Law / United States / Michigan

Protection from Intimate Deep Fakes Act (Public Act 11 of 2025)

MCL 752.388

In force since .

An AI prohibited practices rule binding public and private bodies.

Obligation class
Prohibition
Audit expectation
none
Setting the rule reaches
General

What it requires

  • Do not intentionally create or disseminate a deep fake realistically depicting the intimate parts of, or a sexual act involving, an identifiable individual if you know or should know it would cause that person physical, emotional, reputational, or economic harm.
  • Do not rely on the depicted individual's consent to the deep fake's creation or transmission unless it is contained in a plain-language agreement, signed knowingly and voluntarily, that describes the depiction and, if applicable, the work it will be incorporated into.
  • As a provider of interactive computer service, telecommunications, or the underlying technology, you are not liable for another person's deep fake merely for providing transmission infrastructure or access, or for developing technology not designed, marketed, or deployed for nonconsensual deep fakes, so long as you prohibit that use in your terms of service.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 3.3Targeted application scope is specified and documented based on the system’s capability, established context, and AI system categorization.
NIST AI 600-1
MIT mitigations Draft
  • 1.5Safety Decision Frameworks
  • 3.3Access Management
NIST Privacy Framework
  • CT.PO-P1Policies, processes, and procedures for authorizing data processing (e.g., organizational decisions, individual consent), revoking authorizations, and maintaining authorizations are established and in place.
FINOS AIGF
ETSI EN 304 223
  • 5.1.2-1Business need and security risks written down and assessed before deciding to build an AI system.
  • 5.1.4-5End-users told which uses of the system are prohibited.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Identifiers refer to ETSI EN 304 223 V2.1.1 (2025-12), © ETSI 2025, all rights reserved. ETSI owns the standard; no ETSI text (titles or sentences) is reproduced here. The standard is free to download from ETSI.

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureYes

Private right of actionYes

Criminal exposure note

Absent an aggravating factor, a violation is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year, a fine of not more than $3,000, or both. Where the depicted individual suffers financial loss, the violator intends to profit, operates a website or app for the purpose, posts the deep fake on a website, intends to harass, extort, threaten, or harm, or has a prior conviction under this section, the violation is a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 3 years, a fine of not more than $5,000, or both.

Penalty structure

Criminal fines on conviction under section 8: not more than $3,000 for the misdemeanor in section 8(2) and not more than $5,000 for the felony in section 8(3). A court may also impose a civil fine of not more than $1,000 per day for violating a restraining order or injunction entered in a civil action under section 6(2).

Rule
Fixed only
As of
Currency
USD
Fixed cap
5,000

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

Criminal prosecution under section 8 of the Act, which names no prosecuting agency; the depicted individual or a person representing that individual enforces section 3 by civil action.

Settledness

As of
Open questions
Does the exception in MCL 752.388(5)(d) for a deep fake that "relates to a matter of public interest" require, as the civil defense in MCL 752.385(2)(d) does, that the person "clearly identified" the item as a deep fake and acted in good faith?

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Section 8 states the offense, its aggravating factors, its consent defense, and its exemptions. None of it requires a log, record, or documentation of any kind.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

The Protection from Intimate Deep Fakes Act (Public Act 11 of 2025) makes it a crime for an individual to intentionally create or disseminate a deep fake that realistically depicts the intimate parts of, or a sexual act involving, an identifiable individual, where the individual knew or should have known the deep fake would cause the depicted individual physical, emotional, reputational, or economic harm.

A first violation is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year's imprisonment or a $3,000 fine; the offense becomes a felony punishable by up to three years or a $5,000 fine where the depicted individual suffers financial loss, the creator intends to profit, the creator operates a website or app for the purpose, the creator posts the deep fake online, the creator intends to harass, extort, threaten, or harm, or the creator has a prior conviction under this section.

Consent to the deep fake's creation is not a defense unless given in a signed, plain-language agreement describing the depiction.

The Act also creates a civil cause of action for the depicted individual for economic and noneconomic damages, confidential filing, and injunctive relief to maintain that confidentiality, and exempts interactive computer services, telecommunications providers, and technology developers who prohibit the conduct in their terms of service and did not design or market the technology for it.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app generates images with AI, generates video with AI or publishes adult content.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .