Law / Republic of the Congo

Law No. 29-2019, automated decisions

Loi n° 29-2019, art. 13 (automated individual decisions)

In force.

A data subject rights rule binding public and private bodies.

Obligation class
Data subject rights
Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Do not base a decision producing legal effects for a person solely on automated processing intended to define their profile or evaluate aspects of their personality, unless the decision arises from concluding or performing a contract on which the person had a chance to comment, or it grants their own request.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 3.5Processes for human oversight are defined, assessed, and documented in accordance with organizational policies from the GOVERN function.
NIST Privacy Framework
  • CT.DM-P10Stakeholder privacy preferences are included in algorithmic design objectives and outputs are evaluated against these preferences.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

What record it asks for

Logging duty

Article 13 bars a court decision assessing a person's behavior, and any decision with legal effects on a person, from resting solely on automated processing meant to profile the person or assess aspects of their personality, with an exception for decisions taken in concluding or performing a contract where the person could present observations, and decisions that grant the person's own request. It sets no duty to keep a log, record or explanation of the automated decision, and gives no body a power to demand one.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Article 13 bars a decision producing legal effects for a natural person from resting solely on automated processing intended to define the person's profile or evaluate aspects of their personality. A parallel first sentence restricts a court decision the same way, but that clause binds only courts. The prohibition does not apply to a decision made in concluding or performing a contract on which the person had a chance to comment, or to a decision that grants the person's own request. No source stating the day on which the Law came into force has been located.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app makes high-risk automated decisions.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .