LexLint.ioBeta

Know the law your code answers to.

Law / United States / New Hampshire

Creation of Child Intimate Visual Representations

RSA 649-A:3-c

In force since .

An AI prohibited practices rule binding public and private bodies.

Obligation class
Prohibition
Audit expectation
none
Setting the rule reaches
General

What it requires

  • Do not knowingly create, produce, manufacture, or direct an intimate visual representation of an identifiable child for prurient purposes, whether the image is an authentic photograph or an altered or wholly synthetic, AI-generated image.
  • A violation is a class B felony.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 3.3Targeted application scope is specified and documented based on the system’s capability, established context, and AI system categorization.
NIST AI 600-1
MIT mitigations Draft
  • 1.5Safety Decision Frameworks
  • 3.3Access Management
FINOS AIGF
ETSI EN 304 223
  • 5.1.2-1Business need and security risks written down and assessed before deciding to build an AI system.
  • 5.1.4-5End-users told which uses of the system are prohibited.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Identifiers refer to ETSI EN 304 223 V2.1.1 (2025-12), © ETSI 2025, all rights reserved. ETSI owns the standard; no ETSI text (titles or sentences) is reproduced here. The standard is free to download from ETSI.

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureYes

Criminal exposure note

RSA 649-A:3-c, VI makes a violation a class B felony. New Hampshire's general felony fine cap under RSA 651:2, IV(a) is $4,000 for an individual, or up to double the defendant's gain from the offense in lieu of that cap.

What it makes you log

Logging duty

RSA 649-A:3-c defines and grades the offense of creating a child intimate visual representation, including a synthetic image; it creates no duty for any party to keep a log, record or other documentation, and names nobody who may check one.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

No person may knowingly create, produce, manufacture, or direct an intimate visual representation of an identifiable child for prurient purposes.

The chapter defines the covered representation to include a synthetic image, one that has been altered or created depicting an individual's image in a realistic but false representation, alongside an ordinary photograph, film, video, or digital image, so an AI-generated or AI-altered intimate image of a child falls within the prohibition on the same footing as an authentic one. A violation is a class B felony.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app generates images with AI or generates video with AI.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .