Law / Frameworks / NIST Privacy Framework / Communicate-P
NIST Privacy Framework, Communicate-PCM.AW-P3
System/product/service design enables data processing visibility.NIST Privacy Framework, version 1.0, January 2020, CM.AW-P3
We read each law below as bearing on this control. That does not mean the control, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Corpus as of .
- 10
- laws
- 10
- places
- 0
- with court rulings behind them
- 2
- not yet in force
A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force
Data subject rights
10 laws, 10 places| Place | Law | What it asks, as read here |
|---|---|---|
| Loi n°2017-20 portant Code du Numérique en République du Bénin, Livre V, automated decisions |
Do not base a decision that produces legal effects for a person, or otherwise significantly affects them, solely on automated processing, including profiling, and disclose the underlying logic and the significance and consequences of such processing when the person asks. |
|
| LGPD, review of automated decisions |
Provide, on request, clear and adequate information about the criteria and procedures used for an automated decision, subject to trade and industrial secrecy. |
|
| Personal Data Protection Law, rights of the data subject |
Tell a data subject, on request, the information and reasoning behind a decision, automated or not, applied against them. |
|
| Loi n° 24.001 portant protection des données à caractère personnel, droits liés au traitement |
On request, give a person access to their data and to information about how any automated decision producing legal effects for them was reached, so they can understand and contest it. |
|
| SIC Circular on AI, Data Subject Rights |
Let a data subject obtain, at any time and without restriction, information about how an artificial intelligence system is processing their personal data. |
|
| Digital Code, Book I: automated individual decision-making |
Disclose to a data subject, on request, the logic underlying an automated decision taken about them under Article 65 and the significance and expected consequences of that processing. |
|
| Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act, consumer rights and profiling |
Offer a Minnesota consumer the right to opt out of automated profiling in furtherance of decisions with legal or similarly significant effects, question the result, receive an explanation, and have the decision reevaluated if based on inaccurate data. |
|
| Personal Data Protection Act, 2022, automated decision making |
Tell a data subject the logic involved where automatic evaluation of matters relating to them is, or is likely to be, the sole basis of a decision significantly affecting them. |
|
| Motor Vehicle Data Privacy from , in 3 months |
As a motor vehicle manufacturer selling or leasing vehicles in Utah, once in effect, provide in-vehicle privacy controls letting a consumer view what personal data categories the vehicle collects and shares, opt out of sale or targeted-advertising processing, and delete readily accessible data stored locally on the vehicle. |
|
| Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act, consumer rights from , in 15 months |
Once in force, give a Vermont consumer access, correction, deletion, portability, opt-out of targeted advertising and sale, a profiling explanation and reevaluation right for housing decisions, and a list of third parties their data was sold to. |
Full text of the NIST Privacy Framework, public domain (a US government work). Every control of the framework.