Law / Albania

Law No. 124/2024, automated decisions

Law No. 124/2024, art. 20 (automated individual decisions)

In force since .

A data subject rights rule binding public and private bodies.

Obligation class
Data subject rights
Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Give a data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal or similarly serious effects, unless a listed exception applies, and where an exception does apply, let them obtain human intervention, express their view, and contest the decision.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 3.5Processes for human oversight are defined, assessed, and documented in accordance with organizational policies from the GOVERN function.
  • MEASURE 3.3Feedback processes for end users and impacted communities to report problems and appeal system outcomes are established and integrated into AI system evaluation metrics.
NIST Privacy Framework
  • CT.DM-P10Stakeholder privacy preferences are included in algorithmic design objectives and outputs are evaluated against these preferences.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

What record it asks for

Logging duty

Article 20 gives the data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, lists the permitted cases, and requires suitable safeguards including human intervention, the data subject's point of view and a right to contest the decision. It names no log, no record of the decision and no audit.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Article 20(1) gives the data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing of their data, including profiling, that produces legal effects or similarly serious effects on them. Paragraph 2 lists exceptions, including where the decision is necessary for entering into or performing a contract. Where an exception applies, the controller must give the data subject the right to obtain human intervention, express their point of view, and contest the decision.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app makes high-risk automated decisions.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .