Law / Frameworks / ETSI EN 304 223 / 5.1

ETSI EN 304 223, 5.15.1.3-1

Threat modelling and risk management, reviewed regularly and covering AI-specific attacks. Our summary; European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI)'s text is not ours to print.

We read each law below as bearing on this provision. That does not mean the provision, done well, meets the law: what each law asks is on its own page. Law library as of .

The kinds of duty that reach it: DPIA, security.

16
laws
11
jurisdictions
0
with court rulings behind them
3
not yet in force
5
proposed, not law

Related controls in other frameworks the same duties, in at least two laws we track, reach both

A law in force is unmarked; the rest wear their state: not yet in force proposed

  • Andorra
  • Armenia
  • Canada
  • El Salvador
  • European Union
  • Hungary
  • Italy
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Mauritius
  • Moldova
  • United Kingdom

AI governance

7 laws, 7 jurisdictions
JurisdictionLawHow it reaches this provision
Andorra Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Andorra proposed

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

Armenia Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Armenia proposed

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

Canada Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Canada proposed

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

El Salvador Ley de Fomento a la Inteligencia Artificial y Tecnologías, marco institucional, registro y evaluación de riesgos

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

European Union AI Act, Article 26(9) (using Article 13 information for a data protection impact assessment) from , in 13 months

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

Moldova Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by Moldova proposed

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

United Kingdom Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, signed by the United Kingdom proposed

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

AI risk obligations

5 laws, 3 jurisdictions
JurisdictionLawHow it reaches this provision
European Union AI Act, Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) from , in 13 months

Through its security duty. What it requires

European Union AI Act, Article 27 (fundamental rights impact assessment) from , in 13 months

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

Italy Codice Penale Art. 437-bis, Omitted Safety Measures in High-Risk AI Systems and Unlawful Alteration of Them

Through its security duty. What it requires

Italy Decreto Legislativo 160/2026, After-the-Fact Facial Recognition Integrated in Video Surveillance (Art. 10)

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

Kyrgyzstan Digital Code, Chapter 23: AI system design and risk-management obligations

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

AI sector rules

2 laws, 2 jurisdictions
JurisdictionLawHow it reaches this provision
European Union MiFID II Algorithmic Trading Controls: Resilient Systems, Testing, Kill Functionality, Records and Notification (Article 17 and RTS 6)

Through its security duty. What it requires

Mauritius FSC Fintech Series Guidance Notes 4, responsible use of artificial intelligence in financial services

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

AI prohibited practices

1 law, 1 jurisdiction
JurisdictionLawHow it reaches this provision
Italy Decreto Legislativo 160/2026, Police Biometric AI: Dataset Labelling and Real-Time Remote Identification (Artt. 7-9, 13)

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

AI training data

1 law, 1 jurisdiction
JurisdictionLawHow it reaches this provision
Hungary Act XLVII of 1997 on Health Data, Section 35/A(4) to (8), Conditions for AI Development on Electronic Health Service Space Data

Through its DPIA duty. What it requires

Identifiers refer to ETSI EN 304 223 V2.1.1 (2025-12), © ETSI 2025, all rights reserved. ETSI owns the standard; no ETSI text (titles or sentences) is reproduced here. The standard is free to download from ETSI. Every provision of the framework.