Law / United States /
Minnesota
Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act, consumer rights and profiling
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force since 31 July 2025.
A data subject rights rule binding private bodies.
As of 27 August 2026.
What it requires
- Give a Minnesota consumer a means to confirm processing, access, correct, delete, and port their personal data.
- Provide a Minnesota consumer, on request, a list of the specific third parties you disclosed their personal data to, not merely categories of third parties.
- Offer a Minnesota consumer the right to opt out of automated profiling in furtherance of decisions with legal or similarly significant effects, question the result, receive an explanation, and have the decision reevaluated if based on inaccurate data.
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
MCDPA grants a Minnesota consumer the rights to confirm processing, access, correct, delete, port their personal data, and opt out of targeted advertising, sale, and certain profiling, with an appeal right for denials.
A consumer may also demand a list of the specific third parties a controller disclosed their personal data to, going further than the multi-state model's usual categories-only disclosure, and may opt out of automated profiling for decisions with legal or similarly significant effects, question such a decision, receive an explanation, and have it reevaluated if based on inaccurate data.
A controller must respond within 45 days of receipt, extendable once by 45 additional days, and must respond to an appeal within 45 days, extendable by 60 additional days.
When LexLint raises it
crawls_webtrains_modelsdeploys_chatbotautomated_outreachhigh_risk_decisions
Read the law
official Minnesota statute text, Minn. Stat. Chapter 325M, Office of the Revisor of Statutes
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.