Law / Frameworks / NIST Privacy Framework / Identify-P
NIST Privacy Framework, Identify-PID.RA-P5
Risk responses are identified, prioritized, and implemented.NIST Privacy Framework, version 1.0, January 2020, ID.RA-P5
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .
- 15
- laws
- 14
- jurisdictions
- 0
- with court rulings behind them
- 3
- not yet in force
- 1
- proposed, not law
Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-005 System Acceptance Testing, 2 laws
A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force proposed
Sensitive categories
8 laws, 8 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Law of the Republic of Belarus On Personal Data Protection, special personal data |
Adopt a set of measures against the risks processing poses to a personal data subject's rights and freedoms before relying on any Article 8 exception to process special personal data. |
|
| SB 24-041, Protecting Minors' Online Data |
If you offer an online service, product, or feature that you actually know or willfully disregard is used by a minor, use reasonable care to avoid a heightened risk of harm to that minor, and complete a data protection assessment where that risk exists. |
|
| Personal Data Protection and Privacy Act, 2025, sensitive personal data and children's data from a date not yet set |
Apply specific safeguards to any marketing or profiling directed at children, and put anything addressed to a child in clear, plain language they can easily understand. |
|
| Insurance Sector Law Article 181-3, Lawful Processing of Health Data by Insurers and Reinsurers |
Document and justify internally any exclusion of the data protection officer, impact assessment, anonymization, audit or code of conduct measures, and keep the documentation available to the Commission nationale pour la protection des données (Article 181-3, paragraph 2). |
|
| Law No. 2014-038, sensitive personal data |
Where an exception permits sensitive data to be processed, put in place the safeguards the law or the CMIL requires for that exception. |
|
| Loi sur la Protection des Données Personnelles, données sensibles et mineurs |
Put safeguards in place to prevent discrimination or another risk to a person's rights and freedoms wherever an exception lets you process their sensitive data on a public interest, medical, or archival, research, or statistical ground. |
|
| Data Protection Act, sensitive personal data |
Where you rely on the vital-interests or right-or-obligation grounds to process sensitive personal data without consent, put appropriate safeguards in place first. |
|
| Draft Law on the Protection of Privacy and Personal Data, special categories, children and criminal data proposed |
Take particular care when you do process the data listed above, so it does not cause unfair discrimination, prejudice, or other harm to the data subject. |
Comprehensive regime
3 laws, 3 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Superintendencia Circular on AI and Personal Data |
Where you cannot be certain an artificial intelligence system's processing will not cause serious, irreversible harm, refrain from that processing or adopt precautionary measures, and adapt your risk management systems to identify, measure, control and monitor the situations that could affect your compliance with personal data protection rules. |
|
| Act on the Protection of Privacy in Working Life, Sections 15 to 17, Genetic Testing and Camera Surveillance of Employees |
Before introducing camera surveillance, examine less intrusive means, keep the intrusion on employee privacy to what is necessary, use recordings only for the purposes of the surveillance, inform employees after the cooperation or consultation procedure, and announce the surveillance visibly in the premises where cameras are placed (Section 17, paragraph 1). |
|
| Law on Personal Data Protection (LPDP), video surveillance |
Analyse the goal of a video surveillance system before installing it, and reassess it every two years, covering the continuing need for it, its goals, and feasible technical alternatives. |
Age-appropriate design code
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| AB 2246 (2026), Online Services, Products, or Features Likely to be Accessed by Children from , in 7 weeks |
Take reasonable steps to prevent reasonably foreseeable physical or financial harm to children, severe and reasonably foreseeable psychological or emotional harm to a reasonable child, a highly offensive intrusion on privacy rights, and adverse discrimination in violation of state or federal law. |
Biometric privacy
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| CNIL Standard Regulation on Workplace Biometric Access Control (Deliberation No. 2019-001) |
Run a data protection impact assessment and document why a less intrusive alternative was rejected before deploying a biometric access-control system for employees or building access in France. |
Cross border transfer
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Contractual Clauses for Transfers to Third Countries, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/914 |
The data importer notifies the data exporter promptly if it has reason to believe that it is or has become subject to laws or practices not in line with Clause 14(a); the data exporter then promptly identifies appropriate measures and suspends the transfer if it considers that no appropriate safeguards can be ensured, or if instructed to do so by the competent supervisory authority (Clause 14(e) and (f)). |
Data subject rights
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Work Directive, Transparency, Human Oversight and Human Review of Automated Systems (Articles 9 to 11) from , in 3 weeks |
Where the oversight or evaluation identifies a high risk of discrimination at work in the use of your automated monitoring systems or automated decision-making systems, or finds that individual decisions have infringed the rights of a person performing platform work, take the steps necessary, including, if appropriate, the modification of the system or the discontinuation of its use, in order to avoid such decisions in the future (Article 10(3)). |
Full text of the NIST Privacy Framework, public domain (a US government work). Every control of the framework.