Law / France

CNIL Standard Regulation on Workplace Biometric Access Control (Deliberation No. 2019-001)

CNIL Deliberation n. 2019-001 du 10 janvier 2019 portant reglement type relatif a la mise en oeuvre de dispositifs de controle d'acces… biometrique

In force since .

A biometric privacy rule binding public and private bodies.

Audit expectation
periodic
Who audits it
Self
Where the report goes
Produced on request

What it requires

  • Run a data protection impact assessment and document why a less intrusive alternative was rejected before deploying a biometric access-control system for employees or building access in France.NIST Privacy FrameworkID.RA-P4NIST Privacy FrameworkID.RA-P5
  • Do not rely on employee consent alone as the legal basis for a workplace biometric system; use a legal-obligation or legitimate-interest basis, or pair consent with a genuinely equivalent non-biometric alternative.NIST Privacy FrameworkCT.PO-P1

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text. Also read by: Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) (guidance, recorded ).

In the frameworks

NIST Privacy Framework
  • ID.RA-P4Problematic data actions, likelihoods, and impacts are used to determine and prioritize risk.
  • ID.RA-P5Risk responses are identified, prioritized, and implemented.
  • CT.PO-P1Policies, processes, and procedures for authorizing data processing (e.g., organizational decisions, individual consent), revoking authorizations, and maintaining authorizations are established and in place.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework, and in the NIST Privacy Framework, line by line beside each duty above. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

Who enforces it

Settledness

The standard regulation is a binding instrument that the CNIL itself adopted, so the regulation is also the regulator's guidance on this duty.

As of
Guidance link
https://www.cnil.fr/fr/question-reponses-sur-le-reglement-type-biometrie
Guidance body
Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
Open questions
Does the CNIL standard regulation on biometric access control apply to access control for the staff of a contractor or for visitors, who are not 'personnel' of the organisation that imposes the biometric device, or must that processing rest on an Article 9(2) condition of its own?

What it makes you log

Who may demand the log

Regulator

What the log must hold

Event time, Actor identity, Access record

Log retention

The ceiling applies to the active database. Intermediate archives with restricted access are allowed where a law requires them or the data may matter in a dispute, for the limitation period.

Unit
Months
As of
Basis
Fixed
Maximum value
6

Logging duty

The controller defines how access logs are kept and managed as part of its access policy, and documents the justifications the standard asks for and keeps them available to the CNIL.

Kind
Explicit
As of
Provision
CNIL Deliberation No. 2019-001, Arts. 4, 8, 10 and 11
Trigger
personal_data_processing

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

CNIL's standard regulation for workplace biometric access control (English: Standard Regulation on the Implementation of Biometric Access-Control Devices) adds requirements to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Loi Informatique et Libertes: the controller must show why biometrics is needed where badges, passwords or other measures would not give the security level required, and must run a data protection impact assessment before deployment.

A CNIL guidance page on workplace biometric access control describes biometrics as covering fingerprints, iris, voice, face and gait.

CNIL guidance states that consent can only very rarely be the legal basis for processing data at work, since the hierarchical link between employer and employee affects whether consent is freely given; a legal obligation or the controller's legitimate interest is preferred, and an employer that does rely on consent must offer an equivalent alternative such as a badge or password.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app processes biometric data or processes personal data.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .