LatviaOmbudsman Law (Tiesībsarga likums), Article 13, Points 15 and 16, Access to AI System Documentation and Testing Requests
Tiesībsarga likums, 13. panta 15. un 16. punkts
In force since .
An AI governance rule binding government bodies.
- Obligation class
- Governance
As of .
What it requires
- Article 13 assigns the Ombudsman, not an AI developer or deployer, the tasks in points 15 and 16; the Ombudsman is the body that these tasks bind.
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text, as of .
Who enforces it
Enforcement body
The Ombudsman (Tiesībsargs) requests and accesses AI system documentation in review cases and can ask the market surveillance authority to have an AI system tested.
What it makes you log
Logging duty
Points 15 and 16 assign the Ombudsman a documentation-access task and a testing-request task and state no duty to create, keep or produce a log or record of anything.
- Kind
- None
- As of
What this law does
Article 13 of the Ombudsman Law (Tiesībsarga likums) gives the Ombudsman two tasks that concern artificial intelligence systems. Point 15 gives the Ombudsman the task of requesting and accessing the documentation of artificial intelligence systems that a review case needs.
Point 16 gives the Ombudsman the task of submitting to the market surveillance authority, within its competence, a reasoned request to have an artificial intelligence system tested by technical means, where the documentation the review case needs is not sufficient. Points 15 and 16 are in the text of the Ombudsman Law in force on . Article 13 was amended by the law of , which took effect on .