Law / United States / Arizona

Denial of claims; individualized review requirement

A.R.S. § 20-3103

In force since .

An AI sector rules rule binding private bodies.

Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • If you are a health care insurer, do not deny a claim submitted by a provider on the basis of medical necessity without a medical director individually reviewing the denial and exercising independent medical judgment.
  • The reviewing medical director may not rely solely on recommendations from any other source, including an automated or AI-assisted recommendation, in making that individualized review.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 3.5Processes for human oversight are defined, assessed, and documented in accordance with organizational policies from the GOVERN function.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Section 20-3103 requires a medical director to individually review a medical-necessity denial and exercise independent medical judgment without relying solely on a recommendation from any other source; it states no duty to log, record, or document that the review took place, or what the review considered.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Before a health care insurer may deny a claim submitted by a provider on the basis of medical necessity, a medical director must individually review the denial, exercise independent medical judgment, and may not rely solely on recommendations from any other source.

The section's own text and the Arizona Senate's fact sheet for the enacting bill, HB 2175 (2025), state this duty in technology-neutral terms; neither document uses the term artificial intelligence, though contemporaneous news coverage of the bill's passage describes it as a response to insurers' use of AI and algorithm-based tools to automate medical-necessity and prior-authorization denials.

Enacted in 2025 as Laws 2025, chapter 165 (HB 2175), approved by the Governor on , with the act itself providing that it is effective from and after .

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app handles health records or is an insurer.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .