Resolución ANIA 0001/2025, derecho a notificación ante decisiones automatizadas

Resolución No. 0001/2025, ANIA, art. 24

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force.

An AI transparency rule binding public and private bodies.

As of 5 September 2026.

What it requires

If you use an AI system to make a decision about a person in El Salvador without meaningful human review, and it negatively affects their health, financial services, employment, education, government benefits, housing or transportation, notify them.
In that notification, confirm that AI was involved, explain the role it played, and give the person a way to challenge the decision.
This notification duty does not apply where disclosure would undermine fraud detection or cybersecurity, where the system supports law enforcement or national-security functions, or where the AI's role is limited to content recommendation, search results, ad optimization, or basic spellcheck or grammar assistance.

What it reaches

How the hook was established

express

What makes it apply

Operator establishment, Market targeting, Place of effect

What it makes you log

Who may demand the log

Data subject

What the log must hold

Decision basis, Disclosure shown

Logging duty

Article 24 never uses the words log, record, or audit trail, but the notification it requires must at minimum confirm that AI was involved, explain the role it played, and provide a mechanism to challenge the decision, which cannot be done without a record of what the decision was, so the duty is implicit.

Kind: Implicit
As of: 22 September 2026
Provision: Resolución No. 0001/2025, art. 24
Trigger: automated_decisions

Who checks it

Audit expectation

none

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Article 24 requires any entity using an AI system to make a decision affecting a person in El Salvador to notify them, independent of whether the entity is subject to registration, whenever the decision was made without meaningful human review and negatively affects the person's rights or economic situation in health, financial services, employment, education, government benefits, housing, or transportation.

The notification must be clear and understandable and must at minimum confirm that AI was involved, explain the role it played, and provide a mechanism to challenge the decision. Article 25 exempts the duty where disclosure would undermine fraud detection or cybersecurity, support law enforcement or national-security functions, or where the AI's role is limited to content recommendation, search results, advertising optimization, or basic spellcheck and grammar assistance.

When LexLint raises it

high_risk_decisions
automated_outreach

Read the law

Resolución No. 0001/2025
Agencia Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial, official text published by the Órgano Judicial's Diario Oficial document repository

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example · Lint your app