Law / Frameworks / ETSI EN 304 223 / 5.2
ETSI EN 304 223, 5.25.2.2-5
AI-specific incident management and recovery plans that are created, tested and maintained. Our summary; European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI)'s text is not ours to print.
We read each law below as bearing on this provision. That does not mean the provision, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .
The kinds of duty that reach it: breach notice, reporting.
- 27
- laws
- 16
- jurisdictions
- 1
- with court rulings behind it
- 7
- not yet in force
- 1
- proposed, not law
Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both
- NIST AI RMFGOVERN 1.1 Legal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and..., 15 laws
- NIST AI RMFMANAGE 4.3 Incidents and errors are communicated to relevant AI actors, including..., 9 laws
- NIST AI RMFGOVERN 4.2 Organizational teams document the risks and potential impacts of the AI..., 8 laws
- 2 more in the NIST AI RMF
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-09 Information Security, 27 laws
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-07 Human-AI Configuration, 17 laws
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-08 Information Integrity, 6 laws
- NIST AI 200-22.3 Apply & Measure, 12 laws
- NIST AI 200-24.3 Composing a TEVV Toolbox, 12 laws
- OWASP LLM Top 10LLM03:2026 Excessive Agency, 12 laws
- OWASP Agentic Top 10ASI09 Human-Agent Trust Exploitation, 13 laws
- MIT mitigations4.3 Incident Reporting, 27 laws
- MIT mitigations4.2 Risk Disclosure, 26 laws
- MIT mitigations4.5 Third-Party System Access, 26 laws
- 5 more in the MIT mitigations
- NIST Privacy FrameworkGV.PO-P5 Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding privacy are..., 2 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-DET-004 AI System Observability, 27 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-DET-021 Agent Decision Audit and Explainability, 26 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-005 System Acceptance Testing, 12 laws
- 3 more in the FINOS AIGF
A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force proposed
AI governance
7 laws, 7 jurisdictionsAI risk obligations
7 laws, 3 jurisdictionsAI sector rules
6 laws, 6 jurisdictionsAI transparency
5 laws, 5 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this provision |
|---|---|---|
| Companion Chatbot Safety and Accountability Act (SB 243) |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| HB 26-1263 (2026), Conversational AI Service Operator Requirements |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| Ordonnance n°0011/PR/2026, marquage des contenus générés par intelligence artificielle |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
|
| AI Companion Chatbot Safety Act (SB 1546) from , in 2 months |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
AI prohibited practices
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this provision |
|---|---|---|
| Code Pénal Arts. 294-3 to 294-4, Child Sexual Abuse Material Including Realistic and AI-Generated Depictions |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
Computer misuse
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this provision |
|---|---|---|
| Loi n° 09-04 relative à la prévention et à la lutte contre les infractions liées aux technologies de l'information et de la communication |
Through its reporting duty. What it requires |
Identifiers refer to ETSI EN 304 223 V2.1.1 (2025-12), © ETSI 2025, all rights reserved. ETSI owns the standard; no ETSI text (titles or sentences) is reproduced here. The standard is free to download from ETSI. Every provision of the framework.