Law / United States / Washington / Seattle

Ordinance 127241 (Council Bill 121000), Algorithmic Rent Fixing

Seattle Municipal Code ch. 7.34

In force since .

An AI prohibited practices rule binding public and private bodies.

What it reaches
supply
Obligation class
Prohibition
Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Do not offer or operate, in Seattle, a coordinating service that uses algorithms and nonpublic competitor pricing, supply, or occupancy data from two or more landlords to recommend rental prices, fees, or lease terms
  • Do not accept payment from a Seattle landlord for such a coordinating service

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 3.3Targeted application scope is specified and documented based on the system’s capability, established context, and AI system categorization.
NIST AI 600-1
MIT mitigations Draft
  • 1.5Safety Decision Frameworks
  • 3.3Access Management
FINOS AIGF
ETSI EN 304 223
  • 5.1.2-1Business need and security risks written down and assessed before deciding to build an AI system.
  • 5.1.4-5End-users told which uses of the system are prohibited.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Identifiers refer to ETSI EN 304 223 V2.1.1 (2025-12), © ETSI 2025, all rights reserved. ETSI owns the standard; no ETSI text (titles or sentences) is reproduced here. The standard is free to download from ETSI.

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureNo

Private right of actionYes

Penalty structure

SMC 7.34.040: the City Attorney may file a civil action for civil penalties of up to $7,500 per violation, and each instance of coordinating services for each dwelling unit may be considered a separate violation. The court may award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to the City Attorney if the City Attorney prevails.

Rule
Per violation only
As of
Currency
USD
Per violation unit
Violation
Per violation amount
7,500

Statutory damages

SMC 7.34.050: an injured person may recover damages of up to $7,500 per violation in addition to any actual damages incurred, so the sum is a ceiling per violation and not a guaranteed minimum; the court may award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to a prevailing injured person. The section is silent on class actions.

As of
Currency
USD

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

The Seattle City Attorney, through a civil action for civil penalties under SMC 7.34.040, and any person injured by a violation, through a private civil action under SMC 7.34.050.

Settledness

As of
Open questions
  • Does a service provider that analyzes data from "two or more landlords" but gives each recommendation to a single landlord provide recommendations "to more than one landlord" within the definition of "coordinate" in Seattle Municipal Code section 7.34.020?
  • Does a service that generates a rent estimate for one landlord's unit on request amount to "publishing rental price estimates" within the exclusion in Seattle Municipal Code section 7.34.020, or only an estimate that is "equally available to all members of the public"?

What it makes you log

Logging duty

The chapter bans coordinating rent-setting services and separately clarifies that a landlord's own recordkeeping software is not itself a violation. It states no duty for anyone to create, keep, or produce a log or record of coordinating services.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

It is a violation of SMC Chapter 7.34 for a landlord, in or affecting commerce, to contract with or exchange anything of value for the coordinating services of a service provider, and it is a separate violation for a service provider, in or affecting commerce, to provide coordinating services to two or more landlords. A coordinating service uses algorithms and nonpublic competitor pricing or occupancy data from multiple landlords to recommend rental prices, fees, or terms.

SMC 7.34.020 defines 'Landlord' as the owner, lessor, or sublessor of a dwelling unit and defines 'Person' to include a governmental entity. The chapter's only exclusions, in section 7.34.025, are short-term rentals and hotels, so a government agency operating as a residential landlord or as a coordinating-service provider is not carved out.

The chapter exempts a landlord's own recordkeeping software, short-term rentals, and hotels, and it exempts publicly available rent estimates that require no contract to obtain. The City Attorney may seek civil penalties of up to $7,500 per violation, and any injured person may bring a private civil action.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app makes housing decisions.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .