Law / South Korea

AI Framework Act, Article 31 (transparency obligations for AI outputs)

Act No. 20676, Article 31

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force 8 months, effective 22 January 2026.

An AI transparency rule binding public and private bodies.

As of 14 August 2026.

What it requires

  • Notify users when content they see was produced by generative AI
  • Check the Enforcement Decree for labeling specifics as they phase in

What it reaches

How the hook was established

express

What makes it apply

Market targeting, User location

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Article 31 requires prior notice that a product or service operates on high-impact or generative AI, a label that generative output was AI-generated, and, for near-indistinguishable synthetic audio, image or video, a user-perceptible notice or label; the Enforcement Decree's Article 23 states only the method of that notice (on the product, in a contract or manual, on screen, or posted at the point of sale). Neither Article 31 nor its Decree imposes a duty to create, keep or later produce a log or record of having given the notice or applied the label.

Kind
None
As of
22 September 2026

Who checks it

Audit expectation

none

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

An AI business operator providing a product or service using high-impact or generative AI must give users prior notice that it operates on that AI. An operator providing generative AI, or a product or service using it, must indicate that output was AI-generated, either through a human-perceptible label or machine-readable metadata or watermark.

Where an operator uses AI to produce a virtual sound, image, or video difficult to distinguish from reality, only a user-perceptible label satisfies the deepfake-specific duty, with a narrow exception for artistic or creative works. The Act reaches conduct outside Korea affecting Korean users under its own extraterritoriality clause, and a foreign operator meeting revenue or user thresholds must appoint a domestic representative.

When LexLint raises it

  • generates_content
  • deploys_chatbot

Read the law

official statute portal, National Law Information Center (law.go.kr)
confirmed live and returning the law number, article structure, and dates, though the site's JavaScript-rendered pages do not serve the full Article 31 text

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app