Law / Frameworks / ETSI EN 304 223 / 5.4
ETSI EN 304 223, 5.45.4.2-2
Logs analysed for anomalies, breaches and effects of drift or poisoning. Our summary; European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI)'s text is not ours to print.
We read each law below as bearing on this provision. That does not mean the provision, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .
The kinds of duty that reach it: security.
- 3
- laws
- 2
- jurisdictions
- 0
- with court rulings behind them
- 1
- not yet in force
Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both
- NIST AI RMFMEASURE 2.6 The AI system is evaluated regularly for safety risks – as identified in the..., 3 laws
- NIST AI RMFMEASURE 2.5 The AI system to be deployed is demonstrated to be valid and reliable...., 2 laws
- NIST AI RMFMEASURE 2.7 AI system security and resilience – as identified in the MAP function – are..., 2 laws
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-04 Data Privacy, 3 laws
- NIST AI 600-1GAI-RISK-09 Information Security, 3 laws
- NIST AI 200-22.2 Define & Construct, 3 laws
- NIST AI 200-24.3 Composing a TEVV Toolbox, 3 laws
- OWASP LLM Top 10LLM01:2026 Prompt Injection, 3 laws
- OWASP LLM Top 10LLM02:2026 Sensitive Information Disclosure, 3 laws
- OWASP LLM Top 10LLM04:2026 Supply Chain, 3 laws
- 1 more in the OWASP LLM Top 10
- OWASP Agentic Top 10ASI01 Agent Goal Hijack, 3 laws
- OWASP Agentic Top 10ASI03 Identity and Privilege Abuse, 3 laws
- OWASP Agentic Top 10ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities, 3 laws
- MIT mitigations2.1 Model & Infrastructure Security, 3 laws
- MIT mitigations2.3 Model Safety Engineering, 3 laws
- MIT mitigations3.1 Testing & Auditing, 3 laws
- 1 more in the MIT mitigations
- NIST CSF 2.0PR.IR-03 Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and..., 2 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-007 Legal and Contractual Frameworks for AI Systems, 3 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-008 Quality of Service (QoS) and DDoS Prevention for AI Systems, 3 laws
- FINOS AIGFAIR-PREV-012 Role-Based Access Control for AI Data, 3 laws
- 4 more in the FINOS AIGF
A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force
AI risk obligations
2 laws, 2 jurisdictions| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this provision |
|---|---|---|
 European Union |
AI Act, Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) from , in 13 months |
Through its security duty. What it requires |
 Italy |
Codice Penale Art. 437-bis, Omitted Safety Measures in High-Risk AI Systems and Unlawful Alteration of Them |
Through its security duty. What it requires |
AI sector rules
1 law, 1 jurisdiction| Jurisdiction | Law | How it reaches this provision |
|---|---|---|
| European Union |
MiFID II Algorithmic Trading Controls: Resilient Systems, Testing, Kill Functionality, Records and Notification (Article 17 and RTS 6) |
Through its security duty. What it requires |
Identifiers refer to ETSI EN 304 223 V2.1.1 (2025-12), © ETSI 2025, all rights reserved. ETSI owns the standard; no ETSI text (titles or sentences) is reproduced here. The standard is free to download from ETSI. Every provision of the framework.