Law / Frameworks / NIST Privacy Framework / Communicate-P
NIST Privacy Framework, Communicate-PCM.AW-P3
System/product/service design enables data processing visibility.NIST Privacy Framework, version 1.0, January 2020, CM.AW-P3
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .
- 13
- laws
- 13
- jurisdictions
- 0
- with court rulings behind them
- 4
- not yet in force
Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both
- NIST AI RMFMEASURE 2.9 The AI model is explained, validated, and documented, and AI system output..., 5 laws
A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force
Data subject rights
10 laws, 10 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Loi n°2017-20 portant Code du Numérique en République du Bénin, Livre V, automated decisions |
Do not base a decision that produces legal effects for a person, or otherwise significantly affects them, solely on automated processing, including profiling, and disclose the underlying logic and the significance and consequences of such processing when the person asks. |
|
| LGPD, review of automated decisions |
Provide, on request, clear and adequate information about the criteria and procedures used for an automated decision, subject to trade and industrial secrecy. |
|
| Personal Data Protection Law, rights of the data subject |
Tell a data subject, on request, the information and reasoning behind a decision, automated or not, applied against them. |
|
| Loi n° 24.001 portant protection des données à caractère personnel, droits liés au traitement |
On request, give a person access to their data and to information about how any automated decision producing legal effects for them was reached, so they can understand and contest it. |
|
| SIC Circular on AI, Data Subject Rights |
Let a data subject obtain, at any time and without restriction, information about how an artificial intelligence system is processing their personal data. |
|
| Digital Code, Book I: automated individual decision-making |
Disclose to a data subject, on request, the logic underlying an automated decision taken about them under Article 65 and the significance and expected consequences of that processing. |
|
| Loi 78-17 Article 47, Automated Administrative Decisions |
If you are a French public-sector body that takes an individual administrative decision about a person solely by automated processing, keep control of the algorithmic processing and its changes so you can explain to the person, in detail and in a form they can follow, how it was applied to them, under Loi 78-17 Article 47. |
|
| Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act, consumer rights and profiling |
Offer a Minnesota consumer the right to opt out of automated profiling in furtherance of decisions with legal or similarly significant effects, question the result, receive an explanation, and have the decision reevaluated if based on inaccurate data. |
|
| Personal Data Protection Act, 2022, automated decision making |
Tell a data subject the logic involved where automatic evaluation of matters relating to them is, or is likely to be, the sole basis of a decision significantly affecting them. |
|
| Motor Vehicle Data Privacy from , in 7 weeks |
As a motor vehicle manufacturer selling or leasing vehicles in Utah, once in effect, provide in-vehicle privacy controls letting a consumer view what personal data categories the vehicle collects and shares, opt out of sale or targeted-advertising processing, and delete readily accessible data stored locally on the vehicle. |
Age-appropriate design code
3 laws, 3 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| AB 2246 (2026), Online Services, Products, or Features Likely to be Accessed by Children from , in 7 weeks |
Give a child an obvious signal when the child's parent, guardian, or another consumer is monitoring the child's online activity or tracking the child's location. Do not collect, sell, or share a child's precise geolocation by default, and give the child an obvious sign for as long as precise geolocation is being collected. |
|
| A4015/S3413, New Jersey Kids Code Act from , in 10 months |
Give a covered child or covered minor a prominent and constant real-time signal when precise geolocation information is collected or used or when their online activity is monitored by any individual, including a parent. |
|
| S.69 (2025), Vermont Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (Act 63 of 2025) from , in 7 weeks |
Do not monitor a minor or track their location without signaling it to them. |
Full text of the NIST Privacy Framework, public domain (a US government work). Every control of the framework.