, commits an offence and is liable to a fine of $5,000 to $100,000 in the case of a natural person and $15,000 to $150,000 in all other cases.
Québec has no product-security, vulnerability-reporting or sector cyber-resilience statute for private-sector software providers that has been located, and the breach-notification duties of the private-sector personal information Act (CQLR c P-39.1) are privacy entries.
The security rules located are in the Act to establish a legal framework for information technology (CQLR c C-1.1), a general statute on technology-based documents, whose section 25 binds the person responsible for access to a technology-based document containing confidential information and whose section 26 binds a service provider that holds such a document in custody.
The Act sets no fine or other penalty for a breach of either section and is administered by the Minister of Cybersecurity and Digital Technology. The information-security regime for public bodies is outside this entry.
CQLR c C-1.1, s. 25official consolidated statute text, LégisQuébec (Les Publications du Québec)
In force since .Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
The person responsible for access to a technology-based document containing confidential information must take appropriate security measures to protect its confidentiality. Such measures include controlling access to the document by means of a restricted view technique, or any technique that prevents unauthorized persons from accessing such information or from otherwise accessing the document or the components providing access to it.
A technology-based document is a document in any medium based on any information technology referred to in paragraph 2 of section 1 of the Act. The Act came into force on , except section 104, which took effect on .
CQLR c C-1.1, s. 26official consolidated statute text, LégisQuébec (Les Publications du Québec)
In force since .Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
Anyone who places a technology-based document in the custody of a service provider must first inform the provider of the privacy protection the document requires, according to the confidentiality of the information it contains, and of the persons who are authorized to access it.
During the period the document is in the provider's custody, the service provider must see to it that the agreed technological means are in place to ensure its security, maintain its integrity and, if applicable, protect its confidentiality and prevent access by unauthorized persons. The service provider must also ensure compliance with any other obligation provided for by law as regards the retention of the document. The Act came into force on , except section 104, which took effect on .
Québec has no enacted adult-content age-verification law, social-media minimum-age rule, app-store or device age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code.
The one Québec provision located whose duty turns on a child's age and reaches online services is section 248 of the Consumer Protection Act (CQLR c P-40.1), which bars commercial advertising directed at persons under thirteen, with exemptions set by regulation, and it has an entry of its own; the consolidated text of the Act and the regulation print no commencement day for it.
The Cinema Act (CQLR c C-18.1) bars admitting a person to the public exhibition of a film, and selling, leasing or lending video material in a video material retail outlet, by the film's classification of 13 and over, 16 and over or 18 and over. The consent of a minor under 14 to the use of personal information is a rule of the private-sector personal information Act and is held with that Act's privacy entries.
No Québec law on social media, screens or age verification for minors enacted in the 43rd Legislature has been located; that Legislature ended on when the Assemblée nationale was dissolved. The federal proposals on young persons' online access to pornographic material and on social media are described in Canada's national entry.
No person may make use of commercial advertising directed at persons under thirteen years of age, subject to what the regulations provide. Whether an advertisement is directed at persons under thirteen is judged by the context of its presentation, in particular the nature and intended purpose of the goods advertised, the manner of presenting the advertisement and the time and place it is shown.
That an advertisement appears in printed matter or on air time intended for persons thirteen and over, or for both age groups, creates no presumption that it is not directed at persons under thirteen. The regulations exempt an advertisement that appears in a children's magazine or insert for sale and published at intervals of not more than three months, on conditions.
They also exempt an advertisement announcing a programme or show directed at children, and one on a store window, display, container, wrapping or label, on conditions. Contravening section 248 is an offence under section 278 of the Act.
Québec has no press-publisher right, news-bargaining code, hot-news misappropriation rule or text-and-data-mining opt-out of its own. Copyright, including fair dealing, and the news-bargaining regime are federal law, found in the Copyright Act and the Online News Act and described in Canada's national entry.
The one Québec rule on linking located is section 22 of the Act to establish a legal framework for information technology (CQLR c C-1.1), a general intermediary rule that covers indexes, hyperlinks, directories and search tools and is not written for news, publishers or copyright. The Consumer Protection Act (CQLR c P-40.1) has no provision on news, publishers or copyright, and its one mention of a hyperlink concerns where a consumer's attention is drawn to contract terms.
The Act respecting the discoverability of French-language cultural content in the digital environment (S.Q. 2025, c. 38), assented to on and coming into force by government decree, concerns the discoverability of cultural content and does not mention news or journalism.
CQLR c C-1.1, s. 22official consolidated statute text, LégisQuébec (Les Publications du Québec)
In force since .Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
An intermediary that provides technology-based documentary referral services, such as an index, hyperlinks, directories or search tools, is not responsible for activities engaged in by a user of such services. The service provider may incur responsibility, particularly if, on becoming aware that the services are being used for an illicit activity, it does not act promptly to cease providing services to the persons known to be engaging in that activity.
The Act containing this rule came into force on , except section 104, which took effect on .
These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.
AI law
No Québec statute written for artificial intelligence systems has been located. The automated-decision rule that reaches Québec businesses is section 12.1 of the Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector (CQLR c P-39.1), which requires an enterprise that uses personal information to render a decision based exclusively on automated processing to inform the person concerned, and it is held with that Act's privacy entries, not here.
The Act to protect consumers against the misleading or fraudulent use of a person's identity or image (S.Q. 2026, c. 20), assented to and in force on , added section 238.1 to the Consumer Protection Act (CQLR c P-40.1), which bars using another person's identity or image without that person's consent for the purpose of making representations to a consumer and treats any image, altered or not, that represents or appears to represent a person as an image of that person.
Section 238.1 is technology-neutral and does not mention artificial intelligence, so it is not held as an AI entry. No bill on artificial intelligence enacted in the 43rd Legislature has been located; that Legislature ended on when the Assemblée nationale was dissolved. The federal approach to artificial intelligence is described in Canada's national entry.
As of .
Scraping law
Québec has no provincial computer-misuse, anti-scraping, database-right, text-and-data-mining or robots.txt statute that has been located. Unauthorized use of a computer and copyright are federal matters, described in Canada's national entry. Neither the Consumer Protection Act (CQLR c P-40.1) nor the Act to establish a legal framework for information technology (CQLR c C-1.1) mentions scraping, crawling, robots or automated access.
Section 24 of the Act to establish a legal framework for information technology provides that the use of extensive search functions in a technology-based document containing personal information which is made public for a specific purpose must be restricted to that purpose, and that the person responsible for access to the document must see to it that appropriate technological means are in place to achieve that end.
Because its trigger is personal information made public, that rule belongs with the privacy entries and is not held here as a scraping entry. An enterprise's collection of personal information is governed by the private-sector personal information Act (CQLR c P-39.1), which is held in the privacy entries.
As of .
Case law
No current case law for Quebec AI law
No current case law for Quebec privacy law
No current case law for Quebec scraping law
No current case law for Quebec cybersecurity law
No current case law for Quebec communications law
No current case law for Quebec content moderation law
No current case law for Quebec product and AI liability law
No current case law for Quebec digital accessibility law
No current case law for Quebec age gating law
No current case law for Quebec reuse law
Reporting clocks that run here4 instruments
The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Quebec comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.
Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.
Where the incident presents a risk of serious injury, judged by the sensitivity of the information, the anticipated consequences and the likelihood of injurious use, promptly notify the Commission d’accès à l’information and each person whose personal information is concerned.
Report a cyber security incident in respect of any of your critical cyber systems to the Communications Security Establishment, in accordance with the regulations, within the period the regulations prescribe, which may not exceed 72 hours (section 17).
Immediately after reporting, notify the appropriate regulator that the report was made, in the form and manner the regulations prescribe, and give it a copy of the report (section 18).
Report any breach of security safeguards involving personal information under the organization's control to the Privacy Commissioner as soon as feasible, if it is reasonable to believe the breach creates a real risk of significant harm to an individual.
Without delay after you become aware of an incident that has a material impact on an end user, on another payment service provider that performs retail payment activities, or on a clearing house of a designated clearing and settlement system, notify that individual or entity and the Bank of Canada of the incident (section 18(1)).
Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.
AIDrafted with AI
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made
This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched
to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are
counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own
primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal
advice.