KazakhstanCode of Administrative Offences, artificial intelligence violations
Law No. 232-VIII (17 November 2025), Administrative Offences Code Art. 641-1
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force 8 months, effective 17 January 2026.
An AI governance rule binding public and private bodies.
As of 6 September 2026.
What it requires
- An AI system's owner or holder who fails to ensure users are informed of misleading synthetic output, or fails to carry out risk management of the system, is liable to an administrative fine of fifty to two hundred monthly calculation indices depending on business size, together with possible suspension or prohibition of the system's operation.
Who enforces it
Enforcement body
Ministry of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Development
What it makes you log
Logging duty
Article 641-1 penalizes failure to inform users of synthetic output (the duty Article 21 of Law No. 230-VIII imposes) and failure to carry out risk management (the duty Article 18 of Law No. 230-VIII imposes), and Article 692-3 gives the authorized body jurisdiction to hear these cases. Neither provision itself creates a logging, record-keeping or documentation duty; it is a penalty and adjudication-jurisdiction provision for duties that live in a different article.
- Kind
- None
- As of
- 22 September 2026
Who checks it
Audit expectation
none
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
Law No. 232-VIII inserted Article 641-1 into the Code of Administrative Offences the same day it adopted the AI Law itself, giving that Law's disclosure and risk-management duties an administrative penalty. Article 641-1(1) makes it a violation for the owner or holder of an AI system to fail to ensure users are informed of synthetic output of the system capable of misleading them, or to fail to carry out risk management of the AI system.
The fine schedule tiers by the size of the violator: fifty monthly calculation indices for a small business or non-profit organisation, seventy for a medium-sized business, and two hundred for a large business, together with suspension or prohibition of the AI system's operation. A companion Article 692-3 gives the authorised body in the sphere of artificial intelligence, the Ministry of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Development, jurisdiction to hear these cases.
When LexLint raises it
generates_contentdeploys_chatbothigh_risk_decisions
Read the law
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.