KyrgyzstanDigital Code, Article 126: AI systems used in digital well-being services are systems of increased danger
Digital Code, Law No. 178, Art. 126 (read with Art. 1, definition 61), in force
In force since .
An AI sector rules rule binding public and private bodies.
- Obligation class
- Governance
- Audit expectation
- none
As of .
What it requires
- A provider of a digital well-being service that uses an AI system within the service must treat that system as an AI system of increased danger and meet the requirements the Digital Code sets for such systems.
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text, as of .
What it makes you log
Logging duty
Article 126 classifies AI systems used for digital well-being as systems of increased danger and requires the provider to comply with the Code's requirements for such systems; it names no log or record itself (the logging duties sit in the articles on systems of increased danger, covered by the Articles 191 to 196 row).
- Kind
- None
- As of
What this law does
Article 126 of the Digital Code provides that artificial intelligence systems used to provide digital well-being are artificial intelligence systems of increased danger. A provider of a digital well-being service that uses artificial intelligence systems within the service must comply with the requirements the Code sets for artificial intelligence systems of increased danger.
The Code defines a digital well-being service as a service directed at improving the quality of life of a natural person on the basis of processing digital data on that person's physiological characteristics.
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app makes high-risk automated decisions.