AI Act, Article 21(1) and (3) (provider's information and documentation to a competent authority on a reasoned request, and confidentiality)
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 21(1) and (3)
An AI governance rule binding public and private bodies.
- Private right of action
- No
- How the hook was established
- express
- What makes it apply
- Market targeting, Place of effect
- Obligation class
- Governance
- Audit expectation
- on_request
- Who audits it
- Regulator
As of .
What it requires
- This duty takes effect on for a high-risk AI system classified under Article 6(2) and Annex III, and on for one classified under Article 6(1) and Annex I (Article 113, third paragraph, point (c), as replaced by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744), other than a system related to a product covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section B of Annex I, to which, under Article 2(2), only Article 6(1), Article 60a and Articles 102 to 112 apply, and Articles 57, 58 and 59 apply only in so far as the requirements for high-risk AI systems under this Regulation have been integrated in that Union harmonisation legislation; a system already placed on the market or put into service before its date is reached only once its design changes significantly, or by if it is intended for use by public authorities.
- If you are the provider of a high-risk AI system, provide a competent authority, when it makes a reasoned request, with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of the system with the requirements of Chapter III, Section 2 (Article 21(1)).
- Give that information and documentation in a language which the authority can easily understand, being one of the official languages of the institutions of the Union as indicated by the Member State concerned (Article 21(1)).
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text, as of .
Who enforces it
Settledness
- As of
- Open questions
- Which information and documentation are "necessary to demonstrate" the conformity of a high-risk AI system under Article 21(1) when the competent authority's reasoned request does not list the items it wants?
What it makes you log
Who may demand the log
Regulator
Logging duty
Article 21(1) requires the provider to provide the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate conformity, which cannot be done without a kept record of how conformity was established. The paragraph does not say what must be kept or for how long: the technical documentation is Article 11's, its keeping is Article 18's and the logs are Article 19's, and access to the automatically generated logs is paragraph 2 of this Article.
- Kind
- Implicit
- As of
- Provision
- Article 21(1)
- Trigger
- high_risk_systems
What this law does
Upon a reasoned request by a competent authority, a provider of a high-risk AI system must provide that authority all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of the system with the requirements set out in Section 2. The provider must give that information and documentation in a language which can be easily understood by the authority, in one of the official languages of the institutions of the Union as indicated by the Member State concerned.
Any information obtained by a competent authority pursuant to Article 21 must be treated in accordance with the confidentiality obligations set out in Article 78. Article 16, point (k), separately lists as an obligation of the provider that it demonstrate, upon a reasoned request of a national competent authority, the conformity of the high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Section 2.
Article 21(2) separately requires the provider itself, upon a reasoned request by a competent authority, to give that authority access to the automatically generated logs of the high-risk AI system referred to in Article 12(1), to the extent such logs are under its control. Article 21 sits in Chapter III, Section 3, which is headed Obligations of providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems and other parties.
Under Article 113, third paragraph, point (c), as replaced by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Chapter III, Sections 1, 2 and 3, with the exception of Article 6(5), apply from for a system classified as high-risk under Article 6(2) and Annex III, and from for a system classified as high-risk under Article 6(1) and Annex I. Under Article 111(2), as the Digital Omnibus on AI rewrote it, the Regulation reaches the operators of a high-risk AI system placed on the market or put into service before the date Chapter III applies only if, from that date, the system's design changes significantly; in any case, the providers and deployers of a high-risk AI system intended to be used by public authorities must take the necessary steps to comply with the Regulation's requirements and obligations by .
For an AI system classified as high-risk under Article 6(1) and related to a product covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section B of Annex I, Article 2(2), as replaced by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, applies only Article 6(1), Article 60a and Articles 102 to 112, and applies Articles 57, 58 and 59 only in so far as the requirements for high-risk AI systems under the Regulation have been integrated in that Union harmonisation legislation.
Article 99(6a), inserted by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, provides that in the case of small mid-cap enterprises each fine referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 of Article 99 is up to the percentages or amount referred to there, whichever is lower.
Under Article 2(13), inserted by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, the application of specific requirements or obligations laid down in Articles 9 to 15 and 17 to 25 to a high-risk AI system referred to in Article 6(1) may be limited where and to the extent that Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section A of Annex I lays down requirements or obligations providing an equivalent or higher level of protection of health, safety or fundamental rights, and the limitation does not reduce the overall level of protection provided for by the Regulation.
By , the Commission is to adopt delegated acts under Article 97 specifying the high-risk AI systems concerned, the requirements or obligations that may be limited, the conditions under which the limitation applies, and the scope of the limitation.
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app makes high-risk automated decisions or processes biometric data.